Konaklama İşletmelerinde Çalışan Yöneticilerin Yaratıcılık Engelleri

Yapılan bu araştırmanın amacı, otel işletmelerinde çalışan yöneticilerin yaratıcılıklarının önündeki engellerin belirlenmesidir. Araştırmanın evrenini, Pamukkale Üniversitesi’nde 9 Mart 2020 tarihinde dördüncüsü gerçekleşen Kariyer günleri’ne 43 otelden katılım gösteren yöneticiler oluşturmaktadır. Araştırma kapsamında veriler anket yöntemi ile toplanmıştır. Elde edilen tüm veriler İstatistik paket programında frekans analizi, faktör analizi, korelasyon analizi, Kolmogorov-Simirnov testi, Mann- Whitney U testi ve Kruskal-Wallis testi kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda, katılımcıların çalıştıkları kurumlarda çok fazla değişim korkusu yaşamadıkları, eleştiri almadıkları, zaman ve iş baskısına maruz kalmadıkları, örgüte ve sisteme bağlılıklarının yüksek olduğu ve çalıştıkları kurumdaki kuralları ve şirket tarzını katı bulmadıkları tespit edilmiştir. Yapılan Kruskal-Wallis Testi sonucunda yöneticilerin eğitimleri ve mevcut iş yerindeki çalışma süreleri ile katı kurallar ve şirket tarzı arasında anlamlı bir farklılık olduğu tespit edilirken; Mann-Whitney U testi sonucunda ise cinsiyet ile katı kurallar ve şirket tarzı arasında anlamlı bir farklılık olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Çalışma sonucunda lisansüstü düzeyde eğitim alan yöneticilerin katı kurallar ve şirket tarzını lise, ön lisans ve lisans mezunu yöneticilere göre daha fazla yaratıcılığa engel olarak gördüğü sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Ayrıca, erkek yöneticilerin, katı kurallar ve şirket tarzını (p=0,016

Creativity Barriers of Managers Working in Hospitality Industry

The purpose of this research is to identify the barriers to the creativity of the managers working in hotel businesses. The universe of the research is comprised of managers from 43 hotels attending the fourth Career Days which took place on March 9, 2020 at Pamukkale University. Within the scope of the research, the data were collected using the survey method. All the data obtained were analyzed in the Statistical package program using frequency analysis, factor analysis, correlation analysis, Kolmogorov-Simirnov test, Mann- Whitne y U test and Kruskal-Wallis test. As a result of the research, it has been determined that the participants do not have too much fear of change in the companies they work in, they are not criticized, they do not experience time and work pressure, they have high commitment to the organization and the system and they do not find the rules and company style rigid in the companies they work in. As a result of the kruskal-wallis test, it was determined that there was a significant difference between the training of the managers and the working times at the current workplace, and rigid rules and company style; As a result of the mann-whitney u test, there was a significant difference between gender and rigid rules and company style.As a result of the study, it was concluded that the managers who received postgraduate education see the strict rules and company style as an obstacle to creativity compared to high school, associate and undergraduate graduate managers. In addition, it has been found that male managers see strict rules and company style (p = 0.016

PDF

___

Agogué, M., Kazakçi, A., Hatchuel, A., Le Masson, P., Weil, B., Poirel, N., andCassotti, M. (2014). The impact of type of examples on originality: Explaining fixation and stimulation effects. The Journalof Creative Behavior, 48(1), 1-12.3
Ahmadi, N. T., Mustaffa, S., andAhmadi, A. (2014). The barriers of enhancing creativity developed by parents in developing countries. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 114(21), 257-261.
Amabile, T., andMueller, J. (2008). Studying creativity, its processes and its antecedents. An exploration of the componential theory of creativity. Teoksessa: Handbook of organizational creativity, toim. Shalley, CE–Zhou, J., 34–64.
Arköse, O. (2004). Yaratıcılığa ve Yeniliğe Yönlendirici Örgüt Yapısı. Yayınlanmış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. İzmir: Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
Azimi, S. (2012). Perspectives of teachers about impact of schools standard on their happiness. unpublished master's thesis. Tehran: KharazmiUnivercity.
Boz, N. veÖztürk, H. M. (2020). Importance of Creativity and Innovation for Gastronomy and Business Tourism. In Accelerating Knowledge Sharing, Creativity, and Innovation Through Business Tourism. IGI Global.
Cardoso, C., andBadke-Schaub, P.E. T. R. A. (2011). The influence of different pictorial representations during idea generation. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 45(2), 130-146.
Davis, G. A. (1999). Barriers to creativity and creative attitudes. Encyclopedia of creativity, 1, 165-174.
De Stobbeleir, K. E., De Clippeleer, I., andDewettinck, K. (2010). From creativity to success: Barriers and critical success factors in the creative process. Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School.
Dziuban, C. D. and Shirkey, E. C. (1974). When Is a Correletion Matrix Appropriate for Factor Analysis? Some Decision Rules. Psychological Bulletin, 81(6), 358-361.
El-Masry, A. A., andMostafa, M. (2008). Perceived barriers to organizational creativity: a cross-cultural study of British and Egyptian futuremarketing managers. Cross Cultural Management, 15(1), 81–93.
Ertekin, E. (2016). Seyahat Acentası Çalışanlarının Örgütsel Yaratıcılık ve Müşteri Memnuniyeti Algılamalarını Belirlemeye Yönelik Bir Araştırma, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Balıkesir.
Fazelian, P. andAzimi, S. (2013). Creativity in Schools, World Conference on Psychology and Sociology, Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences. (82), 719 –723. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.335F
isher, Bradley and Specht, Diana (1999). Successful aging and creativity in later life. Journal of Aging Studies, 13(4), 457-472.
Foley, S. andKazerounian, K. (2007, January). Barriers to Creativity in Engineering Education: A Study of Instructors and Students Perceptions. InASME 2007 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference(pp. 539-555). American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection.
Ghafarian Shirazi, H. R. (2014). Study of Creativity Barriers in Education, Indian J.Sci.Res, 6 (1) 55-60.
Gonçalves, M. (2017). Design finds a way: Creative strategies to cope with barriers to creativity. In DS 87-8 Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 17) Vol8: Human Behaviour in Design, Vancouver, Canada, 21-25.08. 2017 (pp. 569-578).
Kalaycı, Şeref (2008), SPSS Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistik Teknikleri. Ankara: Asil Yayın Dağıtım.
Kazerounian, K., andFoley, S. (2007). Barriers to creativity in engineering education: A study of instructors and students perceptions. Journal of Mechanical Design, Transactions of the ASME. Vol. 129,761-768.
Kendir, H. (2013). Konaklama İşletmelerinde Çalışan İşgörenlerin Örgütsel Yaratıcılık Algıları: Afyonkarahisarİli Örneği, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Tokat.
Khalilinezhad, S. E., Shahvarani, A. andMardanbeigi, M. (2017). The analysis of the effect of removing barriers on the creativity of students’ mathematical learning. Mathematics Education Trends and Research, 1, 1-11.
Kılınç, S. (2018). Psikolojik Sermaye ve İşgören Güçlendirmenin Örgütsel Yaratıcılık Üzerindeki Etkisi, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Konya.
Lee, C., Hallak, R., andSardeshmukh, S. R. (2019). Creativity and innovation in the restaurant sector: Supply-side processes and barriers to implementation. Tourism Management Perspectives, 31, 54-62.
McCrae, R. R., andCosta Jr, P. T. (1997). Conceptions and correlates of openness to experience. In Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 825-847). Academic Press.
Nordin, N., andMalik, M. (2015). Undergraduates’ barriers to creative thought and innovative in a new millennial era. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 201, 93-101.
Paulus, P. B. (2008). Fostering creativity in groups and teams. Handbook of organizational creativity, New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 165-188.
Popescu, M. I., Moraru, A., andSava, N. I. (2015). Familial barriers in the development of creativity in preschoolers. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 187, 601-606.
Rinkevich, J. L. (2011). Creative teaching: Why it matters and where to begin. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas,84(5), 219-223.
Rosenbusch, N., Brinkmann, J., andBausch, A. (2011). Is innovation always benefcial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, 26, 441–457.
Samen, S. (2008). İşletmelerde yaratıcılığın önemi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi,17(2), 363-378.
Sekaran, U. (1992). Research Methods for Business –A skill building approach. (2nd Ed). United States of America: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Sipahi B., Yurtkoru, E.S. ve Çinko M. (2008). Sosyal Bilimlerde SPSS ile Veri Analizi, İstanbul: Beta Yayınları.Sternberg, R. J. (2005). Manual de creativitate. Iaşi: Polirom, 17-37.
Tierney, P. (2008). Leadership and Employee Creativity, Handbook of Organizational Creativity New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 95-124.
Walter, C. (2012). Work environment barriers prohibiting creativity. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 40, 642-648,
West, M. A., andRichter, A. W. (2008). Climates and cultures for innovation and creativity at work. Handbook of organizational creativity, New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 211-236.
Wong, C. K. S. and Pang, W. L. L. (2003). Barriers to creativity in the hotel industry–perspectives of managers and supervisors. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 15(1), 29-37.