B.а. AKHMEDOV, A.k. ABİLDAEV, B.k. MUKHAMEDZHANOV

On the Importance of Physical Culture in the Development of Personality

Our ancestors said that “health is the most important wealth”. This statement has not lost its significance at the present stage of technological development. At present, unfortunately, the number of citizens who think more about intellectual perfection in order to keep up with technological development, instead of physical training, is increasing. Physical culture as part of the integral education of the individual has now become an integral part of people's lives. Of particular interest in the implementation of the line “professionalism-decency” is the need for philosophical, sociological, cultural, psychological and pedagogical analysis of the problems of physical education as an element of the General and social culture of students in order to perform their functions in practice at a high professional level.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Physical education, practical work, professionalism, personality, physical training, psychological and pedagogical analysis

On the Importance of Physical Culture in the Development of Personality

Keywords:

Physical education, practical work, professionalism, personality, physical training, psychological and pedagogical analysis,

PDF

___

1. Qoıanbaev J.B., Qoıanbaev R.M. Pedagogıka. – Almaty: Atamura, 2002. – 384 b.
2. Mavropýlo O.S., Krıvsýn S.N. Zdorove ı dvıgatelnaıa aktıvnost cheloveka // Materıaly sbornıka naýchnyh trýdov. Sotsıalno-ekonomıcheskıe ı tehnıko-tehnologıcheskıe problemy razvıtııa sfery ýslýg. / Redkollegııa: Ilın V.G., Mınasıan L.A. – Moskva, 2012. – S. 73-75.
3. Lapkın M.M. Sravnıtelnaıa harakterıstıka vegetatıvnogo kontrolıa ı profılaktıka narýshenıı serdechnogo rıtma ý podrostkov prı fızıcheskoı nagrýzke / M.M.Lapkın, A.L.Pohachevskıı // Profılaktıcheskaıa medıtsına. – 2014. – №3 (17). – S. 27-31.
4. Kýrys V.N., Evstıgneeva M.I. Soderjanıe ı sootnoshenıe ponıatıı «fızıcheskaıa kýltýra lıchnostı» ı «telesno-dvıgatelnaıa kýltýra» // Ýchenye zapıskı ýnıversıteta ım. P.F. Lesgafta. – Moskva, 2013. – №1 (95). – S. 84-89.
5. Hrenkova V.V., Abakýmova L.V., Lysenko A.V., Barshaı V.M., Rogınskaıa A.A., Karsakova A.A., Jýravleva M.V. Varıatsıonnaıa kardıoıntervalometrııa kak metod ekspress-otsenkı fýnktsıonalnogo sostoıanııa stýdentov s raznym ýrovnem dvıgatelnoı aktıvnostı // Fýndamentalnye ıssledovanııa. – Moskva, 2014. – №11-5. – S. 1090-1093.
6. Kýrys V.N., Slıadneva L.N., Shııanova G.V. Obrazovanıe deteı doshkolnogo vozrasta v oblastı fızıcheskoı kýltýry – teoret. aspekt: monografııa / V.N. Kýrys, L.N. Slıadneva, G.V. Shııanova; M-vo obrazovanııa ı naýkı RF, M-vo obrazovanııa Stavropol. kraıa. – Stavropol, 2006.
7. Blattner, W. (2006). Heidegger′s Being and Time: Areader′s guide. London & New York: Continuum Books.
8. Pintrich P.R. “The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching, and assessing,” Theory into Practice, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 219–225, 2002.
9. Kıselёv P.A., Kıselёva S.B. Nastolnaıa knıga ýchıtelıa fızıcheskoı kýltýry: metodıcheskoe posobıe. – M.: Globýs, 2009. – 320 s.
10. Ianson Iý.A. Fızıcheskaıa kýltýra v shkole. Novye pedagogıcheskıe tehnologıı. – Rostov-na-Doný: Fenıks, 2005. – 432 s.