Post-Keynesyen Paranın İçselliği Yaklaşımında Faiz Oranı Nedenselliği: Türkiye Örneği

Bu çalışmada, 2013-2019 dönemi için Türkiye’de T.C.M.B. faiz oranı/T.C.M.B faiz beklentisi ile banka kredi faiz oranı/5 yıllık devlet tahvil faiz oranı arasındaki nedensellik ilişkisinin post keynesyen paranın içselliğinin iki yaklaşımından hangisini desteklediği araştırılmıştır. Çalışmada, yöntem olarak Johansen eşbütünleşme, vektör hata düzeltme modeli ve Granger nedensellik kullanılmıştır. Çalışmanın ilk bulgusu, kısa dönemde T.C.M.B. faiz oranı/T.C.M.B faiz beklentisinden banka kredi faiz oranına doğru tek yönlü nedenselliğin var olduğunu göstermektedir. Bu bulgu, paranın tam içselliği yaklaşımını desteklemektedir. İkinci bulgu, kısa dönmede 5 yıllık devlet tahvil faiz oranından T.C.M.B. faiz oranına doğru tek yönlü nedenselliğin varlığını ileri sürmektedir. Diğer bir bulgu ise, uzun dönemde 5 yıllık devlet tahvil faiz oranı ile T.C.M.B. faiz oranı arasında çift yönlü, karşılıklı bir nedenselliğin varlığına işaret etmektedir. Bu iki bulgu ise, paranın yapısal içselliğini desteklemektedir. Sonuç olarak tüm bulgular, Post-Keynesyen paranın içselliği yaklaşımıyla uyumludur.Bu çalışmada, 2013-2019 dönemi için Türkiye’de T.C.M.B. faiz oranı/T.C.M.B faiz beklentisi ile banka kredi faiz oranı/5 yıllık devlet tahvil faiz oranı arasındaki nedensellik ilişkisinin post keynesyen paranın içselliğinin iki yaklaşımından hangisini desteklediği araştırılmıştır. Çalışmada, yöntem olarak Johansen eşbütünleşme, vektör hata düzeltme modeli ve Granger nedensellik kullanılmıştır. Çalışmanın ilk bulgusu, kısa dönemde T.C.M.B. faiz oranı/T.C.M.B faiz beklentisinden banka kredi faiz oranına doğru tek yönlü nedenselliğin var olduğunu göstermektedir. Bu bulgu, paranın tam içselliği yaklaşımını desteklemektedir. İkinci bulgu, kısa dönmede 5 yıllık devlet tahvil faiz oranından T.C.M.B. faiz oranına doğru tek yönlü nedenselliğin varlığını ileri sürmektedir. Diğer bir bulgu ise, uzun dönemde 5 yıllık devlet tahvil faiz oranı ile T.C.M.B. faiz oranı arasında çift yönlü, karşılıklı bir nedenselliğin varlığına işaret etmektedir. Bu iki bulgu ise, paranın yapısal içselliğini desteklemektedir. Sonuç olarak tüm bulgular, Post-Keynesyen paranın içselliği yaklaşımıyla uyumludur.

Interest-rate Causality in The Post-Keynesian Endogenous Money Theory: Case of Turkey

This paper examines the two approaches of Post-Keynesian endogenous money in terms of causality between the CBRT interest rate/the CBRT future rate and banka loan rate/the Turkey 5Y Treasury bond rate in Turkey over the period 2013-2019. The paper employs a Johansen cointegration technique, vector error-correction modeling, and Granger causality. First, empirical evidence in this paper indicates unidirectional causalities from CBRT interest rate/CBRT future rate to bank loan rate in the short run. This empirical evidence supports the Horizontalist approach. Second, empirical evidence of the paper indicates unidirectional causalities from the Turkey 5Y Treasury bond rate to the CBRT interest rate in short run. But, the other empirical evidence in this paper shows bidirectional causalities between the Turkey 5Y Treasury bond rate and the CBRT interest rate in long run. Such findings are supportive of the Structuralists approach. The empirical findings are consistent with Post-Keynesian endogenous money

___

  • Arestis, Phillips (1988), Post-Keynesian Theory of Money, Credit, and Finance. P.Arestis (Yay. Haz.), Post-Keynesian Monetary Economics: New Approaches to Financial Modelling, içinde (s.41-72). Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar.
  • Arestis, Phillips (1992), The Theory of Money, Credit and Finance. P.Arestis (Yay.Haz.). The Post- Keynesian Approach to Economics içinde (s. 179-203). Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar. Atesoğlu, S. (2005), Monetary policy and long-term interest rates, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 27:3, 533-539.
  • Atesoğlu, S. (2003) Monetary transmission--federal funds rate and prime rate, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 26:2, 357-362
  • Biefang-Frisancho Mariscal & Howells (2002) Central Banks and Market Interest Rates, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 24:4, 569-585.
  • Binici, K. H. Kara P. Özlü (2016), Faiz Koridoru Ve Banka Faizleri: Parasal Aktarım Mekanizmasına Dair Bazı Bulgular, T.C.M.B. Çalışma Tebliği 16/08.
  • Chick, Victoria, (1983), Macroeconomics After Keynes: A Reconsideration of the General Theory, Oxford: Philip Allan.
  • Cook, T. & T. Hahn, (1988), The Effect of Changes in The Federal Funds Rate Target on Market Interest Rates in The 1970s, Federal Rezerv Bank of Richmond, Working Paper 88-4.
  • Cottrell, Allin, (1986), The Endogeneity of Money and Money-Income Causality, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 33 (1), 2-27.
  • Davidson, Paul, (1978), Money and Real World, London: Macmillan Press, 2nd edition.
  • Davidson, Paul, (1986), Finance, Funding, Saving and Investment, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, IX, 1: 101-110.
  • Dow, Sheila, (1996), Horizontalism: A Critique, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 20, 497-508.
  • Dow, Sheila., (1994), Endogenuos Money, Discussion Papers in Economics, Universtiy of Stirling, September.
  • Hein, E. & E. Stockhammer (2009), A Post Keynesian Alternative to the New Consensus Model. Giuseppe Fontana ve Mark Setterfield (Yay.Haz.). Macroeconomic Theory and Macroeconomic Pedagogy, içinde, (s.273-294). Palgrave Macmıllan, UK.
  • Howells, Peter (1995), The Demand for Endogenous Money, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 18 (1), 89-106.
  • Howells, Peter 1999), The Source of Endogenous Money, Economic Issues, 4 (1), 101-112.
  • Johansen, S. (1988), Statistical Analysis of Cointegrating Vectors, International of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12, 231-254.
  • Investing.com, 2 Ocak 2020 tarihinde https://www.investing.com/ adresinden erişildi. Işık, S. (2010), Para, Finans ve Kriz: Post Keynesyen Yaklaşım, Palme Yayıncılık, Ankara. Kaldor, N. ve J.Trivithick, (1981), A Keynesian Perspective on Money, Lloyds Bank Review, January. Londan,
  • Kaldor, Nicholas (1986), The Scourge of Monetarism, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Kregel, J.A. (1984-85), Constraints on the Expansion of Output and Employment: Real or Monetary?, Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics, VII, 2: 139-152.
  • Lavoie, Marc (1996), Horizontalism, Structuralism, Liquidity, Preference and The Principle of Increasing Risk, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 43, 3: 275-300.
  • Lavoie, Marc (1999); The Credit-Led Supply of Deposits and The Demand for Money: Kaldor’s Reflux Mechanism as Previously Endorsed by Joan Robinson, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23, 103-113.
  • Lavoie, Marc, (1985), “Credit and Money: The Dynamic Circuit, Overdraft Economics, and Post Keynesyen Economics. M.Jarsulic (Yay.Haz.). Money and Macro Policy içinde (s.63-84). Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.
  • Lavoie, Marc, (1992), Foundations of Post-Keynesian Economic Analysis. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
  • Lavoie, Marc. (2009), Taming the New Consensus: Hysteresis and Some Other Post Keynesian Amendments. Giuseppe Fontana ve Mark Setterfield (Yay.Haz.). Macroeconomic Theory and Macroeconomic Pedagogy içinde, (s.191-213), Palgrave Macmıllan, UK.
  • Lavoie, Marc (2014), Post-Keynesian Economics: New Foundations, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
  • Lee J. & Strazicich M. C. (2013). Minimum LM Unit Root Test With One Structural Break, Economic Bulletin, 33(4), pp. 2483-2492.
  • Levrero, E.S. & M. Deleidi, (2019), The Causal Relationship Between Shortand Long-Term İnterest Rates: An Empirical Assessment of the United States, MPRA Paper No:93608.
  • Minsky, Hyman (1982), Can “it” happen Again?: Essays on Instability and Finance, New York: M.E.Sharpe.
  • Minsky, Hyman (1986), Stabilizing an unstable Economy, New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Moore, Basil J (1998), Accommodation to Accommodationism: A note, Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics, 21, 1: 175-179.
  • Moore, Basil J, (1988), Horizontalist and Verticalist: The Macroecomics of Credit Money. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Moore, Basil J, (1989a), The Endogeneity of Credit Money, Review of Political Economy, 1, 1: 65-93.
  • Moore, B. (1989b), On the Endogeneity of Money Once More, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 11:3, 479-487.
  • Moore, Basil J, (1991 Money Supply Endogeneity: “Reserve Price Setting” or “Reserve Quantity Setting”?, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 13, 3: 404-407.
  • Moore, Basil J, (1995), Exogeneity of Short-Term Interest Rate: A Reply to Wray, Journal of Economic Issue, XXIX, 1: 258-266.
  • Mott, Tracy (1985-86), Towards a Post-Keynesian Formulation of Liquidity Preference, Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics, 8, 2: 222-232.
  • Nishiyama, Y. (2007), Monetary transmission---federal funds rate and CD rates, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 29:3, 409-426.
  • Palley, Thomas (1994), Competing Views of Money Supply Process: Theory and Evidence, Macroeconomics, 45, 1: 67-88.
  • Palley, Thomas 1991) The Endogeonus Money Supply: Consensus and Disagreement, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 13 (3), 397-403.
  • Palley, Thomas, (1996), Accommodationism Versus Structuralism: Time for An Accommodation Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 18, 4: 585-594.
  • Palley, Thomas, (1998), Accommodationism, Structuralism, and Superstructuralism, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 21, 1: 171-173.
  • Payne, J.E. (2006), More On The Monetary Transmission Mechanism: Mortgage Rates And The Federal Funds Rate, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 29:2, 247-257.
  • Pollin, R. (1991), Two Theories of Money Supply Endogeneity: Some Empirical Evidence, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 13:3, 366-396,
  • Pollin, Robert (1996), “Money Supply Endogeneity: What and the Questions and Why do They Matter?”. G. Deleplace ve E.J. Nell (Yay.Haz.). Money in Motion: The Post Keynesian and Circulation Approaches içinde (s. 490-516). London: Macmillan Press.
  • Pollin, R. (2008), Considerations on Interest Rate, Political Economy Research Institute (PERI), Working Paper Series, 177.
  • Rahimi, A., B. M. Chu & M. Lavoie (2017), Linear And Non-Lınear Granger Causalıty Between Short- Term And Long-Term Interest Rates: A Rollıng Wındow Strategy, Metroeconomica, 68:4: 882-902.
  • Rochon, L.P. & M. Setterfield, (2007), Interest Rate, Income Distribution, and Monetary Policy Dominance: Post Keynesians and “Fair Rate” of Interest, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Fall, 31,1, s. 13-42.
  • Rogers, Colin. (1989), Money, Interest and Capital: A Study in The Fundamentals of Monetary Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rousseas, Stephen (1985), A Markup Theory of Bank Loan Rates, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, VIII, 1: 135-144.
  • Rousseas, Stephen, (1986), Post Keynesian Monetary Economics. New York: M.E, Sharp, Armonk
  • Sawyer, M. (2009), Teaching Macroeconomics When the Endogeneity of Money is Taken Seriously. Giuseppe Fontana ve Mark Setterfield (Yay.Haz.). Macroeconomic Theory and Macroeconomic Pedagogy içinde s.131-143). Palgrave Macmıllan, UK.
  • Sellon, G.H. (2002), The Changing U.S. Financial System: Some Implications for the Monetary Transmission Mechanism, Economic Review, First Quarter, Federal Rezerv Bank of Kansas City . Smithin, J. (2009), Teaching the New Consensus Model of ‘Modern Monetary Economics’ from a Critical Perspective: Pedagogical Issues. Giuseppe Fontana ve Mark Setterfield (Yay.Haz.). Macroeconomic Theory and Macroeconomic Pedagogy içinde (s.255-273), Palgrave Macmıllan, UK.
  • Taş, B.K. Onur ve Togay S. (2012), ‘”A Direct of the Endogeneity of Money: Implications for Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) Countries”, Economic Modelling, 29, 577-585.
  • Turguttopbas, N. (2019), The bank lending channel of monetary transmission in Turkey. Business and Economics Research Journal, 10(2), 313-326.
  • Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Merkez Bankası (TCMB). Elektronik Veri Dağıtım Sistemi (EVDS), 2 Ocak 2020 tarihinde https://evds2.tcmb.gov.tr adresinden erişildi.
  • Tymoinge, E. (2009), Central Banking, Asset Prices And Financial Fragility, Routledge Publishing, USA
  • Wray, Randall L. (1990), Money and Credit in Capitalist Economics: The Endogenous Money Approach. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
  • Wray, Randall L. (1992), Alternative Approaches to Money and Interest Rates, Journal of Economic Issues, XXVI, 4:1145-1178.
  • Wray, Randall L. (1992), Commerical Banks, The Central Bank and Endogenous Money, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 14, 3: 297-308.
  • Wray, Randall L.(1996), Money in The Circular Flow. G. Deleplace ve E.J. Nell (Yay.Haz.). Money in Motion: The Post Keynesian and Circulation Approaches içinde (s. 440-464). London: Macmillan Press.
  • Wray, L.R. (2006), When are interest rates exogenous?. M. Setterfield (Yay.Haz.) Complexity, Endogenous Money and Macroeconomic Theory içinde (s.271-289). Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
  • Wray, R. (2012), What is Modern Money Theory?, 13 Mart 2020 tarihinde http://neweconomicperspectives.org/2012/01/mmp-blog-30-what-is-modern-money-theory.html adresinden erişildi.
  • Zivot, E. & Andrews, D. W. K. (1992), Further Evidence on the Great Crash, the Oil-Price Shock, and the Unit-Root Hypothesis. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 10(3):251-270.