Influence of Bacteria Isolated from Different Ecological Zone of Turkey on Maize Growth and Nutrient Uptake

Influence of Bacteria Isolated from Different Ecological Zone of Turkey on Maize Growth and Nutrient Uptake

The aim of this study was to find potential PGPR from sub-forest soil located different region soils of Turkey. Previous research indicated that the existing bacteria in arable soil are not capable to represent their individual performance most probably due to the competition. To overcome this phenomenon, soils are collected from sub-forest soil of Adana (Ad), Antalya (An), Hatay (Ha), Isparta (Is), Ordu (Or) and Sivas (Si) provinces. Experiment was carried out on the soil existing in Isparta in a greenhouse condition. Four fast growing bacteria colonies in tryptic soy (CASO) agar medium from each province were isolated and then, each isolate cultivated at liquid CASO broth until they reach 106 cfu ml-1. Experiments were carried out with a total of 24 bacteria including 6 province and 4 bacteria cultures from each region. The effects of those bacteria on biomass development and nutrient uptake of maize (Zea mays) were investigated. Sterile broth was applied treatment defined as control. The results revealed that 23 isolates out of 24 stimulated plants shoot dry weight. The highest value observed in the Or1 and Is4 isolates as 12.8 and 12.7 g plant-1 which around 77% higher than control whereas the lowest was in Or2 as 6.45 g plant-1. Plant nutrient concentrations were also influenced from inoculates where An1, Ad1, Or1, Is1 and Is3 significantly increased macro nutrients uptake where total N, available P, K, Ca and Mg were higher by 19%, 14%, 14%, 59% and 41% over the control, respectively. The Fe concentration was found 48% higher in Ad3 isolate. The Cu, Mn and Zn were the highest in Si3 as 43%, 30% and 31%, respectively. In general 4 out of 24 isolates were selected as promising PGPR for both plant development and nutrient uptake of maize.

___

  • Agbodjato NA, Noumavo PA, Adjanohoun A, Agbessi L, Baba- Moussa L. 2016. Synergistic effects of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and chitosan on in vitro seeds germination, greenhouse growth, and nutrient uptake of maize (Zea mays L.). Biotechnology research international, Ar¬ticle ID 7830182, 11:2016.
  • Ali S, Kim WC. 2018. Plant growth promotion under water: Decrease of water logging-induced ACC and ethylene levels by ACC deaminase-producing bacteria. Frontiers in microbiology, 9.
  • Barton CJ. 1948. Photometric analysis on phosphate rock. Ind. And. Eng. Chem. Anal. Ed. 20:1068-1073.
  • Biari A, Gholami A, Rahmani HÁ. 2008. Growth promotion and enhanced nutrient uptake of maize (Zea mays L.) by application of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in arid region of Iran. J. Biol. Sci, 8(6):1015-1020.
  • Calvo P, Watts DB, Kloepper JW, Torbert HA. 2017. Effect of microbial‐based inoculants on nutrient concentrations and early root morphology of corn (Zea mays). Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 180(1):56-70.
  • Chattha MB, Iqbal A, Chattha MU, Hassan MU, Khan I, Ashraf I, Faisal M, Usman M. 2017. PGPR Inoculated-Seed Increases the Productivity of Forage Sorghum under Fertilized Conditions. Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 13:150-153.
  • Dar ZM, Masood A, Mughal AH, Asif M, Malik MA. 2018. Review on drought tolerance in plants induced by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 7:(5), ISSN: 2319-7706.
  • Dimkpa C, Weinand T, Asch F. 2009. Plant-rhizobacteria interactions alleviate abiotic stress conditions. Plant Cell Environ. 32, 1682–1694.
  • Egamberdiyeva D. 2007. The effect of plant growth promoting bacteria on growth and nutrient uptake of maize in two different soils. Applied Soil Ecology, 36(2-3): 184-189.
  • Ekinci M, Turan M, Yildirim E, Güneş A, Kotan R, Dursun A. 2014. Effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on growth, nutrient, organic acid, amino acid and hormone content of cauliflower (Brassica oleracea l. var. botrytis) transplants. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Hortorum Cultus, 13(6): 71-85.
  • Fukami J, Cerezini P, Hungria M. 2018. Azospirillum: benefits that go far beyond biological nitrogen fixation. AMB Express, 8(1):73.
  • Ghaly FM, Mosaad ISM, Alanos MATE. 2016. Effect of Bio Fertilizer, Nitrogen and Sulfur Levels on Maize Production in Saline Soil of North Delta of Egypt. J.Soil Sci. and Agric. Eng., Mansoura Univ., 7(8): 541-546.
  • Gholami A, Biyari A, Gholipoor M, Asadi Rahmani H, 2012. Growth promotion of maize (Zea mays L.) by plant-growthpromoting rhizobacteria under field conditions. Communications in soil science and plant analysis, 43(9): 1263-1272.
  • Gholami A, Shahsavani S, Nezarat S. 2009. The effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on germination, seedling growth and yield of maize. Int J Biol Life Sci, 5(1): 35-40.
  • Glick BR. 2014. Bacteria with ACC deaminase can promote plant growth and help to feed the world. Microbiological research, 169(1): 30-39.
  • Gulnaz Y, Fathima PS, Denesh GR, Kulmitra AK, Shivrajkumar HS. 2017. Effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and PSB on root parameters, nutrient uptake and nutrient use efficiency of irrigated maize under varying levels of phosphorus. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Stu¬dies; 5(6): 166-169.
  • Hubbell DH, Kidder G. 2003. Biological Nitrogen Fixation. Fact sheet document SL-16, of the Soil and Water Science Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. Hussain MB, Mehmood S, Zahir ZA, Naveed M, Imran M, Ahmad I, Ahmed N, Nawaz H. 2016. Modulating nutrition, physiology and production of maize through Rhizobium phaseoli and Mesorhizobium ciceri inoculation under drought stress conditions. 7 th International Conference on Water Resources and Arid Environments (ICWRAE 7): 549-559.
  • Jarak M, Mrkovački N, Bjelić D, Joscaron D, Hajnal-Jafari T, Stamenov D. 2012. Effects of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on maize in greenhouse and field trial. African Journal of Microbiology Research, 6(27): 5683-5690.
  • Kacar B, Inal A. 2010. Plant Analyses. Nobel Academic Publish: LTD.ŞTİ. 892s, Ankara.
  • Khosravi A Zarei M and Ronaghi A 2018. Effect of PGPR, Phosphate sources and vermicompost on growth and nutrients uptake by lettuce in a calcareous soil. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 41(1): 80-89.
  • Kloepper JW. 1978. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on radishes. In Proc. of the 4th Internet. Conf. on Plant Pathogenic Bacter, Station de Pathologie Vegetale et Phytobacteriologie, INRA, Angers, France, 1978 (2): 879- 882.
  • Kundan R, Pant G, Jadon N, Agrawal PK. 2015. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: mechanism and current prospective. J Fertil Pestic, 6(2), p.9.
  • Labuschagne N, Pretorius T, Idris AH. 2010. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as biocontrol agents against soilborne plant diseases. In: Maheshwari, D.K. (Ed.), Plant Growth and Health Promoting Bacteria. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 211–230.
  • Lin Y, Watts DB, Kloepper JW, Torbert HA. 2018. Influence of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria on Corn Growth Under Different Fertility. Sources Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 49(10): 1239-1255.
  • Meena VS, Maurya BR, and Verma JP. 2014. Does a rhizospheric microorganism enhance K+ availability in agricultural soils?. Microbiological research, 169(5-6): 337-347.
  • Molina-Romero D, Baez A, Quintero-Hernández V, Castañeda- Lucio M, Fuentes Ramírez LE, del Rocio Bustillos-Cristales M, Rodríguez-Andrade O, Morales García YE, Munive A, Muñoz-Rojas J, 2017. Compatible bacterial mixture, tolerant to desiccation, improves maize plant growth. PloS one, 12(11): 0187913.
  • Morais TPD, Brito CHD, Brandão AM, Rezende WS. 2016. Inoculation of maize with Azospirillum brasilense in the seed furrow. Revista Ciência Agronômica, 47(2): 290-298. Mosimann C, Oberhänsli T, Ziegler D, Nassal D, Kandeler E, Boller T, Mäder P, Thonar C. 2017. Tracing of two pseudomonas strains in the root and rhizoplane of maize, as related to their plant growth-promoting effect in contrasting soils. Frontiers in microbiology, 7: 2150.
  • Mutlu H, Coskan A. 2018. The restriction of individual performance of PGPR on maize nutrient uptake by antagonistic relations. In “Agriculture for Life, Life for Agriculture” Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 93- 100). Sciendo.
  • Ottow JCG. 1984. Bodenmikrobiologisch-biochemisches- Pratikum. S. 1-2.
  • Patel P, Trivedi G, Saraf M, 2018. Iron biofortification in mungbean using siderophore producing plant growth promoting bacteria. Environmental Sustainability, 1(4): 357- 365.
  • Pereg L, de-Bashan LE, Bashan Y. 2016. Assessment of affinity and specifi¬city of Azospirillum for plants. Plant and soil, 399(1-2): 389-414.
  • Picazevicz AA, Kusdra JF, Moreno ADL. 2017. Maize growth in response to Azospirillum brasilense, Rhizobium tropici, molybdenum and nitrogen. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental, 21(9): 623-627.
  • Richard PO, Adekanmbi AO, Ogunjobi AA. 2018. Screening of bacteria isolated from the rhizosphere of maize plant (Zea mays L.) for ammonia production and nitrogen fixation. African Journal of Microbiology Research, Vol. 12(34): 829- 834.
  • Richardson AE, Barea JM, McNeill AM, Prigent Combaret C. 2009. Acquisition of phosphorus and nitrogen in the rhizosphere and plant growth promotion by microorganisms. Plant and soil, 321(1-2): 305-339.
  • Rojas-Tapias D, Moreno-Galván A, Pardo-Díaz S, Obando M, Rivera D, Bonilla R. 2012. Effect of inoculation with plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) on amelioration of saline stress in maize (Zea mays). Applied Soil Ecology, 61: 264- 272.
  • Sandy M, Butler A. 2009. Microbial iron acquisition: marine and terrestrial siderophores. Chemical reviews, 109(10): 4580- 4595.
  • Singh K, Gera R. 2018. Assessing phosphate solubilization ability of sesbania grandiflora rhizobia isolated from root nodules using diverse agroecological zones of Indian soils for biofertilizer production. International Journal of Chemical Studies, 6(4): 398-402.
  • Turan M, Sahin F. 2013. Role of plant growth promoting rhizobacter strain reduce application rates mineral fertilizer in barley. ProEnvironment Promediu, 6(14).
  • Vejan P, Abdullah R, Khadiran T, Ismail S, Nasrulhaq Boyce A. 2016. Role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in agricultural sustainability -a review. Molecules, 21(5): 573.
  • Yolcu H, Gunes A, Gullap MK, Cakmakci R. 2012. Effects of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on some morphologic characteristics, yield and quality contents of Hungarian vetch. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 17(2): 208-214.
  • Youseif SH. 2018. Genetic diversity of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and their effects on the growth of maize plants under greenhouse conditions. Annals of Agricultural Sciences, 63(1): 25-35.
  • Zaidi A, Khan M, Ahemad M, Oves M. 2009. Plant growth promotion by phosphate solubilizing bacteria. Acta microbiologica et immunologica Hungarica, 56(3): 263-284.
  • Zhang L, Fan J, Ding X, He X, Zhang F, Feng G. 2014. Hyphosphere interactions between an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus and a phosphate solubilizing bacterium promote phytate mineralization in soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 74: 177-183.
Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2148-127X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Aylık
  • Başlangıç: 2013
  • Yayıncı: Turkish Science and Technology Publishing (TURSTEP)
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Farklı Gamma Işını Dozlarının İki Sıralı Arpada (Hordeum vulgare L.) Bazı Tarımsal Özellikler Üzerine Etkisi

İlknur AKGÜN, Tuğçe Ayşe KARAKOCA, Ruziye KARAMAN

Bazı Yonca Çeşitlerinin Farklı Tuz Konsantrasyonlarında Çimlenme Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi

Gamze BAYRAM, Mustafa YILMAZ

Tane Rengi ve Tane Ağırlığının Keten (Linum usitatissimum L.) Tohumunun Çimlenme Gücü Üzerine Etkileri

Orhan KURT, Muhammet Safa HACIKAMİLOĞLU, Naziha EL BEY

Gümüşhacıköy Basma Bölgesi İçin Geliştirilen Hibrit Tütünlerin Verim ve Kalite Performansları

Ahmet KINAY, Dursun KURT, Erdem KARAKOÇ

Farklı Ekim Sıklıklarının Ketencik (Camelina sativa L.) Bitkisinin Bazı Agronomik Özelliklerine Etkileri

Ahmet KINAY, Güngör YILMAZ, Şaziye DÖKÜLEN

Adaçayı ve Dağ Çayında Tuz Stresi Üzerine Selenyum Uygulamalarının Etkileri

Gülsüm YALDIZ, Abdurrahman BAŞOL, Halit AŞKIN, Mahmut ÇAMLICA, Ferit ÖZEN

Pirinç Biti Sitophilus oryzae (L.) Popülasyonlarında Endosimbiyont Mikroorganizmaların Belirlenmesi

Mehmet Oğuz YAMAN, Erhan KOÇAK

Bazı Melez Patates Kombinasyonlarında Yapılan Fenotipik Erken Generasyon Seleksiyonları

Aslı YILMAZ, Güngör YILMAZ, Levent YAZİCİ, Özge KOYUTÜRK, Rahime KARATAŞ, Başak ÖZYILMAZ, İlker POLAT

Isparta Ekolojik Koşullarında Farklı Silajlık Mısır Çeşitlerinin Verim ve Bazı Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi

Mevlüt TÜRK, Mehmet ALAGÖZ

Farklı Tuz Konsantrasyonlarının Şeker Mısır (Zea mays L.Var. sacharata sturt.) Çeşitlerinde Çimlenme ve Erken Fide Gelişimi Üzerine Etkileri

Hasan AKAY, Elif ÖZTÜRK, İsmail SEZER, Murat Can BAHADIR