___

• American Psychiatric Association [APA] (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington: American Psychiatric Publishing.
• Beard, L., Carpenter, L., & Johnston, L. (2011). Assistive technology: Access for all students (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice-Hall.
• *Belson, S. I., Hartmann, D., & Sherman, J. (2013). Digital note-taking: The use of electronic pens with students with specific learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 28(2), 13-24. doi:
• 10.1177/016264341302800202 Blackhurst, A. E. (2005). Perspectives on applications of technology in the field of learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 28(2), 175-178. doi: 10.2307/1593622
• Bouck, E. C., Bassette, L., Taber-Doughty, T., Flanagan, S. M., & Szwed, K. (2009). Pentop computers as tools for teaching multiplication to students with mild intellectual disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 44(3), 367-380.
• Brodin, J. (2010). Can ICT give children with disabilities equal opportunities in school? Improving Schools, 13(1), 99-112. doi: 10.1177/1365480209353483
• *Bryant, B. R., Ok, M., Kang, E. Y., Kim, M. K., Lang, R., Bryant, D. P., & Pfannestiel, K. (2015). Performance of fourth-grade students with learning disabilities on multiplication facts comparing teacher-mediated and technology-mediated interventions: A preliminary investigation. Journal of Behavioral Education, 24(2), 255-272. doi: 10.1007/s10864-015-9218-z
• Butterworth, B., & Laurillard, D. (2010). Low numeracy and dyscalculia: Identification and intervention. ZDMMathematics Education, 42(6), 527-539. doi: 10.1007/s11858-010-0267-4
• *Campbell, M. L., & Mechling, L. C. (2009). Small group computer-assisted instruction with SMART board technology: An investigation of observational and incidental learning of nontarget information. Remedial and Special Education, 30(1), 47-57. doi: 10.1177/0741932508315048
• Chang, Y. J., Chen, S. F., & Huang, J. D. (2011). A Kinect-based system for physical rehabilitation: A pilot study for young adults with motor disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(6), 2566-2570. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.07.002
• *Ciullo, S., Falcomata, T. S., Pfannenstiel, K., & Billingsley, G. (2015). Improving learning with science and social studies text using computer-based concept maps for students with disabilities. Behavior Modification, 39(1), 117-135. doi: 10.1177/0145445514552890
• *Corkett, J. K., & Benevides, T. (2016). iPad versus handwriting: Pilot study exploring the writing abilities of students with learning disabilities. Journal of International Special Needs Education, 19(1), 15-24. doi: 10.9782/JISNE-D-15-00011.1
• *Cullen, J., Keesey, S., Alber-Morgan, S. R., & Wheaton, J. (2013). The effects of computer-assisted instruction using Kurzweil 3000 on sight word acquisition for students with mild disabilities. Education and Treatment of Children, 36(2), 87-103. doi: 10.1353/etc.2013.0017
• *Cullen, J. M., Alber-Morgan, S. R., Schnell, S. T., & Wheaton, J. E. (2014). Improving the reading skills of students with disabilities using head sprout comprehension. Remedial and Special Education, 35(6), 356- 365. doi: 10.1177/0741932514534075
• *Curcic, S. (2011). Addressing the needs of students with learning disabilities during their interaction with the web. Multicultural Education & Technology Journal, 5(2), 151-170. ISSN: 1750-497X
• Çakıroğlu, O. (2017). Özel öğrenme güçlüğüne giriş. In M. A. Melekoğlu & U. Sak (Eds.), Öğrenme güçlüğü ve özel yetenek [Learning disabilities and giftedness] (pp. 1-22). Ankara: Pegem Atıf İndeksi.
• Çoklar, A., N., Ergenekon, Y., & Odabaşı, H., F. (2018). Özel eğitimde teknoloji. In Odabaşı, H., F. (Ed.), Özel eğitim ve eğitim teknolojisi [Special Education and educational technology] (pp. 1-44). Ankara: Pegem Atıf İndeksi.
• *Decker, M. M., & Buggey, T. (2014). Using video self- and peer modelling to facilitate reading fluency in children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47(2), 167-177. doi: 10.1177/0022219412450618
• *Dimitriadi, Y. (2001). Evaluating the use of multimedia authoring with dyslexic learners: A case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(3), 265-275. doi: 10.1111/1467-8535.00197
• *Dolan, R. P., Hall, T. E., Banerjee, M., Chun, E., & Strangman, N. (2005). Applying principles of universal design to test delivery : The effect of computer-based read-aloud on the test performance of high school students with learning disabilities. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 3(7), 1-33.
• Drigas, A. S., & Ioannidou, R. E. (2013). Special education and ICTs. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 8(2), 41-47.
• *Englert, C. S., Wu, X., & Zhao, Y. (2005). Cognitive tools for writing: Scaffolding the performance of students through technology. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 20(3), 184-198. doi: 10.1111/j.1540- 5826.2005.00132.x
• *Evmenova, A. S., Regan, K., Boykin, A., Good, K., Hughes, M., MacVittie, N., … Chirinos, D. (2016). Emphasizing planning for essay writing with a computer-based graphic organizer. Exceptional Children, 82(2), 170-191. doi: 10.1177/0014402915591697
• *Floyd, K. K., & Judge, S. L. (2012). The efficacy of assistive technology on reading comprehension for postsecondary students with learning disabilities. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 8(1), 48-64.
• *Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlet, C. L., Powell, S. R., Capizzi, A. M., & Seethaler, P. M. (2006). The effects of computer-assisted instruction on number combination skill in at-risk first graders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(5), 467-475. doi: 10.1177/00222194060390050701
• Galatis, H., & White, G. K. (2013). Mobile learning-why tablets ? Australian Council for Educational Research, 1(1), 1-13.
• *Gentry, J. E., & Lindsey, P. (2008). The impact of assistive technology on vocabulary acquisition of a middle school student with learning disabilities and limited English proficiency: A descriptive case study analysis. Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals, 63-93.
• *Hall, T. E., Cohen, N., Vue, G., & Ganley, P. (2015). Addressing learning disabilities with UDL and technology: Strategic reader. Learning Disability Quarterly, 38(2), 72-83. doi: 10.1177/0731948714544375
• *Hetzroni, O. E., & Shrieber, B. (2004). Word processing as an assistive technology tool for enhancing academic outcomes of students with writing disabilities in the general classroom. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(2), 143-154. doi: 10.1177/00222194040370020501
• *Higgins, E. L., & Raskind, M. H. (1995). Compensatory effectiveness of speech recognition on the written composition performance of postsecondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 18(2), 159-174. doi: 10.2307/1511202
• *Higgins, E. L., & Raskind, M. H. (2000). Speaking to read: The effects of continuous vs. discrete speech recognition systems on the reading and spelling of children with learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(1), 19-30. doi: 10.1177/016264340001500102
• *Huscroft-D’Angelo, J., Higgins, K. N., & Crawford, L. L. (2014). A descriptive study examining the impact of digital writing environments on communication and mathematical reasoning for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 20(4), 177-188. doi: 10.18666/LDMJ-2014- V20-I4-6146
• *Irish, C. (2002). Using peg- and keyword mnemonics and computer-assisted instruction to enhance basic multiplication performance in elementary students with learning and cognitive disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 17(4), 29-40. doi: 10.1177/016264340201700403
• Jones, A., Issroff, K., & Scanlon, E. (2006). Affective factors in learning with mobile devices. Big issues in mobile learning: A report of a workshop by the Kaleidoscope Network of Excellence Mobile Learning Initiative (pp. 15-20). Nottingham: Learning Sciences Research Institute,University of Nottingham.
• Kaur, D., Koval, A., & Chaney, H. (2017). Potential of using iPad as a supplement to teach math to students with learning disabilities. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 3(1), 114-121.
• *Kennedy, M. J., Deshler, D. D., & Lloyd, J. W. (2015). Effects of multimedia vocabulary instruction on adolescents with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(1), 22-38. doi: 10.1177/0022219413487406
• *Kennedy, M. J., Thomas, C. N., Meyer, J. P., Alves, K. D., & Lloyd, J. W. (2014). Using evidence-based multimedia to improve vocabulary performance of adolescents with LD: A UDL approach. Learning Disability Quarterly, 37(2), 71-86. doi: 10.1177/0731948713507262
• *Keyes, S. E., Cartledge, G., Gibson Jr., L., & Robinson-Ervin, P. (2016). Programming for generalization of oral reading fluency using computer-assisted instruction and changing fluency criteria. Education and Treatment of Children, 39(2), 141-172.
• King-Sears, M. E., & Evmenova, A. S. (2007). Premises, principles, and processes for integrating technology into instruction. Teaching Exceptional Children, 40(1), 6-14. doi: 10.1177/004005990704000101
• *Klemes, J., Epstein, A., Zuker, M., Grinberg, N., & Ilovitch, T. (2006). An assistive computerized learning environment for distance learning students with learning disabilities. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 21(1), 19-32. doi: 10.1080/02680510500468062
• Koscinski, S. T., & Gast, D. L. (1993). Computer-assisted instruction with constant time delay to teach multiplication facts to students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 8(3), 157-168.
• *Lange, A. A., Mulhern, G., & Wylie, J. (2009). Proofreading using an assistive software homophone tool: Compensatory and remedial effects on the literacy skills of students with reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(4), 322-335. doi: 10.1177/0022219408331035
• *Leh, J. M., & Jitendra, A. K. (2013). Effects of computer-mediated versus teacher-mediated instruction on the mathematical word problem-solving performance of third-grade students with mathematical difficulties. Learning Disability Quarterly, 36(2), 68-79. doi: 10.1177/0731948712461447
• Lin, Y. L., Chen, M. C., Wu, T. F., & Yeh, Y. M. (2008). The effectiveness of a pedagogical agent-based learning system for teaching word recognition to children with moderate mental retardation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(4), 715-720. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00747.x
• Lyon, G. R., Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2003). A definition of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 1-15. doi: 10.1007/s11881-003-0001-9
• *Meyer, N. K., & Bouck, E. C. (2014). The Impact of text-to-speech on expository reading for adolescents with LD. Journal of Special Education Technology, 29(1), 21-33. doi: 10.1177/016264341402900102
• Miles, M, B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı [Ministry of National Education] (2010). Okullarımızda neden nasıl niçin kaynaştırma : Yönetici-öğretmen-aile klavuzu [How and Why inclusion in our schools: Manager-teacher-family guide]. (1. baskı). Ankara: Milli Eğitim Basımevi.
• Mohammed, A. A., & Kanpolat, Y. E. (2010). Effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction on enhancing the classification skill in second-graders at risk for learning disabilities. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 8(3), 1115-1130.
• National Association of Special Education Teachers (2005). Characteristics of children with learning disabilities. National Association of Special Education Teachers (NASET) LD Report. Retrieved from https://www.naset.org/fileadmin/user_upload/LD_Report/Issue__3_LD_Report_Characteristic_of_LD.pdf
• *Nelson, L. M., & Reynolds, T. W. (2015). Speech recognition, disability, and college composition. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 28(2), 181-197.
• *Niedo, J., Lee, Y. L., Breznitz, Z., & Berninger, V. W. (2014). Computerized silent reading rate and strategy instruction for fourth graders at risk in silent reading rate. Learning Disability Quarterly, 37(2), 100-110. doi: 10.1177/0731948713507263
• *Nordness, P. D., Haverkost, A., & Volberding, A. (2011). An examination of hand-held computer-assisted instruction on subtraction skills for second grade students with learning and behavioral disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 26(4), 15-24. doi: 10.1177/016264341102600402
• *Papadima-Sophocleous, S., & Charalambous, M. (2014). Impact of ipod touch-supported repeated reading on the english oral reading fluency of L2 students with specific learning difficulties. The EUROCALL Review, 22(1), 47-58. doi: 10.4995/eurocall.2014.3639
• Price, G. R., & Ansari, D. (2013). Dyscalculia : Characteristics , causes, and treatments. Numeracy, 6(1), 1-16. doi: 10.5038/1936-4660.6.1.2
• *Raskind, M. H., & Higgins, E. L. (1999). Speaking to read: The effects of speech recognition technology on the reading and spelling performance of children with learning disabilities. Annals of Dyslexia, 49, 251-281. doi: 10.1007/s11881-999-0026-9
• *Regan, K., Berkeley, S., Hughes, M., & Kirby, S. (2014). Effects of computer-assisted instruction for struggling elementary readers with disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 48(2), 106-119. doi: 10.1177/0022466913497261
• Shiah, R. L., Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., & Mushinski Fulk, B. J. (1994). The effects of computer-assisted instruction on the mathematical problem solving of students with learning disabilities. Exceptionality, 5(3), 131-161. doi: 10.1207/s15327035ex0503_2
• *Satsangi, R., & Bouck, E. C. (2015). Using virtual manipulative instruction to teach the concepts of area and perimeter to secondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 38(3), 174-186. doi: 10.1177/0731948714550101
• *Satsangi, R., Bouck, E. C., Taber-Doughty, T., Bofferding, L., & Roberts, C. A. (2016). Comparing the effectiveness of virtual and concrete manipulatives to teach algebra to secondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 39(4), 240-253. doi: 10.1177/0731948716649754
• *Scheeler, M. C., Macluckie, M., & Albright, K. (2010). Effects of immediate feedback delivered by peer tutors on the oral presentation skills of adolescents with learning disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 31(2), 77-86. doi: 10.1177/0741932508327458
• *Seo, Y. J., & Bryant, D. (2012). Multimedia CAI program for students with mathematics difficulties. Remedial and Special Education, 33(4), 217-225. doi: 10.1177/0741932510383322
• *Seo, Y. J., & Woo, H. (2010). The identification, implementation, and evaluation of critical user interface design features of computer-assisted instruction programs in mathematics for students with learning disabilities. Computers and Education, 55(1), 363-377. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.002
• Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2005). Dyslexia (specific reading disability). Biological Psychiatry, 57(11), 1301-1309. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.01.043
• *Shin, M., & Bryant, D. P. (2017). Improving the fraction word problem solving of students with mathematics learning disabilities: Interactive computer application. Remedial and Special Education, 38(2), 76-86. doi: 10.1177/0741932516669052
• *Silió, M. C., & Barbetta, P. M. (2010). The effects of word prediction and text-to-speech technologies on the narrative writing skills of hispanic students with specific learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 25(4), 17-32. doi: 10.1177/016264341002500402
• *Silver-Pacuilla, H. (2006). Access and benefits: Assistive technology in adult literacy. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 50(2), 114-125. doi: 10.1598/JAAL.50.2.4
• *Skiada, R., Soroniati, E., Gardeli, A., & Zissis, D. (2014). EasyLexia 2.0: Redesigning our mobile application for children with learning difficulties. Themes in Science and Technology Education, 7(2), 119-135.
• *Stetter, M. E., & Hughes, M. T. (2011). Computer assisted instruction to promote comprehension in students with learning disabilities. International Journal of Special Education, 26(1), 88-100.
• *Stultz, S. L. (2013). The effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction for teaching mathematics to students with specific learning disability. The Journal of Special Education Apprenticeship, 2(2), 1-13. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/josea/vol2/iss2/7
• *Tanners, A., McDougall, D., Skouge, J., & Narkon, D. (2012). Comprehension and time expended for a doctoral student with a learning disability when reading with and without an accommodation. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 18(1), 3-10.
• *Tariq, R., & Latif, S. (2016). A mobile application to improve the learning performance of dyslexic children with writing difficulties. Educational Technology & Society, 19(4), 151-166. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.19.4.151
• Topbaş, S. (1997). Öğrenme güçlüğü gözlenenler. In S. Eripek (Ed), Özel eğitim ilköğretim öğretmenliği lisans tamamlama programı [Special education primary education undergraduate program] (pp. 54–64).
• Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu [Turkish Statistical Institute] (2002). Özürlülük oranı [Disability rate]. Retrieved from http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreTablo.do?alt_id=1017
• *Twyman, T., & Tindal, G. (2006). Using a computer-adapted , conceptually based history text to increase comprehension and problem-solving skills of students with disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 21(2), 5-16. doi: 10.1177/016264340602100201
• U.S. Department of Education (2016). 38th annual report to congress on the implementation of the individuals with disabilities education act. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED572027.pdf
• Vaughn, S., & Linan-Thompson, S. (2003). What is special about special education for students with learning disabilities? The Journal of Special Education, 37(3), 140-147. doi: 10.1177/00224669030370030301
• *Wade, E., Boon, R. T., & Spencer, V. G. (2010). Use of Kidspiration© software to enhance the reading comprehension of story grammar components for elementary-age students with specific learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8(2), 31-41.
• *White, D. H., & Robertson, L. (2015). Implementing assistive technologies: A study on co-learning in the Canadian elementary school context. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 1268-1275. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.003
• *Williams, S. C. (2002). How speech-feedback and word-prediction software can help students write. Teaching Exceptional Children, 34(3), 72-78. doi: 10.1177/004005990203400310
• World Health Organization (2015). Disabilities and rehabilitation. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs352/en/
• *Xin, J. F., & Rieth, H. (2001). Video-assisted vocabulary instruction for elementary school students with learning disabilities. Information Technology in Childhood Education, 1, 87-103. ISSN 1522-8185
• *Xin, Y. P., Tzur, R., Hord, C., Liu, J., Park, J. Y., & Si, L. (2017). An intelligent tutor-assisted mathematics intervention program for students with learning difficulties. Learning Disability Quarterly, 40(1), 4-16. doi: 10.1177/0731948716648740
• *Zhang, Y. (2000). Technology and the writing skills of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(4), 467-478. doi: 10.1080/08886504.2000.10782292