Ademi Merkeziyetçiliğin Ekonomik Büyüme Üzerinde Etkisi

Mali ademi merkeziyetçilik ve ekonomik büyüme arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemek için, biri dengesiz ve diğeri dengeli olmak üzere 1980-2000 dönemlerini kapsayan iki farklı panel veri seti kullanılmıştır. OECD ülkelerinin dengeli panelinde önemli bir ilişki yokken, gelişmekte olan ülkeler ve OECD ülkelerinin dengesiz panel verilerinde mali ademi merkeziyetin ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki olumlu etkisini destekleyen kanıtlar bulunmuştur.

The Impact of Decentralization on Economic Growth

Two different panel data sets are used, one unbalanced and one balanced over the 1980-2000 periods to examine the relationship between fiscal decentralization and economic growth. It is found evidence supporting a positive effect of fiscal decentralization on economic growth in the unbalanced panel data of developing and OECD countries while no significant relationship in the balanced panel of OECD countries.

PDF

___

Akai, N. ve Sakata, M. (2002). Fiscal Decentralization Contributes to Economic Growth Evidence from State-Level Cross Section Data for the United States. Journal of Urban Economic, 52(1), s. 93-108.
Arellano, M. ve Bond, S. (1991). Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), s. 277-297.
Baltagi, B. H. (2005). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data (Third Edition). John Wiley & Sons.
Bennett, Robert J. (1990). Decentralization, Local Governments and Markets. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Bird, R. M. ve Vaillancourt, F. (1999). Fiscal Decentralization in Developing Countries: An Overview. In: Fiscal Decentralization in Developing Countries (Eds.: R. M. Bird and F. Vaillancourt). Cambridge University Press, s. 1-48.
Caselli, F., Esquivel, G. ve Lefort, F. (1996). Reopening Convergence Debate: A New Look at Cross-Country Growth Empirics. Journal of Economic Growth, 1, s. 363-389.
Davoodi, H. ve Zou, H.-Fu, (1998). Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth: A CrossCountry Study. Journal of Urban Economics, 43(2), s. 244-257.
de Mello, L. ve Barenstein, M. (2001). Fiscal Decentralization and Governance: A CrossCountry Analysis. IMF Working Paper. de Mello, L. R. (2000). Fiscal Decentralization and Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations: A CrossCountry Analysis. World Development, 28(2), s. 365-380.
Eller, Markus (2004). The Determinants of Fiscal Decentralisation and its Impact on Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from a Panel of OECD Countries. Diploma Thesis.
Gemmell, Norman & Kneller, Richard & Sanz, Ismael. (2013). Fiscal decentralization and economic growth: Spending versus revenue decentralization. Economic Inquiry, Vol. 51, No. 4, October, s. 1915–1931.
Stigler, G. J. (1957). The Tenable Range of Functions of Local Government. In: Federal Expenditure Policy for Economic Growth and Stability (Ed. US Congress Joint Economic Committee). Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office. Thiessen, Ulrich (2003). Fiscal Decentralisation and Economic Growth in High‐Income OECD Countries. Fiscal Studies, 24, s. 237-274.
Thornton, John (2007). Fiscal decentralization and economic growth reconsidered. Journal of Urban Economics 61, s. 64–70.
Wildasin, D. (1997). Fiscal Aspects of Evolving Federations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Woller, Gary M. ve Phillips, Kerk (1998). Fiscal decentralisation and IDC economic growth: An empirical investigation. The Journal of Development Studies, 34:4, s. 139-148.
Yilmaz, Serdar (2000). The Impact of Fiscal Decentralization on Macroeconomic Performance. Proceedings: Annual Conference on Taxation and Minutes of the Annual Meeting of the National Tax Association, 92, s. 251-260.
Zhang, T. and Zou, H.-F. (1998). Fiscal Decentralization, Public Spending, and Economic Growth in China. Journal of Public Economics, 67, s. 221-240.