A study on primary school english teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs

Bu çalışma, ilköğretim 1. kademede görev yapan İngilizce öğretmenlerinin özyeterlik inançlarının (a) mezun oldukları bölüme, (b) çocuklara dil öğretimine yönelik ders alıp almamalarına, (c) hizmetiçi eğitime katılıp katılmamalarına ve (d) mesleki deneyimlerine göre değişip değişmediğini araştırmayı amaçlamaktadır. Betimsel nitelik taşıyan bu araştırmaya, Mersin il merkezinde ve bağlı köylerde 2004 yılında görev yapan toplam 266 Türk İngilizce öğretmeni katılmıştır. Araştırmada, öğretmenlerin demografik özelliklerini belirlemek üzere 15 maddeden oluşan bir anket kullanılmıştır. Güven (2005) tarafından geliştirilen Öğretmen Mesleki Yeterlik Algısı Ölçeği ise katılımcı öğretmenlerin özyeterlik inançlarına yönelik veri toplamak için kullanılmıştır. (Araştırma sonuçları, İlköğretim birinci kademede görev yapan İngilizce öğretmenlerinin özyeterlik inançlarının mezun oldukları bölüme ve çocuklara dil öğretimine yönelik ders alıp almadıklarına göre değiştiğini; çocuklara dil öğretimi dersi alan öğretmenlerin özyeterlik algılarının, almayanlara göre anlamlı farklılık gösterdiğini, İngilizce Öğretmenliği, İngiliz Dili ve Edebiyatı ve İngiliz Dilbilimi mezunu olan öğretmenlerin özyeterlik algılarının, eğitim dili İngilizce ve farklı bölümlerden mezun olan öğretmenlerden daha yüksek olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Ancak hizmetiçi eğitim değişkeni özyeterlik inancında bir farklılık yaratmamıştır. Araştırmada, eğitim özgeçmişinin ve çocuklara dil öğretimine yönelik alınan derslerin ilköğretim 1. kademe İngilizce öğretmenlerinin özyeterlik inancını etkileyen önemli birer değişken olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır.

İlköğretim ingilizce öğretmenlerinin özyeterlik inançları üzerine bir çalışma

The main purpose of this study was to investigate whether or not primary school English language teachers’ self–efficacy beliefs changed according to the variables of (a) the department graduated, (b) taking a course about teaching English to children, (c) taking an in-service training, and (d) experience. The descriptive study was conducted with 266 English language teachers working for the public primary schools in the villages and the city center of Mersin in Turkey in 2004. Two data collection instruments used were a questionnaire consisting of 15 items which sought demographic and educational information about the teachers and a 34- item Likert-type scale titled Teachers’ Perception of Professional Competence. The findings revealed that primary school English language teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs changed according to the department graduated, and taking a course about teaching English to children. The teachers who had taken a course about teaching English to children perceived themselves more efficacious than the teachers who had not. Furthermore, the teachers who graduates of English Language Teaching, and English/American Language and Literature, and Linguistics departments perceived themselves more efficacious than the teachers who were graduated from the departments other than English teaching. On the other hand, the study indicated that the teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs did not change according to taking an in-service training. Finally, the outcome of the research implied the interplay between training regarding specific content area and efficacy. According to the overall findings of this research, it is concluded that English teachers’ perception of their teaching competencies has very much to do with their educational background. For this reason, especially primary school English teachers should be equipped with specific teaching methods, techniques and materials for teaching English to young children.

___

  • Alkan, C. (2000). Meslek ve Öğretmenlik Mesleği. In V. Sönmez (Ed.), Öğretmenlik mesleğine giriş (pp.191-230). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
  • Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122-147.
  • Bandura, A. (1995). Exercise of personal and collective efficacy in changing societies. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp.1-45). United States of America: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bear, J. M. (1992). Context and content in English language teacher education. In Tradition and innovation ELT and teacher training in the 1990s (pp 24-34). Ankara: The British Council.
  • Brumfit, C. (1991). Introduction: Teaching English to children. In C. Brumfit, J. Moon, R. Tongue (Eds.), Teaching English to children. London: Harper Collins Publishers.
  • Çakır, Ö., & Alıcı, D. (2009). Seeing self as others see you: variability in self efficacy ratings in student teaching. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(5), 541-561.
  • Darling-Hammond, L., & Chung, R., Frelow, F. (2002). Variation in teacher preparation. How well do different pathways prepare teachers to teach? Journal of Teacher Education, 53(4),286-302.
  • Demirel, Ö. (1989). Yabancı Dil Öğretmenlerinin Yeterlikleri. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 4, 5-26.
  • Demirel, Ö. (1992). A model approach to training ELT teachers. In Tradition and innovation ELT and teacher training in the 1990s (pp.35-45). Ankara: The British Council.
  • Doğuelli, T. (1992). Training for the future: Building up a cadre of in-service teacher trainers. In Tradition and innovation ELT and teacher training in the 1990s (pp.102-107). Ankara: The British Council.
  • Fives, H. (2003). What is teacher efficacy and how does it relate to teachers’ knowledge? A theoretical review. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Conference, Chicago.
  • Güven, S. (2005). “The Profile and the perception of professional competencies of the first stage state primary school EFL teachers.” Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Mersin Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Mersin.
  • Haznedar, B. (2003). Türk Eğitim Sisteminde Yabancı Dil Eğitimi ve Kalite Arayışları-Özel Okullar Derneği. İstanbul: Özyurt Matbaacılık.
  • Henson, R. K., Kogan, L.R., & Vacha-Haase, T. (2001). A reliability generalization study of the teacher efficacy scale and related instruments. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61(3), 404-420.
  • Hoy, A. W., & Spero, R. B. (2005). Changes in teacher efficacy during the early years of teaching: A comparison of four measures. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 343-356.
  • Koç, S. (1992). Teachers on-line: An alternative model for in-service teacher training in ELT. In Tradition and innovation ELT and teacher training in the 1990s (pp.47-52). Ankara: The British Council.
  • Lennon, P. (1988). The linguist and the language teacher: Love at first sight or the end of honeymoon. The English Teaching Forum, 26(4), 2-5.
  • Lin, H., & Gorell, J. (2001). Exploratory analysis of pre-service teacher efficacy in Taiwan. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 623-635.
  • MNE (2002). Öğretmen yeterlilikleri. Ankara: Milli Eğitim Basımevi.
  • MNE (n.d.). Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı- Anadolu Üniversitesi İşbirliğinde İngilizce Öğretmeni Yetiştirme Projesi. [Online] retrieved on 08.12.2006, at http://oyegm.meb.gov.tr.
  • MNE (2008). İngilizce öğretmeni özel alan yeterlikleri [Online] retrieved on 04.01.2010 at http://otmg. meb.gov.tr/alaningilizce.html
  • Mulholland, J., & Wallace, J. (2001). Teacher induction and elementary science teaching: enhancing self-efficacy, Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 243-261.
  • Murshidi, R., Mohd, M.K., Habibah, E., & Foo, S.F. (2007). Sense of efficacy among beginning teachers in Sarawak. Teaching Education, 17 (3), 265-275.
  • Ross, J. A. (1992). Teacher efficacy and the effects of coaching on student achievement. Canadian Journal of Education, 17 (1), 51-65.
  • Ross, J. A., & Bruce, C. (2005). Teacher self-assessment: A mechanism for facilitating professional growth. Paper presented at AERA, Montreal.
  • Sarıçoban, A. (2000). The quality of foreign language teaching in Turkey. In D. Köksal, I. H. Erten (Eds.), Conference proceedings- Challenges for language teachers towards the millennium, 257- 270. Çanakkale: Onsekiz Mart University Offset.
  • Sewell, M. A.,& St. George, M. A (1999). ‘ll have a go at that! Developing efficacy beliefs in the classroom. Paper presented at the AARE - NZARE Conference Global Issues & Local Effects: The Challenge for Educational Research, Melbourne Australia.
  • Thomas, A. L. (1987). Language teacher competence and language teacher education. In R.Bowers (Ed.), Language teacher education: An integrated programme for EFL teacher training, 33-42. London: Modern English Publications in association with the British Council.
  • Tschannen-Moran, M. & Woolfolk Hoy, A. E. (2001). Teacher efficacy: capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783-805.
  • Woolfolk Hoy, A. E. (2000). Changes in teacher efficacy during the early years of teaching, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA
  • Woolfolk Hoy, A. E. & Burke Spero, R. (2005). Changes in teacher efficacy during the early years of teaching: A comparison of four measures. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 343-356.
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1995). Self-efficacy and educational development. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Selfefficacy in changing societies, 202-230. United States of America: Cambridge University Press.