Gurur ve öfke: Orhan Pamuk'un nobel ödülü ve milliyetçilik

Bu çalışma Orhan Pamuk’un Nobel Edebiyat ödülü örnek olayının -en ılımlısından/makulünden en fanatiğine/radikaline- Türk milliyetçiliği söylemlerini anlamada çok verimli bir zemin oluşturduğunu ileri sürmektedir. Türkiye’de haber medyasının, farklı milliyetçilik söylemleri aracılığıyla, Orhan Pamuk’la hem özdeşleşmeyi hem de onu ötekileştirmeyi eş zamanlı olarak gerçekleştirdiği belirtilmektedir. Pamuk’un Nobel ödülü’nün Türk basınındaki temsillerini irdeleyen bu çalışmada hem farklı ötekilik biçimlerini inşa edici hem de Türklüğü yüceltici söylemsel stratejilerin ne şekilde kullanıldığı ortaya konulmaktadır.

Pride and anger: Orhan Pamuk's nobel prize and discourses of nationalism

This study argues that Orhan Pamuk’s Nobel Prize case provides fertile ground to understand the content of Turkish nationalist discourses from moderate to fanatic/radical. This paper also asserts that Turkish news media contributes both to the feelings of otherness and/or feelings of common identification with Orhan Pamuk through different nationalisms at the same time. This study, in which the representations of the Pamuk case were examined in Turkish press, looks at the way in which discursive strategies are employed to self-glorify Turkness and to construct the forms of otherness.

___

  • Anderson, Benedict (1983). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.
  • Bauman, Zgymunt (1992). Soil, Blood and Identity, Sociological Review, 40(4): 675-701.
  • Bell, Allan (1998) The discourse structure of news stories, in Allan Bell and Peter Garrett (eds),. Approaches to Media Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 64-104.
  • Billig, Michael (1995). Banal Nationalism, London: Sage, 1997.
  • Bora, Tanıl (2003). Nationalist Discourses in Turkey, The South Atlantic Quarterly, 102:2/3: 433-451.
  • Bora, Tanıl (2002). Sunuş [Preface], in T.Bora (ed) Modern Türkiye’de Siyasi Düşünce: Milliyetçilik [Political Thinking in Modern Turkey: Nationalism]. Vol::4, İstanbul: İletişim, pp.15-22.
  • Bora, Tanıl and Can, Kemal (2004). Devlet ve Kuzgun. 1990'lardan 2000'lere MHP (Milliyetçi Hareket Partisi) [State and Raven. The NAP (Nationalist Action Party) from the 1990s to the 2000s], İstanbul: İletişim.
  • Burney, Shehla (2002). Manufacturing Nationalism: Post-September 11 Discourse in United States Media, Studies in Media & Information Literacy Education, Volume 2, Issue 2, Article Number:21.
  • Fairclough, Norman (1995) Media Discourse, London: Arnold
  • Fowler, Roger (1991). Language in the News. Discourse and Ideology in the Press. London: Routledge.
  • Göl, Ayla (2005). Imagining the Turkish Nation Through ‘Othering’ Armenians, Nations and Nationalism 11 (1), 2005, 121–139.
  • Grigoriadis, Ioannis N (2006). Upsurge Amidst Uncertainty, Nationalism in post-2004 Turkey’, SWP Research Paper, Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, German Institute for International and Security Affairs (Berlin: RP 11, October 2006).
  • Iri, Murat and Arcan, H. Esra. (2005). The Orhan Pamuk Case: How mainstream Turkish media framed his freedom of speech, Paper presented in the International Crossroads Conference, 2-23 July 2006, İstanbul.
  • Kadıoğlu,Ayşe (1996). ‘The Paradox of Turkish Nationalism and the Construction of Official Identity,’ in S. Kedourie (ed.) Turkey: Identity, Democracy, Politics. London: Frank Cass, pp. 177-93.
  • Kadıoğlu, Ayşe (1997). Sıradan Milliyetçilik: Sürekli Milliyetçilik, Varlık (1097), 2-5.
  • Koçak, Cemil (2002). Kemalist Milliyetçiliğin Bulanık Suları, pp. 37-43 in T. Bora (ed.) Modern Türkiye’de Siyasi Düşünce: Milliyetçilik, [Political Thinking in Modern Turkey: Nationalism] Vol.:4, İstanbul: İletişim.
  • Pickering, Michael (2001). Stereotyping: The Politics of Representation. Basingstoke and London: Palgrave.
  • Petersoo, Pille (2007). Reconsidering Otherness: Constructing Estonian identity, Nations and Nationalism 13 (1), 2007, pp.117–133.
  • Özkırımlı, Umut (2006). ‘Milliyetçilik Araştırması’ [A Survey of Nationalism] Tempo , April 6, 2006.
  • Renan, Ernest (1882). What is a Nation? in H. K. Bhabba (ed.) Nation and Narration. London: Routledge, 1990, pp. 8-22.
  • Triandafyllidou, Anna (1998). National Identity and the `Other,’ Ethnic and Racial Studies Vol. 21: 593-612.
  • Van Dijk, Teun (1988). News as Discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Yörük, Zafer (2002), “Politik Psişe Olarak Türk Kimliği,” T.Bora (der.) Modern Türkiye’de Siyasi Düşünce: Milliyetçilik, [Political Thinking in Modern Turkey: Nationalism] Vol.:4, İstanbul: İletişim, pp. 309-324.
  • Yumul, Arus and Özkırımlı, Umut (2000). ‘Reproducing the Nation: ‘Banal Nationalism’ in the Turkish Press,’Media, Culture & Society Vol. 22, pp.787–804.
  • INTERNET RESOURCES
  • Belge, Murat (2005). Love Me, or Leave me? The Strange Case of Orhan Pamuk,’ http://www.opendemocracy.net/content/articles/PDF/2935.pdf, October 18, 2005.
  • Davies, Elizabeth (2007). Silenced: The Nationalist War on Turkey’s Intellectuals, The Independent, March 7, 2007, http://news.independent.co.uk/europe/article2334920.ece
  • Günay, Cengiz (2006). Flags Against Fears and Uncertainities, January 12, 2007 http://www.esiweb.org/pdf/esi_turkey_tpq_id_82.pdf
Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2001
  • Yayıncı: Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi