Yeni 'Kamusal' örgütler : Kamu yararı şirketleri

Kamu hizmetlerinin sunumunda kamu sektörü, özel sektör ve kâr amacı gütmeyen sektör örgütlerinin ortaklığına ilişkin yeni bir örgütlenme modeli olarak önerilen kamu yaran şirketleri, devlet merkezli sosyal demokrasinin ve piyasa merkezli yeni sağın ötesinde çok daha geniş tabanlı olduğu iddia edilen "üçüncü yol arayışı"nın bir ürünüdür. Kamu yararı şirketleri, kamu hizmeti sunan, hükümetlerin denetiminden bağımsız, ticari esaslara göre hizmet sunan, örgütlenme ve finansman açısından esnek kurallara tabi, kurumsal yönetişim esasına göre yönetilen, yönetiminde yerel paydaşların olduğu kamusal örgütler biçiminde tanımlanmaktadır. 'Kamusal' bir örgüt modeli olarak sunulan kamu yararı şirketlerinin incelenmesi önem, taşımaktadır. Gerek oluşturulmalarının gerisinde yatan nedenler gerek örgütlenme biçimleri değerlendirildiğinde, kamu hizmetlerinin örgütlenme ve finansmanında esneklik arayışlarının bir ürünü olarak ortaya çıkan kamu yararı şirketlerinin, kamu örgütlenmesinin kamusallaşmasına katkı sağlayamayacağı, aksine bu örgütlenme biçiminin kamu hizmeti ethosunu ve ekonomik ve sosyal haklarla donatılmış yurttaşlık kimliğini zedeleyici sonuçlar yaratacağı düşünülmektedir.

New 'Public' organizations : Public interest companies

Public interest companies, proposed as a new organizational model for the partnership among the organizations of public sector, private sector and non-profit sector, to provide public services, are the product of third way policy which is claimed to be more broad-based than state-centred social democracy and free market centred new right policy. Public interest companies are defined as the public organizations providing public services, independent from governmental political control, governed based on corporate governance, serving by commercial principles, subject to flexible organizational and financial rules and which are under the direction of local stakeholders, instead of shareholders. The study of public interest companies is very significant, as they are presented as a "public" organization model. Evaluating either the reasons to constitute them or their organization forms, it is thought that public interest companies, which are the consequence of a search for flexibility in organizing and financing public services, will cause further privatization of public organization and create some destructive consequences on public service ethos and citizenship identity equipped with economic and social rights.

PDF

___

AKSOY, Şinasi (1995), "Yeni Sağ ve Kamu Yönetimi," Kamu Yönetimi Disiplini Sempozyumu Bildirileri II. Cilt (Ankara: TODAİE Yayınları): 159-173.
ALEXANDER, A. Jeffrey/WEINER, J. Bryan (1998), "The Adoption of the Corporate Governance Model by Nonprofit Organizations," Nonprofit Management ft Leadership, 8/3: 223-242.
AVRUPA KOMİSYONU (2008), Türkiye 2008 İlerleme Raporu, www.abgs.gov.tr, 12 Haziran 2009.
AYYILDIZ, Musa (2000), Menkul Kıymet Borsalarının Kâr Amaçlı Şirketlere Dönüşmeleri ve Türkiye İçin Öneriler (Ankara: SPK).
AZRAK, A. Ülkü (1976), Millileştirme ve İdare Hukuku (İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları).
BARNES, Marian/NEWMAN, Janet/KNOPS, Andrew/SULLIVAN, Helen (2003), "Constituting The Public' in the Public Participation," Public Administration, 81/2: 379-399.
BIRCHALL, Johnston (ed.) (2001), The New Mutualism in Public Policy (London: Routledge).
BIRCHALL, Johnston (2002), "Mutual, Non-Profit or Public Interest Company? An Evaluation of Options for the Ownership and Control of Water Utilities," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Till: 181-213.
BOZEMAN, Barry (1987), All Organizations Are Public: Bridging Public and Private Organizational Theories (San Francisco: Jossey Bass Publishers).
BRANSTON, Robert/COWLING, Keith/SUGDEN, Roger (2006), "Corporate Governance and the Public Interest," International Review of Applied Economics, 20/2: 189-212.
BRECHER, Charles (2002), The Public Interest Company as a Mechanism to Improve Service Delivery (London: Public Management Foundation).
CABINET OFFICE (1999), Modernising Government (London).
CABINET OFFICE (2002), Private Action, Public Benefit: A Review of Chanties and the Wider Not-For-Profit Sector (London: Strategy Unit Report).
CARINO, Ledivina V. (2001), "Private Action for Public Good? The Public Role of Voluntary Sector Organizations," Public Organization Review, 1: 55-74.
DTI (2003), Enterprise for Communities: Proposals for a Community Interest Company (London: HM Treasury).
ERYILMAZ, Bilal (2002), Bürokrasi ve Siyaset: Bürokratik Devletten Etkin Yönetime (İstanbul: Alfa Basım).
FLINDERS, Matthew (2004), "Distributed Public Governance in Britain," Public Administration 82/4: 883-909.
FLINDERS, Matthew (2005), "The Politics of Public-Private Partnerships," The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 111: 215-239.
GIBSON-SMITH, C. S. (2002), Public Interest Companies and Risk (London: IPPR).
GIDDENS, Anthony (2000), Üçüncü Yol: Sosyal Demokrasinin Yeniden Dirilişi (İstanbul: Birey Yayıncılık) (Çev.: M. Özay).
GREVE, C./FLINDERS, M./THIEL, V. (1999), "Quangos - What's in a Name? Defining Quangos from a Comparative Perspective," Governance, 12/2: 129-146.
GÜLER, Birgül A. (2003), "Yönetişim: Tüm İktidar Sermayeye," Praksis, 9: 93-116.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/turkish/europe/story/2007/09/070903Jranceenergy.shtml, 10.09.2007.
http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk.
http://www.cicregulator.gov.uk.
http://www.cicregulator.gov.uk/coSearch/companyList.shtml, 11.08.2007.
http://www.cicregulator.gov.uk/guidance.shtml, 10.06.2007.
http://www.cicregulator.gov.uk/guidance/Chap1package01August06.pdf, 11.06.2007.
http://www.cicregulator.gov.uk/guidance/Part6package.pdf, 11.06.2007.
http://www.dh.gov.uk/NewsHome/Speeches/SpeechesList/SpeechesArticle, 20.09.2004.
http://www.hastanedergisi.com/en/haberdetay.asp?id=5, Sayı 42, 2006, 10.06.2009.
http://nao.gov.uk/pn/01-02/networkrail.htm, 13.06.2007.
http://www.networkrail.co.uk/documents/2937_MembershipPolicy.pdf, 03.06.2007.
http://arsiv.ntvmsnbc.com/news/198324.asp#BODY, 23.02.2009, 10.4.2009.
http://www.unison.org.uk/foundation/pages_view.asp?did=433, 25.5.2008.
http://www.utvlive.com/newsroom/indepth.asp?pt=n£tid=81434, 13.08.2007.
KARASU, Koray (2004), Kuram ve Uygulamada Kamu Örgütleri (yayımlanmamış Doktora tezi)(Ankara: A.Ü. S.B.E.).
KAY, John (2007), "Helping Savers and Attending to Credit Risk," Financial Times,http://www.johnkay.com/regulation/515, 25.09.2007.
KAY, John (2001), "A New Public Sector," Prospect, http://www.johnkay.com/political/204, 25.09.2007.
MALTBY, Paul (2003), In the Public Interest?: Assessing the Potential for Public Interest Companies (London: Institute for Public Policy Research).
MARINE, Allix (2003), "The Politics of Quasi-Autonomous Organisations in France and Italy," PSA Annual Conference: 1-38.
MATTHEWS, David (1984), "The Public in Practice and Theory," Public Administration Review, 44: 120-125.
MAYO, Ed/MOORE, Henrietta (2001), The Mutual State: How Local Communities Can Run Public Services (London: New Economics Foundation).
OSBORNE, P. Stephen (2000), "Introduction: Understanding Public-Private Partnerships in International Perspective, Globally Convergent or Nationally Divergent Phenomena,"
OSBORNE, P. Stephen (ed.), Public-Private- Partnetships: Theory and Practice in International Perspective (London: Routledge): 1-8.
PALMAS, Karl (2005), The UK Public Interest Company: The Idea, Its Origins, and Its Relevance for Sweden, Göteborg University CBIS Discussion Paper 1, http://www.hgu.gu.se/Files/Handels_mainsite/projects/corpcitizenship/News/CBiS_DP_UK_PIC.pd f, 10.06.2006.
PARKER, Kathryn/PASSEY, Andrew (2006), Proposals for a Community Interest Company (PIC) (University of Technology Sydney, Centre for Australian Community Organisations and Management) http://www.business.uts.edu.au/cacpm/articles/commentaries/ communityic.html, 20.11.2006.
PESCH, Udo (2005), The Predicaments of Publicness: An Inquiry into the Conceptual Ambiguity of Public Administration (The Netherlands: Eburon Delft).
PRABHAKAR, Rajiv (2004a), "Do Public Interest Companies Form a Third Way within Public Services," The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 6/3: 353-369.
PRABHAKAR, Rajiv (2004b), "Commercialisation or Citizenship?," Politics, 24/3: 215-220.
PRABHAKAR, Rajiv (2004c), "Whatever Happened to Stakeholding," Public Administration, 82/3: 567- 584.
SAĞLIK BAKANLIĞI (2003), Sağlıkta Dönüşüm (Ankara).
SHAW, Eric (2004), "What Matters is What Works: The Third Way and the Case of the Private Finance Initiative," HALE, Sarah/LEGGETT, Will/MARTELL, Luke (eds.), The Third Way and Beyond; Criticisms, Futures and Alternatives (Manchester: Manchester University Press): 64-82.
SHAOUL, Jean (2003), "A Financial Analysis of the National Air Traffic Services PPP," Public Money and Management, 23/3: 185-194.
SIGMA (2008), Peer Assistance in Public Procurement and Consessions/PPPs: Turkey, Final Report (Paris).
TAN, Turgut (1992), "Kamu Hizmeti İmtiyazından 'Yap-İşlet-Devret' Modeline," AÜSBF Dergisi, 47-3-4: 307-325.
TAN, Turgut (1995), "İdarede Yeni Ussallık Arayışları ve Hukuk," Kamu Yönetimi Disiplini Sempozyumu, C.2 (Ankara: TODAİE Yayınları): 175-183.
TÜSİAD (1995), 21. Yüzyıl İçin Yeni Bir Devlet Modeline Doğru: Optimal Devlet (İstanbul).
UNISON (2003), Seven Reasons Why UNISON is Opposed to Foundation Trusts (London).
WHITEHOUSE, Lisa (2003), "Railtrack is Dead - Long Live Network Raill Nationalization Under the Third Way," Journal of Law and Society, 30/2: 217-235.