Grup Çalışması Becerileri Ölçeği'nin Türkçeye Uyarlanması

Bu araştırmanın amacı, Cumming vd. (2014) tarafından geliştirilen Grup Çalışması Becerileri Ölçeği’ni Türkçeye uyarlamaktır. Ölçeğin dilsel eş değerlik çalışmasını yapmak amacıyla birinci araştırma grubu İngilizce öğretmenliği programında öğrenim gören 70 öğretmen adayından oluşmuştur. Ölçeğin yapı geçerliğini belirlemek amacıyla oluşturulan ikinci araştırma grubunda, bir devlet üniversitesinin eğitim fakültesinin çeşitli programlarında öğrenim gören 509 öğrenci yer almaktadır. Ölçeğin orijinali iki faktör ve 10 maddeden oluşmaktadır. Dilsel eş değerliği sağlanan ölçeğin yapı geçerliğini belirlemek için ise açımlayıcı ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizi kullanılmıştır. Açımlayıcı faktör analizine göre ölçeğin orijinali ile uyumlu olarak 10 maddeden oluşan iki faktörlü yapı oluşmuş ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ile de doğrulanmıştır. Ölçeğin güvenirliği için ise iç tutarlılık katsayıları Cronbach alfa .80 ve Spearman-Brown .74 olarak hesaplanmıştır. Elde edilen güvenirlik katsayıları da ölçeğin güvenilir sonuçlar ürettiğini göstermektedir.

Turkish Adaptation of Groupwork Skills Questionnaire

The aim of this study is to adapt Groupwork Skills Questionnaire developed by Cumming et al. (2014) into Turkish culture. The first study group was consisted of 70 prospective teachers studying at English Language Teaching Department to implement linguistic equivalence of the scale. The second study group was consisted of 509 students studying at different departments in a public university for construct validity. The original version of the scale has two factors and 10 items. The scale, which had linguistic equivalence, was analyzed with exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis for construct validity. According to exploratory factor analysis, 10 items two-factor construct was formed like the original one, and it was confirmed with confirmatory factor analysis. For the reliability of the scale, internal consistency coefficients were calculated as Cronbach Alpha .80 and Spearman-Brown .74. The reliability coefficients have also showed that the scale has been reliable.

PDF

___

Aggarwal, P., & O’Brien, C. L. (2008). Social loafing on group projects: Structural antecedents and effect on student satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Education, 30, 255-264. doi:10.1177/0273475308322283
Albayrak, E., Ayas, T., & Horzum, M. B. (2012). Üniversite öğrencilerinin grup çalışmalarında görevi ihmal etme ve grup çalışmalarına yatkınlıklarının incelenmesi. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 23, 335-353.
Burdett, J. (2003). Making groups work: University students’ perceptions. International Education Journal, 4, 177-191.
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2011). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı (14. baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
Byrne, B. M., & Campbell, T. L. (1999). Cross-cultural comparisons and the presumption of equivalent measurement and theoretical structure: A look beneath the surface. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30(4), 555-574.
Chang, H-T., & Lee, A.T. (2001). The relationship between psychological safety, organisation context support and team learning behaviour in Taiwan. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 5(2), 185-192.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.
Cumming, J. (2010). Student-initiated group management strategies for more effective and enjoyable groupwork experiences. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport, & Tourism Education 9. doi:10.3794/johlste.92.284
Cumming, J., Woodcock, C., Cooley, S. J., Holland, M. J. G., & Burns, V. E. (2014). Development and validation of the groupwork skills questionnaire (GSQ) for higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(7), 988-1001. doi:10.1080/02602938.2014.957642
Çırak-Kurt, S., & Çokluk-Bökeoğlu, Ö. (2017, Ekim). Grup Çalışmasına Katkı Ölçeği’nin Türk Kültürüne uyarlanması. 5. Uluslararası Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Kongresi’nde sunulan bildiri, Muğla.
Falk, A. (2012). Enhancing the team experience in service learning courses. Journal for Civic Commitment, 18, 1-16. http://scholarworks.merrimack.edu/soe_facpub/1.
Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd edition). London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Gorsuch, R. L. (1974). Factor analysis. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company.
Hobson, C. J., Strupeck, S., Griffin, A., Szostek, J., & Rominger, A. S. (2014). Teaching MBA students teamwork and team leadership skills: An empirical evaluation of a classroom educational program. American Journal of Business Education 7(3), 191-212.
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M.R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Journal of Business Research Methods, 6, 53–60.
Howe, C., Tolmie, A., Thurston, A., Topping, K., Christie, D., Livingston, K., Jessiman, E., & Donaldson, C. (2007). Group work in elementary science: Towards organisational principles for supporting pupil learning. Learning and Instruction, 17, 549-563.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., and Smith, K. A. (1998). Cooperative learning returns to college: What evidence is there that it works? Change, 30(4), 27-35. doi:10.1080/ 00091389809602629.
Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31-36.
Karakuş-Yılmaz, T., Baydaş, Ö., ve Kokoç, M. (2017). Grup Çalışması Ortamlarına Karşı Öğrenci Tutumları Ölçeğinin (GÇOÖT) Türkçeye uyarlanması. İlköğretim Online, 16 (3), 1049-1057. doi:10.17051/ilkonline.2017.330241.
Kirschner, F., Paas, F., and Kirschner, P. A. (2009a). A cognitive load approach to collaborative learning: United brains for complex tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 21(1), 31-42.
McCorkle, D. E., Reardon, J., Alexander, J. F., Kling, N. D., Harris, R. C., and Iyer, R. V. (1999). Undergraduate marketing students, group projects, and teamwork: The good, the bad, and the ugly? Journal of Marketing Education 21, 106-117. doi:10.1177/ 027347539921200.
Macgowan, M. J. (2008). A guide to evidence-based group work. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mercer, N. (1995). The guided construction of knowledge: Talk amongst teachers and learners. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Mercer, N. (1996). The quality of talk in children’s collaborative activity in the classroom. Learning and Instruction, 6, 359-377.
Murray, M. H., and Lonne, B. (2006). An innovative use of the web to build graduate team skills. Teaching in Higher Education, 1(11), 63-77.
Mutch, A. (1998). Employability of learning? Groupwork in higher education. Education and Training, 40, 50-56. doi:10.1108/00400919810206884.
Nunnally, J., and Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Pallant, J. (2005). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows version 12 (2nd ed.). Crows Nest NSW, Australia: Allen and Unwin.
Scott-Ladd, B., and Chan, C. C. A. (2008). Using action research to teach students to manage team learning and improve teamwork satisfaction. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9, 231-248. doi:10.1177/1469787408095848.
Stevens, M. J., and Campion. M. A. (1994). The knowledge, skill, and ability requirements for teamwork: Implications for human resource management. Journal of Management, 20(2), 503-530. doi:10.1177/014920639402000210.
Summers, J. J., Beretvas, S. N., Svinicki, M. D., and Gorin, J. S. (2005). Evaluating collaborative learning and community. The Journal of Experimental Education, 73, 165-188.
Tabachnick, B. G., and Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education Inc.
Volet, S., and Mansfield, C. (2006) Group work at university: Significance of personal goals in the regulation strategies of students with positive and negative appraisals, Higher Education Research and Development, 25(4), 341-356, doi:10.1080/07294360600947301.
Wolters, C. A. (2003). Regulation of motivation: Evaluating an underemphasized aspect of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(4), 189-205.