Bilgi ve iletişim teknolojilerinin yaygınlaşması ile platformlar üzerinden şahsen veya sanal olarak bir defaya mahsus yapılan görevler veya işlerden oluşan yeni bir piyasa gelişmektedir. Görevlerin arz ve talebini eşleştiren bu yeni piyasa, gig ekonomisi olarak tanımlanmakta ve gig ekonomisinde platform ve çalışan sayısı giderek artmaktadır. Gig ekonomisi birçok kişiye esnek çalışma ve ek kazanç fırsatları sunmasına rağmen, istihdam korumalarının yanı sıra, örgütlenme ve toplu pazarlık hakkının kullanımında yaşanan zorluklar ve kısıtlamalarla gündeme gelmektedir. Bu açıdan, gig-tabanlı çalışanlar platformlar tarafından özel sözleşmelerde çoğunlukla bağımsız yüklenici veya serbest çalışan olarak sınıflandırılmaktadır. Bu bağlamda, bu çalışma, temel olarak, gig ekonomisinin ayırt edici özellikleri, gig-tabanlı çalışma koşulları ve modelleri ile istihdam statüsünden kaynaklanan istihdamın korunması, örgütlenme ve toplu pazarlık açısından yaşanan zorluklara ilişkin ülke örnekleri ile yapılandırılmış kavramsal-teorik bir inceleme sunmayı ve bir takım sosyal politikalar önermeyi amaçlamaktadır.
A new market consisting of one-off tasks or jobs performed personally or virtually through platforms is developing based on the widespread usage of information and communication technologies. The new market which matches the supply and demand of those tasks is described as the gig economy and the number of platforms and workers in the gig economy gradually increases. Although the gig economy offers opportunities for many people to get flexible work and additional earnings, it remains on the agenda the restrictions and challenges experienced in the usage of employment protections and rights to organise and collective bargaining. In this sense, gig-based workers are often classified as independent contractors or self-employed or freelancers in private contracts by the platforms running in the gig economy. In this context, this study mainly aims to present a conceptual-theoretical review structured with country instances related to the distinctive features of the gig economy, gig-based working conditions and models, and challenges experienced in terms of employment protections, organisation, and collective bargaining which result from employment statu and suggest a range of social policies
Aloisi, A. (2016). Commoditized Workers. Case Study Research on Labour Law Issues Arising from a Set of “on-Demand/Gig Economy” Platforms. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal. 37(3). 653-690.
Askitas, N., Eichhorst, W., Fahrenholtz, B., Meys, N. ve Ody, M. (2018). Industrial Relations ve Social Dialogue in the Age of Collaborative Economy (IRSDACE). National Report Germany. IZA Research Report No. 86.
Balliester, T. ve Elsheikhi, A. (2018). The Future of Work: A Literature Review. ILO Research Department. Working Paper No. 29.
Berg, J., Furrer, M., Harmon, E., Rami, U. veSilberman, S. (2018). Digital Labour Platforms and the Future of Work: Towards Decent Work in Online World. Geneva. ILO.
Conaty, P., Bird, A. ve Ross, P. (2016). Not Alone: Trade Union and Co-Operative Solutions for Self-Employed Workers.
Co-Operatives UK.Donovan, S. A., Bradley, D. H. ve Shimabukuro, J. O. (2016). What Does the Gig Economy Mean for Workers? Congressional Research Service: Report. 1–16.
Drahokoupil, J. ve Fabo, B. (2016). The Platform Economy and the Distruption of the Employment Relationship. European Trade Union Institute (ETUI) Policy Brief European Economic. Employment and Social Policy.
Durward, D., Blohm, I. ve Leimeister, J. M. (2016). Principal Forms of Crowdsourcing and Crowd Work. The Digital Economy and the Single Market (Eds. Wobbe, W., Bova, E. and Dragomirescu-Gaina, C.). The European Parliament. Triptyque. Belgium.
Eurofound ve ILO (2017). Working Anytime, Anywhere: The Effects on the World of Work. Publications Office of the European Union. Luxembourg, and the International Labour Office. Geneva.
Felstiner, A. (2011). Working the Crowd: Employment and Labor Law in the Crowdsourcing Industry. Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law. 32(1). 143–202.
Fine, J. (2015). Alternative Labour Protection Movements in the United States: Reshaping Industrial Relations? International Labour Review. 154(1). 15–26.
Florisson, R. ve Mandl, I. (2018). Platform Work: Types and Implications for Work and Employment– Literature Review. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. Dublin.
De Groen, W. P., Kilhoffer, Z., Lenaerts, K. veMandl, I. (2018). Employment and Working Conditions of Selected Types of Platform Work. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Guppta, K. (2016). Will Labor Unions Survive in the Era of Automation?Forbes. [https://www.forbes.com/sites/kaviguppta/2016/10/12/will-labor-unions-survive-in-the-era-of-automation/#2cd6eb433b22]. (Erişim: 20 Mayıs 2020).
Hayter, S., Fashoyin, T. ve Kochan, T. A. (2011). Review Essay: Collective Bargaining for the 21st Century. Journal of Industrial Relations. 53 (2). 225-247. https:// doi . org/10.1177/0022185610397144.
Howcroft, D. ve Bergvall-Kåreborn, B. (2019). A Typology of Crowdwork Platforms. Work, Employment and Society. 33(1). 21–38. doi: 10.1177/0950017018760136.
Howe, J. (2006). The Rise of Crowdsourcing. Wired Magazine. 14 (6). [https://www.wired.com/2006/06/crowds/]. (Erişim: 28 Ağustos 2020).
Hyman, R. (2015). Three Scenarios for Industrial Relations in Europe. International Labour Review. 154(1). 5-15.
ILO (International Labour Organisation) (2016). Non-Standard Employment Around the World: Understanding Challenges, Shaping Prospects. International Labour Office. Geneva.
IOE (International Organisation of Employers) (2017). Understanding the Future of Work. Geneva). [https:// www . ioe -emp . org / fileadmin/ioe_documents/publications/Policy%20Areas/future_of_Work/EN/ _2017-02-03__IOE_Brief_-_ understanding _ the _ Future_of_Work__full_publication__-_web __ print_version.pdf]. (Erişim: 15 Mayıs 2020).
Johnston, H. ve Land-Kazlauskas, C. (2019). Organizing on-Demand: Representation, Voice, and Collective Bargaining in the Gig Economy. Conditions of Work and Employment Series. No. 94.
ILO, Geneva. Kaine, S. ve Josserand, E. (2019). The Organisation and Experience of Work in the Gig Economy. Journal of Industrial Relations. 61(4). 479–501. doi:10.1177/0022185619865480.
Kalleberg, A. L. ve Dunn, M. (2016). Good Job, Bad Jobs in the Gig Economy. Perspectives on Work. 10-14.
Kilhoffer, Z., Lenaerts, K. ve Miroslav, B. (2017). The Platform Economy and Industrial Relations: Applying the Old Framework to the New Reality. CEPS Research Report. No. 2017/12. [https://ssrn.com/abstract=3053826].(Erişim: 9 Eylül 2020).
Ludkin, M. (2016). GMB Wins Monumental Vi ctory in Employment Case against Uber. [https:// www . gmb . org . uk / news / monumental-victory – employment – case – against - uber]. (Erişim: 10 Mayıs 2020).
Piasna, A. (2020). Counting Gigs. How Can We Measure the Scale of Online Platform Work?European Trade Union Institute (ETUI) Working Paper 2020.06. Brussels. Belgium.
Prassl, J. (2018). Collective Voice in the Platform Economy: Challenges, Opportunities, Solutions. Technical Report to the European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC).
Rubiano, C. (2013). Precarious Work and Access to Collective Bargaining: What Are the Legal Obstacles? International Journal of Labour Research. 5(1). 133-151.
De Stefano, V. (2016). The Rise of the ‘Just-in-Time Workforce’: On DemandWork, Crowdwork, and Labor Protection in the ‘Gig-Economy’. Conditions of Work and Employment Series. ILO Working Paper 71.
Geneva.Todolí-Signes, A. (2017). The ‘Gig Economy’: Employee, Self-Employed or the Need for a Special Employment Regulation? Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research. ETUI . 23 (2) . 193 – 205 . doi . 10.1177/1024258917701381.
Valenduc, G. ve Vendramin, P. (2016). Work in the Digital Economy: Sorting the Old from the New. ETUI (The European trade union institute). Brussels. Belgium.
Vandaele, K. (2018). Will Trade Unions Survive in the Platform Economy? Emerging Patterns of Platform Workers’ Collective Voice and Representation in Europe. ETUI (The European Trade Union Institute). Working Paper 2018.05. Brussels.
Waas, B., Liebman, W., Lyubarsky, A., Kezuka, K. (2017). Crowdwork — A Comparative Law Perspective. Bund-Verlag. Frankfurt am Main. Germany.