Mobil Teknolojiler Kapsamında Tüketicilerin Akıllı Telefon Kullanım Tercihlerinin Satın Alma Sürecine Etkileri

Günümüzde internet ve mobil cihaz teknolojilerindeki gelişmeler hem tüketicilerin hem de perakendecilerin pazarlama bağlamında, mobil teknolojilerin sunduğu olanaklardan daha fazla yararlanmalarına imkan vermektedir. Bu çerçevede çok kanallı perakendeciliğin yapı taşlarından biri haline gelen mobil teknolojilere yönelik tüketici değerlendirmeleri araştırılmaya değer bir konu olarak ön plana çıkmaktadır. Çalışmanın amacı; mobil teknoloji kullanımına yönelik kullanım davranış öncüllerinin ve tutumların, tüketicilerin satın alma karar süreci adımları üzerindeki etkilerini incelemektir. Teknoloji Kabul Modeli (TKM) temel alınarak geliştirilen araştırma modelinde; algılanan kullanım kolaylığı, algılanan fayda ve tutum değişkenlerinin satın alma karar sürecinin her bir adımı üzerindeki etkileri analiz edilmiştir. Analizler için gerekli veriler online anket aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. 925 katılımcıdan sağlanan verilerle yapısal denklem kullanılarak yapılan model testi sonucunda tüketicilerin mobil teknoloji kullanımına yönelik tutumları üzerinde algılanan kullanım kolaylığı ve faydanın etkili olduğu görülmüştür. Ayrıca tüketicilerin satın alma karar süreci adımlarından; alternatifleri belirleme ve alternatifleri değerlendirme safhalarında akıllı telefonlarını daha yoğun olarak kullandıkları tespit edilmiştir.

The Effects of Smartphone Usage Preferences of Consumers on the Buying Process Under the Scope of Mobile Technologies

Nowadays, the developments in internet and mobile device technologies allow both consumers and retailersto benefit more from the opportunities offered by mobile technologies with regards to marketing. In thiscontext, consumer evaluations regarding mobile technologies, which have become one of the buildingblocks of multi-channel retailing, have come to the fore as a subject worth researching. The aim of thisstudy is to examine the effects of usage precursor behaviours and attitudes towards the use of mobiletechnology on the stages of the buying decision process of consumers. In the research model developedbased on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), the effects of perceived ease of use, perceivedusefulness and attitude variables on each stage of the buying decision process were analyzed. The datarequired for the analyses were collected using a questionnaire that was designed online. As a result of themodel test conducted using the structural equation with the data provided by 925 participants, the perceivedease of use and usefulness were found to be effective on the attitudes of consumers towards the use ofmobile technology. In addition, it was determined that the consumers used their smartphones moreintensively at the ‘information search’ and ‘evaluation of alternatives’ stages of the buying decision process.

___

  • Agrebi, S., & Jallais, J. (2015). Explain the intention to use smartphones for mobile shopping. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 22, 16-23.
  • Blackwell, R.D., Miniard, P.W. & Engel, J.F. (2003). Consumer Behavior. Harcourt. Orlando, FL.
  • Bryman, A., & Cramer, D. (2001). Quantitative Analysis with SPSS Release 10 for Windows: A Guide For Social Scientists. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Butler, P., & Peppard, J. (1998). Consumer purchasing on the internet: Processes and prospects. European Management Journal, 16(5), 600-610.
  • Büyükkalaycı, G., & Karaca, H. M. (2019). Pazarlama 4.0: Nesnelerin Interneti, Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi Dergisi, 54(1), 463-477
  • Cengiz, E., & Şekerkaya, A. (2010). Investigating internet users decision making processes regarding their internet purchases and a research on the classification of internet users in terms of internet usage density. Öneri Dergisi. 9 (33), 33-49.
  • Cheng, J.M.S., Sheen, G.J. & Lou, G.C. (2006). Consumer acceptance of the internet as a channel of distribution in Taiwan - A channel function perspective, Technovation, Volume 26, Issue 7, 856- 864.
  • Cheng, T. E., Lam, D. Y., & Yeung, A. C. (2006). Adoption of internet banking: An empirical study in Hong Kong. Decision Support Systems, 42(3), 1558-1572.
  • Cliquet, G., Picot-Coupey, K., Huré, E., & Gahinet, M. C. (2014). Shopping with a smartphone: A French-Japanese perspective. Marketing:ZFP-Journal of Research and Management, 36(2), 96-106.
  • Darley, W. K., Blankson, C., & Luethge, D. J. (2010). Toward an integrated framework for online consumer behavior and decision making process: A review. Psychology & Marketing, 27(2), 94-116.
  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13 (3), 319-340.
  • Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
  • Deloitte (2016). Deloitte Global Mobile User Survey 2015 Turkey Executive Summary. İstanbul Deloitte Global. https://www2.deloitte.com/tr, Accessed: 22.11.2016.
  • Engel, J. F., Kollat, D. T., & Blackwell, R. D. (1968). Consumer Behavior. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, Newyork.
  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior. An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading. MA: Addison-Wesley. http://people.umass.edu/aizen/f&a1975.html, Accessed: 07.06.2016.
  • Gao, L., Waechter, K. A., & Bai, X. (2015). Understanding consumers’ continuance intention towards mobile purchase: A theoretical framework and empirical study–A case of China. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 249-262.
  • Grob, M. (2015). Exploring the acceptance of technology for mobile shopping: An empirical investigation among smartphone users. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 25(3), 215-235.
  • Hawkins, D.I., Coney, K.A., & Best, R.J. (2003), Consumer Behavior: Building Marketing Strategy, Chicago. IL: Irwin.
  • Holmes, A., Byrne, A., & Rowley, J. (2014). Mobile shopping behaviour: insights into attitudes, shopping process involvement and location. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management. Vol. 42 No. 1, pp. 25-39.
  • Hoogland, J. J., & Boomsma, A. (1998). Robustness studies in covariance structure modeling: An overview and a meta-analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 26(3), 329-367.
  • Howard, J. A., & Sheth, J. N. (1969). The theory of buyer behaviour. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
  • Hult, G. T. M., Sharma, P. N., Morgeson III, F. V., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Antecedents and consequences of customer satisfaction: do they differ across online and offline purchases?. Journal of Retailing, 95(1), 10-23.
  • Jahangir, N., & Begum, N. (2008). The role of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, security and privacy, and customer attitude to engender customer adaptation in the context of electronic banking. African Journal of Business Management, 2(2), 032-040.
  • Karaatli, G., Ma, J., & Suntornpithug, N. (2010). Investigating mobile services' impact on consumer shopping experience and consumer decision-making. International Journal of Mobile Marketing, 5(2), 75-86.
  • Kim, Y. A. & Srivastava, J. (2007). Impact of social influence in e-commerce decision making. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Electronic Commerce: The Wireless World of Electronic Commerce (ICEC'07), 293-302.
  • Kim, S. C., Yoon, D., & Han, E. K. (2016). Antecedents of mobile app usage among smartphone users. Journal of Marketing Communications, 22(6), 653-670.
  • Maslowska, E., Malthouse, E. C., & Viswanathan, V. (2017). Do customer reviews drive purchase decisions? The moderating roles of review exposure and price. Decision Support Systems, 98, 1-9.
  • Morris, M. G., & Dillon, A. (1997). How user perceptions influence software use. IEEE Software, 14(4), 58-65.
  • Patwardhan, P., & Ramaprasad, J. (2005). Rational integrative model of online consumer decision making. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 6(1), 2-13.
  • Persaud, A., & Azhar, I. (2012). Innovative mobile marketing via smartphones. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 30 (4), 418-443.
  • PwC (2016). Total Retail 2016 Research. PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited. www.pwc.com.tr/toplamperakende, Accessed: 03.04.2017.
  • Qiu, L., & Li, D. (2008). Applying TAM in B2C E-commerce research: An extended model. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 13(3), 265-272.
  • Rapp, A., Baker, T. L., Bachrach, D. G., Ogilvie, J., & Beitelspacher, L. S. (2015). Perceived customer showrooming behavior and the effect on retail salesperson self-efficacy and performance. Journal of Retailing, 91(2), 358-369.
  • Samarhan, A. (2018). In-store Consumer Shopping Behaviour Through Mobile Phones. Arcada University Master School Finland/Helsinki (Doctoral dissertation, Master Thesis. goo. gl/t8C2gZ, Acc. 09/05).
  • Schwarz, E. C., Hunter, J. D., & LaFleur, A. (2013). Advanced Theory and Practice in Sport Marketing. 2nd Edition, USA: Routledge.
  • Sekeran, U. (1992). Research Methods For Business: A Skill Building Approach. 2nd Ed., New York: Wiley.
  • Shank, M. D. (2009). Sport Marketing: A Strategic Perspective. 4th Ed., New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.
  • Solomon, M. R., Russell-Bennett R., & Previte J. (2013). Consumer behaviour: Buying, Having, Being. 11th Ed. Australia: Pearson.
  • Venkatesh, V., & Davis F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46 (2), 186-204.
  • Verhoef, P. C., Neslin S. A., & Vroomen B. (2007). Multichannel customer management: understanding the research-shopper phenomenon. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24 (2), 129-148.
  • von Helversen, B., Abramczuk, K., Kopeć, W., & Nielek, R. (2018). Influence of consumer reviews on online buying decisions in older and younger adults. Decision Support Systems, 113, 1-10.
  • Wang, R. J. H., Malthouse, E. C., & Krishnamurthi, L. (2015). On the go: How mobile shopping affects customer purchase behavior. Journal of Retailing, 91(2), 217-234.
  • We Are Social (2020). Digital 2020 Global Overview Report, We Are Social Ltd. https://wearesocial.com, Accessed: 12.05.2020.
  • Yang, K. (2010). Determinants of US consumer mobile shopping services adoption: implications for designing mobile shopping services. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 27 (3), 262-270.
  • Yang, K. (2012). Consumer technology traits in determining mobile shopping adoption: an application of the extended theory of planned behavior. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 19(5), 484-491.