Ulrika Mårtensson, Abdulkader I. Tayob ve Göran Larsson’un İbn Cerîr et-Taberî’nin Târîh’ini Farklı Okuma Denemeleri

Batı ilim dünyasında İslâm tarihyazıcılığının karakterini anlamamızı kolaylaştıracak ilmî çalışmaların nicelik ve nitelik itibarıyla ciddi bir seviye kazandığını söyleyebiliriz. İlk başlarda tarihsel eleştirel yöntemle yürütülen bu araştırmalarda tartışmaların odak noktasını, İslâm tarihinin erken dönemiyle ilgili tarihî kaynakların güvenilirliği konusu teşkil ederken, son zamanlarda klasik tarih kaynaklarında yer alan rivâyetlerin sıhhati ve tarihlendirilmesinden ziyade, modern veya post-modern teorilerden hareketle haberlerin kompoze ediliş şekli ile bununla iletilmek istenen mesaja ağırlık veren edebî eleştirel yaklaşımlar öne çıkmaya başlamıştır. Ulrika Mårtensson, Abdulkader I. Tayob ve Göran Larsson’un İbn Cerîr et-Taberî’nin tarihyazıcılığı üzerine yaptıkları çalışmalar, bu türden bir çabayı temsil etmektedir. Batı ilim geleneği içinde yetişmiş her üç araştırmacının göze çarpan müşterek özelliği, Ortaçağ İslâm tarihyazıcılığının modern tarih kuramları üzerinden okunup okunamayacağını sınamak istemeleri, spesifik olarak da Taberî’nin Târîhu’l-ümem ve’l-mülûk adlı eserinin literatür değeri ile tarihte vuku bulan olaylara ilişkin bize ne söyleyebileceğini ortaya koyma amacını taşımalarıdır.

Different Attempts to Read the Historiography of Ibn Jarir al-Tabari in his Tarikh with special reference to Ulrika Mårtensson, Abdulkader I. Tayob and Göran Larsson

It would be plausible to consider that the scholarly works of the Western academic world that facilitate the understanding of the character of Islamic historiography have reached to a significant level both in the sheer magnitude of its quantity as well as its excellence of quality. At its infancy, the focus of the research field was restricted on the authenticity of historical sources regarding the early Islamic period. Subsequently, the critical-literary theory based approaches became prominent which rather than dating the time or validating the narrations in historical sources, following the modern and the postmodern theories concentrated on the forms of composition and what message is delivered through them. The works undertaken on Ibn Jarīr al-Tabarī’s historiography by Ulrika Mårtensson, Abdulkader I. Tayob and Göran Larsson represent such endeavor. The outstanding common trait of all the three Western-trained scholars is their inquiry whether or not the medieval Islamic historiography could be read through the modern history theories, and more specifically a purpose to determine what al-Tabarī’s Tarīkh al-umam wa’l-mulūk in holding its literary value could reveal to us what really happened in history.

___

  • Ahmed b. Hanbel, Ebû Abdillah Ahmed b. Muhammed. el-Müsned. thk. Şu‘ayb el-Arnaût - Âdil Mürşid. 50 Cilt. Beyrut: Müessesetu’r-risâle, ts.
  • Althusser, Louis. İdeoloji ve Devletin İdeolojik Aygıtları. çev. Alp Tümertekin. İstanbul: İthaki Yayınları, 2003.
  • Certeau, Michel de. Tarihyazımı. çev. Oğuz Adanır. İstanbul: Doğu Batı Yayınları, 2020.
  • Campopiano, Michele. “a Land Tax ʿalā l-misāḥa and muqāsama: Legal Theory and the Balance of Social Forces in Early Medieval Iraq (6th-8th Centuries C.E.)”. Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 54 (2011), 239-269.
  • Demircan, Adnan. “Tarih Üzerine Bazı Düşünceler”. Milel ve Nihal 4/3 (2007), 69-89.
  • Donner, Fred M. Narratives of Islamic Origins. Princeton: Darwin Press, 1998.
  • Donner, Fred M. “Modern Approaches to Early Islamic History”. The New Cambridge History of Islam. e.d. Chase F. Robinson. 1/625-644. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
  • Donner, Fred M. “ʿUthmān and the Rāshidūn Caliphs in Ibn ʿAsākir’s Tārīkh Madīnat Dimashq: A Study in Strategies of Compilation”. Ibn ʿAsākir and Early Islamic History. ed. James. E. Lindsay. 44-61. Princeton: The Darwin Press, 2001.
  • Duri, Abdülaziz. The Rise of Historical Writing Among the Arabs. trans. Lawrence I. Conrad. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983.
  • Goldziher, Ignaz. “Historiography in Arabic Literature”. Gesammelte Schriften. ed. and trans. Joseph De Somogyi. 3/359-394. Hildesheim: s. l., 1967-73.
  • Hibri, Tayeb. Reinterpreting Islamic Historiography: Hārūn al-Rashīd and the Narrative of the ʿAbbāsid Caliphate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
  • Hibri, Tayeb. “The Unity of Tabarī’s Chronicle”. Al-ʿUṣūr al-Wusṭā 11/1 (1999), 1-3.
  • Humphreys, Stephen. “Qurʾānic Myth and Narrative Structure in Early Islamic Historiography”. Tradition and Innovation in Late Antiquity. eds. F.M. Clover and R.S. Humphreys. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1989.
  • Hylén, Torsten. “The hand of God is over their hands (Q. 48:10): on the notion of covenant in al-Ṭabarī’s account of Karbalā”. Journal of Qur'anic Studies 18/2 (2016), 58-88.
  • Jenkins, Keith. Tarihi Yeniden Düşünürken. çev. Ayhan Şahin. Ankara: Birleşik Yayınevi, 2011.
  • Keaney, Heather. “Confronting the Caliph: ʿUthmān b. ʿAffān in Three ʿAbbāsid Chronicles”. Studia Islamica 106 (2011), 25-48.
  • Kennedy, Hugh (ed.). Al-Tabarī: A Medieval Historian and His Work. Princeton: The Darwin Press, Inc., 2008.
  • Koren, Judith - Nevo D. Nevo. “Methodological Approaches to Islamic Studies”. The Quest for the Historical Muhammad. ed. Ibn Warraq. 420-443. Amherst: Prometheus Books, 2000.
  • Larsson, Göran. “al-Tabarī on history and knowledge”. Al-Tabarī’s History, Interpretations and Challenges. ed. Hakan Rydving. 15-24. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Historia religionum 27, Stocholm, 2007.
  • Mårtensson, Ulrika. “Discourse and Historical Analysis: The Case of al-Tabarī's History of the Messengers and the Kings”. Journal of Islamic Studies 16/3 (2005), 287-331.
  • Mårtensson, Ulrika. “Discourse and Historical Analysis: The Case of al-Tabarī's History of the Messengers and the Kings”. Erişim 3 Ocak 2021. https://academic.oup.com/jis/article/16/3/287/795998. Mårtensson, Ulrika. “"It's the Economy, Stupid": Al-Tabarī’s Analysis of the Free Rider Problem in the 'Abbāsid Caliphate”. Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 54/2 (2011), 203-238.
  • Mårtensson, Ulrika. “Introduction: 'Materialist' Approaches to Islamic History”. Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 54/2 (2011), 117-131.
  • Mårtensson, Ulrika. Tabarī: Makers of Islamic Civilization. New York: I. B. Tauris, 2012.
  • Mårtensson, Ulrika. The True New Testament: Sealing the Heart's Covenant in al-Tabarī's History of the Messengers and the Kings. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, 2001.
  • Robinson, Chase F. Islamic Historiography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
  • Robinson, Chase F. “al-Tabarī”. Arabic Literary Culture 500-925. eds. Michael Cooperson&Shawkat M. Toorawa. 332-343. Detroit: Thomson, 2005.
  • Rosenthal, Franz. A History of Islamic Historiography. 2nd ed. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1968.
  • Rydving, Hakan (ed.). Al-Tabarī’s History, Interpretations and Challenges. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Historia religionum 27, Stocholm, 2007.
  • Shoshan, Boaz. The Poetics of Islamic Historiography: Deconstructing Tabarī’s History. Leiden: Brill, 2004.
  • Söylemez, Mehmet Mahfuz. “Tarih Üzerine Notlar”. Milel ve Nihal 4/3 (2007), 9-17.
  • Stefan, Sperl. “Man’s Hollow Core: Ethics and Aesthetics in Ḥadı̄th Literature and Classical Arabic Adab” [İnsanın Boş Özü: Hadis Literatüründe ve Klasik Arap Edebinde Etik ve Estetik]. çev. Suat Koca. Hitit Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 20/1 (Haziran 2020), 509-546.
  • Taberî, Ebû Ca‘fer Muhammed b. Cerîr b. Yezîd el-Âmülî, Tarihu’l-ümem ve’l-mülûk. 6 Cilt. Beyrut: Daru’l-Kutubi’l-İlmiyye, 1415/1995.
  • Taberî, Ebû Ca‘fer Muhammed b. Cerîr b. Yezîd el-Âmülî, Tarihu’t-Taberî Taberi Tarihi. çev. Cemaleddin Saylık. 4 Cilt. Ankara: Ankara Okulu Yayınları, 2018.
  • Tayob, Abdulkader I. “Tabarī on the Companions of the Prophet: Moral and Political Contours in Islamic Historical Writing”. Journal of the American Oriental Society 119/2 (1999), 203-210.
  • Tezcan, Selim. “Hayden White ve Tarih Anlatısı Sorunu”. Turkish History Education Journal 7/2 (2018), 632-661.
  • White, Hayden. “The Value of Narrativity in the Representation of Reality”. The Content of the Form: Narrative discourse and historical representation. 1-25. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1987.
  • White, Hayden. “The Historical Text as Literary Artifact”. Tropics of Discourse: Essays in cultural criticism. 81-100. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1978.