A simple method for diagnostic of Phytophthora infestans (Mont.) de Bary from potato agricultural fields of potato

A correct detection and appropriate identification of causal pathogens associated with crop plants or seeds are considered to be the most important issue in designing the proper management plans for plant diseases. This study was designed to detect Phytophthora infestans inoculum from potato grown soil. A high detection rate of P.infestans was obtained from the naturally infested soil of potato fields. Naturally soils were firstly moistened in a plastic pots and then pre-incubated at ±18°C for 3 days, baiting with potato tuber slice for 24, 48, and 72 h. The baits were then thoroughly washed, flooded with 10–15 ml of distilled water in Petri-dishes and incubated under continuous darkness in chamber ±18ºC. Sporangia started to emerge from the margins of potato tuber slice. They were easily observed under the stereomicroscope. Pure culture of the fungus was obtained by isolating from baited tubers on a Rye Agar medium. This is the first report of recovery of P. infestans from naturally infested potato growing soils using susceptible potato tuber (K. Bahar) as bait in India. All isolates were determined to be A2 mating type.

___

Canaday C, Schmitthenner, A. 1982. Isolating Phytophthora megasperma f. sp. glycinea from soil with a baiting method that minimizes Pythium contamination. Soil Biol Biochem., 14: 67– 68.

Davison E, Tay FCS. 2005. How many soil samples are needed to show that Phytophthora is absent from sites in the south-west of Western Australia? Australasian Plant Pathol., 34: 293–297.

Erwin DC, Ribeiro OK. 1996. Phytophthora diseases worldwide. American Phytopathological Society (APS Press), St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.

Gallegly ME Hong C. 2008. Phytophthora: identifying species by morphology and DNA fingerprints. American Phytopathological Society (APS press), St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.

Haverkort AJ. 2008. Societal costs of late blight in potato and prospects of durable resistance through cisgenic modification. Potato Res., 51: 47–57.

Ho HH. 1981. Synoptic Keys to the Species of Phytophthora. Mycologia, 73:705–714.

Hua-Bo Zhuzdw, Xiao-Ming W. 2003. A new method of isolating Phytophthora sojae from soil. Mycosystema, 22: 142–147.

Lacey J. 1965. The infectivity of soils containing Phytophthora infestans. Annals of Applied Biology. 56: 363–80.

Lamour K, Kamoun S. 2009. Oomycete genetics and genomics: diversity, interactions, and research tools. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, USA.

Mohammadi A, Alizadeh A, Mirabolfathey M, Mofrad NN. 2008. Races of Phytophthora sojae in Iran. Pak J Biol Sci.,11: 302– 305.

O’Brien PA, Williams N, Hardy GES. 2009. Detecting Phytophthora. Critical Reviews in Microbiology, 35: 169–181.

Singh, B.P. and Bhattacharyya, S.K. (1995). Field resistance to late blight in four Indian potato cultivars. Potato Research. 38: 171- 178.

Ranjbaran M, Alizadeh A, Safaie N. 2006. Genetic diversity of Iranian populations of Phytophthora nicotianae using ISSR and RAPD markers. Iranian Journal of Plant Pathology, 42: 619– 638.

Reeser PW, Sutton W, Hansen EM, Remigi P, Adams GC. 2011. Phytophthora species in forest streams in Oregon and Alaska. Mycologia, 103: 22–35.

Tsao PH. 1983. Factors affecting isolation and quantitation of Phytophthora from soil. In Erwin DC, Bartnicky Garcia S, Tsao PH (eds.). Phytophthora its Biology, Taxonomy, Ecology, and Pathology. St. Paul, Minnesota: American Phytopathological Society (APS Press), pp. 219–236.

Wu X, Zhou B, Zhao J, Guo N, Zhang B, Yang F, Chen S, Gai J, Xing H. 2011. Identification of quantitative trait loci for partial resistance to Phytophthora sojae in soybean. Plant Breed, 130:144–149. www.worldseed.org, last accessed in November 2012.

Yamak F, Peever TL, Grove GG, Boal RJ. 2002. Occurrence and identification of Phytophthora spp. pathogenic to pear fruit in irrigation water in the Wenatchee River Valley of Washington state. Phytopathology, 92:1210–1217.
Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2148-127X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Aylık
  • Başlangıç: 2013
  • Yayıncı: Turkish Science and Technology Publishing (TURSTEP)
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Aflatoxin M1 Determination in Traditional Küp Cheese Samples of Turkey Using Immunoaffinity Column and High-Performance Liquid Chromatography

Akin KOLUACİK, Goksel SİVRİ TİRPANCİ, BİNNUR KAPTAN

Gıdalardaki Biyokoruyucu: Nisin (E234)

BAŞAR UYMAZ TEZEL, PINAR ŞANLIBABA

Model Sistem Tavuk Eti Emülsiyonlarında Sığır Karkas Yağı Yerine Tavuk Derisi Kullanımının Emülsiyon Karakteristikleri Üzerine Etkisi

ASLI ZUNGUR BASTIOĞLU, BERKER NACAK, FATMA MELTEM SERDAROĞLU

Bazı Ekmeklik Buğday Çeşitlerinin Kayseri Koşullarına Adaptasyonu

Sancar Bulut

Eksik Veri Analizinde Çoklu Atama Yönteminin Değerlendirilmesi: Hayvancılıkta Tekrarlı Ölçüm Verisi Üzerine Bir Uygulama

GAZEL SER, Cafer Tayyar BATİ

Türkiye'de Kuru Fasulye Üretiminin Mevcut Durumu ve Gelecek Dönemler Üretiminin Tahmin Edilmesi

MEHMET AYDOĞAN, KÜRŞAT DEMİRYÜREK, NUR İLKAY ABACI

Cansız Malçlama Yöntemlerinin Mandalina Bahçesinde Yabancı Otlanma Üzerine Olan Etkisi

ONUR KOLÖREN, FEYZULLAH NEZİHİ UYGUR

Risk Perception and Management Strategies in Dairy Farming: A Case of Adana Province of Turkey

SEYİT HAYRAN, AYKUT GÜL

Effects of Additive Feeding with Pollen and Water on Some Characteristics of Honeybee Colonies and Pine Honey Production

HALİL YENİNAR, ETHEM AKYOL, Alaeddin YÖRÜK

A simple method for diagnostic of Phytophthora infestans (Mont.) de Bary from potato agricultural fields of potato

Touseef HUSSAİN, Bir Pal SİNGH, Firoz ANWAR, Sonica TOMAR