Pınar BIÇAKSIZ, Selin ŞERMET, Çağla GİRİŞ

Türk Sürücülerde Öz-Belirleyicilik ve Kontrol Odağının Kabul Edilen Otomasyon Seviyesi ile İlişkisi

Bu çalışmada Türk sürücülerinin araçtaki otomasyon sistemlerini kabul etme düzeyleri ve bunun olası yordayıcıları olan motivasyon ve bireysel farklılık değişkenleri incelenmiştir. Öz-belirleyicilik kuramı kavramları olan göreli özerklik doğrusu ve genel nedensellik yönelimleri (özerk, kontrol, kişisel olmayan yönelim) ile araçta kabul edilen otomasyon seviyesi arasındaki ilişkiler incelenmiştir. Araç sürmek için daha içsel bir motivasyon ve özerk bir yönelimin kabul edilen otomasyon seviyesiyle olumlu yönlü, dışsal motivasyon ve kişisel olmayan bir yönelimin ise olumsuz yönlü ilişki göstermesi beklenmiştir. Ayrıca genel kontrol odağı ve trafikte kontrol odağı değişkenlerinin araçta kabul edilen otomasyon seviyesi ile ilişkisi incelenmiş ve dışsal kontrol odağının araçta daha yüksek seviyede otomasyonu kabul etme ile olumlu yönlü ilişki göstermesi beklenmiştir. Analizler, yaşları 20 ile 60 arasında değişen 203 (% 49.8 kadın, % 51.2 erkek) katılımcı ile yürütülmüştür. Sonuçlar genel olarak hipotezleri destekleyen bir eğilim göstermiştir ve en güçlü ilişki trafikte kontrol odağının kader boyutuyla kabul edilen otomasyon seviyesi arasındaki pozitif korelasyon bulgusudur.

Associations of Self-Determination and Locus of Control with Accepted Level of Automation among Turkish Drivers

The present study investigated Turkish drivers’ levels of acceptance of automated driving,along with possible motivational and individual differences, and the antecedents of this acceptance.Specifically, the associations of self-determination theory constructs of the relative autonomy continuumand the general causality orientations (i.e., autonomy, control and impersonal orientations) as themotivational factors for the task of driving with the accepted level of automation were examined. A moreintrinsic motivation for driving and autonomy orientation were expected to be negatively related to theaccepted level of automation, while extrinsic motivation and an impersonal orientation were expected tobe positively related to the acceptance of automation. In addition, the relationship of the general locus ofcontrol and the traffic locus of control constructs with the accepted level of automation were investigated,and a positive relationship between an external locus of control and accepted level of automation wasexpected. The analyses were conducted with a sample of 203 drivers (49.8% women, 51.2% men) betweenthe ages of 20 and 60. The results yielded a general trend toward supporting the hypotheses, in addition tolow levels of acceptance for this technology, with the strongest association being the positive correlationbetween the fate dimension of the traffic locus of control and accepted level of automation.

PDF

___

Arthur W. & Doverspike D. (1992). “Locus of Control and Auditory Selective Attention as Predictors of Driving Accident Involvement: A Comparative Longitudinal Investigation”. Journal of Safety Research 23 (1992) 73-80.
Bazilinskyy P., Kyriakidis M. & de Winter J. (2015). “An International Crowdsourcing Study into People’s Statements on Fully Automated Driving”. Procedia Manufacturing 3 (2015) 2534-2542.
Dağ İ. (2002). “Kontrol Odağı Ölçeği (KOÖ): Ölçek Geliştirme, Güvenirlik ve Geçerlik Çalışması”. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi 17 (2002) 77-90.
Deci E. L. & Ryan R. M. (1985). “The General Causality Orientations Scale: Self-determination in Personality”. Journal of Research in Personality 19 (1985) 109-134.
Deci E. L. & Ryan R. M. (1987). “The Support of Autonomy and the Control of Behavior”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53 (1987) 1024-1037.
Deci E. L. & Ryan R. M. (2000). “The “what” and “why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Selfdetermination of Behavior”. Psychological Inquiry 11 (2000) 227-268.
Deci E. L. (1980). The Psychology of Self-determination. Lexington 1980.
Guastello S. J. & Guastello D. D. (1986). “The Relation Between Locus of Construct and Involvement in Traffic Accidents”. The Journal of Psychology 120 (1986) 293-297.
Haboucha C. J., Ishaq R. & Shiftan Y. (2017). “User Preferences Regarding Autonomous Vehicles”. Transportation Research Part C 78 (2017) 37-49.
Hoyt M. F. (1973). “Internal-External Control and Beliefs about Automobile Travel”. Journal of Research in Personality 7 (1973) 288-293
Hulse L. M., Xie H. & Galea E. R. (2018). “Perceptions of Autonomous Vehicles: Relationships with Road Users, Risk, Gender and Age”. Safety Science 102 (2018) 1-13. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.ssci.2017.10.001
Kyriakidis M., Happee R. & de Winter J. C. F. (2015). “Public Opinion on Automated Driving: Results of an International Questionnaire Among 5000 Respondents”. Transportation Research Part F 32 (2015) 127-140.
Lefcourt H. M. (1982). Locus of Control. Current Trends in Theory and Research. Hillsdale 1982.
Lefcourt H. M. (1991). Locus of Control. Eds. J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver & L. S. Wrightsman, Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes (1991) 413–499. San Diego.
Miller P. C., Lefcourt H. M. & Ware E. E. (1983). “The Construction and Development of the Miller Marital Locus of Control Scale”. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science 15 (1983) 266-279.
Montag I. & Comrey A. L. (1987). “Internality and Externality as Correlates of Involvement in Fatal Driving Accidents”. Journal of Applied Psychology 72 (1987) 339-343.
Özkan T. & Lajunen T. (2005). “Multidimensional Traffic Locus of Control Scale (T-LOC): Factor Structure and Relationship to Risky Driving”. Personality and Individual Differences 38 (2005) 533-545.
Petridou E. & Moustaki M. (2000). “Human Factors in the Causation of Road Traffic Crashes”. European Journal of Epidemiology 16 (2000) 819-826.
Phares E. J. (1976). Locus of Control in Personality. Morristown 1976.
Rotter J. B. (1966). “Generalized Expectancies for Internal vs. External Control of Reinforcement”. Psychological Monographs 80 (1966) 1-28.
Rotter J. B. (1975). “Some Problems and Misconceptions Related to the Construct of Internal Versus External Control of Reinforcement”. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 43 (1975) 56-67.
Rudin-Brown C. M. & Parker H. A. (2004). “Behavioural Adaptation to Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC): Implications for Preventive Strategies”. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 7 (2004) 59-76.
Ryan R. M. & Deci E. L. (2000). “Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being”. American Psychologist 55 (2000) 68-78.
Ryan R. M. & Deci E. L. (2006). “Self-Regulation and the Problem of Human Autonomy: Does Psychology Need Choice, Self-Determination, and Will?” Journal of Personality 74 (2006) 1557-1585.
Ryan R. M., Connell J. P. & Deci E. L. (1985). “A Motivational Analysis of Self-Determination and SelfRegulation in Education”. Eds. C. Ames & R. E. Ames, Research on Motivation in Education: The Classroom Milieu (1985) 13-51. New York.
Şen G. & Dağ İ. (2016). “Genel Nedensellik Yönelimleri Ölçeğinin Türkçeye Uyarlanması, Geçerlilik ve Güvenilirliğinin Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Sınanması”. Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi 17 (2016) 100-107.
Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) International (2014). Standard J3016: Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to On-Road Motor Vehicle Automated Driving Systems. Retrieved from http://www.sae.org/misc/pdfs/automated_driving.pdf
Spector P. E. (1988). “Development of the Work Locus of Control Scale”. Journal of Occupational Psychology 61 (1988) 335-340.
Trice A. D. (1985). “An Academic Locus of Control Scale for College Students”. Perceptual and Motor Skills 61 (1985) 1043-1046.
Wallston B. S., Wallston K. A., Kaplan G. D. & Maides S. A. (1976). “Development and Validation of the Health Locus of Control (HLC) Scale”. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 44 (1976) 580- 585.
World Health Organization (2008). World health statistics 2008. Retrieved from: www.who.int/whosis/ whostat/2008/en/index.html
Word Health Organization (2014) The 10 Leading Causes of Death in the World, 2000 and 2012. Retrieved from; http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs310/en