ABDULKADİR GÜLLÜ, Ahmet ÖZDEMİR, HALİL DEMİR

Yüzey pürüzlülüğü ölçme yöntemleri ve mukayesesi

Talaş kaldırarak imal edilen makine parçalarında elde edilen yüzey pürüzlülüğü, malzeme yapısının, seçilen işleme şartlarının ve yönteminin kesin bir göstergesi olmuştur. Yapılan çeşitli araştırmarlarda yüzey pürüzlülüğünün doğru olarak ölçülmesi ve üretim şekli için en uygun yüzey pürüzlülük ölçme yönteminin tercih edilmesi önemli bir adım olarak kabul edilmektedir. Bu çalışmada; meydana gelen pürüzlülüğün ölçülmesi veya kontrol edilmesinde, günümüzde kullanılan yöntemler ve bu yöntemlerin teknik özellikleri özetlenmiştir. Yüzey pürüzlülüğünü ölçmeye dayalı araştırma yapanlara bir kılavuz kaynak olması ve doğru yöntem seçimi için yol göstermek amaçlanmıştır.

Surface roughness measurement methods and their comparison

Surface roughness of the mechanical parts that are manufactured by chip removal is the result of material structure, machining parameters and method selected. In the various researches, the correct measurement of surface roughness and the selection of the best surface roughness measurement method are accepted as a very important decision for the production method. In this study, methods used today and their technical properties for the measurement and control of the surface roughness are summarized. It is aimed that this paper makes a guidence for the researchers who wants to measure surface roughness, and is a source for appropriate selection of surface roughness measurement method.

PDF

___

1. ISO 5725-1, Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of Measurement Methods and Results, Part 1 : General Principals and Definitions, 1994. TEKNOLOJİ, Yıl 6, Sayı 1-2, 2003 91

2. ISO 5725-2, Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of Measurement Methods and Results, Part 2 : Basic Method for the Determination of Repeatability and Reproductability Of Standard Measurement Method, 1994.

3. ISO 5725-3,Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of Measurement Methods And Results, Part 3 : Intermediate Measure of The Precision of a Standard Measurement Method, 1994.

4. ISO 5725-4, Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of Measurement Methods And Results, Part 4 : Basic Method For The Determination of The Trueness of a Standard Measurement Method, 1994.

5. ISO 5725-5, Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of Measurement Methods And Results, Part 5 : Alternative Methods for the Determination of the Precision of a Standard Measurement Method, 1998.

6. ISO 5725-6, Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of Measurement Methods and Results, Part 6 : Use In Practice of Accuracy Values, 1994.

7. Güllü, A., “Silindirik Taşlamada İstenen Yüzey Pürüzlülüğünü Elde Etmek İçin Taşlama Parametrelerinin Bilgisayar Yardımıyla Optimizasyonu”, Doktora Tezi, Ankara, Eylül - 1995.

8. Sherington, I and Smith, E.H., “Parameters for Characterizing The Surface Topography of Engineering Components”. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part C, 201 (c4), 297-306, 1987.

9. Thomas, T. R., Characterizing of Suface Roughness. Precision Engng, 1 3 (2), 97-104, 981.

10. Thomas, T. R. and Charton, G., “Variation of Roughness Parameters On Same Typical Manufactured Surfaces”. Precision Engng, 3 (2), 91-96, 1981.

11. King, T. G. and Spedding, T.A., On The Relationships Between Surface Profile Height Parameters. Wear, 83, 91-108, 1982.

12. Reason, R. E., The Measurement Of Surface Texture, 1970 (RTH).

13. A. J. T. Scar, “Metrology and Precision Engineering”, Mc. Graw-Hill Publishing Company Limited, New York, 1991.

14. ISO 4287 / 1 - 1984 (E / F / R).

15. Dagnall, H., Exploring Surface Texture, 1980 (RTH).

16. Barash, M., "Shop Built Instrument Checks Surface Finishes", Machinery 72, 177, 1966.

17. Törnebohm, H., “Modern Tolerance Requirements and Their Scientific Determination”, Mechanical Engineering, 411, July 1936.

18. Kamnev, V. V., “Integral Evaluation of Surfaces Roughness”, Measmt. Tech., no:2 February 1966.

19. Nicolau, M., “Aplication du Micromètre Solex à la Mesure de l'ètat des Surfaces”, Mecanique 1937.

20. Graneek, M., Lee, A. M. and Wunsch, H. L., “Application of Pneumatic Gagging to the Measurement of Surface Finish”, Machinery, 81 September, 1952.

21. A. M. Swigert, “Story of Superfinish”, p. 91 ff, Lynn Publishing Company, Detroit, Mich., 1940: Surface Finish, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1942.

22. Perthen, J., “Ein Neues Verfahren Zum Messen Der OberfläChengüte Durch Die KapazitäT Eines Kondensators”, Maschinengüte, 15 (no: 23/24), 669, 1936.

23. Gabe, D. R., “Methods of Measuring Surface Roughness”, Metallurgy 72 (no: 429), 1965.

24. Guentert, O. J., “Development of Surface of Measurement System”, Raytheon Co., Research Div., Waltham, Mass., U.S.A. Interim Engineering Progress Report No. S-860 (1 st January - 31 st March), 1966.

25. Anderson, W. A., Griffin, G. L., Mooney, C. F. and Wiley, R. S., "Electron Microscope Method for Measuring Diffraction Gratin Groove Geometry", Appl. Optic, 4 (no: 8), 999, 1965.

26. Tolansky, S., “Multiple Beam Interferometry of Surfaces and Films”, (Oxford University Press), 1966.

27. Wada, H., “On the Oblique Incidence Type Microinterferometry”, Bull, Japan S. C. Prec. Engrs. 1 (no: 4) 1966.

28. Sprague, R. A., “Suface Roughness Measurement Using White Light Speckle”. Applied Optics, Vol 11, No 12, December, 1972, pp. 2811-2816.

29. Nelson, H. R., “Taper Sectioning as a Means of Describing the Surface Contour of Metals”, M. I. T. Proc. Special Summer Conf. on Friction and Surface Finish 1940.

30. Schlesinger, G.,”Report on Surface Finish”, 1942.

31. Green, E., “Review of Surface Texture Measurement and the Associated Meteorological Problem”, 1967.

32. Bennett, H. E. and Porteus, J. O., “Relation Between Surface Roughness and Specula Reflectance at Normal Incidence”, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 51 (no: 2), 1961.

33. Speckle in Optics. J. Opt. Soc. Am., Vol 66, No 11, December, 1976. 92 Yüzey Pürüzlülüğü Ölçme Yöntemleri Ve Mukayesesi

34. Leger, D., Mathiev, E. And Perrin, J. C., “Optical Suface Roughness Determination Using Speckle Correlation Techniqe”. Applied Optics, Vol 14, No 4, 1975, pp. 872-877.

35. Karabay, M., Makina Mühendisliği El Kitabı, Ankara, 1987.

36. Küçükkağnıcı, A. S., “Yüzey Pürüzlülüğü Ölçme Yöntemleri”, Lisans Tezi, . G.Ü. Teknik Eğitim Fakültesi Ankara, 1997.

37. Ulaş, B. S. ve Danışman, K., “Yüzey Pürüzlülüğü Ölçümünde ileri Fiber-Optik Sistemin Tasarımı ve Uygulaması”, 2. Ulusal Makina Tasarım ve imalat Kongresi, ODTÜ, Ankara, 17 - 19 Eylül 1996.

38. Hecht, E. and Zajac, A., Optics, “Addison - Wesley Publishing Company”, U.S.A., 1974.

39. Stewart, Way, “Surface Roughness Methods of Measurment”, Product Engineering, p 124.

40. Reason, R. E., “The Measurement of Surface Texture”, In Modern Workshop Technology (Pt 2) (Cleaver-Hume Press Ltd.), 1960.

41. Snaith, B., Edmands, M. J. And Probert, S. D., “Use of a Profilometer for Surface Mapping. Precision Engng”, 1981, 3 (2), 87-90.

42. Garratt, J. D., “A New Stylus Instrument With a Wide Dynamic Range For Use in Surface Metrology”, Precision Engng, 1982, 4 (3), 145-151.

43. Whitehouse, D. J. “The Digital Mesurement of Peak Parameters on Surface Profiles”. J. Mech. Engng Sci., 1978, 20 84), 221-227.

44. Garlenko, O. A., “Assessment of Suface Roughness Parameters and Their Interdependence”. Precision Eng, 1981, 3 (2), 105-108.