Ayşegül TAŞ, Levent YILMAZ, Zeynep Birce ERGÖR

Göç Yönetiminde Lojistik Konum Seçimi: Ege Bölgesi Üzerine Bir Inceleme

Türkiye coğrafi konumu gereği önemli göç rotaları üzerinde bulunan bir ülkedir. Özellikle son yıllarda artan göç eden insan sayısındaki yoğunluk, Türkiye’deki göç olgusunun farklı yönlerden ele alınarak etkin bir şekilde yönetilmesini gerekli kılmıştır. Bu bağlamda, göç yönetiminde lojistik konum seçimi, önem arz eden konuların başında gelmektedir. Göç yönetiminin sürdürülebilirliği, operasyonel destek faaliyetlerin yürütülmesi ile doğrudan ilişkilidir. Destek faaliyetleri sadece sağlam zemine sahip bir lojistik yapı üzerine inşa edilebilir. Mevcut kaynakların verimli ve etkin kullanımı organizasyon yapısını güçlendirir ve aynı zamanda bu yapı içindeki personeli motive ve teşvik eder, bu da yönetimi güçlendirir. Bu çalışmada, Ege Bölgesi’nde göç yönetiminde operasyonel faaliyetlerin sürdürülmesi konusunda önem taşıyan lojistik desteği sağlamak amacıyla kurulabilecek bir lojistik tesisin yer seçimi sorununa yönelik çözüm önerisi sunulmaktadır. Çalışmada öncelikle Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci (AHS) yöntemi kullanılarak lojistik yer seçimi kriterleri sıralanmıştır. Ardından, sıralanan kriterler doğrultusunda, MULTIMOORA tekniği kullanılarak lojistik yerler belirlenmiştir.

Logistics Location Selection In Migration Management: An Analysis Of Aegean Region

Turkey is located on important migration routes due to its geographical location. Especially in recent years,the increasing density of the number of migrants has made it necessary to effectively manage the migrationphenomenon in Turkey by addressing it from different angles. In this context, the choice of logistic locationin the fight against migration is one of the important issues in migration management. The sustainabilityof the fight against migration is directly associated with the feasibility of operational activities. The supportactivities can only be built on a logistic structure that has sound grounds. The efficient and effective use ofsupplies strengthens the organizational structure, and at the same time motivates and encourages thepersonnel within that structure, which reinforces the management. In this study, a solution is proposed forthe location selection problem of a logistics facility that can be established in order to provide logisticalsupport that is important for the maintenance of operational activities in the Aegean Sea in the fight againstmigration. In this respect, the aim of the study is to address the facility location problem by employing Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and MULTIMOORA multi-criteria decision making methods. First,logistics location selection criteria rankings are obtained by using AHP. Based on these criteria, logisticslocations are determined by MULTIMOORA technique. In conclusion, logistics location selection criteriarankings are offered as a solution for migration.

PDF

___

AAP-6, (2015). NATO Glossary of Terms and Definitions, North Atlantic Treaty Organization NATO Standardization Office, 2-L-5.
Acar, Ö. E., & Köylüoğlu, A. S. (2020). Sürdürülebilir Tedarikçi Seçiminin Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi (AHP) Yöntemiyle Analizi. Third Sector Social Economic Review, 55(1), 419-440.
Adalı, E. A., & Işık, A. T. (2017). The multi-objective decision making methods based on MULTIMOORA and MOOSRA for the laptop selection problem. Journal of Industrial Engineering International, 13(2), 229-237.
Arabani, A. B., & Farahani, R. Z. (2012). Facility location dynamics: An overview of classifications and applications. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 62(1), 408-420.
Beine, M., Bertoli, S., & Fernández‐Huertas Moraga, J. (2016). A practitioners’ guide to gravity models of international migration. The World Economy, 39(4), 496-512.
Blair, J. P., & Premus, R. (1993). Major factors in industrial location: A review. Economic Development Quarterly, 1(1), 72-85.
Bohn, S., & Pugatch, T. (2015). US border enforcement and Mexican immigrant location choice. Demography, 52(5), 1543-1570.
Brauers, W. K. (2008). Multi-objective contractor's ranking by applying the MOORA Method. Journal Of Business Economics And Management, (4), 245-255.
Brauers, W. K., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2006). The MOORA method and it’s application to privatization in a transition economy. Control and Cybernetics, 35(2), 445.
Canel, C., & Khumawala, B. M. (1996). A mixed-integer programming approach for the international facilities location problem. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 16(4), 49-68.
Chakraborty, S. (2011). Applications of the MOORA method for decision making in manufacturing environment. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 54(9-12), 1155-1166.
Chaneta, I. (2014). Planning and decision-making. International Journal Of Innovative Research & Development, 3(2), 165-167.
Crawley, H., & Hagen‐Zanker, J. (2019). Deciding Where to go: Policies, People and Perceptions Shaping Destination Preferences. International Migration, 57(1), 20-35.
Çetin, T. (2008). The Socio-economic Outcomes of the Last Turkish Migration (1989) From Bulgaria to Turkey. Turkish Studies, 3 (7), 241-270.
Drezner, T., Drezner, Z., & Kalczynski, P. J. (2016). The multiple markets competitive location problem. Kybernetes, 45(6), 854-865.
Düvell, F. (2019). The ‘Great Migration’of summer 2015: analysing the assemblage of key drivers in Turkey. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 45(12), 2227-2240.
Elitok, S. P., & Straubhaar, T. (2010). Turkey: Change from an emigration to an immigration and now to a transit migration country (No. 3-16). HWWI Policy Paper.
Farahani, R. Z., Steadieseifi, M., & Asgari, N. (2010). Multiple criteria facility location problems: a survey. Applied Mathematical Modelling, (34), 1689-1709.
Ghadge, A., Yang, Q., Caldwell, N., Caldwell, N., Konig, K. & Tiwari, M. K. (2016). Facility location for a closed-loop distribution network: a hybrid approach. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 44(9), 884-902.
Hekman, J. S. (1982). Survey of location decisions in the south. Economic Review, (6), 6-19.
Jiraskova, E. (2015). A comparison of location factors evaluation in the secondary and tertiary sectors. E+ M Ekonomie a Management, (1), 46.
Karande, P., & Chakraborty, S. (2012). Application of multi-objective optimization on the basis of ratio analysis (MOORA) method for materials selection. Materials & Design, 37, 317- 324.
Kim, Y., & Chung, E. S. (2013). Fuzzy VIKOR approach for assessing the vulnerability of the water supply to climate change and variability in South Korea. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37(22), 9419-9430.
Kirişçi, K. (2004). Reconciling refugee protection with combating irregular migration: Turkey and the EU. Perceptions (Summer), 9, 5-20.
Kuschminder, K., & Koser, K. (2017). The role of migration-specific and migration-relevant policies in migrant decision-making in transit (No. 022). United Nations UniversityMaastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
Maccarthy, B., & Atthirawong, W. (2003). Factors affecting location decisions in international operations-a Delphi study. International Journal of Operations & Production Managemenet, 23(7), 794-818.
Meijboom, B., & Voordijk, H. (2003). International operations and location decisions: a firm level approach. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 94(4), 463-476.
Özkul, G. & Dengiz, S. (2018). The Factors Affecting of the Syrian Immigrants to become entrepreneur: The case of Hatay Province. Third Sector Social Economic Review, 53(3), 1044-1065.
Plaziak, M., & Szymanska, A. I. (2014). Role of modern factors in the process of choosing a location of an enterprise. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 120, 72-83.
Ramanathan, R. (2001). A note on the use of the analytic hierarchy process for environmental impact assessment. Journal of Environmental Management, 63(1), 27-35.
Rathi, R., Khanduja, D., & Sharma, S. (2015). Synergy of fuzzy AHP and Six Sigma for capacity waste management in Indian automotive industry. Decision Science Letters, 4(3), 441-452.
Saaty, T. (1994). How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Interfaces, 24(6), 19- 43.
Salardini, F. (2013). An AHP-GRA method for asset allocation: A case study of investment firms on Tehran Stock Exchange. Decision Science Letters, 2(4), 275-280.
Srivastava, S. K., Amula, A., & Ghagare, P. (2016). Service facility relocation decision: a case study. Facilities, 34(9/10), 595-610.
Tolay, J. (2015). Discovering immigration into Turkey: The emergence of a dynamic field. International Migration, 53(6), 57-73.
Wissink, M., Düvell, F., & van Eerdewijk, A. (2013). Dynamic migration intentions and the impact of socio-institutional environments: A transit migration hub in Turkey. Journal of Ethnic and Migration studies, 39(7), 1087-1105.
Yang, J., & Lee, H. (1997). An AHP decision model for facility location selection. Facilities, 15(9/10), 241-254.
Zhang, M., Huang, J., & Zhu, J. M. (2012). Reliable facility location problem considering facility failure scenarios. Kybernetes, 41(10), 1440-146.