TORAKS CERRAHİSİ İÇİN UYGULANAN EPİDURAL LOKAL ANESTEZİKLERİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI: BUPİVAKAİN İLE LEVOBUPİVAKAİN

Amaç: Göğüs cerrahisinin pre, intra ve postoperatif dönemlerinde uygulanan epidural bupivakain ve levobupivakainin analjezik, hemodinamik ve yan etkilerinin karşılaştırılmasıdır. Gereç ve yöntem: Elektif torakotomi uygulanan 30 eriflkin hasta torakal epidural bupivakain veya levobupivakain alan iki gruba ayrıldı. Hem cerrahi insizyondan 15 dk önce, hem de toraks kapatılırken Grup I’e bupivakain, Grup II’ye levobupivakain bolusları verildi. Fentanil ile bupivakain ya da levobupivakain kombine edilerek yoğun bakım ünitesinde sürekli epidural infüzyonla verildi. Ayrıca bütün hastalara hasta kontrollü analjezi cihazıyla iv morfin bolusu verildi. Dirençli omuz ağrısı olduğunda diklofenak sodyum uygulandı. Hemodinamik veriler, ağrı skorları ve yan etkiler preoperatif dönemden epidural infüzyonun 24. saatine kadar kaydedildi. Bulgular: Ortalama arter basıncı, kalp atım hızı, ağrı skorları ve morfin tüketiminde gruplar aras›ndaki farklılık anlamlı değildi (p > 0.05). Her iki grup içinde postoperatif dönemde bazal de¤erlere göre vizüel analog skaladaki azalma istatistiksel olarak anlaml› bulundu (p < 0.05). Ciddi bir yan etki ile karşılaşılmadı. Sonuç: Bupivakain ve levobupivakain, göğüs cerrahisi için analjezi, hemodinami ve yan etkiler yönünden benzer bulundu. Torakal epidural fentanil ile kombine edildiğinde levobupivakainin sürekli infüzyonu bupivakaine iyi bir alternatif olabilir.

A COMPARISON OF EPIDURAL LOCAL ANESTHETICS ADMINISTERED FOR THORACIC SURGERY: BUPIVACAINE VERSUS LEVOBUPIVACAINE

Aim: We aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy, hemodynamia, and side effects of epidural bupivacaine and levobupivacaine given preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative periods of thoracic surgery. Materials and methods: Thirty adult patients undergoing elective thoracotomy were divided into two groups receiving thoracal epidural bupivacaine or levobupivacaine. Group I received bupivacaine, whereas Group II received levobupivacaine boluses both 15 min before surgical incision and during the closure of thorax. Continuous epidural infusion of fentanyl combined with either bupivacaine or levobupivacaine was given in intensive care unit. In addition, all patients received iv morphine bolus with patient controlled analgesia device. If shoulder pain persisted, diclofenac sodium was administered. Hemodynamic data, pain scores, and side effects were recorded from preoperative period to 24th hr of epidural infusion. Results: The difference in mean arterial pressures, heart rates, pain scores, and morphine consumptions were not significant between the groups (p > 0.05). Decrease in visual analog scale was statistically significant compared to the basal values within the groups during the postoperative period (p < 0.05). There were no serious side effects. Conclusion: Bupivacaine and levobupivacaine were found to be comparable in the analgesia, hemodynamia, and side effects for thoracic surgery. In combination with thoracic epidural fentanyl, a continuous infusion of levobupivacaine may be considered as a good alternative to bupivacaine.

___

  • Tiippana E, Nilsson E, Kalso E. Post-thoracotomy pain after thoracic epidural analgesia: a prospective follow-up study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2003; 47: 433-438.
  • Yegin A, Erdogan A, Kayacan N, Karsli B. Early postoperative pain management after thoracic surgery; pre- and postoperative versus postoperative epidural analgesia: a randomized study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2003; 24: 420-424.
  • Debreceni G, Molnár Z, Szélig L, Molnár TF. Continuous epidural or intercostal analgesia following thoracotomy: a prospective randomized double-blind clinical trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2003; 47: 1091-1095.
  • Sandler AN. Post-thoracotomy analgesia and perioperative outcome. Minerva Anestesiol 1999; 65: 267-274.
  • Foster RH, Markham A. Levobupivacaine: a review of its pharmacology and use as a local anesthetic. Drugs 2000; 59: 551579.
  • Ganesh A, Adzick NS, Foster T, Cucchiaro G. Efficacy of addition of fentanyl to epidural bupivacaine on postoperative analgesia after thoracotomy for lung resection in infants. Anesthesiology 2008; 109: 890-894.
  • Behera BK, Puri GD, Ghai B. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia with fentanyl and bupivacaine provides better analgesia than intravenous morphine patient-controlled analgesia for early thoracotomy pain. J Postgrad Med 2008; 54: 86-90.
  • Rock P, Rich PB. Postoperative pulmonary complications. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2003; 16: 123-131.
  • De Cosmo G, Aceto P, Gualtieri E, Congedo E. Analgesia in thoracic surgey: review. Minerva Anestesiol 2009; 75: 393-400.
  • Akarsu T. Levobupivacaine plus fentanyl versus bupivacaine plus fentanyl in epidural anesthesia for lumbar disc surgery. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci 2011; 31: 100-108.
  • Block BM, Liu SS, Rowlingson AJ, Cowan AR, Cowan JAJr, Wu CL. Efficacy of postoperative epidural analgesia: a meta-analysis. JAMA2003; 290 : 2455-2463.
  • Wheatley RG, Schug SA, Watson D. Safety and efficacy of postoperative epidural analgesia. Br J Anaesth 2001; 87: 47-61.
  • Dickenson AH. Spinal cord pharmacology of pain. Br J Anaesth 1995; 75: 193-200.
  • Tan CN, Guha A, Scawn ND, Pennefather SH, Russell GN. Optimal concentration of epidural fentanyl in bupivicaine 0,1% after thoracotomy. Br J Anaesth 2004; 92: 670-674.
  • Sanjay OP, Kadam VR, Menezes J, Prashanth P, Tauro DI. Thoracic epidural infusions for post thoracotomy pain relief: a clinical study to compare the efficacy of fentanyl-bupivacaine mixtures versus fentanyl alone. Ind J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003; 19: 113-118.
  • De Cosmo G, Mascia A, Clemente A, Congedo E, Aceto P. Use of levobupivacaine for the treatment of postoperative pain after thoracotomies. Minerva Anesthesiol 2005; 71: 347-351.
  • Ong CK, Lirk P, Seymour RA, Jenkins BJ. The efficacy of preemptive analgesia for acute postoperative pain management: a meta-analysis. Anesth Analg 2005; 100:757-773.
  • Şentürk M, Özcan PE, Talu GK, et al. The effects of three different analgesia techniques on long-term postthoracotomy pain. Anesth Analg 2002; 94: 11-15.
  • Mendola C, Ferrante D, Oldani E, et al. Thoracic epidural analgesia in post-thoracotomy patients: comparison of three different concentrations of levobupivacaine and sufentanil. Br J Anaesth 2009; 102: 418-423.
  • De Cosmo G, Congedo E, Lai C, et al. Ropivacaine vs. levobupivacaine combined with sufentanil for epidural analgesia after lung surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2008; 25: 1020-1025.
  • Cücü O, Karaca P, Enç Y, ve ark. Comprasion of thoracic paravertebral and epidural blocks for pain relief after thoracotomy. Turkish J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006; 14: 42-47.
  • Cox CR, Faccenda KA, Gilhooly C, Bannister J, Scott NB, Morrison LM. Extradural S(-)-bupivacaine: comparison with racemic RS-bupivacaine. Br J Anaesth 1998; 80: 289-293.
  • Berrisford RG, Sabanathan SS, Mearns AJ, Bickford-Smith PJ. Pulmonary complications after lung resection: the effect of continuous extra-pleural intercostal nerve block. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1990; 4: 407-411.
  • Gerner P. Postthoracotomy pain management problems. Anesthesiol Clin 2008; 26: 355-367.
  • Burlacu CL, Buggy DJ. Update on local anesthetics: focus on levobupivacaine. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2008; 4: 381-392.
  • Macias A, Monedero P, Adame M, Torre W, Fidalgo I, Hidalgo F. Arandomized, double-blinded comparasion of thoracic epidural ropivacaine, ropivacaine/fentanyl, or bupivacaine/fentanyl for postthoracotomy analgesia. Anesth Analg 2002; 95: 1344-1350.
Anestezi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0578
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1993
  • Yayıncı: Betül Kartal
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

KOLONOSKOPİ YAPILAN HASTALARDA PROPOFOL-KETAMİN VE MİDAZOLAM-KETAMİNİN ETKİLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

ÖZLEM SAĞIR, Sabri ÖZASLAN, İsmail YAMAN, H. Fisun DEMİR, Ahmet KÖROĞLU

TORAKS CERRAHİSİ İÇİN UYGULANAN EPİDURAL LOKAL ANESTEZİKLERİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI: BUPİVAKAİN İLE LEVOBUPİVAKAİN

Eser ŞAVKILIOĞLU, Mehtap TUNÇ, Şaziye ŞAHİN, Hilal SAZAK, Serdar KOKULU

EPİDURAL KATETER KOPMASI

Zeliha KORKMAZ DİŞLİ, Arzu İTİLLİ, Barış CÖMERT

ALT VE ÜST EKSTREMİTE CERRAHİLERİNDE ANESTEZİ DENEYİMLERİMİZ: SON ALTI YILIN RETROSPEKTİF ANALİZİ

MEHMET AKSOY, İLKER İNCE, ALİ AHISKALIOĞLU, İbrahim TÖR, Ayşenur DOSTBİL, Hacı Ahmet ALICI, Mine GÜRSAÇ ÇELİK

CORNELİA DE LANGE SENDROMU VE SEDASYON

METİN ALKAN, GÜLAY KİP, Şaziye ŞAHİN, Mustafa Sancar ATAÇ, Dilek KALAYCI

KONJENİTAL KALP CERRAHİSİNDE PERİFERİK VENÖZ BASINÇ SANTRAL VENÖZ BASINCA ALTERNATİF OLABİLİR Mİ?

Onur IŞIK, Cengiz ŞAHUTOĞLU, Zeliha KORKMAZ DİŞLİ, İsmail AYTAÇ, Olcay Murat DİŞLİ, ALİ KUTSAL

GENEL ANESTEZİ SONRASI GELİŞEN NEGATİF BASINÇ AKCİĞER ÖDEMİ

Pınar ÜŞAR, Aysun Afife KAR, Jale MARAL, Seyhan YALAZ, Hakan ÖZTÜRK

SKALP BLOĞUN YENİDEN GÖZDEN GEÇİRİLMESİ

Merve YAZICI KARA, KEZİBAN SANEM ÇAKAR TURHAN, Feyhan ÖKTEN

A COMPARISON OF EPIDURAL LOCAL ANESTHETICS ADMINISTERED FOR THORACIC SURGERY: BUPIVACAINE VERSUS LEVOBUPIVACAINE

Serdar KOKULU, Mehtap TUNÇ, Hilal SAZAK, Şaziye ŞAHİN, Eser ŞAVKILIOĞLU

VENTİLATÖR İLİŞKİLİ PNÖMONİNİN MORTALİTE TAHMİNİNDE SKORLAMA SİSTEMLERİ VE BİYOBELİRTEÇLERİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Işıl KÖSE, Çiler ZİNCİRCİOĞLU, Gürsel ERSAN, Lütfiye KUZUCU, ŞÜKRAN KÖSE