MİGREN HASTALARINDA MERKEZİ KORNEA KALINLIĞIN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Amaç: Migren hastalarında merkezi korneal kalınlığın (MKK) normal populasyonla karşılaştırılması. Gereç-yöntem: Göz polikliğine başvuran hastaların dosyaları retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi. Önceden migren tanısı almış 28 kadın hastanın 56 gözü çalışma grubu olarak, refraksiyon kusuru nedeniyle başvuran sistemik ve oküler hastalık hikayesi olmayan 34 kadın hastanın 68 gözü kontrol grubu olarak değerlendirildi ve gruplar göz içi basıncı (GİB) ve MKK açısından değerlendirildi.Bulgular: Çalışma grubundaki hastaların yaş ortalaması 33,57±8,24 yıl iken kontrol grubunda 34,65±6,54 yıldı. Aradaki fark istatistiksel olarak anlamlı değildi. MKK değerleri çalışma grubunda 521,69±35,74 µm, kontrol grubunda 546.15 ±32,39 µm bulundu, fark istatistiksel anlamlıydı (P< 0.05). GİB değerleri çalışma grubunda 13,23±2,33 mm Hg, kontrol grubunda 13,32±2,12 mm Hg ölçüldü fark istatistiksel anlamlı değildi (P >0.05).Sonuç: Migrenli hastalarda MKK değerleri normal populasyona göre anlamlı olarak düşük bulundu. Migren ve glokomun vasküler ve nörolojik faktörlerin etkili olduğu iki hastalık olduğu gözönüne alındığında migren hastalarında MKK'nin ince olmasının glokom değerlendirilmesinde özellikle dikkat edilmesi gereken bir nokta olduğunu düşünmekteyiz.

Evaluation of Central Korneal Thickness In Migraine Patients

Purpose: Comparison of central corneal thickness in migraine patients with normal population.Material and methods: Files of patients who applied to eye clinic before were browsed. 56 eye of 28 women patients who were diagnosed with migraine before was accepted as study group while 68 eye of 34 women patiens who were applied to hospital for refraction failure and hadn't any ocular disease before as control group. All patients in two group was examined for intraocular pressure (IOP) and central corneal thickness (CCT).Results: Mean age of patients in study group was 33,57±8,24 while 34,65±6,54 in control group. Difference of mean age between groups was not statistically significant. Mean CCT of study group was 521,69±35,74 µ while 546.15±32,39 µ in control group, showing a statistically significant difference. Mean IOP of study group was 13,23±2,33 mmHg while 13,32±2,12 mm Hg in control group, showing a statistically nonsignificant difference.Conclusions: CCT of migraine patients was found to be statistically significant in study group compared to controls. We figure out that when considering glaucoma, CCT have to be taken into consideration given the fact that vascular and neurologic factors are influential in migraine and glaucoma.

PDF

___

1. Diamond S. A fresh look at migraine therapy. Postgraduate Medicine 2001;109:49-54.
2. Rasmussen BK. Epidemiology of headache. Cephalalgia 2001;21:774-7.
3. Headache Classification Subcommittee of the International Headache Society. The international classification of headache disorders. Cephalalgia 2004;24(Suppl 1):14-160.
4. Ropper AH, Brown RH. Çeviri: Emre M,Sahin G. Adams and Victor's Principles of Neurology. 8. Baskı, Ankara, Günes Kitabevi, 2006, 144-167.
5. Quigley HA: Open angle glaucoma. N Eng J Med. 1993;328:1097-1106.
6. Wilson MR ve Martone JF: Epidemiology of chronic openangle glaucoma. In: Ritch R, Shields MB, Krupin T, eds. The Glaucomas.St. Louis: Mosby. 1996:753-768.
7. Goldmann H, Schmidt T: Über Applanationstonometrie. Ophthalmologica. 1957;134:221 -242.
8. Wolfs RC, Klaver CC, Vingerling JR ve ark.: Distribution of central corneal thickness and its association with intraocular pressure: The Rotterdam Study. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997;123:767-772.
9. Argus VA: Ocular hypertension and central corneal thickness.Ophthalmology. 1995;102:1810-1812.
10. Ventura AC, Bohnke M, Mojon DS: Central corneal thickness measurements in patients with normal tension glaucoma, primary open angle glaucoma, pseudoexfolia tion glaucoma, or ocular hypertension. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;85:792-795.
11. Ko Y-C, Liu CJ-I, Hsu W-M: Varying effects of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with different tonometers.Eye. 2005;19:327-332.
12. Yıldırım R, Oral Y, Bahçecioğlu H: Santral kornea kalınlığı ve göz içi basıncı değerleri arasındaki ilişki. T Oft Gaz. 2000;30:319-323.
13. Copt R-P, Thomas R, Mermoud A: Corneal thickness in ocular hypertension, primary open-angle glaucoma, and normal tension glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:14-17.
14. Herman DC, Hodge DO, Bourne WM: Increased corneal thickness in patients with ocular hypertension. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:334-336.
15. Keskin A, Yanyalı A, Bayrak Y, ve ark.: Glokom ve oküler hipertansiyonda santral kornea kalınlığı ile göz içi basıncı ölçü- mü üzerine etkisi. T Oft Gaz. 2003;33:417-415.
16. Özveren F, Eltutar K, Akkan F, ve ark.: Oküler hipertansiyon, normotansif glokom ve normal gözlerde santral kornea kalınlığı. MN Oftalmol. 2003;10:344-346.
17. Marsich MW, Bullimore MA: The repeatability of corneal thickness measures. Cornea. 2000;19:792-795.
18. Miglior S, Albe E, Guareschi M, et al.: Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility in the evaluation of ultrasonic pachymetry measurements of central corneal thickness. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88:174-177.
19. Gunvant P, Broadway DC, Watkins RJ: Repeatability and reproducibility of the BVI ultrasonic pachymeter. Eye. 2003;17:825-828.
20. Doughty MJ, Zaman ML: Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and metaanalysis approach. Surv Ophthalmol. 2000;44:367-407.
21. Harper CL, Boulton ME, Bennett D, et al.: Diurnal variations in human corneal thickness. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996;80:1068- 1072.
22. Lattimore MR Jr, Kaupp S, Schallhorn S, et al.: Orbscan pachymetry:implications of a repeated measures and diurnal variationanalysis. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:977-981.
23. Shah S, Spedding C, Bhojwani R, et al.: Assessment of the diurnal variation in central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure for patients with suspected glaucoma. Ophthalmology.2000;107:1191-1193.
24. Wickham L, Edmunds B, Murdoch IE: Central corneal thickness:Will one measurement suffice? Ophthalmology. 2005;112:225-228.
25. Shildkrot Y, Liebmann JM, Fabijanczyk B, et al.: Central corneal thickness measurement in clinical practice. J Glaucoma. 2005;14:331-336
26. Brandt JD, Beiser JA, Kass MA, et al.: Central corneal thickness in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS). Ophthalmology. 2001;108:1779-1788.
27. Gordon MO, Baiser JA, Brandt JE, et al.: The ocular hypertension treatment study: Baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120: 714-720.
28. Bhan A, Browning AC, Shah S. et al.: Effect of corneal thickness on ocular presure measurements with pneumotonometer, Goldmann aplanation tonometer and Tonopen. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:1389-1392.
29. Stodtmeister R: Applanation tonometry and correction according to corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1998;76:319- 324.
30. Ku JYF, Danesh-Meyer HY, Craig JP: Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by Pascal Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry. Eye. 2005,1-8 .
31. Pache M, Wilmsmeyer S, Lautebach S. et al.: Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study.Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005;243:763-767.
32. Drance SM, Douglas GR, Wijsman K, Schulzer M, Brit ton, RJ: Response of blood flow to warm and cold in nor mal and lowtension glaucoma patients. Am J Ophthal mol 1988; 105: 3539
33. Üretmen Ö, Ates H, Andac K, Emre S, Bilgin S, Demir D: Migrenli hastalarda glokom arastırılması. MN Oftal moloji. 2000; 7: 154157
34. Corbett JJ, Phelps CD, Eslinger P, Montague PR: The neurological evaluation of patients with low tension glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1985; 26: 11011104
35. Olesen J: The ischemic hypotheses of migraine. Arch Neural 44:321322 Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1987; 226:224226
36. Katz B: Bilateral sequential migrainous ischemic optic neuropathy. Am J Ophthalmol 1985; 99: 489
37. O'Hara M, O'Connor PS: Migrainous optic neuropathy. J Clin Neuroophthalmol 1984; 4: 8590
38. Cursiefen C, Wisse M, Cursiefen S, Junemann A, Martus P, Korth M: Migraine and glaucoma in high tension arid normal pressure glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 2000; 129:102104
39. Uchida H, Brigatti L ,Caprioli J: Detection for structural damage from glaucoma with confocal laser image analy sis. Invest Opluhalmol Vis Sci 1996; 37: 23932401
40. Tomita G, Nyman K, Raitta C, et al: Intraocular asy mmetry of optic disc size and its relevance to visual field loss in normaltension glaucoma. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1994; 232: 2906