COVID-19 Pandemisinde Fiziksel Tasarım Stüdyolarından Sanal Tasarım Stüdyolarına Geçişi Değerlendirmek: İkinci Sınıfların Dijital Tasarım Gelişimi

Çevrimiçi tasarım stüdyoları dünya çapındaki farklı üniversitelerde popülerlik kazanırken, bu alandaki bilgi ve deneyimler sınırlı kalmaktadır. 2020 yılında koronavirüsün hızla yayılması nedeniyle üniversiteler çevrimiçi platformlara geçmek zorunda kalmıştır. Bunun sonucu olarak, birçok tasarım dersinde eğitmenler ve öğrenciler ilk kez bir çevrimiçi tasarım stüdyosu deneyimi yaşadılar. İlk çevrimiçi tasarım stüdyosu deneyimleri, farklı disiplinlerde farklı şekillerde sonuçlanmış olabilmektedir ve bu farklı deneyimleri araştırmak ve ölçmek tasarım eğitimi açısından önem taşımaktadır. Bu çalışmanın kapsamı iç mimarlık disipliniyle sınırlandırılmıştır ve yüz yüze eğitimde İç Mimarlık ve Çevre Tasarımı Bölümü ikinci sınıf öğrencilerinin tasarım dersinde bilgisayar destekli yazılımlar kullanılması izin verilmezken, çevrimiçi tasarım stüdyosunda bu öğrencilerin ve tasarım dersindeki hocaların dijital ortamdaki deneyimlerinin araştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Bu çalışma, öğrenciler ve öğretim elemanları ile yapılan, Akdeniz Üniversitesi, Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Bilimsel Araştırma ve Yayın Etiği Kurulu’nun 20.11.2020 tarihli ve 19/240 numaralı etik onayının bulunduğu anketin sonuçlarına dayanmaktadır. 2019-20 akademik yılı bahar döneminde “İç Mekan Tasarım Stüdyosu IV” dersine katılan 32 öğrencinin tamamı ve üç öğretim elemanı, çevrimiçi öğrenme deneyimleri hakkında anket çalışmasına katıldı. Çoktan seçmeli sorulardan elde edilen veriler MS Excel ve açık uçlu soruların yanıtları ise tematik analiz yöntemi kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Çalışmada çıkan sonuçlar, öğrencilerin çevrimiçi stüdyoda yüz yüze eğitime göre tasarım geliştirme açısında daha iyi ilerleme kaydettiğini ve hem hocaların ve hem öğrencilerin çevrimiçi tasarım stüdyosundan memnun olduğunu göstermektedir. Sonuçlar aynı zamanda; takım çalışması ve işbirliği oluşturma yönünden, öğretim görevlilerindeki ve dersin içeriğindeki noksanlıklara işaret etmektedir. Bu araştırmanın devamında, ikinci sınıf iç mimarlık öğrencilerinin deneyimlerini yüz yüze ve çevrimiçi tasarım stüdyosu olarak daha detaylı ve ayrıntılı araştırarak iki yöntemi daha kapsamlı karşılaştırmaya ihtiyaç duyulmaktadır.

Evaluating the Shift from Physical to Virtual Design Studios During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Exploring the Second Years’ Digital Design Development

While online design studios have gained popularity in different universities around the world, our understanding of online design studios remains limited. Due to the rapid spread of coronavirus in 2020, universities were forced to migrate to the online platform. Consequently, many design instructors and students had their first experience with an online design studio. In the education of different design disciplines, this first online design studio experience may have resulted in different ways and different studies should be conducted to measure them. The scope of this study is limited to the discipline of interior architecture. This study aimed to investigate the experience of second-year students and instructors at Department of Interior Architecture and Environmental Design, where, under normal conditions, students are not allowed to develop their design projects using computer-aided software. This study is based on the results of the questionnaire survey conducted with students and instructors, with the ethical approval of Akdeniz University, Social and Human Sciences Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Committee, dated 20.11.2020 and numbered 19/240. All 32 students attending the Interior Design Studio IV course in Spring 2020 and three instructors were invited to complete a questionnaire about their experiences with online learning. Data from close-ended questions were analysed by using MS Excel and answers to the open-ended questions were analysed using thematic analysis. The results suggest that students demonstrated better progress in design and were satisfied with the online design studio. The results also point to shortcomings among instructors and the content of the course in building on teamwork and cooperation among students. Further studies are needed to present a detailed comparison between the face-to-face and online design studio learning for second-year students.

___

  • Al Maani, D., Alnusairat, S., & Al-Jokhadar, A. (2021). Transforming learning for architecture: online design studio as the new norm for crises adaptation under COVID-19. Open House International. 46(3), 348-358. https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-01-2021-0016
  • Allam, Z., Dey, G., & Jones, D. S. (2020). Artificial intelligence (AI) provided early detection of the coronavirus (COVID-19) in China and will influence future Urban health policy internationally. AI, (2), 156-165. https://doi.org/10.3390/ai1020009
  • Almanthari, A., Maulina, S., & Bruce, S. (2020). Secondary school mathematics teachers’ views on E-learning implementation barriers during the COVID-19 pandemic: the case of Indonesia. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(7), em 1860. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8240
  • Basilaia, G., & Kvavadze, D. (2020). Transition to online education in schools during a SARSCoV- 2 coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in Georgia. Pedagogical Research, 5(4), em0060 60. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/7937
  • Bender, D.M. (2003). Interior design faculty intentions to adopt distance education. Journal of Interior Design, 29(1‐2), 66-81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1668.2003.tb00385.x
  • Bender, D.M., & Vredevoogd, J.D. (2006). Using online education technologies to support studio instruction. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 9(4), 114-122.
  • Brandon, L. & McLain‐Kark, J. (2001). Effects of Hand‐Drawing and CAD techniques on design development: A comparison of design merit ratings. Journal of Interior Design, 27(2), 26- 34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1668.2001.tb00475.x
  • Broadfoot, O. and Bennett, R. (2003). Design studios: online. In Apple University consortium academic and developers conference proceedings 2003 (pp. 9-21).
  • Charitonidou, M. (2021). The use of virtual environments in architectural design studio teaching: collaborative computer-aided strategies of distance learning. In Online Education:
  • Teaching in a Time of Change (2021). ETH Zurich, Chair of the History and Theory of Urban Design.
  • Chen, W., & You, M. (2009). A framework for the development of online design learning environment. Bulletin of Japanese Society for the Science of Design, 56(1), 83-92. https://doi.org/10.11247/jssdj.56.83_1
  • Chen, W., & You, M. (2010). Student response to an Internet-mediated industrial design studio course. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20(2), 151-174. doi: 10.1007/s10798-008-9068-2
  • Cini, M.A., & Vilic, B. (1999). Online Teaching: Moving form Risk to Challenge. Syllabus, 12(10), 38-40.
  • Dağlıoğlu, E. K., Pınar, E., Dino, İ. G., Arslan, P. Y., & Bütüner, F. B. (2020). Teaching Architectural Design Studio Remotely: The Introduction to Architectural Design Course at METU. Journal of Design Studio, 2(2), 153-157. https://doi.org/10.46474/jds.820352
  • Dreamson, N. (2020). Online Design Education: Meta‐Connective Pedagogy. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 39(3), 483-497. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12314
  • Drexler, A. and Chafee, R. (1976). The architecture of the Ecole des Beaux-Arts. Secker and Warburg.
  • Dyson, M.C., & Campello, S.B. (2003). Evaluating Virtual Learning Environments: What Are We Measuring?. Electronic Journal of E-learning, 1(1), 11-20.
  • Faherty, L.J., Schwartz, H.L., Ahmed, F., Zheteyeva, Y., Uzicanin, A., & Uscher-Pines, L. (2019). School and preparedness officials' perspectives on social distancing practices to reduce influenza transmission during a pandemic: Considerations to guide future work. Preventive medicine reports, 14, 100871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.100871
  • Fichera, T.A. (2012). The effectiveness of distance delivery studios in interior design education. (Unpublished master’s thesis) The Graduate College, University of Nebraska; Lincoln.
  • Fleischmann, K. (2020). Online design education: Searching for a middle ground. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 19(1), 36-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022218758231
  • Houghton, N. (2016). Six into one: The contradictory art school curriculum and how it came about. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 35(1), 107-120. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12039
  • Ibrahim, A. F., Attia, A. S., Asma'M, B., & Ali, H. H. (2021). Evaluation of the online teaching of architectural design and basic design courses case study: College of Architecture at JUST, Jordan. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 12(2), 2345-2353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2020.10.006
  • Jones, D., & Dewberry, E. (2013). Building Information Modelling Design Ecologies: A New Model?. International Journal of 3-D Information Modeling (IJ3DIM), 2(1), 53-64. doi: 10.4018/ij3dim.2013010106
  • Jones, D., Lotz, N., & Holden, G. (2021). A longitudinal study of Virtual Design Studio (VDS) use in STEM distance design education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 31:839–865. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09576-z
  • Malins, J., Gray, C., Pirie, I., Cordiner, S., & McKillop, C. (2003). The virtual design studio: developing new tools for learning, practice and research in design.
  • Marshalsey, L., & Sclater, M. (2020). Together but Apart: Creating and Supporting Online Learning Communities in an Era of Distributed Studio Education. International Journal of Art & Design Education. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12331
  • Masdéu, M., & Fuses, J. (2017). Reconceptualizing the design studio in architectural education: Distance learning and blended learning as transformation factors. ArchNet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 11(2), 6.
  • Meggs, S.M., Greer, A., & Collins, S. (2012). Virtual reality in interior design education: Enhanced outcomes through constructivist engagement in Second Life. International Journal of Web- Based Learning and Teaching Technologies (IJWLTT), 7(1), 19-35. doi: 10.4018/jwltt.2012010102
  • Mohammed, S.B., Taha, M.S., Mohammed, R.B., Mamand, S.A., & Mohammed, D.A. (2021). Teaching Methodology for Interior Design Studio-I during COVID-19 Pandemic at Tishk International University. Eurasian Journal of Science and Engineering, 7(1), 185-196. doi: 10.23918/eajse.v7i1p185
  • Özorhon, G., & Lekesiz, G. (2021). Re-considering the Architectural Design Studio after Pandemic: Tools, Problems, Potentials. Journal of Design Studio, 3(1), 19-36. https://doi.org/10.46474/jds.927181
  • Öztoprak, A. (2004). An evaluation of virtual design studio: A course between Middle East Technical University and Delft University of Technology (Unpublished master’s thesis) School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
  • Park, J.Y. (2011). Design education online: Learning delivery and evaluation. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 30(2), 176-187. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476- 8070.2011.01689.x
  • Pasin, B. (2017). Rethinking the design studio-centered architectural education. A case study at schools of architecture in Turkey. The Design Journal, 20(sup1), S1270-S1284. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352656
  • Saghafi, M., Franz, J., & Crowther, P. (2012). Perceptions of physical versus virtual design studio education. Archnet-IJAR, 6(1), 6-22.
  • Sagun, A., Demirkan, H., & Goktepe, M. (2001). A framework for the design studio in web‐based education. Journal of Art & Design Education, 20(3), 332-342. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5949.00282
  • Schnabel, M.A. & Kvan, T. (2001). Implementing the first virtual environment design studio. In Architectural Education for the Asian Century, Proceedings of the 1st ACAE Conference on Architectural Education, Centre for Advanced Studies in Architecture, National University of Singapore, 2001 (pp. 157-166).
  • Şekerci, Y., Danacı, H. M., & Elinç, Z. K. (2021). Uzaktan eğitimin uygulamalı derslerde sürdürülebilirliği: mimarlık bölümleri örneği. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 12(1), 54-68. https://doi.org/10.29048/makufebed.874055
  • Shao, Y.J., Daley, L., & Vaughan, L. (2007). Exploring Web 2.0 for virtual design studio teaching. Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, Singapore.
  • Simoff, S.J., & Maher, M.L. (2000). Analysing participation in collaborative design environments. Design Studies, 21(2), 119-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(99)00043-5
  • Uscher-Pines, L., Schwartz, H.L., Ahmed, F., Zheteyeva, Y., Meza, E., Baker, G., & Uzicanin, A. (2018). School practices to promote social distancing in K-12 schools: review of influenza pandemic policies and practices. BMC Public Health, 18(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5302-3
  • Waks, L.J. (2001). Donald Schon's philosophy of design and design education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 11(1), 37-51.
  • Wojtowicz, J. (1995). Virtual design studio (Vol. 1). Hong Kong University Press.