Towards a New Critical Edition of Yavuz Sultān Selīm’s Persian Dīvān: An Overview of The Manuscripts

Many Ottoman Sultans excelled in poetry but Selīm I was the only one who composed poetry almost exclusively in Persian. The first printed edition of the divan was published in Istanbul in 1889. This edition was based on a single manuscript. The first critical edition was prepared by a German Iranist, Paul Horn in 1904. He based his work on seven manuscripts four of which he found in European libraries. Only three came from libraries in Turkey. A couple of years ago a project was started to prepare a new edition of the divan. The work started with browsing library catalogues and collecting manuscripts that were unknown to Horn. The search included libraries in Europe and the Middle East. Many new manuscripts were found. The new critical edition that is planned to be printed this year is going to be based on Horn’s edition and 24 manuscripts 21 of which were not seen by Horn. Nineteen of the manuscripts are from libraries in Turkey, four are from libraries in Tehran and one is from Israel. These manuscript contained many unpublished poems. The aim of the present article is to give a detailed description of all the manuscripts used for the new critical edition of Sultān Selīm’s divan.

Literature as an Experience

Experience is all of the information and experiences that the individual gains throughout life. In human life, experiences that start from the birth of human, constitutes a cognitive process untill his/her death. Experiences that plays an important role in embodying knowledge regarding life and world, change and shape human for better or for worse. Due to the fact that experience not having a precise definition as a term, its classification, identifying its features, and distingu-ishing its types; provides convenience to identify the term’s framework of meaning. Literature in case, is a field of art that reflects world, life, feelings and events through language. Literature contains informations about life either. These infor-mations are related to the reality eventhough they belong to a fictitious world. Literature, could teach individual a life lesson or a moral lesson, support his/her imagination or give aesthetic pleasure, change and shape mentally. Not only as an artistic way but also as a vital production; literature, appears as an experience. Moreover, literature exists both as an aesthetic experience and as an experience in general meaning. In this study, the relationship between literature and expe-rience will be discussed.

___

  • Akın-Kıvanç, Esra(2011). Mustafa ʿÂli’s Epic Deeds of Artists. A Critical Edition of the Earliest Ottoman Text about the Calligraphers and Painters of the IslamicWorld. Leiden–Boston: Brill. Aköz, Alaattin, ‘Karaman’dan Sigetvar’a: Bir Eyalet Öleçeğinde Kanuni Sultan Süleyman’in Son Macaristan Seferi’. Perspectives on Ottoman Studies. Papers from the 18th Symposium of the International Committee of Pre-Ottoman and Ottoman Studies (Ciepo). Eds. Ekrem Causevic–Nenad Moacanin–Vjeran Kursar. Münster: Lit Verlag. Aydın, Şadi(2010). Türk Edebiyatında Farsça Divânlar ve Divânçeler. Ankara: Anekdot Yayınevi. Aydın, Seda(2016). Destâvîz-i Dâniş (Yavuz Sultan Selîm Dîvânı’nın Şerhi). Tenkitli Metin ve İnceleme (s. 180–366). Yüksek Lisans Tezi. İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi. Bağcı, Serpil–Çağman, Filiz–Renda, Günsel–Tanındı, Zeren(2010). Ottoman Painting. Ankara: Ministry of Culture and Tourism, The Bank Association of Turkey. Horn, Paul(1904). Dīvān-i balāġat-ʿunvān-i Sulṭān Salīm Ḫān-i avval. Berlīn: Maṭbaʿa-yi daulatī. Horn, Paul(1906). “Der Dichter Sultān Selīm I”. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 60: 97–111. Ḥüsnī, Ḥüseyin(1306/1889). Dīvān-i Yavuz Sulṭān Selīm. İstanbul:Āṣādūryān Şirket-i Mürettebiye Maṭbaʿası. İşbilir, Ömer(2002). “Kuyucu Murad Paşa”. İslam Ansiklopedisi.C.26. İstanbul: Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı Yay. 507–508. Kaya, İbrahim(2019). “Yavuz sultan Selim’in Matbu Farsça Divanı İle Tarlan Tercümesinin Karşılaştırılması”. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmaları Dergisi 12(63): 119–129. Kégl, Sándor(1910). “Szelim szultán mint perzsa költő”. Keleti tanulmányok. Goldziher Ignácz születésének hatvanadik évfordulójára írták tanítványai. Budapest: Hornyánszky Viktor kiadása, 183–203. Kınalızâde Hasan Çelebi(2017). Tezkiretü’ş-şu’arâ. Hazırlayan: Aysun Sungurhan. Ankara: Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı. Latîfî(2018). Tezkiretü’ş-Şu’arâ ve Tabsıratü’n-Nuzamâ. Hazırlayan: Rıdvan Canım. Ankara: Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı. Minorsky, Vladimir(1959). Calligraphers and Painters. A Treatise by Qādī Aḥmad, Son of Mīr Munshī (circa A.H. 1015/1606). Washington: Smithsonian Institution. Péri Benedek(2015a). “Szelim szultán kiadatlan versei (Unpublished ghazals by Yavuz Sultan Selim. Part. 1.)”. Keletkutatás 2015 tavasz, 115–138. Péri Benedek(2015b). “I. Szelim szultán kiadatlan versei II.” (Unpublished Persian poems of Sultan Selim I. Part 2. )”. Keletkutatás 2015 ősz, 113–130. Péri Benedek(2020). “Yavuz Sultan Selīm (1512–1520) and his imitation strategies. A case study of four Ḥāfiẓ ghazals”. Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae (forthcoming) Sehî Beg(2017). Heşt Bihişt. Hazırlayanlar Halûk İpekten, Günay Kut, Mustafa İsen, Hüseyin Ayan, Turgut Karabey. Ankara: Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı. Şeyḫ Vaṣfī(1308/1891). Bāriḳa. Yavuz Sulṭān Selīm’in Eşʿārı ile Tercümeleri. İstanbul:Āṣādūryān Şirket-i Mürettebiye Maṭbaʿası. Tarlan, Ali Nihat(1946). Yavuz Sultan Selim Divanı. İstanbul: Ahmet Halit Kitabevi. Terzi, Beyza(2016). Destâvîz-i Dâniş (Yavuz Sultan Selîm Dîvânı’nın Şerhi). Tenkitli Metin ve İnceleme (s. 1–180). Yüksek Lisans Tezi. İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi. Yerkazan, Hasan(2017). “Halil b. Seyyid Abdullâtif Amâsî (V. 1196/1782) ve Câmi„u‟l-Asğar Adlı Eseri”. Uluslararası Amasya Âlimleri Sempozyumu. 21–23 Nisan–Amasya. Bildiri Kitabı 1. Editörler: Şuayip Özdemir, Ayşegü Gün. Ankara: Kıbrıs Balkanlar Avrasya Türk Edebiyatları Kurumu.