Aryanist Oryantalist, Milliyetçi ve İslamcı Tarihyaziminda İslam Sonrası Hayali İran

Bu çalışma oryantalistlerin, İranlı milliyetçilerin ve İslamcıların geç Kaçar dönemindenbaşlayarak yeniden kurguladıkları İslam sonrası ‘İran’ ve ‘İranlı’ imajını incelemektedir.Elde edilen sonuçlara göre, Ernest Renan ve Arthur de Gobineau gibi Aryancılar veBrowne gibi oryantalist İranistlerce geliştirilen tarihe ırk-temelli yaklaşımlar, PehleviKrallığı’nın ideologları olan tarihçilerin bakış açısını etkilemiştir. Böylelikle, Abdul Hossein Zarrinkoob gibi milliyetçi tarihçiler oryantalistlerin ırk-temelli yaklaşımlarıetkisinde ‘İran’, ‘İranlı’ ve ‘İran milletinin’ tarihsel sürekliliğini ve üstünlüğünü Sasaniİmparatorluğu’nun çöküşünü izleyen dört yüz yıllık bir dönemde göstermeyeçalışmışlardır. Bu doğrultuda, İran milliyetçi tarihçileri İslami dönemde gerçekleşenbütün başarılara bir İranlının öncüllük ettiğini veya ‘İran uygarlığından’ esinlendiğinigöstermeye kalkmışlardır. Oryanistlerin ve İran milliyetçilerinin Arap karşıtı ırkçıyaklaşımlarının İslam karşıtı eğilimlere dönüşmesi Murtaza Mutahhari ve Ali Şeriati gibiİslamcıların tepkilerine yol açmıştır. 1979 İran İslam devriminin arifesinde, bu İslamcıseçkinler söz konusu ırkçı yaklaşımları yapıbozuma uğratmaya çalışarak uluslararasıcıİslami öğretilerle eşleşen yeni bir tarihyazımını geliştirmeye çalışmışlardır.

IMAGINED IRAN AFTER THE ARRIVAL OF ISLAM IN ARYANISTORIENTALIST, NATIONALIST AND ISLAMIST HISTORIOGRAPHY

This study investigates the orientalist, nationalist, and Islamist historiography of Iran during the late Qajar and Pahlavi eras. More specifically, using the Critical Discourse Analysis method the study examines texts produced by some of the main figures of these three groups to explore the ways they reconstructed the image of ‘Iran’ and ‘Iranians’ during the first four centuries of the Islamic era. The results show that the race-based approaches to history developed by the forefathers of the Aryan race theory - like Ernest Renan and Arthur de Gobineau - alongside orientalist Iranists – such as Edward G. Browne - shaped the worldview of many of the Iranian activist historians who later became ideologues of the Pahlavi monarchy. Accordingly, nationalist historians like Abdul-Hossein Zarrinkoob, who were under influence of the race-based approaches, pursued to present both the historical continuity and racial-civilizational superiority of Iran, Iranians, and the Iranian nation during the four centuries that have followed the collapse of the Sassanid empire. To this end, nationalist historians, as well as orientalist Aryanists, have argued that it was Iranians who inspired and/or achieved the main accomplishments in the first four centuries of the Islam era. Their anti-Arab racist approaches when translated into anti-Islam tendencies attracted critiques from Islamists elites such as Morteza Motahhari and Ali Shari’ati. On the eve of the 1979 Islamic revolution, these Islamic elites sought to deconstruct the orientalist and nationalist racial approach to history, by offering a new way of historiography partly in accordance with Internationalist Islamic doctrines.

___

  • Abdi, K. (2001). Nationalism, politics, and the development of archaeology in Iran. American Journal of Archaeology, 105(1), 51-76.
  • Al-Biruni, M. (2007). Al-Āthār al-Bāqīyah ‘an al-Qurūn al-Khālīyah. (A. Danaseresht, Trans.), Amir Kabir.
  • Algar, H. (1973). Mīrzā Malkum Khān: A Study in the History of Iranian Modernism. University of California Press.
  • Alizadeh, N. (2020a). Ibrat, Hasrat, or Tahdid: Turkish modernity in the eyes of Iranian Nationalist modernists in the Qajar-Pahlavi interregnum. Turkish Studies, DOI: 10.1080/14683849.2020.1788943.
  • Alizadeh, N. (2020b). Revising Iranian Nationalist historiography and shaping a new intellectual field. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 9(5), 3456-3478.
  • Ansari, A. (2012). The Politics of Nationalism in Modern Iran. Cambridge University Press.
  • Arvidsson, S. (2007). Aryan Idols: Indo-European Mythology as Ideology and Science. Chicago University Press.
  • Ashkavari, H. Y. (1994). Ebu-Lo’lo’. Daeratolmaarefe Bozorge Eslami (Vol. 6).
  • Bakhtiyari, Sh. (2007). Amalkarde Abbasiyan dar Qebale Qiyamhaye ZeddeOmaviye Zeyd va Yahya. Faslnameye Olume Ensaniye Daneshgahe Alzahra, 17(65), 1-20.
  • Behnam, J. (2010). Berlaniha. Nashre Foruzan.
  • Biddiss, M. D. (1970). Father of Racist Ideology: The Social and Political Thought of Count Gobineau. Weybright & Talley.
  • Bosworth, C. E. (1965). On the chronology of the Ziyarids in Gurgan and Tabaristan. in Der Islam; Zeitschrift für Geschichte und Kultur des Islamischen Orients, 40, 25-34.
  • Bosworth, C. E. (2000). Tahirids. in The Encyclopaedia of Islam (Vol.5). Brill.
  • Browne, E. G. (1893). A Year amongst the Persians. Adam and Charles Black.
  • Browne, E.G. (1959). A Literary History of Persia (Vol.I). (A. Pasha Saleh, Trans.), Ebnesina.
  • Busse, H. (1975). Iran under the Buyids. in R. N. Frye (ed.), The Cambridge History of Iran (Vol. 4). Cambridge University Press.
  • Calmard, J. (2001). Joseph Arthur de Gobineau. Encyclopædia Iranica: https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/gobineau, Access date: 22.07.2020.
  • Canfield, R. L. (1991). Turko-Persia in Historical Perspective. Cambridge University Press.
  • Cannon, G. (1990). The Life and Mind of Oriental Jones: Sir William Jones, the Father of Modern Linguistics. Cambridge University Press.
  • Cole, J. RI. (1996). Marking boundaries, marking time: The Iranian past and the construction of the self by Qajar Thinkers. Iranian Studies, 29(1-2), 35-56.
  • Daniel, E. L. (1996). The Ahl Al-Taqadum and the problem of the constituency of the Abbasid revolution in the Merv Oasis. Journal of Islamic Studies, 7(2), 150-179.
  • Davis, D. (2012). Iran and Aniran. in A. Emanat & F. Vejdani (Eds.), Iran Facing Others (pp. 39-50). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Dinwari, A. (1989). Al-Akhbar Al-Atiwal. Manshurat Alrazi.
  • El-Hibri, T. (2010). Parable and Politics in Early Islamic History: The Rashidun Caliphs. Columbia University Press.
  • Etemad al-Saltaneh, M.H. (1992). Dorar al-Tijan fi Tarikh bani-Ashkan (Vol. 1). Entesharate Atlas.
  • Frye, R. N. (1975). The Samanids. in R. N. Frye (ed.), The Cambridge History of Iran, (Vol. 4) (pp.136–161). Cambridge University Press.
  • Frye, R. N. (1983). The History of Ancient Iran. Beck.
  • Gnoli, G. (1989). The Idea of Iran: An Essay on Its Origin. Brill.
  • Haider, N. (2019). The Rebel and the Imam in Early Islam: Explorations in Muslim Historiography. Cambridge University Press.
  • Han-Woo, Ch. (2000). A Study of the Ancient Turkic TARQAN. International Journal of Central Asian Studies, 5(1), 105-111.
  • Hawting, G.R. (2002). The First Dynasty of Islam: the Umayyad Caliphate AD 661-750. Routledge.
  • Homai, J. (1934a). Shuu’biya l. Mehr, 2(1), 49-56.
  • Homai, J. (1934b). Shuu’biya 2. Mehr, 2(2), 135-140.
  • Homai, J. (1934c). Shuu’biya 3. Mehr, 2(3), 236-240.
  • Homai, J. (1934d). Shuu’biya 4. Mehr, 2(4), 349-351.
  • Homai, J. (1935a). Shuu’biya 5. Mehr, 2(5), 137-143.
  • Homai, J. (1935b). Shuu’biya 6. Mehr, 2(11), 1137-1144.
  • Homai, J. (1935c). Shuu’biya7. Mehr, 2(12), 1265-1301.
  • Homai, J. (1935d). Shuu’biya dar Qarne Sevvome Hejri. Mehr, 3(2), 158-164.
  • Homai, J. (1935e). Shuu’biya: Mokhalefate Shuu’biya ba Dine Eslam. Mehr, 3(1), 65-71.
  • Ibn al-Nadim, E. (2002). Al-Fihrist. (M. Tajaddod, Trans.). Diba.
  • Ibni Athir, I. (1987). Alkamil fi-alTtarikh (Vol.5). Darassar.
  • Irwin, R. (2016). Gobineau, the would-be Orientalist. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, 26(1-2), 321-332.
  • Legendre, M. (2016). Neither Byzantine nor Islamic? The Duke of the Thebaid and the formation of the Umayyad State. Historical Research, 89(243), 3- 18.
  • Levy, R. (2000). The Social Structure of Islam. Taylor & Francis.
  • Madelung, W. & Walker, P. E. (1998). An Ismaili Heresiography: The ‘Bab Alshaytan’ from Abu Tammam's Kitab Al-shajara. Brill.
  • Marashi, A. (2011). Nationalizing Iran: Culture, Power, and the State, 1870- 1940. University of Washington Press.
  • Marashi, A. (2013). Patron and Patriot: Dinshah J. Irani and the Revival of IndoIranian Culture. Iranian Studies, 46(2),185-206.
  • Matin-Asgari, A. (2014). The Berlin circle: Iranian Nationalism meets German counter modernity. in K. S. Aghaie & A. Marashi (Eds.), Rethinking Iranian Nationalism and Modernity (pp. 49-66). University of Texas Press.
  • Matin-Asgari, A. (2018). Both Eastern and Western: An Intellectual History of Iranian Modernity. Cambridge University Press.
  • Momtahen, H. A. (1991). Nehzate Shuu’biya. Sherkate Sahamiye Ketabhaye Jibi.
  • Motahhari, M. (1979). Khadamate Motaghabele Iran va Eslam. Entesharate Sadra.
  • Nash, G. & O'Donoghue, D. (2008). Comte de Gobineau and Orientalism: Selected Eastern Writings. Routledge.
  • Negmatov, N. (1999). The Samanid State. in M. S. Asimov & C. E. Bosworth (eds.), History of Civilizations of Central Asia (Vol.4). Motilal Banarsidass Publishers.
  • Nizam-ul-Mulk, H. (2018). Siyasat Nama. Rovzaneh.
  • Rajabi, P. (2004). Hezarehaye Gom-Shode (Vol.4). Entesharate Tus.
  • Ram, H. (2000). The immemorial Iranian Nation? School textbooks and historical memory in post‐revolutionary Iran. Nations and Nationalism, 6(1), 67-90.
  • Ringer, M. (2012). Iranian nationalism and Zoroastrian identity. in A. Amanat & F. Vejdani (Eds.), Iran Facing Others (pp. 267-278). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Sadrinia, B. (1995). Pajhuheshi dar Bab Estelahe Mamaleke Mahruseye Iran. Iranshenakht, 1, 65-87.
  • Safa, Z. (1947). Shuu’biya. Artesh, 9, 24-29.
  • Said, E. (1979). Orientalism. Vintage Books.
  • Saleh, A. (2013). Ethnic Identity and the State in Iran. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Savory, R. (1980). Iran Under the Safavids. Cambridge University Press.
  • Shari’ati, A. (1978). Bazgasht be Khishtan: Bazgasht be Kodam Khishtan, Majmu’eye Asar (Vol.4). Hoseyniyeye Ershad.
  • Skjærvø, P. O. (2013). Marriage II. Next of Kin Marriage in Zoroastrianism. Encyclopedia Iranica http://www.iranicaonline. org/articles/marriage-next-of-kin, Access date: 11.07. 2020.
  • Stausberg, M. (2011). From power to powerlessness: Zoroastrianism in Iranian history. in A. N. Longva & A. S. Roald (Eds.), Religious Minorities in the Middle East: Domination, Self-Empowerment, Accommodation (pp. 171– 193). Brill.
  • Tabari, M. J. (2003). Tarikhe Tabari (Vol. 10). Entesharate Esatir.
  • Tavakoli-Targhi, M. (1994). Tarikh-pardazi va Iran-aryai: Bazsazi-yi Huviyat-I Irani dar Guzarish-e Tarikh. Iran Nameh, 12(4), 583-611.
  • Tavernier, J. (2007). The Case of Elamite tep-/tip-and Akkadian ṭuppu. Iran, 45(1), 57-69.
  • Tenorio, E. H. (2011). Critical discourse analysis, an overview. Nordic journal of English studies, 10(1), 183-210.
  • Van Berkel, M., El Cheikh, N. M., Kennedy, H., & Osti, L. (2013). Crisis and Continuity at the Abbasid Court: Formal and Informal Politics in the Caliphate of Al-Muqtadir. Brill.
  • Vaziri, M. (1993). Iran as Imagined Nation. Paragon House.
  • Vejdani, F. (2015). Making History in Iran: Education, Nationalism, and Print Culture. Stanford University Press.
  • Wickens, G. M., Cole, J. & Ekbal, E. (1989). Browne, Edward Granville. Encyclopædia Iranica IV/5, pp. 483-488.
  • Zarrinkoob, A. (1957). Do Qarn Sokut. Entesharate Amirkabir.
  • Zia-Ebrahimi, R. (2010). An emissary of the golden age: Manekji Limji Hataria and the charisma of the archaic in pre-nationalist Iran. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism, 10(3), 377-390.
  • Zia-Ebrahimi, R. (2011). Self-orientalization and dislocation: The uses and abuses of the Aryan discourse in Iran. Iranian Studies, 44(4), 445-472.
  • Zia-Ebrahimi, R. (2014). Arab Invasion and Decline, or the Import of European Racial Thought by Iranian Nationalists. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 37(6), 1043-1061.
  • Zia-Ebrahimi, R. (2016). Better a Warm Hug than a Cold Bath: Nationalist Memory and the Failures of Iranian Historiography. Iranian Studies, 49(5), 837-854.