___

• Akbulut, H. ve Yereli, A. B. (2016), “Kamu Gelirleri ve Kamu Harcamaları Nedensellik İlişkisi: 2006-2015 Dönemi İçin Türkiye Örneği”, Sosyoekonomi, 24(27), 103-119.
• Akçağlayan, A. ve Kayıran, M. (2010), “Türkiye’de Kamu Harcamaları ve Gelirleri: Nedensellik İlişkisi Üzerine Bir Araştırma”,Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 5 (2), 129- 146.
• Akçoraoglu, A. (1999), “Kamu Harcamaları, Kamu Gelirleri ve Keynesci Politikalar: Bir Nedensellik Analizi”, Gazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 2, 51-65.
• Alfonso, A. ve Rault, C. (2009), “Spend and Tax: A Panel Data Investigation for The EU”, Economics Bulletin, 29(4), 2542-2548.
• Al-Qudair, K.H.A. (2005), “The Relationship Between Government Expenditure and Revenues in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Testing for Cointegration and Causality”, JKAU, 19(1), 31–43.
• Anderson, W., Myles, S. W. ve John, T. W. (1986), “Government Spending and Taxation: What Causes What?”, Southern Economic Association, 52(3), 630-639.
• Aslan, M. ve Tasdemir, M. (2009), “Is Fiscal Synchronization Hypothesis Relevant for Turkey? Evidence from Cointegration and Causality Tests with Endogenous Structural Breaks”, Journal of Money, Investment and Banking, 12, 14-25.
• Aşgın, Sait (2000), Cumhuriyet Döneminde Doğu Anadolu’ya Yapılan Kamu Harcamaları (1946-1960), Ankara, Yücel Ofset.
• Awokuse, T. O. (2003), “Is the export-led growth hypothesis valid for Canada?”, Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, 36: 126–136. doi:10.1111/1540-5982.00006
• Aziz, Mariam Abdul, Muzafar, S. H., Azman-Saini, W.N.W ve Azali, M. (2000), “Testing for Causality between Taxation and Government Spending: An Application of Toda–Yamamoto Approach”, Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 8 (1), 45-50.
• Baghestani, H. ve Mcnown, R. (1994), “Do Revenues or Expenditures Respond to Budgetary Disequilibria?”, Southern Economic Journal, 61 (2), 311-322.
• Barro, R. J. (1974), “Are Government Bonds Net Wealth?”, Journal of Political Economy, 82 (6), 1095-117.
• Bataineh, K. (2011), “Government Revenues and Expenditures: Causality Tests for Jordan”, Ministry of Planning and Inernational Cooperation.
• Bayrak, M. Ve Esen, Ö (2013), “Examining the policies in Turkey that have been implemented during the structural reform process from the standpoint of growth-unemployment”. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 5(6), 134-150.
• Bradley, E. T. ve Payne, J. E. (1998), “Government Revenue-Expenditure Nexus: Evidence from Latin America”, Journal of Economic Development, 23 (2).
• BUMKO, İstatistikler, http://www.bumko.gov.tr/ ,Erişim Tarihi:01/05/2016.
• Chang, T. ve Chiang G. (2009), “Revisiting the Government RevenueExpenditure Nexus: Evidence from 15 OECD Countries Based On the Panel Data Approach”, Czech Journal of Economics and Finance, 59(2), 165-172.
• Chang, T. ve Ho, Y. H. (2002), “Tax–and–Spend, Spend–and–Tax or Fiscal Synchronization: The Case of China”, Journal of Development, 27 (1), 151-160.
• Çavusoglu, A.T. (2008), “Türkiye’de Kamu Gelirleri ile Kamu Harcamaları Arasındaki İliski Üzerine Ekonometrik Bir Analiz”, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 20, 143-160.
• Darrat, A.F. (1998), “Tax and Spend or Spend and Tax? An Inquiry into The Turkish Budgetary Process”, Southern Economic Journal, 64(4), 940- 956.
• De Castro, F., González-Páramo, J. M. ve Hernández de Cos, P. (2004), “Fiscal Consolidation in Spain: Dynamic Interdependence of Public Spending and Revenues”, Investigaciones Economicas, 28(1), 193-207.
• Dickey, D. A. ve Fuller, Wayne A. (1979), “Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root”, Journal of the American Statiscal Association, 74 (366), 427-431.
• Dökmen, Gökhan (2012), “Kamu Harcamaları ve Kamu Gelirleri Arasındaki İlişki: Panel Nedensellik Analizi”, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 27(2), 115-143.
• Eita, J. H. ve Mbazima D. (2008), “The Causal Relationship Between Government Expenditure and Revenue in Namibia”, MPRA Paper No. 9154, University of Munich.
• Engle, R.F. ve Granger, C.W.J., (1987), “Cointegration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation and Testing”, Econometrica, 55 (2), 251– 276.
• Erginay, A. (2010), Kamu Maliyesi, Ankara, Savaş Kitap ve Yayınevi. Fasano U. ve Q. Wang (2002), “Testing the Relationship Between Government Spending and Revenue: Evidence from GCC Countries”, IMF, Working Paper, No. 21.
• Fuees, S. M. Hou, J. W. ve Millea, M. (2003), “Tax or Spend, What Causes What? Reconsidering Taiwan‟s Experience”, International Journal of Business and Economics, 2 (2), 109-119.
• Gregory, A. W., ve Hansen, B. E. (1996), “ Tests For Cointegration in Models With Regime And Trend Shifts”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 58, 555–560.
• Gujaratı, D.N. (1999), Temel Ekonometri, (Çev. Ü. Şenesen ve G.G. Şenesen), Literatür Yayınları, İstanbul.
• Günaydın, İ. (2004), “Vergi‐Harcama Tartışması: Türkiye Örneği”, Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 5(2), 163‐181.
• Johansen, S., ve Juselius, K. (1990), “Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on Cointegration with application to the demand for money”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52, 169–210.
• Keho, Y. (2010), “Budget Deficits and Economic Growth: Causality Evidence and Policy Implications for WAEMU Countries”, European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 18: 99–104.
• Keynes, J.M., (1936). The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money, Harcourt, Brace, and Co, New York.
• Kırchgassner, G. ve Prohl, S. (2003), “Causality between Expenditures and Revenues: Emprical Evidence from Switzerland”, 1-23.
• Konukcu-Önal, D., and Tosun A. N. (2008), “Government RevenueExpenditure Nexus: Evidence from Several Transitional Economies.” Economic Annals, 53 (178–179):145–56. doi:10.2298/EKA0879145K.
• Köse, N. ve Yiğidim, A., (2000), “Toda Yamamoto Yöntemi İle İhracata Dayalı Büyüme Hipotezinin Testi: Türkiye Örneği (1980-1998)”, İstatistik Sempozyumu Ankara.
• Maynard, T. ve Guy, K. (2009), “The Causal Relationship between Government Expenditure and Tax Revenue in Barbados”, Presented at the Annual Review Seminar Research Department Central Bank of Barbodos, 1- 14.
• Meltzer, A.H. and S.F. Richard (1981), “A Rational Theory of the Size of Government”, The Journal of Political Economy, 89(5), 914-927.
• Moalusi, D. (2004),“Causal link between government spending and revenue: A case study of Botswana”, Fordham Economics Discussion Paper Series, 7.
• Musgrave, R. (1966), “Principles of Budget Determination” in: H. Cameron and W. Henderson (eds.), Public Finance Selected Reading, New York: Random House, 15-27.
• Owoye, O. (1995), “The Causal Relationship Between Taxes and Expenditures in The G7 Countries: Cointegration and Error Correction Models”, Applied Economics Letters, 2, 19-22.
• Park, W.K. (1998), “Granger Causality between Government Revenues and Expenditures in Korea”, Journal of Economic Development, 23(1), 145-155.
• Payne, J. (1998), “The Tax-Spend Debate: Time Series Evidence from State Budgets”, Public Choice, 95, 307-320.
• Peacock, A. ve Wiseman J. (1979), “Approaches to the Analysis of Government Expenditure Growth”, Public Finance Review, 7(1), 3- 23.
• Pesaran, M.H., Shin, Y., Smith, R.J. (2001), “Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16, 289–326.
• Phillips, P. C. B., Perron, P. (1988), “Testing For A Unit Root in Time Series Regression”, Biometrika, 75(2), 335-346.
• Ram, R. (1988), “Additional Evidence on Causality between Government Revenue and Government Expenditure”, Southern Economic Journal, 54(1), 763-769.
• Sadiq, T. (2010), “The Government between Revenues and Expenditure of the Federal and Provencial Governments of Pakistan”, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics Conference.
• Sobhee, S. K. (2004), “The Causality between Tax and Spend of the Public Sector in Mauritius: A Vecm Approach”, International Journal of Applied Econometrics and Quantitative Studies, 1 (3), 115-130.
• TCMB EVDS, http://evds.tcmb.gov.tr/ , 10.05. 2016. Terzi, H. ve Oltulular S. (2006), “Harcama-Vergi Geliri Hipotezi: Türkiye Örnegi”, Atatürk Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 20(2), 1-18.
• Toda, H.,Y. ve Yamamoto T. (1995) “Statistical Inference in Vector Autoregressions with Possibly Integrated Processes”. Journal of Econometrics, 66: 225-250.
• Ulusoy, Ahmet (2003), Maliye Politikası, Trabzon, Derya Kitabevi.
• Wahid, N.M. (2008), “An Empirical Investigation on the Nexus Between Tax Revenue and Government Spending: The Case of Turkey”, International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 16, 46-51.
• Yamak, R. ve Abdioğlu, Z. (2012), “Ampirik Bağlamda Toplam ve Alt Kalemler Bazında Kamu Harcamaları ve Kamu Gelirleri Arasındaki İlişki: Türkiye Örneği”, Hacettepe Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 30 (1), 173-193.
• Young, A. (2009), "Tax-Spend or Fiscal Illusion?" Cato Journal, 29, 3.
• Zortuk M., ve Uzgören N. (2008), “Relationship between Taxation and Government Expenditure in Turkey”, Banks and Banking System, 3(1), 57-62.