G.k. ZHYLKYBAY

Semantic Features of Particles in Turkic Languages

It is known that the words are devided into different groups by grammatical meaning and purpose. Firstly, according to the ancient Greeks, the function and the meaning of the words were divided into nouns and verbs. Along with the development of the era, it was found that the words emerging in the field of linguistics has other functions, as well as compiled classifiers and increased the number of word groups. And in the modern theory of General linguistics, types of words are classified as names that have an independent meaning, and verbs and auxiliary words that do not have an independent meaning, are considered as persons of grammatical activity. Possessing stable theories developed in connection with the problems of other parts of speech, postpositions are one of the most important and urgent problems for Kazakh linguistics, and in Turkology. Obviously, the solution to the problems of the modern Kazakh language can be achieved only through a comparative study of the Turkic languages. Despite the fact that the Turkic languages operate from an early time, very little-known spheres are particles. Particles also play an important role in creating certain grammatical categories in a language. On the other hand, it is considered an element necessary to give a modal meaning. The article deals with the semantic features of particles on specific examples.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Turkic languages, linguistics, the grammatical category, the modal value, auxiliary words, particle, semantic features, lexical and grammatical meaning

Semantic Features of Particles in Turkic Languages

Keywords:

Turkic languages, linguistics, the grammatical category, the modal value, auxiliary words, particle, semantic features, lexical and grammatical meaning,

PDF

___

1. Túımebaev J., Saǵıdolda G., Eskeeva M. Túrkі tіlderіnіń salystyrmaly-tarıhı grammatıkasy. (Fonetıka. Morfologııa). – Almaty: Qazyǵurt, 2017. – 324 b.
2. Orazov M. Kómekshі sózder. I. – Tashkent, 1997. - 235 b.
3. Túımebaev J., Saǵıdolda G. Qazaq jáne túrіk tіlderіnіń salystyrmaly-sıpattamaly grammatıkasy (Fonetıka. Morfologııa). – Almaty: Qazyǵurt, 2016. 324 bet.
4.Qazaq grammatıkasy. Fonetıka, sózjasam, morfologııa, sıntaksıs. – Astana, 2002. – 782 b.
5. Kyrgyz tılı. – Bıshkek, 1996. - 146 b.
6. Házırgı qaraqalpaq ádebı tılınıń grammatıkasy. Sóz jasalyý hám morfologııa. – Nókıs: Bılım, 1994. – 452 b.
7. Hısamova F.M. Tatar tele morfologııase. Iýgary ýký ıortlary óchen dáreslek. – Kazan, 2006. - 220 b.
8. Abdýrohmonov H., Rafıev A., Shodmonqýlova D. Ýzbek tılınıng amalıı grammatıkası. – Toshkent: Ýqýtıvchı, 1992. - 123 b.
9. Türkmen diliniñgrammatikasy. Morfologiўa. – Aşgabat: Ruh, 1999. - 72-87 b.
10. Qalybaeva A., Oralbaeva N. Qazіrgі qazaq tіlіnіń morfemalar júıesі. – Almaty, 1986. – 192 b.
11. Nurmahanova Á.N. Túrkі tіlderіnіń salystyrmaly grammatıkasy. – Almaty, 1971. – 292 b.
12. Davletov S., Kýdaıbergenov S. Azyrky kyrgyz tılı. Morfologııa. – Frýnze, 1980.
13. Ýsmanova M.G. Grammatıka bashkırskogo ıazyka dlıa ızýchaıýıh ıazyk kak gosýdarstvennyı. – Ýfa: Kıtap, 2006. – 128 s.
14. Һazırqı zaman ýıǵýr tılı. Morfologııa vá sıntaksıs. II. – Almaty: Ǵylym, 1966. – 456 b.
15. Hacıeminoğlu N. Türk dilinde edatlar. – İstanbul, 1974. – 336 b.
16. Ámіrov R. Jaı sóılem sıntaksısі. – Almaty: Mektep, 1983. – 168 b.
17. Noǵaev A. Qazaq tіlіndegі demeýlіk shylaýlardyń qoldanystaǵy maǵynasy men qyzmetі. – Almaty, 2008.
18. Korkmaz Z. Türkiye Türkçesi Grameri. – Ankara, 2009. – 1224 b.
19. Túımebaev J., Saǵıdolda G. Qazaq jáne tatar tіlderіnіń salystyrmaly-sıpattamaly grammatıkasy. (Fonetıka. Morfologııa). – Almaty: Qazyǵurt, 2017. – 240 b.
20. Aıdarov Ǵ., Quryshjanov Á., Tomanov M. Kóne túrkі jazba eskertkіshterіnіń tіlі. – Almaty: Mektep, 1971. – 272 b.
21. Túımebaev J., Eskeeva M. Kóne túrkі jazba eskertkіshterі tіlіnіń morfologııalyq júıesі. – Almaty: Qazyǵurt, 2016. – 368 b.
22. Aıdarov Ǵ. Kúltegіn eskertkіshі. – Almaty, 1995. - 254 b.
23. Ysqaqov A. Qazіrgі qazaq tіlі. – Almaty, 1991. - 147 b.