Overall Economic Performance of Farms in Burkina Faso: Case of Maize

The objectve of ths study s to define a conceptual framework for measurng the Global Economc Performance (GEP) of farms n Burkna Faso. After a lterature revew of GEPmeasurement methods and ndcators, we have specfied a composte ndcator for ths purpose. It s called Global Economc Performance Indcator (GEPI). It conssts of one group of postve ndcators and another of negatve ndcators. Each group s the reduced centered average of the ndcators that make t up. GEPI was appled to 262 randomly selected maze growers of Burkna Faso grouped nto 'producton systems', 'farm szes' and 'provnces'. The results show that the large farms, the motorzed producers and those of Tuy are generally the most performantes of ther respectve group. A comparson of the GEPI of the producer categores shows that the large and medum producers are generally the best performers, wth a score of 0.59. The category of motorzed producers ranks thrd wth a score of 0.57. In terms of agroecology, the provnce of Tuy s the last category of globally efficent producers

Tarım İşletmelernn Toplam Ekonomk Performansının Ölçülmes: Burkna Faso'dan Örnek Br Çalışma

Bu çalışmanın amacı, tarım şletmelernn Toplam Ekonomk Performansını (TEP) ölçmek çn kavramsal br çerçeve tanımlamak ve uygulamaktır. TEPölçüm yöntemler ve göstergelernn lteratür taramasından sonra, bu amaç çn bütünleşk br gösterge belrlenmştr. Bu gösterge Toplam Ekonomk Performans Gösterges (TEPG) olarak adlandırılmışır. Bu gösterge br grup poztf ölçüt le br grup olumsuz ölçütün toplulaştırılmasından oluşmaktadır. Her grup, onu oluşturan göstergelern ortalamaları ve standart sapmaları dkkate alınarak hesaplamaya dahl edlmş ve uygulanmıştır. Her br üretc çn TEPG, Burkna Faso'da rastgele seçlmş 262 mısır üretcsnden anket yoluyla elde edlen verler kullnılarak tahmn edlmştr. Sonuçlar, “üretm sstemler”, “büyüklük” ve “l” gruplarına göre karşılaştırmalı olarak sunulmuştur. Araştırma sonucunda büyük çftlklern, maknalı üretm yapan üretclern ve Tuy lndek çftçlern genel olarak daha yüksek performans gösterdkler belrlenmştr. Buna ek olarak, büyük üretclern genel olarak 0,59 puanla tüm mısır üretcler gruplarında en y performansı gösterdkler bulunmuştur

PDF

___

Bouljlida A. 2002. La performance financière des PME manufacturières : Conceptualisation et mesure. Mémoire présenté à Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières

Bouquin H., 1986. Le contrôle de gestion, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris

Bourguignon A., 1997. Sous les pavés la plage...ou les multiples fonctions du vocabulaire comptable : l'exemple de la performance, Comptabilité Contrôle Audit, 1(3): 89-101.

Bremmers, H., Omta, O., Kemp, R., and Haverkamp, D-J. 2007. Do Stakeholder Groups Influence Environmental Management System Development in the Dutch Agri-Food Sector? Business Strategy and the Environment Bus. Strat. Env. 16: 214–231,

Crapon M., and Quairel-Lanoizelée F. 2005. Mythes et réalités de l'entreprise responsable, Paris, Ed. La Découverte. De Rochambeau, H., Veronese, T., and Roché, P. 2008. Un exemple d'écoconception dans les filières agricoles, agroalimentaires et agro-industrielles : le pôle de compétitivité « AgriMip Innovation » en région Midi-Pyrénées. Annales des Mines - Réalités industrielles, pp. 72-77.

Delen, D., Kuzey,C., and Uyar, A. 2013. Measuring firm performance using financial ratios: A decision tree approach. Expert Systems with Applications 40(10) 3970–3983.

Dohou, A., and Berland, N. 2008. Mesure de la performance globale des entreprises, Communication au congrès annuel de l'Association Francophone de Comptabilité, Poitiers, 22 p.

Kalogeras ,N., Baourakis, G., Zopounidis,C., and Dijk van, G. 2005. Journal of Food Engineering 70: 365–371.

Kasterine, A., and Vanzetti, D. 2010. The Effectiveness, Efficiency and Equity of Market Based and Voluntary Measures to

Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions from the Agri-Food Sector. UNCTAD Trade and Environment Review, 37 p Kroma, S., and Lamien N. 2017. Evaluation de la rentabilité et de la compétitivité de la chaine de valeur gomme arabique dans l'amélioration des conditions de vie des populations au sahel du Burkina Faso. Agronomie Africaine Sp. 29(1): 29 - 40.

Latruffe, L. 2010. Competitiveness, Productivity and Efficiency in the Agricultural and Agri-Food Sectors. OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Working Papers, No. 30, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5km91nkdt6d6-en (Available December 20, 2018).

Maxime, D., Marcotte, M., and Arcand, Y. 2005. Development of eco-efficiency indicators for the Canadian food and beverage industry. Journal of Cleaner Production 14 : 636-648

Morin, E. M. 2001. Dimensions, critères et indicateurs de performance. Naro, 2005. Responsabilité sociale de l'entreprise et pilotage des performances, Chapitre 4 in : La responsabilité sociale de l'entreprise, Dir. F. Le Roy et M. Marchesnay, Ed. EMS Management et Société, pp. 59-71.

Rastoin, J.-L. 2006. Vers de nouveaux modèles d'organisation du système agroalimentaire ? Approches stratégiques. MSH-M Séminaire de recherche Produits de terroir, filière qualité et développement Montpellier, (22 juin 2006)

Zahm, F., Alonso A., and Ugaglia, B. De l'Homme. L'évaluation de la performance globale d'une exploitation agricole. Synthèse des cadres conceptuels, des outils de mesure et application avec la méthode IDEA. 8`eme Congrès du RIODD, Jun 2013,

Lille, France. 32 p., 2013. (Available December 20, 2018).