Biology Education in the U.S.A: Recommendations for These Similar Problems in Turkey

Biology Education in the U.S.A: Recommendations for These Similar Problems in Turkey

Biyoloji eğitiminin birçok yönleri ile göz ardı edildiği bilinmekte, fakat bunun nedenleri ve sonuçları hâlâ tartışılmaktadır. Bu derlemenin amacı ABD’de uygulanmakta olan yeni öğretim yaklaşımlarının uygulanış yanlışlarını ortaya koymak ve buna bağlı terminoloji karmaşıklığını gidermektir. Çalışma, biyoloji eğitiminin çok disiplinli yönünün önemini vurgulamakta ve Türk eğitim sisteminde ortaya çıkabilecek veya var olan sorunlara ışık tutmaktadır.

___

  • Aldridge, B.G. (1992). Essential changes in secondary science: Scope, Sequence, and Coordination. The National Science Teachers Association.
  • Confrey, J. (2000). Improving research and systemic reform toward equity and quality. In A.E. Kelly & R.A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Hershey, D. R. (1993). Plant neglect in biology education. Bioscience, 43 (7), 418.
  • Hirsch, E. D. (1996). The Schools we need and why we do not have them. New York: Doubleday.http://www.ed.gov/americacounts/glenn
  • http://www.economist.com/editorial/freeforall/19970329/sf0832.htr Who is top?
  • Lawrenz, F. (1986). Misconceptions of physical science concepts among elementary school teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 86 (8), 654-660.
  • Mahner, M. & Bunge, M. (1996). Is religious education compatible with science education? Science and Education, 5, 101-122.
  • National Academy of Sciences (1998). Teaching about evolution and the nature of science. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Okçabol, R. & Gök, F. (1998). The research on teacher profile: Executive summary. [Öğretmen profili araştırması: Özet rapor] .
  • Penick, J.E. (1995). New goals for biology education. Bioscience, 4 (12), 52-57.
  • Ratcliffe, M. (1999). Science subject knowledge of pre- service postgraduate science teachers. Paper presented at the meeting of the Annual Meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, Boston, MA.
  • Reinsvold, R. (1999). Addresses the importance of plant biology in the school biological curricula. Science Activities, 36 ( 2), 3-5.
  • Salt B. (1990). Growing plants in school. Journal of Biological Education, 24 (2), 103-107.
  • Skehan, J.W. & Nelson, C. E. (1997). Effective strategies for teaching evolution and other controversial topics. In C.E. Nelson (ed.), The creation controversy and the science classroom. Arlington, Virginia: National Science Teachers Association.
  • Tinker, R. (1996). Information technologies in science and mathematic education. The Concord Consortium Inc.
  • Wandersee, J.H., Mintzes, J.J., and Novak, J.D. (1994). Research on alternative conceptions in science. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research science teaching and learning.
  • Westhead, K. (1998). Reviews the educational materials ‘classifying animals’ and ‘classifying plants,’ from pictorial charts educational trust”. Journal of Biological Education 32 (2), 156-161.