Bir kavramsal çerçeve olarak “Avrupalılaşma”: Kapsam, gereklilik ve sınırlar

Avrupa Birliği’nin (AB) üye ve aday ülkelerin siyasi ve ekonomik yapılarına etkisi açıktır. 1990’lı yılların ortalarından itibaren Avrupalılaşma (Europeanization) kavramı ile ifade edilen sözkonusu “etki”, akademik literatürde sıklıkla kullanılan bir kavramsal çerçeve haline gelmiştir. Bu makalenin amacı; Avrupalılaşma kavramının literatürde nasıl kullanıldığını, kapsamını, kullanıldığı alanlar ve etki göstergelerini ortaya koyarak, kavramın gereklilik ve sınırlarını tartışmaktır. Makalede, Avrupalılaşma kavramının AB etkisini değerlendirmede önemli bir araç olduğu, ancak incelenen değişkenlerin farklı özellikleri nedeniyle çok boyutlu bir inceleme gerektirdiği savı öne sürülmektedir.

“Europeanization” As a conceptual framework: Scope, necessity and the limits

European Union (EU) has an evident impact on the member and the candidate states’ political and economic structures. This impact is expressed as “Europeanization” from the beginning of 1990s which became a fashionable term and a conceptual framework in academic literature. Aim of this article is to elaborate the Europeanization concept and its scope with its necessity and limits. In the article, it is argued that Europeanization is a useful concept to evaluate the impact of the EU; however it necessitates a multi-faceted approach for elaboration due to the different characteristics of the variables.

___

  • Agnantopoulos. A, (2006). The Europeanisation of National Foreign Policies, A Conceptual Framework and an Empirical Application in Greek Turkish Relations,, Paper presented at the 56th PSA Conference Reading, 3-6 April 2006.
  • Ash, T.G. (2007). Europe’s True Stories, Prospect Magazine, Issue 131, February 2007, p,1, http://www. fh-brandenburg.de/~brasche/EU/k7/Ash_Europes_ true_stories.pdf,erişim tarihi, 27.06.2011.
  • Aspinwall, M. Schneider, G, (2000). Same Menu, Separate Tables: The Institutionalist Turn In Political Science and the Study of European Integration, European Journal Of Political Research, 38:1-36.
  • Aydın, M. ve Açıkmeşe, S.A.(2007). Europeanization through EU conditionality: Understanding the new era in Turkish Foreign Policy, Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans, 9:3, s,263–274.
  • Bache, I. ve Marshall, A. (2004). Europeanisation and Domestic Change: A Governance Approach to Institutional Adaptation in Britain,Queen’s Papers on Europeanisation No 5.
  • Beyers, J. ve Vollaard, H. (2011). The Europeanization of consensus politics in the Low Countries Outline for a research agenda, Paper to be presented at the Biennial Conference of the European Union Studies Association, 2011, Boston, Panel; The Europeanization of Consensus Politics in the Low Countries.
  • Börzel, T. A.,(2003). Shaping and Taking EU Policies: Member States Responses to Europeanization, Queen’s Papers on Europeanization, no: 2.
  • Börzel, T.A., Risse T, (2000). When Europe Hits Home: Europeanization and Domestic Change, EUI Working Papers, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, European University Institute, RSC No: 2000/56.
  • Börzel, T.A., Risse T, (2003). Conceptualizing the Domestic Impact of Europe, , (İçinde: ed: Kevin Featherstone, Claudio M. Radaelli, The Politics Of Europeanization), Oxford University Press, Oxford, NewYork.
  • Buhari, D. (2009). Turkey-EU Relations: The Limitations of Europeanisation Studies, The Turkish Yearbook of International Relations, Vol: 40.
  • Bulmer, S. ve Radaelli, C.M. (2004). The Europeanization of National Policy?, Queen’s Papers on Europeanization. Çelebi, A. (2002). Avrupa: Halkların Siyasal Birliği, Metis Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Delanty, G. (2005). Avrupa’nın İcadı, Çev : Hüsamettin İnaç, Adres Yayınları, Ankara.
  • Diez, T. Agnantopoulos A, Kaliber A. (2005). File:Turkey, Europeanization and Civil Society:Introduction, South European Society and Politics,10:1.
  • Exadaktylos, T. Radaelli C.M., (2009). Research Design in European Studies: The Case of Europeanization, JCMS Volume 47. Number 3.
  • Ertugal, E. (2005). Europeanisation of regional policy and regional governance: The Case of Turkey, European Political Economy Review, Vol.3, No.1, pp. 18-53.
  • Featherstone, K. (2003). Introduction: In the Name of “Europe”, (İçinde: ed: Kevin Featherstone, Claudio M. Radaelli, The Politics Of Europeanization), Oxford University Press, Oxford, NewYork.
  • Featherstone, K ve Papadimitriou, D. (2008). The limits of Europeanization: reform capacity and policy conflict in Greece, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK.
  • Featherstone, K ve Kazamias, G. (2001). Introduction: Southern Europe and the Process of Europeanization (İçinde ed: K. Featherstone and G. Kazamias, Europeanization and the Southern Periphery), Frank Cass, London.
  • Gawrich, A. Melnykovska, I. Schweickert, R. (2009). Neighbourhood Europeanization Through ENPThe Case of Ukraine, KFG Working Paper, No:, Frei Universitat Berlin.
  • Goetz, K.H., (2006). Territory, Temporality and Clustered Europeanization, Political Science Series 109, Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna.
  • Goetz, K.H. Meyer-Sahling, J.H. (2008). The Europeanisation of National Political Systems: Parliaments and Executives, Living Rev. Euro. Gov., Vol. 3, (2008), No. 2. http://www.livingreviews.org/lreg- 2008-2.
  • Grabbe, H. (2003). Europeanization Goes East: Power and Uncertainty in the EU Accession Process, (İçinde: ed: Kevin Featherstone, Claudio M. Radaelli, The Politics Of Europeanization), Oxford University Press, Oxford, NewYork.
  • Gürsoy, Y. (2010). Democratization and Foreign Policy Reforms in Turkey: Europeanization of Turkish Politics?, International Journal of Legal Information, The Official Journal of the Internal Association of Law Libraries, Volume 38, Issue 2, Article 14
  • Hall, P. ve Taylor, R. (1996). Political Science and the Three Institutionalisms, Political Studies, XLIV.
  • Haverland, M. (2005). Does the EU cause domestic developments? The Problem of case selection in Europeanization Research, European Integration Online Papers (EioP) Vol: 9, No:2.
  • Howell, K. (2004). Developing Conceptualisations of Europeanization: Synthesising Methodological Approaches, Queen’s Papers on Europeanization , No 3.
  • Jupille, J. Caporaso, J.A. ve Checkel, J.T. (2003). Integrating Institutions: Rationalism, Constructivism and the Study of the European Union, Comparative Political Studies 36;7.
  • Jupille, J. Caporaso, J.A. (1999). Institutionalism and the European Union: Beyond International Relations and Comparative Politics, Annual Review of Political Sciences, No: 2.
  • Kaminska, J. (2007). New EU Members and the CFSP: Europeanization of Polish Foreign Policy, Political Perspectives 1(2).
  • Kassım, H. (2003). Meeting the Demands of EU membership: The Europeanization of National Administrative Systems, (İçinde: ed: Kevin Featherstone, Claudio M. Radaelli, The Politics Of Europeanization), Oxford University Press, Oxford, NewYork.
  • Knill, C. Lehmkuhl, D.(2002). The National Impacy of European Union Regulatory Policy: Three Europeanization Mechanisms, European Journal of Political Research 41: 255-280.
  • Koray, M. (2005). Avrupa Toplum Modeli, 2. Baskı, İmge Kitabevi Yayınları, Ankara.
  • Ladrech, R. (1994). Europeanization of Domestic Politics and Institutions: The Case of France, JCMS, Volume 32, Issue 1, 69-88.
  • Luif, P. (2003). EU Cohesion in UN General Assembly, Occasional Papers, No:49, Institute for Security Studies, December 2003.
  • Major, C, (2005). Europeanization and Foreign and Security Policy-Undermining or rescuing the nation state? Politics: 2005 Vol 25 (3), 175–190.
  • March, J. ve Olsen, J. (1984). The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life, American Political Science Review 78 (3).
  • March, J. ve Olsen J.P.(2004). The Logic of Appropriateness, Arena Working paper WP04/09 http://arena. uio.no/publications/wp04_9.PDF, erişim tarihi, 12/02/2008.
  • Miskimmon, A. (2007). Germany and the Common Foreign and Security Policy of the European Union, Between Europeanisation and National Adaptation, Palgrave Macmillan, NY.
  • Müller, P. ve Flers N.A. (2009). Applying the Concept of Europeanization to the Study of Foreign Policy: Dimensions and Mechanisms, Working Paper No. 05/2009, Institute for European Integration Research, Austrian Academy of Sciences
  • Nicolaidis, K. (2004). “We, the Peoples of Europe…” Foreign Affairs, Volume 83, No: 6.
  • Olsen, J. P. (2003). Europeanization, (İçinde: ed: Michelle Cini, European Union Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Pomorska, K. (2007). The Impact of Enlargement: Europeanization of Polish Foreign policy? Tracking Adaptation and Change in the Polish Ministry of Foreign Affairs, The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 2.
  • Putnam, R. D.(1988). Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two Level Games, International Organizations, Vol.42, No:3.
  • Radaelli, C.M (2003). Europeanization of Public Policy, (İçinde: ed: Kevin Featherstone, Claudio M. Radaelli, The Politics Of Europeanization), Oxford University Press, Oxford, NewYork.
  • Radaelli, C.M, Pasquier R. (2006). Conceptual Issues, ((İçinde: ed: Paolo Graziano, Maarten P. Vink, Europeanization, New Research Agendas), Basingstoke:Palgrave Macmillan, UK.
  • Rieker, P. (2004). Europeanization of Nordic Security, the European Union and the Changing Security Identities of the Nordic States, Cooperation and Conflict’, Vol: 39 (4).
  • Risse, T. Cowles, M.G. Caporaso, J. (2001). Europeanization and Domestic Change: Introduction, (İçinde: ed: Thomas Risse, Maria Green Cowles, James Caporaso, Transforming Europe, Europeanization and Domestic Change,Cornell University Press,Ithaca and London.
  • Sarıgil, Z. (2007). Europeanization as Institutional Change: The Case of Turkish Military, Mediterrenean Politics,12:1, 39–57.
  • Schimmelfennig, F. (2003). Costs, Commitment and Compliance: The Impact of EU Democratic Conditionality on Latvia, Slovakia and Turkey, Journal of Common Market Studies (JCMS), Vol.41, Number 3.
  • Schimmelfennig, F. (2007). Europeanization beyond Europe, Living Rev. Euro. Gov., 2, 1http://www.li�- vingreviews.org/lreg-2007.
  • Schimmelfennig, F. Sedelmeier, U. (2002). Theorizing EU Enlargement: Research Focus, Hypothesis and the State of Research, Journal of European Public Policy.
  • Sciarini, P. Fischer, A. Nicolet, S. (2004). How Europe Hits Home: evidence from the Swiss Case, Journal of European Public Policy 11:3, June
  • Sedelmeier, U. (2011). Europeanisation in New Member and Candidate States, Living Reviews in European Governance, Vol. 6, (2011), No. 1: http:// www.livingreviews.org/lreg-2011.
  • Smith,A. (2005). Ulusal Kimlik ve Avrupa’nın Birleşme Fikri, ((İçinde: ed: Peter Gowan, Perry Anderson, Avrupa Sorunu Avrupa ne, Avrupalı Kim çev: Ali Çakıroğlu), Aykırı Yayıncılık, İstanbul
  • Smith, M.E. (2000). Conforming to Europe: The domestic impact of EU foreign policy co-operation, Journal of European Public Policy, 7:4 .
  • Taraktaş, B. (2008). A Comparative Approach to Euroscepticism in Turkey and Eastern European Countries, Journal of Contemporary European Studies, Vol: 16, No: 2, ss,249-266
  • Tassinari, F. (2011). Avrupa Komşularından Neden Korkuyor, (çev: Figen Dereli), İnkılap Kitabevi, İstanbul.
  • Torreblanca, J.I. (2001). Ideas, Preferences and Institutions: Explaining the Europeanization of Spanish Foreign Policy, Arena Working Papers, no: 26.
  • Ulusoy, K. (2008). The Europeanization of Turkey and its Impact on the Cyprus Problem, Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 10:3, s. 309-329.
  • Vink, M.P ve Graziano, P. (2006). Challenges of a New Research Agenda (İçinde: ed: Paolo Graziano, Maarten P. Vink, Europeanization, New Research Agendas), Basingstoke:Palgrave Macmilla, UK.
  • Wendt, A. (1999). Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge University Press)