Erkeklerde Benlik Kavramının Netliğinin Mutlak Gerçek İhtiyacı ile Problem Çözme ve Stres Belirtileri Değişkenleri Arasındaki İlişkideki Aracılık Rolünün İncelenmesi

Bireylerin benlik keşfi aşamasında benliklerine ilişkin mutlak bilgiler edinmek istedikleri görül-mektedir. Kendilerine ilişkin mutlak bilgi edinmek isteyen kişilerin yüksek düzeyde soyut kendini analizeğilimlerinin olduğu belirtilmekte ve benliğin veya kişisel deneyimin arkasında yer alan gerçeklik ve aşırıgenel, üst düzey, her durumda geçerli gerçeklik olmak üzere benliğe ilişkin üst düzey temsillerden birisi olanbu eğilim “mutlak gerçek ihtiyacı” (MGİ) olarak tanımlanmaktadır. Mutlak gerçek ihtiyacının yüksekolduğu kişilerin kendilerine ilişkin mutlak bilgi elde etmek adına arayışa girdiklerinde, benlik kavramlarınınnetliğinin azaldığı görülmektedir. Benlik kavramının netliği düşük olan bireylerin de problem çözmekonusunda sorun yaşadıkları ve yoğun stres belirtileri gösterdikleri gözlemlenmektedir. Benlik kavramınınnetliği yüksek olan bireylerin yaşadıkları problemler karşısında daha sağlıklı başa çıkma stratejileri kul-landıkları savunulmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, erkek bireylerde mutlak gerçek ihtiyacı değişkeninin stresbelirtileri ve problem çözme becerileri değişkenleri üzerindeki etkisinde benlik kavramının netliği değiş-keninin aracı rolünün incelenmesidir. Çalışmanın katılımcılarını, 20-50 yaş arasındaki 200 erkek bireyoluşturmaktadır. Verilerin toplanmasında Demografik Bilgi Formu, Benlik Kavramının Netliği Ölçeği,Mutlak Gerçek İhtiyacı Ölçeği, Stres Belirtileri Ölçeği ve Problem Çözme Envanteri kullanılmıştır.Araştırmanın bulgularına göre, erkeklerde benlik kavramının netliği değişkeni mutlak gerçek ihtiyacı ilestres belirtileri ve problem çözme değişkenleri arasındaki ilişkide aracı değişken rolü oynamaktadır.

Investigation of the Mediator Role of Self Concept Clarity on the Relationship Between Need for Absolute Truth and Problem Solving and Symptoms of Stress in Men

People try to find absolute knowledge about the concept of self during identity exploration. Individuals have a high propensity to engage in abstract self-analysis that aims at capturing absolute knowledge about the self. The motive for this is defined as “the need for absolute truth” (NAT). NAT refers to one of the highest level representations concerning the self: the truth beyond the self or personal experiences, a truth that is overgeneralized, superordinate and valid in all contexts. If people who have a high need for absolute truth try to have absolute knowledge about themselves, the clarity their self concept decreases. Individuals who have a low self concept clarity have problems in problem solving and exhibit a high level of stress. People who have a higher self concept clarity use healthier coping strategies for problem solving. The purpose of this study is to show the mediator role of the clarity of the self concept on the relationship between the need for absolute truth and problem solving and symptoms of stress in men. The participants in this study were 200 men whose ages varied between 20 and 50. A Demographic Information Form, Self Concept Clarity Scale, Need for Absolute Truth Scale, Stress Self-Assessment Checklist and Problem Solving Inventory were employed. According to the findings from this study, the concept clarity has the mediator role in the relationship between need for absolute truth and problem solving and the symptoms of stress in men.

___

  • Akcan (2018). Erkek Eşcinsellerde Benlik Kavramının Netliği ve Mutlak Gerçek İhtiyacı Değişkenleri ile Problem Çözme ve Stres Belirtileri Değişkenleri Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi. Doktora Tezi. İstanbul 2018.
  • Akcan G. (2013). Mutlak Gerçek İhtiyacı Ölçeği Geliştirme Çalışması. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. İstanbul Arel Üniversitesi, İstanbul 2013.
  • Bar-Anan Y., Wilson T. D. & Gilbert D. T. (2009). “The Feeling of Uncertainty Intensifies Affective Reactions”. Emotion (2009) 123.
  • Bechtoldt,M. N., de Dreu C. K., Nijstad B. A. & Zapf D. (2010). “Self Concept Clarity and the Management of Social Conflict”. Journal of Personality (2010) 539-574.
  • Berman S. L., Montgomery M. J. & Kurtines W. M. (2004). “The Development and Validation of a Measure of Identity Distress”. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research (2004) 1-8.
  • Buhr K. & Dugas M. J. (2002). “The Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale: Psychometric Properties of the English Version”. Behaviour Research and Therapy (2002) 931-945.
  • Campbell J. D. (1990). “Self-Esteem and Clarity of The Self-Concept”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (1990) 538.
  • Campbell J. D., Assanand S. & Di Paula A. (2003). “The Structure of the Self Concept and Its Relation to Psychological Adjustment”. Journal of Personality (2003)115–140.
  • Campbell J. D., Trapnell P. D., Heine S. J. & Katz I. M. (1996). “Self-Concept Clarity:Measurement, Personality Correlates, and Cultural Boundaries”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (1996) 141-156.
  • Campbell J. D., Trapnell P. D., Heine S. J., Katz I. M., Lavallee L. F. & Lehman D. R. (1996). “Self- Concept Clarity: Measurement, PersonalityCorrelates, and Cultural Boundaries”. Journal of Personality and SocialPsychology (1996) 141.
  • Cass V. C. (1979). “Homosexuality Identity Formation: A Theoretical Model”. Journal of Homosexuality (1979) 219-235.
  • Cohen L. H., Gunthert K. C., Butler A. C., O’Neill S. C. & Tolpin L. H. (2005). “Daily Affective Reactivity as a Prospective Predictor of Depressive Symptoms”. Journal of Personality (2005) 1687-1714.
  • Conley J. J. (1984). “Longitudinal Consistency Of Adult Personality: Self Reported Psychological Characteristics Across 45 Years”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (1984) 1325.
  • Constantino M. J., Wilson K. R., Horowitz L. M. & Pinel E. C. (2006). “The Direct and Stress Buffering Effects of Self-Organization on Psychological Adjustment”. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology (2006) 333-360.
  • de Dreu C. K. & van Knippenberg D. (2005). “The Possessive Self as a Barrier toConflict Resolution: Effects of Mere Ownership, Process Accountability, and Self-Concept Clarity on Competitive Cognitions and Behavior”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (2005) 345.
  • Duval S. & Wicklund R. A. (1972). A Theory of Objective Self Awareness. 1972. Ed D., Suh E. M., Lucas R. E. & Smith H. L. (1999). “Subjective Well-Being: Three Decades of Progress”. Psychological Bulletin (1999) 276-302.
  • Engin E. (2004). The Relationship Between Self-Concept Structure and Behavioral Flexibility: A Model Relating Cognitive Structures to Behavioral Patterns. Doctoral Dissertation. Middle East Technical University, Ankara 2004.
  • Forster J. & Higgins E. T. (2005). “How Global Versus Local Perception Fits Regulatory Focus”. Psychological Science (2005) 631-636.
  • Franks H. M. & Roesch S. C. (2006). “Appraisals and Coping in People Living with Cancer: A MetaǦ Analysis”. Psycho Ǧ Oncology (2006) 1027-1037.
  • Hamilton J. C., Greenberg J., Pyszczynski T. ve Cather C. (1993). “A Self Regulator Perspective on Psychopathology and Psychotherapy”. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration (1993) 205.
  • Hanna F. J. (2002). Therapy With Difficult Clients: Using The Precursors Model to Awaken Change. Washington 2002 .
  • Heppner P. P. & Petersen C. H. (1982). “The Development and Implications of Apersonal Problem- Solving Inventory”. Journal of Counseling Psychology (1982) 66.
  • Hovardaoğlu S. (1997). “Stres Belirtileri ile Durumsal ve Sürekli KaygınınYordanması”. Kriz Dergisi (1997) 127-135.
  • Kernis M. H., Paradise A. W., Whitaker D. J., Wheatman S. R. & Goldman B. N. (2000). “Master of One’s Psychological Domain? Not Likely If One’s Self-Esteem Is Unstable”. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (2000) 1297-1305.
  • Lee-Flynn S. C., Pomaki G., Delongis A., Biesanz J. C. & Puterman E. (2011). “Daily Cognitive Appraisals, Daily Affect, and Long-Term Depressive Symptoms: The Role of Self Esteem and Self Concept Clarity in the Stress Process”. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (2011) 255-268.
  • Leite C. & Kuiper N. A. (2008). “Client Uncertainty and the Process of Change Psychotherapy: The Impact of Individual Differences in Self Concept Clarity and Intolerance of Uncertainty”. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy (2008) 55-64.
  • Lewandowski Jr. G. W., Nardone N. & Raines A. J. (2010). “The Role of Self-Concept Clarity in Relationship Quality”. Self and Identity (2010) 416-433.
  • Luyckx K., Schwartz S. J., Berzonsky M. D., Soenens B., Vansteenkiste M., Smits I. & Goossens L. (2008). “Capturing Ruminative Exploration: Extending the Four-Dimensional Model of dentity Formation in Late Adolescence”. Journal of Research in Personality (2008) 58-82.
  • Malhotra N. K. (2004). Marketing Research an Applied Orientation. New Jersey 2004 4 .
  • Nezlek J. B. & Plesko R. M. (2001). “Day-to-Day Relationships Among Self Concept Clarity, Self- Esteem, Daily Events, and Mood”. Personality and Social Psychology (2001) 201-211.
  • Nisbett R. E. & Wilson T. D. (1977). “Telling More Than We Can Know: Verbal Reports on Mental Processes”. Psychological Review (1977) 231- 259.
  • Özdamar K. (1999). Paket Programlar ile İstatistiksel Veri Analizi. Eskişehir 1999.
  • Philippot P., Baeyens C. & Douilliez C. (2006). “Specifying EmotionalInformation: Regulation of Emotional Intensity Via Executive Processes”. Emotion (2006) 560.
  • Pinquart M. & Sörensen S. (2001). “Gender Differences in Self-Concept and Psychological Well-Being in Old Age: A Meta-Analysis”. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences And Social Sciences (2001) 195-213.
  • Prochaska J. O. & Diclemente C. C. (1983). “Stages And Processes of Selfchange in Smoking: Toward an Integrative Model of Change”. Journal of Consulting Clinical Psychology (1983) 390-395.
  • Ritchie T. D., Sedikides C., Wildschut T., Arndt J. & Gidron Y. (2011). “Self Concept Clarity Mediatest the Relation Between Stress and SubjectiveWell Being”. Self and Identity (2011) 493-508.
  • Sabini J. & Silver M. (1981). “Introspection and Causal Accounts”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (1981) 171-179.
  • Schwartz S. J. (2007). “The Structure of Identity Consolidation: Multiple Correlated Constructs or One Superordinate Construct”. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research (2007) 27-49.
  • Schwartz S. J., Côté J. E.& Arnett J. J. (2005). “Identity and Agency In Emerging Adulthood Two Developmental Routes in the Individualization Process”. Youth & Society (2005) 201-229.
  • Schwartz S. J., Zamboanga B. L., Weisskirch R. S. &Rodriguez L. (2009). “The Relationships of Personal and Ethnic Identity Exploration to Indices of Adaptive and Maladaptive Psychosocial Functioning”. International Journal of Behavioral Development (2009) 131-144.
  • Setterlund M. B. & Niedenthal P. M. (1993). “‘Who Am I? Why Am I Here?’ Self-Esteem, Self Clarity, and Prototype Matching”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (1993) 769.
  • Slotter E. B., Gardner W. L. & Finkel E. J. (2010). “Who Am I Without You? The Influence of Romantic Breakup on the Self-Concept”. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 36/2 (2010) 147-160.
  • Smith E. R. & Miller F. D. (1978). Limits on Perception of Cognitive Processes: A Reply to Nisbett And Wilson. 1978.
  • Smith M., Wethington E. & Zhan G. (1996). “Self-Concept Clarity and Preferred Coping Styles”. Journal of Personality (1996) 407-434.
  • Stöber J., Tepperwien S. & Staak M. (2000). “Worrying Leads to Reduced Concreteness of Problem Elaborations: Evidence for the Avoidance Theory of Worry”. Anxiety Stress and Coping (2000) 217-227.
  • Stucke T. S. & Sporer S. L. (2002). “When a Grandiose SelfǦImage Is Threatened: Narcissism and SelfǦ Concept Clarity as Predictors of Negative Emotions and Aggression Following Ego Threat”. Journal of Personality (2002) 509-532
  • Swann W. B., Pelham B. W. & Chidester T. R. (1988). “Change Through Paradox: Using Self Verification to Alter Beliefs”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (1988) 268.
  • Şimşek Ö. F. (2007). Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesine Giriş: Temel İlkeler ve LISREL Uygulamaları. Ankara 2007.
  • Şimşek Ö. F. (2013). “Self-Absorption Paradox Is Not Paradox: Illuminating the Dark Side of Self Reflection”. International Journal of Psychology ( 2013) 1109-1121.
  • Treadgold R. (1999). “Transcendent Vocations: Their Relationship to Stress,Depression, and Clarity of Self-Concept”. Journal of Humanistic Psychology (1999) 81-105.
  • von Collani G. & Werner R. (2005). “Self-Related and Motivational ConstructsasDeterminants of Aggression: An Analysis and Validation of a German Version of the Buss Perry Aggression Questionnaire”. Personality and Individual Differences (2005) 1631-1643.
  • Watkins E. & Teasdale J. D. (2004). “Adaptive and Maladaptive Self-Focus in Depression”. Journal of Affective Disorders (2004) 1-8.
  • Watkins E. R. (2008). “Constructive and Unconstructive Repetitive Thought”. Psychological Bulletin (2008) 163-206.
  • Watson D., David J. P. & Suls J. (1999). “Personality, Affectivity, and Coping”. Coping: The Psychology of What Works (1999) 119-14.
  • Zhou X., Sedikides C., Wildschut T. & Gao D. G. (2008). “Counteracting Loneliness on the Restorative Function of Nostalgia”. Psychological Science (2008) 1023-1029.