“Konuşmalarımızdan Kesin Olarak Hatırladığım Şey:” Michael Frayn’ın Copenhagen Adlı Oyununda Hafızanın Güç Savaşı İçin Kullanımı

Alman nükleer projesinde yer alan Werner Heisenberg, Manhattan Projesi’nde çalışan Niels Bohr’u, 1941 yılında Kopenhag’ta ziyaret eder. Ancak İkinci Dünya Savaşı sırasında gerçekleşen bu görüşmenin içeriği bir sır olarak kalmıştır ve üzerine pek çok tahmin yürütülmüştür. Heisenberg ve Bohr’un daha sonra yazdığı mektuplar, iki bilim insanının da görüşmede tartıştıkları konuyu ve görüşmeyi aniden bitirme sebeplerini farklı şekillerde anlattıklarını ortaya koymaktadır. Heisenberg, nükleer silahlanmanın ahlaki boyutu konusundaki endişelerini dile getirdiğini hatırlar, ancak Bohr’a göre, Heisenberg, Almanya için atom bombası yapma niyetinde olduğunu belirtmiştir. Michael Frayn’ın Copenhagen (1998) adlı oyunu, yalnızca bilimsel hafıza üzerinde değil, aynı zamanda tarihi ve politik hafıza üzerinde büyük izler bırakan bu görüşmenin kurgusal bir anlatımını sunmaktadır. Bu sepeble, bu makale, Copenhagen oyu- nunda Bohr’un, Heisenberg’ün ve Margrethe’ın ruhlarının bir güç savaşı içine girdiklerini ve Hiroshima ve Nagasaki’yi yerle bir eden atom bombasının yarattığı evrensel travmayı atlatabilmek ve bunun sorumluluğunu üzerlerinden atabilmek için, birbirinden farklı olan kişisel hafızalarını kullandıklarını tartışmaktadır. Oyundaki karakterler, bir yandan Heisenberg’ün ziyaret sebebini hatırlamaya çalışırken, bir yandan da kişisel hafızaları yoluyla atom bombasının hikâyesini yeniden yazarlar.

What I Remember Clearly from our Conversations”: Memory as the Method of Power Struggle in Michael Frayn’s Copenhagen

Werner Heisenberg, who worked for the Nazi German nuclear project, visited Niels Bohr inCopenhagen in 1941, who took part in Manhattan Project. However, the content of this meeting duringWorld War II remained a mystery and has been a subject of speculation. The letters which Heisenbergand Bohr subsequently wrote revealed that both scientists narrated what they had discussed and why theyhad ended up bitter in different ways. In Heisenberg’s memory he expressed his moral concerns aboutnuclear armaments; however, Bohr’s memory led him to argue that Heisenberg had the intention ofmaking an atomic bomb for Nazi Germany. Michael Frayn’s Copenhagen (1998) is a fictional account ofthis meeting which had a profound impact not only on scientific memory but also on historical andpolitical memory. Hence, the aim of this article is to argue that in Copenhagen the spirits of Bohr,Heisenberg and Margrethe engage in a power struggle and use their personal memories, which are alldifferent, to get over the global trauma of the atomic bombs which destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki,and to evade responsibility. While the characters try to remember the real reason for Heisenberg’s visit,they re-write the history of atomic bomb through their personal memories.

PDF

___

Aaserud F. (2002, February). “Introductory Comments”. Niels Bohr Archive. Source: .
Baddeley A. D. (1999). Essentials of Human Memory. East Sussex 1999.
Barnett D. (2005). “Reading and Performing Uncertainty: Michael Frayn’s Copenhagen and the Post- Dramatic Theatre”. Theatre Research International 30 (2005) 139-149. Doi: 10.1017/S0307883305 001148.
Bohr A. (1985). “The War Years and the Prospects Raised by the Atomic Wepons”. Ed. S. Rozental, Niels Bohr: His Life and Work as Seen by His Friends and Colleagues (1985) 191-215. Amsterdam.
Bohr N. (n.d.). “Document 1”. Niels Bohr Archive. Source: .
Bohr N. (1961). “Document 5a”. Niels Bohr Archive. Source: < http://archon.nbi.dk/tms/heisenberg/?doc= facs05a&page=1>.
Bohr N. (n.d.). “Document 7”. Niels Bohr Archive. Source: .
Bohr N. (n.d.). “Document 9”. Niels Bohr Archive. Source: .
Bohr N. (n.d.). “Document 11a”. Niels Bohr Archive. Source: .
Cassidy D. C. (1992). Uncertainty: The Life and Science of Werner Heisenberg. New York 1992.
Cassidy D. C. (2005). “Copenhagen and History”. Ed. M. Dörries, Michael Frayn’s Copenhagen in Debate: Historical Essays and Documents on the 1941 Meeting between Niels Bohr and Werner Heisenberg (2005) 19-23. Berkeley.
Cropper W. H. (2001). Great Physicists: The Life and Times of Leading Physicists from Galileo to Hawking. Oxford 2001.
Dasenbrock R. W. (2004). “Copenhagen: The Drama of History”. Contemporary Literature 45/2 (2004) 218-238.
“Document 6”. (n.d.). Niels Bohr Archive Source: .
Douglas A. & Vogler T. A. (2003). “Introduction”. Eds. A. Dougless & T. A. Vogler, Witness & Memory: The Discourse of Trauma (2003) 1-55. New York & London.
Dower J. W. (1996). “The Bombed: Hiroshimas and Nagasakis in Japanese Memory”. Ed. M. J. Hogan, Hiroshima: In History and Memory (1996) 1-37. Cambridge.
Dörries M. (2005). “Introduction”. Ed. M. Dörries, Michael Frayn’s Copenhagen in Debate: Historical Essays and Documents on the 1941 Meeting between Niels Bohr and Werner Heisenberg (2005) i-1. Berkeley.
Eckert M. (2005). “He Who Plays for Vulgar Ears Plays a Vulgar Tune”. Ed. M. Dörries, Michael Frayn’s Copenhagen in Debate: Historical Essays and Documents on the 1941 Meeting between Niels Bohr and Werner Heisenberg (2005) 23-31. Berkeley.
Ermenc J. J. (1989). “Interview”. Atomic Bomb Scientists: Memoirs, 1939-1945 (1989) 9-77. Westport & London.
Frayn M. (1997). “Introduction”. Michael Frayn: Plays 1 (1997) ix-xix. London.
Frayn M. (1998). Copenhagen. London 1998.
Gottstein K. (2002). “New Insights?: Heisenberg’s Visit to Niels Bohr in 1941 and the Bohr Letters”. Source: .
Heisenberg W. (1957, January 18). Two Letters from Werner Heisenberg to Robert Jungk, the Author of Brighter Than a Thousand Suns Source: .
Heisenberg W. (1985). “Quantum Theory and Its Interpretation”. Ed. S. Rozental, Niels Bohr: His Life and Work as Seen by His Friends and Colleagues (1985) 94-109. Amsterdam.
Heisenberg W. & Heisenberg E. (2016). My Dear Li: Correspondence, 1937-1946. Trans. I. Heisenberg. New Haven & London 2016.
Hogan M. J. (1996). “Hiroshima in History and Memory: An Introduction”. Ed. M. J. Hogan, Hiroshima: In History and Memory (1996) 1-37. Cambridge.
James I. (2004). Remarkable Physicists: From Galileo to Yukawa. Cambridge 2004.
Lesáková T. (2014). Memory and Uncertainty in Michael Frayn’s Copenhagen. Unpublished Diploma Thesis. Charles University, Prague 2014.
Lustig Harry & Shepherd-Barr K. (2002). “Science as Theatre: From Physics to Biology, Science is Offering Playwrights Innovative Ways of Exploring the Intersections of Science, History, Art, and Modern Life”. American Scientist 90/6 (2002) 550-555.
Lüst R. (2004). “Heisenberg and the Scientist’s Responsibility”. Eds. G. W. Buschhorn & J. Wess, Fundamental Physics – Heisenberg and Beyond (2004) 5-25. New York.
Magill F. N. (1999). The 20th Century Go-N: Dictionary of World Biography. New York 1999. “Niels Bohr – Biographical”. (2014). Source: .
Pais A. (1991). Niels Bohr’s Times: In Physics, Philosophy, and Polity. Oxford 1991.
Parkin A. (1999). Memory: A Guide for Professionals. West Sussex 1999.
Plotnitsky A. (2013). Niels Bohr and Complementarity: An Introduction. New York 2013.
Rosenfeld L. & Rüdinger E. (1985). “The Decisive Years 1911-1918”. Ed. S. Rozental, Niels Bohr: His Life and Work as Seen by His Friends and Colleagues (1985) 38-74. Amsterdam.
Selden M. (1989). “Introduction”. Eds. Kyoko & Mark Selden, The Atomic Bomb: Voices from Hiroshima and Nagasaki (1989) xi-3. New York.
“Werner Heisenberg – Biographical”. (2014). Source: .
Wilczek G. (2010). Important Scientists and Philosophers of Our Times. Munich 2010.
Wu D. (2000). “Interview”. Making Plays: Interviews with Contemporary British Dramatists and Their Directors. (2000) 209-232.
Young P. B. (1999). “Copenhagen by Michael Frayn [Review of the play Copenhagen]”. Theatre Journal 51/2 (1999) 218-219.