Gelenekselcilik-davranışsalcılık tartışmasını bağlamında anlamak

Uluslararası İlişkiler disiplininin tarihini büyük tartışmalar üzerinden yazmak bir gelenek halini almıştır. Bu tartışmalardan ilki olan İdealizm-Realizm tartışması, disiplinin terminolojisini yerleştirmek ve sıfırlarını tespit etmek konusundaki katkıları ile disiplinin kurucu tartışması sayılır. İkinci büyük tartışma olarak adlandırılan Gelenekselcilik-Davranışsalcılık tartışması ise disipline özerklik ve daha "bilimsel" bir hüviyet kazandırmıştır. Bu tartışmada Davranışsalcıhğın oynadığı rol özellikle vurgulanmalıdır. Sistem yaklaşırrljarı, oyun teorileri, veri depolama, karar alma yaklaşımı, simülasyon, analiz düzeyi, çatışma çözümlemesi ve içerik analizi başta olmak üzere birçok başlıkta Davranışsalcıhğın disipline önemli katkıları olmuştur. Doğa bilimlerinin kullandığı yol ve yöntemlerin Uİ çalışmalarında da kullanılabileceğini savunan Davranışsalcılar, Uluslararası İlişkiler eğitimine pedagojik ve metodolojik anlamda da hatırı sayılır bir katkı yapmışlardır. İkinci büyük tartışma sadece belirli bir dönem için disiplini etkilememiş; disiplinin bugününü bile şekillendirmiştir. Davranışsalcılar postpozitivistlerin eleştirilerine maruz kalıp, pozitivizmle malul olsa da; etkileri hala hissedilen bir tartışma olarak, Uİ teorisinin en azından tarihsel omurgasındaki önemli halkalardan biri olmayı sürdürmektedir. Bu anlamda Davranışsalcılığı ve ikinci büyük tartışmayı bağlamında ele almak tarafların anlaşılması ve disipline katkılarının takdir edilmesi açısından önemlidir.

Traditionalism vs.behavioralism : Understanding the second great debate in its context

It has become a tradition to write the history of International Relations (1R) discipline over the great debates. Idealism-Realism debate, the first among them, is seen as the founding debate through its contribution in settling the terminology of the discipline and determining its boundaries. Traditionalism-Behavioralism debate, known as the second debate, has led the discipline gain autonomy and "more scientific" identity. In this debate, the role of Behavioralism should be further emphasized via system(ic) approaches, game theories, data making, decision-making approach, simulation, level of analysis, conflict resolution. Behavioralists, defending the methods of natural sciences could be applied within the IR, has made a remarkable contribution in IR education both in pedagogical and methodological ways. The debate did not affected the discipline not for some period but it has also shaped its current era. The debate still continues to be one of the important links in the historical backbone of the discipline. It is important to evaluate Behavioralism and the second great debate in its context in order to understand and appreciate the sides and their contributions in the discipline.

PDF

___

ALGER, Chadwick (1963);*"Comparison of Intranational and International Politics," The American Political Science Review, 57/2.
ALKER, Hayward R. (1990), "Rescuing 'Reason' from the 'Rationalists': Reading Vico, Marx and Weber as Reflective Institutionalists," Millennium: Journal of International Studies 19/2.
ALKER, Hayward/BIERSTEKER, Thomas (1984), "The Dialectics of World Order: Notes for a Future Archeologist of International Savoir Faire," International Studies Quarterly, 28/2.
AYDIN,. Mustafa (2004), "Uluslararası İlişkilerin Gerçekçi Teorisi: Kökeni, Kapsamı, Kritiği," Uluslararası İlişkiler, 1/1.
BANKS, Michael (1984), "The Evolution of International Relations Theory," BANKS, Michael (ed.), Conflict in World Society: A New Perspective on International Relations (Sussex: Wheatsheaf Books).
BAUER, Raymond A., et al. (1958), "National Support for Behavioral Science," Political Research Organization and Design, 1/5.
BERNSTEIN, Steven, et al. (2000), "God Gave Physics the Easy Problems: Adapting Social Sciences to An Unpredictable World," European Journal of International Relations, 6/1.
BRAUMOELLER, Bear F./SARTORI, Anne E. (1999), "Empirical-Quantitative Approaches to the Study of International Relations," SPRINZ, Detlef/WOLINSKY, Yael (eds.), The Analysis of International Relations (Evanston: Northwestern University Press).
BREMER, Stuart A., et al. (2003), "Building a Science of World Politics: Emerging Methodologies and the Study of Conflict, "Journal of Conflict Resolution, 47/1.
BROWN, Chris (1997), Understanding International Relations (London: Macmillan Press).
BULL, Hedley (1966), "International Theory: The Case for A Classical Approach," World Politics, 18/3.
CHERNOFF, Fred (2004), "The Study of Democratic Peace and Progress in International Relations," International Studies Review, 6/1.
CHOMSKY, Noam, et al. (1997), The Cold War and the University: Toward an Intellectual History of the Postwar Years (New York: The New Press).
COX, Robert W. (1972), "Science in the Study of International Organization: A Rejoinder," International Organization, 26/1.
CRAWFORD, Robert (2000), Idealism and Realism in International Relations: Beyond the Discipline (London: Routledge).
CUTLER, Preston (1958), "Political Scientist at the Behavioral Sciences Center," Political Research Organization and Design, 11 A.
ÇALIŞ, Şaban/ÖZLÜK, Erdem (2007), "Uluslararası İlişkiler Tarihinin Yapısökümü: İdealizm-Realizm Tartışması," Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 18.
DENEMARK, Robert A. (1999), "World System History: From Traditional International Politics to the Study of Global Relations," International Studies Review, 1/2.
DEUTSCH, Karl (1958), "The Place of Behavioral Sciences in Graduate Training in International Relations", Behavioral Science, 3/3.
DEUTSCH, Karl/RUSSETT, Bruce M. (1963), "International Trade and Political Independence," The American Behavioral Scientist, 6/7.
DOUGHERTY, James/PFALTZGRAFF, Robert (1981), Contending Theories of International Relations (New York: Harper Row Publishers).
DRULAK, Petr (2004), "The Theory of International Relations," Perspectives, 21.
DRYZEK, John (2006), "Revolutions Without Enemies: Key Transformations in Political Science," American Political Science Review, 100/4.
DUNNE, Timothy (1993), "Mythology or Methodology? Traditions in International Theory," Review of International Studies, 19/3.
DUNNE, Timothy (1995), "International Society: Theoretical Promises Fulfilled?," Cooperation and Conflict, 30/2.
EASTON, David (1985), "Political Science in the United States: Past and Present," International Political Science Review, 6/'1.
EVANS, Graham (1972), "Some Problems with a History of Thought in International Relations," International Relations, Alb.
FERGUSON, Yale/LITTLE, Richard (2004), "From International Politics to Global Politics: An Evolving Field," Fifth Pan European International Relations Conference Paper (Hague: September).
FERGUSON, Yale/MANSBACH, Richard (1988), The Elusive Quest: Theory and International Politics (Columbia: University of South Carolina Press).
FINNEGAN, Richard (1972), "International Relations: The Disputed Search for Method," Review of Politics, 34/i.
FORSYTH, Murray (1978), "The Classical Theory of International Relations," Political Studies, 26/3.
FOX, William/FOX, Annethe (1966), "The Teaching of International Relations in the United .States," OLSON, William/SONDERMANN, Fred (eds.), The Theory and Practice of International Politics (New Jersey: Prentice Hall).
FRIEDEN, Jeffry/LAKE, David (2005), "International Relations as a Social Science: Rigor and Relevance," The Annals of the American Academy, 600.
GADDIS, John Lewis (1987), "Expanding the Data Base: Historians, Political Scientists, and the Enrichment of Security Studies," International Security, 12/1.
GELLER, Daniel/VASQUEZ, John (2004), "The Construction and Cumulation of Knowledge in International Relations," International Studies Review, 6/2.
GOERTZ, Gary/DIEHL, Paul (1993), "Enduring Rivalries: Theoretical Constructs and Empirical Patterns," International Studies Quarterly, 37/2.
GRAND, James C. (2005), "Integration and Fragmentation in Political Science: Exploring Patterns of Scholarly Communication in A Divided Discipline," The Journal of Politics, 67/4.
GRIFFITHS, Martin (1992), Realism, Idealism and International Politics: A Reinterpretation (London: Routledge).
GUZZINI, Stefano/LEANDER, Anna (2001), "Social Theory of International Relations: An Apprasial of Alexander Wendt's Theoretical and Disciplinary Synthesis," Journal of International Relations and Development, 4/4.
HALLIDAY, Fred (1990), "The Pertinence of International Relations," Political Studies, 38/3.
HALLIDAY, Fred (1994), Rethinking International Relations (Hampshire: Macmillan Press).
HARTY, Martha/MODELL, John (1991), "The First Conflict Resolution Movement, 1956-1971," The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 35/4.
HASS, Michael (1974), International Systems: A Behavioral Approach (New York: Chandler Publishing).
HOFFMANN, Stanley (1969), "Theory and International Relations," ROSENAU, James (ed.), International Politics and Foreign Policy (New York: The Free Press).
HOFFMANN, Stanley (1986), "Hedley Bull and His Contribution to International Relations," International Affairs, 62/2.
HOLLIS, Martin/SMITH, Steve (2000), "The International System," LINKLATER Andrew (ed.), Critical Concepts in Political Science Vol. Ill (New York: Routledge).
HOLSTI, Kalevi (1991 ),Change in the International System: Essays on the Theory and Practice of International Relations (New York: Edwar Elgar).
JOYNT, Carey B./CORBETT Percy (1978), Theory and Reality in World Politics (London-MacMillan).
KAPLAN, Morton (1966),w"The New Great Debate: Traditionalism versus Science in International Relations," World Politics, 19/1.
KAPLAN, Morton (1974), "Systems Theory and Objectivity," Theory and Decision, 5/4.
KAPLAN, Morton (1982), "Traditional Theory and All the King's Men," Theory and Decision, 14/2.
KAPLAN, Morton A. (1968), "The Systems Approaches to International Politics," KAPLAN, Morton A. (ed.), New Approaches to International Relations (New York: St. Martin's Press).
KEYFITZ, Nathan (1979), "Understanding World Models," Behavioral Science, 24/3.
KIM, K. W. (1965), "Limits of Behavioural Explanation in Politics," The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, 31 /3.
KING, Gary (1989), "Event Count Models for International Relations: Generalizations and Applications," International Studies Quarterly, 33/2.
LAPID, Yosef (2002), "Sculpting the Academic Identity: Disciplinary Reflections at the Dawn of a New Millennium," PUCHALA, Donald J. (ed.), Visions of International Relations: Assessing an Academic Field (Columbia: University of South Carolina Press).
LARSON, Deborah W. (2003), "Academic Warriors and the Cold War Enemy," Diplomatic History, 27/4.
LESLIE, Stuart (1994), The Cold War and American Science: The Military-Industrial-Academic Complex at MIT and Stanford (New York: Columbia University Press).
LIJPHART, Arend (1974), "The Structure of the Theoretical Revolution in International Relations," International Studies Quarterly, 18/1.
LINKLATER, Andrew (2000), "General Introduction", LINKLATER, Andrew (ed.), International Relations: Critical Concepts in Political Science Vol. I (New York: Routledge).
LITTLE, Richard (1978), "A Systems Approach," TAYLOR, Trevor (ed.), Approaches and Theory in International Relations (New York: Longman).
LONGLEY, Henry (1993), Emergent Scientific Epistemology and International Relations (University of Miami: Unpublished PhD Thesis).
MACNEAL, Edward (1997), "Foundations of A Theory of Decision Making," et Cetera, 54/3.
McCLELLAND, Charles A. (1969), "International Relations: Wisdom or Science?," ROSENAU, James (ed.), International Politics and Foreign Policy (New York: The Free Press).
McDOUGALL, Walter (2000), "The Cold War Excursion of Science," Diplomatic History, 24/1.
MILNER, Helen (1998), "Rationalizing Politics: The Emerging Synthesis of International, American, and Comparative Politics," International Organization, 52/4.
MINTZ, Alex (2005), "The Method of Analysis Problem in International Relations", MINTZ, Alex/RUSSETT, Bruce (ed.), New Directions for International Relations: Confronting the Method of Analysis Problem (Lanham: Lexington Books).
MONROE, Kristen R. (2004), "The Chicago School: Forgotten but Not Gone," Perspectives on Politics,2/1.
MORGAN, Patrick (1987), Theories and Approaches to International Politics: What Are We to Think? (New Brunswick: Transaction Books).
MORGENTHAU, Hans J. (1970), "International Relations 1965-1969," Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 390.
NAVON, Emmanuel (2001), "The Third Debate Revisited," Review of International Studies, 111 A.
NORTH, Robert/WILLARD, Matthew (1984), "The Post-Behavioralism Debate: Indeterminism, Probabilism and the Interaction of Data and Theory," BANKS, Michael (ed.), Conflict in World Society: A New Perspective on International Relations (Sussex: Wheatsheaf Books).
ÖZLÜK, Erdem (2006), Uluslararası İlişkiler Disiplininde Gelenekseldi!k Davranışsalcılık Tartışması ve Çağdaş Uluslararası ilişkiler Teorilerine Etkisi, (Konya: Selçuk Üniversitesi) (Yaymlanmamış Yüksek Lisans tezi).
ÖZLÜK, Erdem (2008), "Uluslararası İlişkiler Disiplininde Davranışsala Paradigmanın Anlamı, Kökeni ve Çatışma Çözümlemesi Örneğinde Davranışsalcılığın Katkısı," Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, .19.
PFALTZGRAFF, Robert (1974), "International Relations Theory: Retrospect and Prospect," International Affairs, 50/'1.
PLANTAN, Frankan (2002), A History of International Relations As A Field of Study (University of Pennsylvania: Unpublished PhD Thesis).
PORTER, Tony (1994), "Postmodern Political Realism and International Relations Theory's Third Debate," SJOLANDER, Claire T./COX, Wayne S. (eds.), Beyond Positivism: Critical Reflections on International Relations (Boulder: Lynne Rienner).
PUCHALA, Donald (1990), "Woe to the Orphans of the Scientific Revolution", Journal of International Affairs, 44/1.
PUCHALA, Donald (2004), Theory and History in International Relations (New York: Routledge).
RAPOPORT, Anatol (1970),"Can Peace Research be Applied?," The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 14/2.
ROBIN, Ron (2001), The Making of the Cold War Enemy: Culture and Politics in the Military-Intellectual Complex (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
ROSENAU, James N. (1965), "Behavioral Science and the Study of International Relations," The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 9/4.
SCHMIDT, Brian C. (2002), "On the History and Historiography of International Relations," CARLSNAES, W. et al. (ed.), Handbook of International Relations (London: Sage Publications).
SCHMIDT, Brian C. (2002), "Together Again: Reuniting Political Theory and International Relations Theory," British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 4/1.
SINGER, David J. (1958), "Threat Perception and the Armament Tension Dilemma," The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2/1.
SINGER, David J. (1963), "Inter-Nation Influence: A Formal Model," The American Political Science Review, 57/2.
SINGER, David J. (1965), "Data-Making in International Relations," Behavioral Science, 10/1.
SINGER, David J. (1990), Models, Methods and Process in World Politics: A Peace Research Odyssey, Models (Boulder: Westview Press).
SJOLANDER Claire T./COX, Wayne S. Cox (1994), "Critical Reflections on International Relations,"
SJOLANDER, Claire T./COX, Wayne S. Cox (eds.), Beyond Positivism: Critical Reflections on International Relations (Boulder: Lynne Rienner).
SKOLNIKOFF, Eugene (1993), Elusive Transformation: Science, Technology and the Evolution of International Politics (New Jersey: Princeton University Press).
SMITH, Steve (1989), "Paradigm Dominance in International Relations: The Development of International Relations as a Social Science," DYER, Hugh C./MANG ASARI AN, Leon (ed.), The Study of International Relations: The State of the Art (London: MacMillan).
SMITH, Steve (1994), "The Self-images of a Discipline: A Genealogy of International Relations Theory," SMITH, Steve/BOOTH, Ken (eds.), International Relations Theory Today (Cambridge: Polity Press).
SMITH, Steve (1996), "Positivism and Beyond," BOOTH, Ken et al. (ed.), International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
SMITH, Steve (2002), "The United States and the Discipline of International Relations: Hegemonic Country Hegemonic Discipline," International Studies Review, All.
SMITH, Thomas W. (1997), The Use and Abuse of History in the Study of International Relations (The University of Virginia: Unpublished PhD Thesis).
SONDERMANN, Fred A;"(1968), "Methodology in International Studies: A Critique," International Studies Quarterly, 12/1.
STARR, Harvey (1974), "The Qualitative International Relations As Surfer Riding the Fourth " Wave," The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 18/2.
SYLVAN, Donald A. (1994), "Case-Based, Model-Based, Explanation-Based Styles of Reasoning in Foreign Policy," International Studies Quarterly, 38/1.
TANRISEVER, Oktay (2000), "Yöntem Sorunu: Gelenekselcilik Davramşsalcılık Tartışması" ERALP, AtHa (ed.), Devlet Sistem ve Kimlik: Uluslararası İlişkilerde Temel Yaklaşımlar (İstanbul: İletişim).
THOMPSON, Kenneth W. (1955), "Beyond National Interest: A Critical Evaluation of Reinhold Niebuhr's Theory of International Politics," Review of Politics, 17/2.
THOMPSON, Kennteh W. (1952), "The Study of International Politics: A Survey of Trends and Developments," The Review of Politics, 14/4.
TOW, William (2003), "Apocalypse Forever? International Relations Implications of 11 September," Australian Journal of Politics and History, 49/3.
UZGEL, İlhan (2004), Ulusal Çıkar ve Dış Politika: Türk Dış Politikasının Belirlenmesinde Ulusal Çıkarın Rolü: 1983-1991 (Ankara: İmge Kitabevi).
VANDENBERG, Steven G. (1959), "Some Thought About Possible Changes in Research Practices Resulting From the Use of Electronic Computers," Behavioral Science, All.
WEVER, Ole (1997), "Figures of International Thought: Introducing Persons Instead of Paradigms," NEUMANN, Iver/W/EVER, Ole (eds.), The Future of International Relations (London: Routledge).
WEISS, Charles (2005), "Science, Technology and International Relations," Technology in Society, 27.
WENDT, Alexander (2001), Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
WILMER, Franke (2002), The Social Construction of Man, the State, and War: Identity, Conflict, and Violence in Former Yugoslavia (New York: Routledge).
WOLFERS, Arnold (1947), "International Relations as a Field of Study," Columbia Journal of International Affairs, 1/1.
ZINNES, Dina A. (1968), "An Introduction to the Behavioral Approach: A Review," The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 12/2,