The Annan plan for Cyprus as a prisoner's dilemma game

Annan Planı 24.04.2004 tarihinde Kıbrıslı Türkler’e ve Rumlar’a aynı anda yapılan referandumla oylandı. Plan birleşik bir Kıbrıs Devleti kurulmasını amaçlamaktaydı. Rum tarafınca reddedilen plan yürürlüğe giremedi. Bu çalışma, Annan Planı’nı Tutuklunun İkilemi Oyunu çerçevesinde psikolojik bir bakış açısıyla ele alıyor. İkilemin iddia ettiğinin aksine referandumda işbirliği içinde davranmak Kıbrıslı Türkler’in her zaman yararına bir sonuç doğurmaktaydı. İşbirliğinin temel ilkelerinden olan etkili iletişim, içten bir algılama, karşılıklı güven duyma ve sorunu çözme arzusu Kıbrıs meselesindeki eksik unsurlardır. Bunun yanında, Annan Planı’nın amaçladığı, Birleşik Kıbrıs Devleti özellikle Kıbrıslı Rumlar’ın istediği bir çözüm de değildir. Bahsedilen çatışmaya barışçı bir çözüm bulmanın tek yolu her iki tarafın da uygulayacağı işbirliğine dayanan bir çözüm bulmaktan geçmektedir.

___

Annan, Kofi (2004). Secretary-General's Press Release. http://www.cyprus-unplan. org/UNIQUE_AND_HISTORIC_CHANCE_TO_RESOLVE_CYPRUS_PR OBLEM_MISSED.pdf, (17.04.2005).

Barash, David P. and Charkes P. Webel (2002). Peace and Conflict Studies. London:Sage Publications.

Bryant, Rebecca (2001). “Justice or respect? A comparative perspective on politics in Cyprus”. Ethnic and Racial Studies 24 (6): 892–924.

Camp, Glen D. (1980). “Greek-Turkish conflict over Cypriots”. Political Science Quarterly 95 (1): 43–70.

Deutsch, Morton (1958). “Trust and suspicion”. Journal of Conflict Resolution 2(4):265–279.

Deutsch,(1973). The Resolution of Conflict. Vail-Ballau Press: USA.

Deutsch,(1983). “Prevention of World War III: A psychological perspective”. Political Psychology 4 (1): 3–31.

Deutsch,(2002). “Social psychology’s contributions to the study of conflict resolution”. Negotiation Journal 18 (4): 307–320.

Deutsch, Morton and Robert M. Krauss (1965). Theories in Social Psychology. London: Basic Books Publishers.

Dodd, Clement (2005). “Constitutional features of the UN plan for Cyprus and its antecedents”. Turkish Studies 6 (1): 39–51.

Dundas, Guy (2004). “Cyprus from 1960 to EU accession: the case for non-territorial autonomy”. Australian Journal of Politics and History 50 (1): 86–94.

Gobbi, Hugo J. (1993). Rethinking Cyprus. Israel: Ha’Dfus Hejadash.

Hapjipavlou, Maria (2007). “The Cyprus conflict: root causes and implications for peacebuilding”. Journal of Peace Research 44(3): 349–365.

Hauk, Esther and Rosmarie Nagel (2001). “Choice of partners in multiple two-person prisoner’s dilemma games: an experimental study”. Journal of Conflict Resolution 45 (6): 770–793.

Hüsnü, Şenel (2006). National stereotypes, in-group identification, intergroup bias,social categorization and in-/out- group attitudes: the case of Cprus. Unpublished Masters Thesis. Ankara: Middle East Technical University.

Iyori, Koihei and Sobei H. Oda (2003). “The emergence of cooperative behaviour in the prisoner’s dilemma network”. The International ESA Meeting. 19–22 June. University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA. http://www.peel.pitt.edu/esa2003/papers/iyori_%20cooperationprisonersdilem a.pdf. (26.05.2006).

James, Harvey S. (1998). “Using the prisoner’s dilemma to teach business when personal and group interests’ conflict”. Teaching Business Ethics 2(2): 211–222.

Kuhn, Steven (2003). Prisoner’s Dilemma. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/prisonerdilemma/#Sym. kuhns@georgetown.edu. (11.04.2005).

Loizides, Neophytos G. (2002). “Greek-Turkish dilemmas and the Cyprus EU accession process”. Security Dialogue 33 (4): 429–442.

Lumsden, Malvern (1973). “The Cyprus conflict as a prisoner’s dilemma game”. Journal of Conflict Resolution 17 (1): 7–32.

Mehmet, Ozay. (1992). Towards a solution in Cyprus through economic federalism. In: N. Salem. (ed) Cyprus: a regional conflict and its resolution. Great Britain:The Macmillan Press.

Miller, Dale T., Julie S. Downs and Prentice and Deborah A. (1998). “Minimal conditions for the creation of a unit relationship: The social bond between birthday mates”. European Journal of Social Psychology 28(3): 475–481.

Müftüler-Bac, Meltem and Aylin Güney (2005). “The European Union and the Cyprus problem 1961–2003”. Middle Eastern Studies 41 (2): 281–293.

Newspot (2004).UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan’s Cyprus Report. http://www.byegm.gov.tr/YAYINLARIMIZ/newspot/2004/may-jun/n6.htm. (11.04.2005).

Nugent, Neill (2000). “EU enlargement and ‘the Cyprus problem’”. Journal of Common Market Studies 38 (1): 131-150.

Polyviou, Polyvios G. (1976). “Cyprus: What needs to be done”? International Affairs 52(4): 582–597.

Rapport, Anatol and Albert M. Chammah (1965). Prisoner’s Dilemma: A Study of Conflict and Cooperation. USA: The University of Michigan Pres.

Salem, Norma (1992). “The constitution of 1960 and its failure.” In N. Salem (ed).Cyprus: a regional conflict and its resolution. Great Britain: The Macmillan Pres.

Sherif, Muzaffer (1970). Group Conflict and Co-operation. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd.

Spyrou, Spyros (2002). “Images of ‘the other’: ‘The Turk’ in Greek Cypriot children’s imaginations”. Race Ethnicity and Education 5 (3): 254–272.

Tullock, Gordon (1999). “Non-prisoner’s dilemma”. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 39 (4): 455–458.

United Nations (2004). The Annan Plan of Cyprus. http://www.cyprus-unplan. org/Comprehensive_Settlement_of_the_Cyprus_Problem.pdf. (11.04.2005).

Worchel, Stephen, Joel Cooper and George R. Goethals (1991). Understanding Social Psychology. California: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.