Tüketicilerin internet bankacılığını benimsemesini etkileyen faktörlerin yapısal eşitlik modeli ile araştırılması

Son dönemlerin en önemli teknolojik gelişmelerinden biri olan internet sayesinde bankalar, pek çok hizmeti zaman ve mekan sınırlaması olmadan müşterilerine sunma imkanına kavuşmuştur. Ancak hala pek çok banka müşterisinin farklı nedenlerle internet banka- cılığını tercih etmemiş olması, müşterilerin internet bankacılığını benimsemesini etkileyen faktörlerin araştırılmasının önemini artırmaktadır. Bu çalışma- da bireysel bankacılık müşterilerinin internet ban- kacılığını benimsemesini etkileyen faktörler, Teknoloji Kabul Modeli temel alınarak Lisrel 8,51 programında yapısal eşitlik modeli ile araştırılmıştır. Çalışma mo- deli, Teknoloji Kabul Modeline algılanan risk değiş- keni eklenerek oluşturulmuştur. Çalışma modelinin yapısal eşitlik modellemesi ile yapılan analizi sonu- cunda; tüketicilerin internet bankacılığına ilişkin kullanım kolaylığı ve fayda algılarının, internet bankacılığını kullanma niyetlerine olan etkisinin in- ternet bankacılığına dönük tutumlarının aracılığı ile gerçekleştiği sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Ayrıca çalışmada tüketicilerin internet bankacılığına ilişkin algıladık- ları riskin internet bankacılığını kullanım niyetlerini hem internet bankacılığına yönelik tutumları aracılı- ğıyla hem de doğrudan etkilediği tespit edilmiştir. Ça- lışmada elde edilen bulgular doğrultusunda internet bankacılığının daha fazla tüketici tarafından benim- senmesine yönelik öneriler sunulmuştur.

Evaluating the factors affecting the ınternet banking adoption of consumers using structural equation model

Banks find an opportunity to provide several services without time and place limitation by means of internet one of the most important technological developments. But the fact that many bank customers haven’t prefer- red internet banking yet due to the different reasons increases the significance of investigating the factors as to the internet banking adoption of bank customers. In this study, the individual bank customers’ internet ban- king adoption has been analyzed by structural equation model based upon the Technology Acceptance Model. The model has been generated by adding the perceived risk variable. According to the results of analysis, it has been seen that the ease of use and utility percep- tion of bank customers depend on their attitudes and intentions toward internet banking. Also, the findings have showed that the risk which bank customers per- ceive toward internet banking affects their intentions of use both directly and by way of their attitudes toward internet banking. In the light of the obtained findings, several suggestions have been made for adopting the in- ternet banking by much more customers.

___

  • Akça, Y. ve Özer, G. (2012). Teknoloji Kabul Modeli- nin Kurumsal Kaynak Planlaması Uygulamaların- da Kullanılması. Business and Economics Research Journal, 3(2): 79-96.
  • Alsajjan, B., (2008). Internet Banking Acceptance Model Across Cultures: The Case of England and Saudi Arabia, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Brunel Bussiness School, Brunel University, UK. Banerjee, M. (2009). Internet Banking: An Interaction Building Channel for Bank-Customer Relationships.In Oliver, D & Associates (Ed.), Self Service In The Internet Age: Expectations and Experiences, Springer Science, Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 195-212.
  • Chen, S. C., Li, S. H. and Li, C. Y. (2011). Recent Re- lated Research Technology Acceptance Model: A Literature Review. Australian Journal of Business and Management Research, 1(9): 124-127.
  • Chuttur, M. (2009). Overview of the Technology Ac- ceptance Model: Origins Developments and Fu- ture Directions. Indiana University, USA, Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, ISSN 1535-6078, 9 (37).
  • Ciciretti, R., Hasan, I. and Zazzara, C. (2009). Do In- ternet Activities Add Value? Evidence From the Traditional Banks. Journal of Financial Services Re- searches, 35(1): 81-98. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi Crespo, Á. H., del Bosque, I. R. and de los Salmones Sánchez, M. M. G. (2009).The Influence Of Per- ceived Risk On Internet Shopping Behavior: A Multidimensional Perspective. Journal of Risk Re- search, 12(2): 259 -277
  • Davis, F.,. D. (1986). A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Informa- tion Systems: Theory and Results. Ph.D. Thesis, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Insti- tute of Technology. DeYoung, R. (2005). The Performance of Interest- Based Business Models: Evidence From The Bank- ing Industry. The Journal of Business, 78(3):893- 948.
  • Dilalla, L., F. (2000). Structural Equation Modeling: Uses and Issues, In H. E. A. Tinsley and S. R. Brown (Eds.), Handbook of Applied Multivariate Statistics and Mathematical Modeling, New York: Academic Press., 439-469.
  • Engel, K. S., Moosbrugger, H. and Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the Fit of Structural Equation Models: Tests of Significance and Descriptive Goodness- of-Fit Measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online,8 (2): 23 – 74.
  • Flora, D, B. and Curran, P. J. (2004). An Empirical Eva- luation of Alternative Methods of Estimation for Confirmatory Factor Analysis with Ordinal Data. Psychological Methods, 9(4): 466 – 491
  • Gefen, D., Karahanna, E. and Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM In Online Shopping: An Integra- ted Model. MIS Quarterly. 27(1): 51-90
  • Gilaninia, S., Taleghani, M., Taheri, T. and Mousavian, S., J.,(2011). Study of Effective Factors on Custo- mers Trust in Electronic Banking Services (Case Study: Melli Bank in Ardabill City), Interdicipli- nary Journal of Contemprory Research in Bussiness, Vol. 3, No. 8: 472-478.
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W., Anderson, R., Babin, B. R. and Tahtam, R. L. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings. London: Mcmillan Book Company. Hamid, M.R.A., Amin, H., Lada, S. and Ahmad, N. (2007). A Comparative analysis of Internet Ban- king in Malaysia and Thailand. Journal of Internet Business, 4: 1-19.
  • Korkmaz, T., Uygurtürk, H. ve Özdemir, R. (2010). “İnternet Bankacılığının KOBİ’ler Açısından Öne- mi: Konya Karaman, Niğde ve Aksaray İllerinde Bir Uygulama” 9. İşletmecilik Kongresi, 6-8 Mayıs 2010 Zonguldak, 467-474.
  • Lee, M. C. (2009). Factors influencing the adoption of internet banking: An integration of TAM and TPB with perceived risk and perceived benefit. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 8: 130–141.
  • Manzano, J.A., Navarre, C.L., Mafe, C. R. and Sanz- Blas, S. (2009). Key Drivers of Internet Banking Services Use. Online Information Review,. 33(4): 672-695.
  • Mcgorry, S. Y. (2000). Measurement in a Cross – Cul- tural Environment: Survey Translation Issues. Qualitative Market Research, 3 (2): 74 – 81.
  • Medyawati, H., Christiyanti, M. and Yunanto, M., (2011). E-Banking Adoption Analysis Using Tech- nology Acceptance Model (TAM): Emprical Study of Bank Customers in Bekasi City, International Conference on Innovation, Management and Ser- vice, IPEDR, Vol. 14: 91-95.
  • Mesleki Eğitim ve Öğretim Sisteminin Güçlendiril- mesi Projesi (MEGEP). (2007). “Pazarlama ve Pe- rakende-Elektronik Bankacılık”. T.C. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı, 1-48. Munusamy, J. (2012). Perceived Barriers of Innovative Banking Among Malaysian Retail Banking Cus- tomers. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 17(1), 1-15.
  • Nasri, W. and Lanouar C. (2012). Factors Affecting the Adoption of Internet Banking in Tunisia: An Inte- gration Theory of Acceptance Model and Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 23: 1-14.
  • Pala, E. ve Kartal, B. (2010). Banka Müşterilerinin İn- ternet Bankacılığı ile İlgili Tutumlarına Yönelik Bir Pilot Araştırma. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Dergisi, Cilt: 17, Sayı: 2, 2010, 43-61.
  • Park, N., Roman, R., Lee, S. and Chung, J, E. (2009). User Acceptance of Digital Library Systems in De- veloping Countries: An Application of the Tech- nology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Management, 29: 196-209.
  • Pikkarainen, T., Pikkarainen, K., Karjaluota, H. and Pahnila, S. (2004). Consumer Acceptance of Online Banking: An Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. Internet Research Journal, 14( 3): 224-235.
  • Randall, S. E., and Lomax, R. G. (2004). A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Rogers, M. (2010). Consumers’ Attıtudes, Perceıved Risk, Trust and Internet Banking Adoption in Uganda, (Unpublished Master’s thesis), Makerere University.
  • Saiz, B. S. and Pilorge, P. (2010). Understanding Cus- tomer Behavior in Retail Banking: The İmpact of the Credit Crisis Across Europe, Ernst&Young, http://www.ey.com /Publication/vwLUAssets/Un- derstanding_customer_ behavior_in_retail_bank- ing_-_February_ 2010/$FILE/EY_Understand- ing_customer_behavior_ in_ retail_banking_-_ February_2010.pdf, Erişim: 08.08.2012. Taylor, S. and Todd, P. (1995). Assessing IT Usage: The Role of Prior Experience. MIS Quarterly, 19(4): 561-570.
  • Turner, M., Kitchenham, B., Brereton, P., Charters, S. and Budgen, D. (2010). Does the Technology Ac- ceptance Model Predict Actual Use ? A Systematic Literature Review, Information and Software Tech- nology, 52: 463-479.
  • Türkiye Bankalar Birliği Raporları İnternet ve Mobil Bankacılık İstatistikleri Raporu. http://www.tbb. org.tr/tr/Banka_ve_Sektor_Bilgileri/Tum_Rapor- lar.aspx (Erişim Tarihi: 03.08.2012) Usluer, Y. K. ve Mazman, G. S. (2010). Eğitimde Yenilik- lerin Yayılımı, Kabulü ve Benimsenmesi Sürecinde Yer Alan Öğeler: Bir İçerik Analizi Çalışması. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(39): 60-74.
  • Ustasüleyman, T., Eyüboğlu, K., (2010). Bireylerin İnter- net Bankacılığını Benimsemesini Etkileyen Faktör- lerin Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli İle Belirlenmesi, BDDK Bankacılık ve Finansal Piyasalar, Cilt: 4, Sayı: 2: 11-38.
  • Zahid, N., Mujtaba, A. and Riaz, A. (2010). Consumer Acceptance of Online Banking European. Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 27: 44-52.
  • Zhao, A. L., Lloyd, S. H., Ward, P. and Goode, M. M. H. (2008). Perceived risk and Chinese consumers’ Internet Banking Services Adoption. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 26(7), 505 - 525.