Is There a Long-run Association between Globalization and Labor Productivity?: Panel Evidence from OECD Countries

Globalization may have various effects in both positive and negative contexts in an economy. By letting a country to reach more advanced technologies and production methods, globalization can augment an economy’s productivity level. Therefore, this study examines the role of globalization on labor productivity in both short-run and long-run. In order to analyze this association, we empirically investigate if there is a long-run relationship between globalization and labor productivity by using a balanced panel data of 34 OECD countries for the years from 2002 to 2012. Panel cointegration test results disclose that globalization and labor productivity are positively related to each other and this relationship is statistically significant in both short-run and long-run. According to the estimation results, if globalization index value goes up by 1% then labor productivity increases by 0.83% in the long-run while this figure is by 0.44% in the short-run.  Also, we could not find any causality association between globalization and labor productivity as a result of panel causality test. 

Is There a Long-run Association between Globalization and Labor Productivity?: Panel Evidence from OECD Countries

Globalization may have various effects in both positive and negative contexts in an economy. By letting a country to reach more advanced technologies and production methods, globalization can augment an economy’s productivity level. Therefore, this study examines the role of globalization on labor productivity in both short-run and long-run. In order to analyze this association, we empirically investigate if there is a long-run relationship between globalization and labor productivity by using a balanced panel data of 34 OECD countries for the years from 2002 to 2012. Panel cointegration test results disclose that globalization and labor productivity are positively related to each other and this relationship is statistically significant in both short-run and long-run. According to the estimation results, if globalization index value goes up by 1% then labor productivity increases by 0.83% in the long-run while this figure is by 0.44% in the short-run.  Also, we could not find any causality association between globalization and labor productivity as a result of panel causality test. 

___

  • Auzina-Emsina, A. (2014). Labour productivity, economic growth and global competitiveness in post-crisis period. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 156, 317-321.
  • Bracker, K., Docking, D. S., & Koch, P. D. (1999). Economic determinants of evolution in international stock market integration. Journal of Empirical Finance, 6(1), 1-27.
  • Chen, P., & Semmler, W. (2018). Short and long effects of productivity on unemployment. Open Economies Review, 1-26.
  • Csordás, S. (2018). Commodity exports and labour productivity in the long run. Applied Economics Letters, 25(6), 362-365.
  • Dreher, A. (2006). Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization. Applied Economics, 38(10), 1091-1110.
  • Dumitrescu, E.-I., and C. Hurlin. 2012. Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic Modelling, 29, 1450-1460.
  • Edwards, S. (1998). Openness, productivity and growth: what do we really know?. The economic journal, 108(447), 383-398.
  • Erdem, E., & Türker, O. (2012). Orta Asya Cumhuriyetlerinde Ekonomik Serbestlik ve Büyüme İlişkisi. In International Conference on Eurasian Economies (pp. 175-182).
  • Hayaloğlu, P., Kalaycı, C., & Artan, S. (2015). Küreselleşme Farklı Gelir Grubundaki Ülkelerde Ekonomik Büyümeyi Nasıl Etkilemektedir. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 10(1), 119-152.
  • Kang, Y. H., Na, K., & Kim, Y. S. (2018). Labor Productivity in Emerging Markets: Evidence from Brazil, China, India, And Russia (BRIC). The journal of Applied Business Research, 34(2), 325-338.
  • Kentor, J. (2001). The long-term effects of globalization on income inequality, population growth, and economic development. Social Problems, 48(4), 435-455.
  • Kobrin, S. J. (1991). An empirical analysis of the determinants of global integration. Strategic Management Journal, 12(S1), 17-31.
  • Koyuncu, C., & İşcan, İ. H. (2017). Does Intelligence Enhance Labor Productivity? Cross-Country Evidence. Social Sciences Research Journal, 6(4), 99-115.
  • Koyuncu, C., & Okşak, Y. (2017). The Association between Subsidies and Productivity: Panel Analysis. Journal of Economics Library, 4(1), 76-82.
  • Koyuncu, C., & Yilmaz, R. (2010). Chinese exports and productivity gains: panel evidence. Asian‐Pacific Economic Literature, 24(2), 161-170.
  • Koyuncu, J. Y., Yılmaz, R. & Yıldırım, S. (2017). Internet Penetration and Productivity: A Panel Study. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 17 (1), 59-66.
  • Koyuncu, J. Y., & Unver, M. (2017). The Association between Corruption and Globalization in African Countries. Social Sciences Research Journal, 6(4), 20-28.
  • Koyuncu, J. Y., Yılmaz, R., & Ünver, M. (2016) The Relationship between Female Labor Force Participation and Labor Productivity: Panel Data Analysis. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 11(2), 237-250.
  • Lieberman, M. B. (1991). Determinants of Vertical Integration: An Empirical Test. Journal of Industrial Economics, 39(5), 451-466.
  • Manda, D. K., & Sen, K. (2004). The labour market effects of globalization in Kenya. Journal of International Development, 16(1), 29-43.
  • Márquez-Ramos, L., Florensa, L. M., & Recalde, M. L. (2017). Understanding the determinants of economic integration in Latin America. Journal of Economic Integration, 558-585.
  • Nistor, C. (2007). Positive and Negative Effects of Globalization. Universitatii Bucuresti. Analele. Seria Stiinte Economice si Administrative, 1, 152.
  • Okşak, Y., & Koyuncu, J. Y. (2017). Does globalization affect female labor force participation: Panel evidence. Journal of Economics Bibliography, 4(4), 381-387.
  • Pesaran, M. H. (2007). "A Simple Panel Unit Root Test in the Presence of Cross-section Dependence." Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22, 265-312
  • Pesaran, H., (2003), A Simple Panel Unit Root Test in the Presence of Cross Section Dependence, Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 0346, Faculty of Economics (DAE), University of Cambridge
  • Preenen, P. T., Vergeer, R., Kraan, K., & Dhondt, S. (2017). Labour productivity and innovation performance: The importance of internal labour flexibility practices. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 38(2), 271-293.
  • Saud, S., & Chen, S. (2018). An empirical analysis of financial development and energy demand: establishing the role of globalization. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1-12.
  • Shirov, A. A., Gusev, M. S., Yantovskii, A. A., & Potapenko, V. V. (2012). Long-term development of the Russian economy and the problem of labour productivity. Studies on Russian Economic Development, 23(1), 1-13.
  • Topal, M. H., & Günay, H. F. (2017). Küresel Kamu Malları Perspektifinden Küreselleşme, Yoksulluk Ve Küresel Barış Arasındaki İlişki. Global Journal of Economics & Business, 6(11), 57-69.
  • Westerlund, J. 2005. New simple tests for panel cointegration. Econometric Reviews 24: 297-316.
  • Westerlund, J. 2007. Testing for Error Correction in Panel Data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 69(6): 709-748.
  • Yaşar, E., & Yaşar, M. (2017). Küresel Servet Eşitsizliği ve Çokuluslu Bir Sınıflama. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 9(4), 259-282.
  • Yay, G. G., & Aksoy, T. (2018). Globalization and the welfare state. Quality & Quantity, 52(3), 1015-1040.
  • Yildirim, K., Koyuncu, C., & Koyuncu, J. (2009). Does Temperature Affect Labor Productivity: Cross-Country Evidence. Applied Econometrics and International Development, 9(1), 29-39.
  • Ying, Y. H., Chang, K., & Lee, C. H. (2014). The impact of globalization on economic growth. Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting, 17(2), 25-34.