KOOPERATİFLERDE MODERN DENETİM TEKNİKLERİNİN UYGULANMASI

Uluslararası Kooperatifler Birliği'nin kooperatif kimliği üzerine açıklaması bir kooperatifi "ortaklaşa sahip olunan ve demokratik olarak kontrol edilen bir işletme aracılığıyla ortak ekonomik, sosyal ve kültürel ihtiyaç ve isteklerini karşılamak için gönüllü olarak bir araya gelen kişilerin özerk bir birliği" olarak tanımlamaktadır. Bu bağlamda, kooperatif, bir grup bireyin karşılıklı faydaları için sahip olduğu ve işlettiği bir ticari organizasyon olarak değerlendirilebilir. Kooperatif üyeleri, ürün veya hizmetlerin üreticileri veya tüketicileri olarak veya çalışanları olarak yakın bir ilişki içindedir. Bu ilişkilerin kooperatif toplumunda kurumsal yönetim ilkeleri perspektifinde ele alınması ve şeffaflığın sağlanması amacıyla modern denetim tekniklerinin uygulanması önemli olmaktadır. Kooperatiflerin denetimi temel olarak kooperatif toplumuna odaklanır ve her işin hukuk sınırları dahilinde değerlendirilmesini sağlayan önemli bir görevdir. Bir kooperatif toplumunun denetimi bir şirketin denetiminden farklıdır. Bunun en önemli nedeni bir kooperatif toplumunun temel unsurları ve iş süreçleri bir şirketten çok farklıdır. Bu araştırma, kooperatiflerin uluslararası standartlara dayalı denetiminin önemini göstermek için kooperatifler için yönetişim ve denetimle ilgili temel konuları analiz etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Ayrıca kooperatif denetiminde en iyi uygulama örnekleri için politika önerileri yapılmaktadır.

IMPLEMENTATION OF MODERN AUDITING TECHNIQUES FOR COOPERATIV

The International Cooperative Alliance’s Statement on the Cooperative Identity defines a cooperative as “an autonomous association of persons united voluntarily to meet their common economic, social, and cultural needs and aspirations through a jointly-owned and democratically-controlled enterprise”. In that respect, cooperative is a business organization owned and operated by a group of individuals for their mutual benefit. Members have a close relationship with the enterprise as producers or consumers of its products or services, or as its employees. Addressing these relationships within the perspective of corporate governance principles and application of modern auditing techniques become important to ensure transparency for cooperative societies. Basically, cooperative auditing focuses on cooperative societies and the assessment of every work within the limits of the law signal an important task regarding the knowledge of employees and directors. The audit of a cooperative society is different from that of a limited liability company (company) because the objects and business processes of a cooperative society are quite different from those of a company. This research aims to analyze key issues on governance and auditing for cooperatives to demonstrate the importance of auditing for cooperatives based on international standards. Also policy recommendations are made for best practices of cooperative auditing.

___

  • Weaver, G. R., Trevino, L.K. and Cochran, P. L., (1999). “Corporate ethics programs as control systems: Influences of executive commitment and environmental factors”, Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), pp. 41-58.
  • White, A. W., (1976). "The essentials for the effective internal audit department", Internal Auditor, April, pp. 30–3.
  • Thompson, A. A. and A. J. Strickland, (2001). "Strategic Management: Concepts and Cases" (International edition) (McGraw Hill, Boston)
  • Titera,W.R., (2013). "Updating Audit Standards—Enabling Audit Data Analysis," Journal of Information Systems, 27, 1, 325–331, Spring, 2013.
  • Trevino, L.K. and Weaver, G.R., (2003). "Managing Ethics in Organizations: A Social Scientific Perspective on Business Ethics", Stanford University Press, California.
  • Teece, D. J. (2010). "Business Models, Business Strategy and Innovation." Long Range Planning 43(2/3): 172-194.
  • Thompson C (2001). "CAAT can do". Internal Auditor, 58(3): 73-75.
  • T.C. Yasalar (1969). 1163 Sayılı Kooperatifler Kanunu. Ankara : Resmi Gazete (13195 sayılı-10.05.1969).
  • Taylor Keith (2015). "Learning from the Co-operative Institutional Model: How to Enhance Organizational Robustness of Third Sector Organizations with More Pluralistic Forms of Governance", Administrative Sciences, ISSN 2076-3387
  • Sutton, S. G., (1993). "Toward an understanding of the factors affecting the quality of the audit process", Decision Sciences, , Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 88–105.
  • Steiger, J. H., and Lind, J. C., (1980). Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the Psychometric Society annual meeting, Iowa City, IA.
  • Spraakman, G., (1997). "Transaction cost economics: a theory of internal audit", Managerial Auditing Journal, , Vol. 17, No. 7, pp. 323–30.
  • Selim, G. and McNamee, D. (1999). "Risk management and Internal auditing: What are the essential building blocks for successful paradign change", International Journal of Auditing Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 147-155.
  • Schneider, A., (1984). "Modeling external auditors’ evaluations of internal auditing", Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 22, pp. 657–78.
  • Sarens, G. and Beelde, I. D. (2006). "Internal auditors’ perception about their role in risk management: A comparison between US and Belgian companies", Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 61-80.
  • Sarens, G. and Christopher, J. (2010). "The association between corporate governance guidelines and risk management and internal control practices: Evidence from a comparative study", Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 25 No. 4, pp. 288-208.
  • Sawyer, L. B. & Dittenhofer, M. A., (1996). "Sawyerˈs Internal Auditing: The Practice of Modern Internal Auditing", , 4th edition, Altamonte Springs, FL: The Institute of Internal Auditors.
  • Sawyer, L. B., (1988). "Sawyerˈs Internal Auditing", Altamonte Springs, , FL: Institute of Internal Auditors.
  • Stern, G. M. (1994). "15 ways internal auditing departments are adding value", Internal Auditor, Vol. 51, No. 2, pp. 30–3.
  • Rasmussen, J. (1997). "Risk management in a dynamic society: A modelling problem", Safety Science, Vol. 27 No. 2/3, pp. 183-213.
  • Pokrovac I, Tušek B, Oluiæ A (2010). "The Relation of Risk Management and Internal Audit Function: The Case of Croatia". 5th International Conference, An Enterprise Odysses: From Crisis to Prosperity Challenges for Government and Business, Held in Opatija (Hrvatska) on 26-29 May 2010. From .
  • Ott John, Andrew MacLeod, and Kevin Mar Fan (2008). " Computer-assisted Audit Techniques: Value of Data Mining for Corporate Auditors", Information System Journal, Volume 3.
  • Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., and Tucci, C.L. (2005). "Clarifying Business Models: Origins, Present, and Future of the Concept." Communications of the Association for Information Systems 2005(16): 1-25.
  • Mihret, D. G. (2013), "The risk management rationale of internal auditing: a labor process analysis", Working Paper, Vol. University of New England No. Armidale, Australia
  • Martin JR (2004). "Sampling made simple". Internal Auditor, 61(4): 21-24.
  • Marais M (2004). "Quality assurance in internal auditing: An analysis of the standards and guidelines implemented by the IIA". Meditari Accountancy Research, 12(2): 85- 107.
  • Mazzarol Tim, Elena Mamouni Limnios ve Sophie Reboud (2011). "Co-Operative Enterprise: A Unique Business Model?", Conference Paper, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235432100
  • Masanell Ramon Casadesus ve Joan Enric Ricart. (2010). " From Strategy to Business Models and onto Tactics", Long Range Planning 43 (2010) 195-215. http://www.elsevier.com/locate/lrp
  • Liebowitz J, Rubenstein-Montano B, McCaw D, Buchwalter J, Browning C, Newman B, Rebeck K (2000). "The knowledge audit". Knowledge and Process Management, 7(1): 3- 10.
  • KPMG (2013). "Transforming Internal Audit: A Maturity Model from Data Analytics to Continuous Assurance", https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/pdf/2015/09/ch-pub-20150922- transforming-internal-audit-maturity-model-en.pdf
  • Kutum I, Fraser I, Hussainey K (2015). "The application of business risk audit methodology within non-Big-4 firms". Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 13(2): 226-246.
  • Johnson, M. W., Christensen, C.M., and Kagermann, H. (2008). "Reinventing Your Business Model." Harvard Business Review 86(12): 50-59.
  • Jacobus, D (2015). "New paradigm of managing risks: Risk and control self-assessment". Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 3: 32-34.
  • Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA). (2015). " Data Analytics and the Future of Internal Audit", The IIA Research Foundation, in partnership with Grant Thornton.
  • Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA). (2017). "The International Professional Practice Framework (IPPF)". Altamonte Springs, FL: The IIA.
  • International Co-operative Alliance. Available online: http://ica.coop/en/what-coop/co-operative-identity-values- principles
  • Hubbard LD (2002). "CSA by any name". Internal Auditor, 59(6): 22-23.
  • Harrington, L. (2015). " Driving Success in a Changing World: 10 Imperatives for Internal Audit", IIA International Conference Presentation, July 5-8 2015, Canada.
  • Hansmann, H. (1996). "The Ownership of Enterprise", Boston, Harvard University Press.
  • Flesher DL, De Magalhaes R (1995). "Electronic workpapers". Internal Auditor, 52(4): 38- 43.
  • Eriş, Gönen (2001). "Kooperatifler Hukuku", Üçüncü Baskı, Ankara.
  • Deryal, Yahya (1998). "Türk Hukukunda Kooperatiflerin Hukuki Niteliği Sorunu", İstanbul Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi, Prof. Dr. Oğuz İmregün Armağanı, İstanbul.
  • Dittenhofer M (1994). "Strategy for the internal audit engagement". Managerial Auditing Journal, 9(8): 13- 17.
  • Desrochers, M & Fischer, K (2005). “The Power of Networks: Integration and Financial Cooperative Performance” Annals of Public and Co-operative Economics Vol 76 (3) pp 307-354.
  • Davis, K (2001). “Credit Union Governance and Survival of the Cooperative Form” Journal of Financial Services Research 19:2/3 197-210.
  • Cuevas, C and Fischer, K (2006). "Cooperative Financial Institutions: Issues in Governance, Regulation and Supervision", World Bank Working Paper No 82.
  • COSO (2004). "The new COSO Enterprise Risk Management Framework", www.coso.org.tr
  • Coetzee P, Fourie H (2009). "Perceptions on the role of internal audit function in respect of risk". African Journal of Business Management, 3(13): 959-968.
  • Cornforth, C (2004). “The governance of cooperatives and mutual associations: a paradox perspective” Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 75:1 pp 11-32.
  • Christensen BE, Elder RJ, Glover SM (2015). "Behind the numbers: Insights into large audit firm sampling policies". Accounting Horizons, 29(1): 61-81.
  • Castanheira N, Rodrigues LL, Craig R (2010). "Factors associated with the adoption of risk based internal auditing". Managerial Auditing Journal, 25(1): 79- 98.
  • Burnaby P, Hass S (2009). "A summary of Global Common Body of Knowledge" 2006 (CBOK) study in internal auditing. Managerial Auditing Journal, 24(9): 813-834.
  • Bilgili, Fatih ve Demirkapı Ertan (2012). "Şirketler Hukuku", 2. Baskı, Adana.
  • Bellman, R. and C. Clark (1957). "On the construction of a multi-stage, multi-person business game." Operations Research 5(4): 469-503.
  • Bailey JA (2010). "Core Competencies for Today’s Internal Auditor: Report II". The IIA Research Foundation, Altamonte Springs, FL: The IIARF.
  • Aktepe, Eyyüp (1988). Kooperatif İşletmeciliği, Ankara.
  • AICPA, (2012). "TheWorld in 2025: Technological Trends." www.aicpa.org/research/cpahorizons2025/globalforces/technological/ pages/default.aspx.
  • AICPA, (2015). " Audit Analytics and Continuous Audit: Looking Toward the Future". American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Inc. New York, NY 10036-8775.
  • Anderson Alan W. (2017). 4 Keys to the Future of Audit. White Paper. https://tax.thomsonreuters.com/wpcontent/private/pdf/checkpoint/whitepapers/Checkpoint-Al-AndersonWhitepaper.pdf. Erişim Tarihi: 01.09.2017.
Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2148-1237
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1941
  • Yayıncı: Türk Kooperatifçilik Kurumu
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

OKUL KOOPERATİFÇİLİK ÇALIŞMALARININ ÖĞRENCİLERİN GİRİŞİMCİLİK BECERİLERİ VE GİRİŞİMCİ KİŞİLİK ÖZELLİKLERİ AÇISINDAN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Mustafa TAHİROĞLU, Ali MEYDAN

TÜRKİYE’DE KONUT POLİTİKALARININ KONUT KOOPERATİFÇİLİĞİ ÜZERİNE ETKİLERİ VE KONUT KOOPERATİFLERİNİN KONUT ÜRETİMİNDEKİ ROLÜ ÜZERİNE BİR İNCELEME

HASAN YAYLI, SİNAN AVAN

İZMİR, ÇANAKKALE VE BALIKESİR İLLERİNDE KEÇİ YETİŞTİRİCİLİĞİ YAPAN İŞLETMELERİN DAMIZLIK KOYUN VE KEÇİ YETİŞTİRİCİLERİ BİRLİĞİNİN İŞLEVLERİ ÜZERİNE GÖRÜŞ VE BEKLENTİLERİ

Sait ENGİNDENİZ, DUYGU AKTÜRK, A. Ferhan SAVRAN, NEDİM KOŞUM, Turgay TAŞKIN, HARUN KESENKAŞ, Mukadderat GÖKMEN, Ayşe UZMAY, Görkem ÖZTÜRK

KIRSAL KALKINMADA YEREL YÖNETİMLER İLE ÜRETİCİ ÖRGÜTLERİNİN İŞBİRLİĞİ OLANAKLARI ÜZERİNE BİR İNCELEME: İZMİR İLİ ÖRNEĞİ

FATİH ÖZDEN, Fazıl Akın OLGUN

GİRİŞİMCİLİK VE KOOPERATİFLERDE TARIMSAL YAYIMIN MEVCUT DURUMU

Ebru IRMAK, Aydın GÜREL

ÖZEL HASTANELERDE ÇALIŞAN SAĞLIK PERSONELİNİN KURUMLARINDA UYGULANMAKTA OLAN PERFORMANS DEĞERLENDİRME SİSTEMLERİNE DUYDUKLARI MEMNUNİYET VE BİR ÖRNEK UYGULAMA

Sinem CANOL, PELİN VARDARLIER

TÜRK KOOPERATİF YÖNETİM PERFORMANSINA ETKİSİ AÇISINDANTOPLUMSAL İLETİŞİM AĞI KOOPERATİFÇİLİKTE HOLLANDA ÖRNEĞİ “NAUTILUS”

Sylvia Monique de ROOIJ, Seyfi ÖZGÜZEL, Kamil U. BİLGİN

TARIM SATIŞ KOOPERATİFLERİ BİRLİKLERİNDE VZA İLE ETKİNLİK ÖLÇÜMÜ: MARMARABİRLİK ÖRNEĞİ

NURİ ÖZGÜR DOĞAN, YUSUF ERSOY

TÜRK KOOPERATİFÇİLİĞİNİN DÖNEMSEL ANALİZİ (1950-1960 DÖNEMİ)

Yasemin MEMİOĞLU

NEVŞEHİR TARIM KREDİ KOOPERATİFİ ÇALIŞANLARININ SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR KALKINMAYA YÖNELİK BİLGİ, TUTUM VE DAVRANIŞ DÜZEYİNİN BELİRLENMESİ

Ali ERBAŞI, ŞÜKRAN GÜNGÖR TANÇ, ABDURRAHMAN GÜMRAH