Nadia CARLOMAGNO, Stefano TORE DI, Rosa SGAMBELLURİ, Veronica FRAGNITO, Filippo PALOMA GOMEZ

New technologies for motor didactics

Today's multimedia environments and information technologies represents a very effective tool to facilitating the processes of teaching and learning in schools, in the same way other technologies today available on the market, could hide some peculiarities and potentiality very useful for didactics process. Aim of the article is to analyze some instrument, chosen based on their potential and applicability in educational contexts, with special regards to the motor learning. It was decided to discuss here only two technologies selected for the high degree of involvement of motor skills that they make it possible. The two technologies that will be presented here are: (1) Kinect (2) Nirvana. Highly immersive didactic environments, such as those achievable through the use of the technologies mentioned above, could facilitate access to knowledge and give a valid assistance as high degree of involvement.

PDF

___

1. Antinucci F. La scuola si è rotta, Laterza, Bari, 2001.

2. Bandura A. Social learning theory, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 1977.

3. Bosio P, Menegoi Buzzi DI. Scuola e diversità in Europa. Strumenti per la formazione dei docenti sull’integrazione dei disabili in Europa, Milano, Franco Angeli,2005

4. Bruner JS. The culture of education, Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Mass.) – London, 1996.

5. Bruner J. La ricerca del significato. Per una psicologia culturale, Bollati Boringheri, 1992.

6. Calvani A. Costruttivismo, progettazione didattica e tecnologie, in D. Bramanti (a cura di) Progettazione formativa e valutazione, Carocci, Roma, 1998.

7. Carassa A, Morganti F, Tirassa M. A situated cognition perspective on presence. In B. Bara, L.W. Barsalou, M. Bucciarelli(Eds.), XXVII Annual Conference of Cognitive Science Society. Alpha, NJ: Sheridan Printing, 384-389, 2005.

8. Carassa A, Morganti F, Tirassa M. Movement, Action, and Situation:Presence in Virtual Environment. In M. Alcaniz Raya, B. Rey Solaz (Eds), Seventh Annual International Workshop Presence 2004. Valencia UPV,7-12: Editorial, 2004.

9. Gardner H. Intelligenze multiple, Anabasi, Milano, 1994.

10. Gibson JJ. The ecological approach to visual perception, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1979.

11. Hughes M, Lipoma M, Sibilio M. La performance analysis. elementi di base ed aspetti applicativi in campo educativo ed integrativo. Milano: Franco Angeli, 2009.

12. Lodrini T. Didattica costruttivista e ipermedia, F. Angeli, Milano, 2002.

13. Machlup F. The Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the United States, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1962.

14. Morganti F, Riva G. Conoscenza, comunicazione e tecnologia,Milano: LED Edizioni Universitarie, 2006.

15. Novak J. L’apprendimento significativo, Erickson, Trento, 2001.

16. Puglisi F. Biomeccanica introduzione alle misure strumentali di postura e movimento, Roma, Marrapese, 2007.

17. Riva G. Psicologia dei nuovi media,Il Mulino, Bologna, 2008.

18. Tarr MJ, Warren WH. Virtual Reality in behavioral neuroscience and beyond, Nature Publishing Group, 2002.

19. Varisco BM. Alle radici dell’ipertestualità, in A. Calvani e B.M. Varisco (a cura di), Costruire/decostruire significati, CLEUP, Padova, 1995.

20. Varisco BM. Costruttivismo socio-culturale, Carocci, Roma, 2002.

21. Vigotskji LS. Il processo cognitivo, Boringheri, Torino, 1980.

22. Villani D, Grassi A, Riva G. Tecnologie emotive: nuovi media per migliorare la qualità della vita e ridurre lo stress, LED, Milano, 2011.

23. Wenger E. Communities of practice. Learning meaning and identity, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.

24. Wiederhold BK, Widerhold MD. Virtual Reality Therapy for Anxiety Disorders, Advances in Education and Treatment. American Psychological Association Press, New York, 2004.