Paris Memorandumu Denetim Datalarının Liman Devletleri Bağlamında Analizi (2016-2018)

Bu çalışmada 2016-2018 yılları arasında gerçekleştirilen Paris MoU liman devleti denetimlerine odaklanılmıştır. Paris MoU üyesi otoriteler, 1 Ocak 2016’dan 31 Aralık 2018’e kadar olan süreçte toplamda 50.680 adet denetleme gerçekleştirmiştir. Bu denetlemelerde tutuklanan toplam gemi sayısı 1.944’dür. Bu sayı, toplam denetlemelerin %3,91’ine karşılık gelmektedir. İncelenen üç yıllık süreç içerisinde tespit edilen eksiklik sayısı ise 8.765 gibi oldukça büyük bir rakamdır. 2016-2018 yılları arasında en fazla denetim yapan üç liman devletinin Rusya, İtalya ve Yunanistan olduğu belirlenmiştir. Bu otoritelerin denetlenme yüzdesi ortalamaları sırasıyla; %20,17, %11,31 ve %9,18 olarak hesaplanmıştır. Benzer şekilde bu üç liman devletinin tutuklama oranları da diğer devletlerden daha yüksek bulunmuştur. İncelenen süreçte en büyük yüzdeye sahip olan eksiklik türleri sırasıyla; yönetim (%24,13), güvenlik & yangın teçhizatları (%23,55), ekipman & makine (%20,75), seyir & iletişim (%14,90), sertifikalar (%5,65), çalışma & yaşam (%5,44) koşulları stabilite & yapı (%4,03) ve gemi & kargo operasyonları (%1,54) başlıkları altında yer almıştır. Tutuklanmalar üzerinde etki yüzdesi büyük olan eksiklik türleri ana başlıklarının altında yer alan alt başlıkların belirlenmesi sürecinde; ISM, yangın tatbikatı, acil durum yangın pompası-boruları, can kurtarma botları-muhteviyatı, yangına dayanıklı bölümlerdeki yangın kapıları-açıklıkları, haritalar, notik neşriyatlar, ışıklar-şekiller-ses sinyalleri, makine dairesinin temizliği, yardımcı makinalar, balast-yakıt-diğer tankları ve acil durum güç kaynağı-acil durum jeneratörü ile ilgili eksikliklerin tutuklanmalara sebep olan ana nedenler olduğu görülmüştür. Sonuç olarak, Paris MoU denetlemeleri özelinde gerçekleştirilen bu çalışmada, tutuklanmaların ana sebepleri ile sözleşmeler arasında kurulan bağlantı Paris MoU denetimlerinde gemilerin daha ziyade SOLAS, STCW 78 ve ILO sözleşmelerine uyum konusunda daha fazla zorlandıklarını göstermiştir.

Analysis of Paris Memorandum Control Data in the Context of Port States (2016-2018)

This study focuses on the Paris MoU port state control inspections carried out between 2016-2018. Paris MoU member authorities carried out 50,680 inspections in total from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2018. In these inspections, the total number of detentions is 1,944. This number corresponds to 3.91% of the total inspections. The number of deficiencies detected in the three-year period examined is a very large number, 8,765. It was determined that the three port states that carried out the most inspections between 2016 and 2018 were Russia, Italy and Greece. The average inspection percentage of these authorities were calculated as 20.17%, 11.31% and 9.18%, respectively. Similarly, the detention rates of these three port states were found higher than other states. The deficiency types that have the largest percentage in the examined process are respectively management (24.13%), security & fire equipment (23.55%), equipment & machinery (20.75%), navigation & communication (14.90%), certificates (5.65%), working & living conditions (5.44%), stability & structure (4.03%) and ship & cargo operations (1.54%). In the process of determining the sub-headings under the main headings of the types of deficiencies with a high percentage of impact on detentions; ISM, fire emergency drills, emergency fire pumps / pipes, life boats / contents, fire doorsopenings in fire-resistant sections, charts, nautical publications, lights-shapes-sound signals, cleaning of the engine room, auxiliary machinery, ballast-fuel-other tanks and the deficiencies in the emergency power supply-emergency generator were found to be the main causes of detentions. In conclusion, in this study which was exclusively focused on the Paris MoU inspections, the connection between the Conventions and the main reasons of detentions was determined and found out that the Conventions to which ships had more difficulties to comply with in the Paris MoU inspections were SOLAS, STCW 78 and ILO Conventions.

PDF

___

Alcaidea, J.I., Piniella, F., & Díaza, E. R. (2016). The ‘‘Mirror Flags”: Ship registration in globalised ship breaking industry. Transportation Research Part D, 48, 378-392. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2016.08.020
Cariou, P., Mejia, M.O., & Wolff, F.C. (2009). Evidence on target factors used for port state control inspections. Marine Policy, 33, 847-859. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2009.03.004
Cariou, P., & Wolff, F.C. (2015). Identifying substandard vessels through port state control inspections: A new methodology for concentrated inspection campaigns. Marine Policy, 60, 27-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.05.013
Dinis, D., Teixeira, A.P., & Soares, C.G. (2020). Probabilistic approach for characterising the static risk of ships using bayesian networks. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 203, 107073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.107073
Fan, L., Luo, M., & Yin, J. (2014). Flag choice and port state control inspections-empirical evidenceusing a simultaneous model. Transport Policy, 35, 350-357. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.04.008
Graziano, A., Cariou, P., Wolff, F.C., Mejia Jr, M.Q., & Schröder-Hinrichs, J.U. (2018 a). Port state control inspections in the European Union: Do inspector's number and background matter? Marine Policy, 88, 230-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.11.031
Graziano, A., Mejia Jr, M.Q., & Schröder-Hinrichs, J.U. (2018 b). Achievements and challenges on the implementation of the European Directive on Port State Control. Transport Policy, 72, 97-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.09.016
Hartog, C., & Jacobs, R.P.W.M. (1980). Effects of the "Amoco Cadiz" oil spill on an eelgrass community at Roscoff (France) with special reference to the mobile benthic fauna. Helgoländer Meeresuntersuchungen, 33, 182-191.
Heij, C., Bijwaard, G.E., & Knapp, S. (2011). Ship inspection strategies: Effects on maritime safety and environmental protection. Transportation Research Part D, 16, 42-48. https://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.trd.2010.07.006
Howell, K.E., & Bhattacharya, S. (2016). Functional and territorial jurisdictions: Regulating a globalized shipping industry. Journal of Transport Geography, 55, 92-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.07.010
Knapp, S., & Velden, M. (2009). Visualization of differences in treatment of safety inspections across port state control regimes: A case for increased harmonization efforts. Transport Reviews, 29 (4), 499-514. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441640802573749
Mitroussi, K., & Arghyrou, M.G (2016). Institutional performance and ship registration. Transportation Research Part E, 85, 90-106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2015.10.004
Paris MoU (2020). https://www.parismou.org/about-us/history. Perepelkin, M., Knapp, S., Perepelkin, G., & Pooter, M. (2010). An improved methodology to measure flag performance for the shipping industry. Marine Policy, 34, 395-405. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2009.09.002
Sanlier, S. (2020). Analysis of port state control inspection data: The Black Sea Region. Marine Policy, 112, 103757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103757
Sanlier, S. (2018). Should chemical tankers' tank cleaning waters be banned from discharging into the sea?. Transportation Research Part D-Transport and Environment, 58, 14-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.11.005
Yang, Z., Yang, Z., & Yin, J. (2018 a). Realising advanced risk-based port state control inspection using data-driven bayesian networks. Transportation Research Part A, 110, 38-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.01.033
Yang, Z., Yang, Z., Yin, J., & Qu, Z. (2018b). A risk-based game model for rational inspections in port state control. Transportation Research Part E, 118, 477-495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2018.08.001
Yang, Z., Yang, Z., & Teixeira, A.P. (2020). Comparative analysis of the impact of new inspection regime on port state control inspection. Transport Policy, 92, 65-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.04.009
Wang, S., Yan, R., & Qu, X. (2019). Development of a non-parametric classifier: effective identification, algorithm, and applications in port state control for maritime transportation. Transportation Research Part B, 128, 129-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2019.07.017
Wilcox, C., & Ford, J.S. (2019). Shedding light on the dark side of maritime trade-a new approach for identifying countries as flags of convenience. Marine Policy, 99, 298-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2018.10.026

Turkish Studies - Economics, Finance, Politics-Cover

ISSN: 2667-5625
Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
Başlangıç: 2006
Yayıncı: ASOS Eğitim Bilişim Danışmanlık Otomasyon Yayıncılık Reklam Sanayi ve Ticaret LTD ŞTİ