Empirical analysis of the spatial distribution of organised food retailers in Ankara with regard to neighbourhoods' social, economic and physical characteristics

Kentleşme süreçleri ile perakende coğrafyasının dönüşümü arasındaki ilişki, 1900’lerin başından beri, kent planlama, coğrafya ve toplumbilim alanlarının ilgi odağı olmuştur. Geliştirilen farklı yaklaşımlar bu ilişkinin farklı boyutları üzerinde yoğunlaşmış, iki süreç arasındaki etkileşimin parçalarını nedensellikler üzerinden açıklamayı amaçlamıştır. Bu yazıda, Ankara kenti üzerine yapılan araştırma bulgularından yola çıkılarak geçmiş yaklaşımların parçacıl açıklamalardan öteye gitmediği, etkileşim sürecinin bütününü anlamaya ve bu bütüne müdahale etmeye yönelik açılımlar sağlamadığı savunulmaktadır. Kentleşme ve perakende coğrafyası arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesindeki bu eksiklikten yola çıkan araştırma, kentsel gelişimin; kentlilerin toplumsal, ekonomik ve fiziksel özellikleri doğrultusunda şekillendiği savını Ankara kentindeki örgütlenmiş gıda perakendecilerinin mahalle özelliklerine göre dağılımı üzerinden doğrulamayı amaçlamıştır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda Ankara’da etkinlik gösteren 18 firmaya ait 516 örgütlü gıda perakende noktası bulundukları mahallelerle ilişkilendirilmiş ve bulunma oranları ile mahallelerin toplumsal, ekonomik ve fiziksel özellikleri arasındaki ilişki incelenmiştir. Araştırma bulguları, örgütlü gıda perakende firmalarının mahallelerin toplumsal, ekonomik ve fiziksel özelliklerine göre yer seçmekte olduğunu göstermiştir. Bulgulara göre firmalar, üstünlükleri söz konusu olan mahallelerde daha çok sayıda bulunurken olumsuz konumdaki mahallelerde daha az varlık göstermektedirler. Sonuç olarak, kent-perakende gelişim ilişkisi üzerinde geliştirilecek yeni bir yaklaşımın ancak kentin toplumsal, ekonomik ve fiziksel özelliklerini etkileyen kentsel politik iktisadın gerçeklerini içererek bütüncül ve gerçeğe yakın bir modelleme sunacağı ileri sürülmektedir.

Ankara Kentindeki örgütlü gıda perakendecilerinin; Mahallelerin toplumsal, ekonomik ve fiziksel özelliklerine göre yer seçimi üzerine deneysel bir çözümleme

Commercial activities are considered to be a very important part of urbanisation process due to both its economic role and its importance in the social reproduction inhabitants. Today, with the increasing specialisation in economic activities and sophistication of daily lives the peculiar role of retailing solidified more and consequently the number of retail based studies have increased to a considerable degree in recent years. Based on this view, the paper aims to develop a research path with special emphasis on retailing’s contribution on social and economic structure of cities. In defining the aim as above, retail activities are seen as an inseparable part of general urbanisation process and it is hypothesised that retail activities tend to follow already established social and economic variations, sometimes lessen but mostly aggravating them. The trend necessitates political economic explanations that encompass both the formation of social and economic differentiations and urbanisation process in a comprehensive way. To this end various retail theories are analysed in relation with their social and economic structure of cities and a new approach is proposed on the basis of the case of Ankara. The paper initiates with the brief summary and critique of theories that consider production of retail environments as a part of general urbanisation process and explain the retail development in relation with urban dynamics. To this end, some theories that consider retailing individually in a rather isolated way, were not taken into account (Annex 1). The first part starts with ecological theories and continues with normative spatial theories that include both central place theories and spatial interaction models. The section is terminating with postmodern approaches. The second part of the paper is devoted to the case of organised food retailers (OFRs) in Ankara. This part aims to prove the relationship between socio economic characteristics of the neighbourhoods and OFR presence. In the third and final part the Ankara case is analysed with reference to literature about disadvantaged consumers and food-deserts, and proposals for further researches are developed.

___

  • AKSEL-GÜRÜN, B. (2009) Impact of Shopping Centers on the Fragmentation of the City Center, unpublished PhD thesis, City and Regional Planning Department, ODTÜ, Ankara.
  • Alışveriş Merkezi Yatırımcıları Derneği (AYD) (2012) Retail Sector in Turkey. [http://www.ayd.org.tr/TR/Data Bank.aspx] Accessed on 14.09.2013.
  • BATTY, M. (2007) Cities and Complexity: Understanding Cities with Cellular Automota, agent-based Models, and Fractals, University Press Group, London.
  • BERRY, B.J.L. (1967) Geography of Market Centers and Retail Distribution, New Jersey Englewood Cliffs.
  • BRENNER, N., THEODORE, N. (2002) Cities and the Geographies of “Actually Existing Neoliberalism, Antipode, 34(3) 349–379.
  • BURGESS, E.W. (1925) The Growth of the City: An Introduction to a Research Project, The City eds. R.E. Park, E.W. Burgess and R.D. McKenzie, University of Chicago Press, Chicago; 47–62.
  • COELHO, J.D., WILSON, A.G. (1976) The Optimum Location and Size of Shopping Centres, Regional Studies (10) 413-21.
  • DANIELS, M.J. (2007) Central Place Theory and Sport Tourism Impacts, Annals of Tourism Research 34(2) 332-347.
  • DEAR, M., FLUSTY, S. (1998) Postmodern Urbanism, Annals of the Association of American Geographers 88(1) 50-72.
  • DENNIS, C., MARSHLAND, D., COCKETT, T. (2002) Central Place Practice: shopping centre attractiveness measures, hinterland boundaries and the UK retail hierarchy, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 9, 185-199.
  • FLANAGAN, W.G. (1993) Contemporary Urban Sociology, Cambridge University Press, Massacussets.
  • GIDDENS, A. (1973) The Class Structure of the Advanced Capitalist Societies, Hutchison University Library, London.
  • GOTTDIENER, M. (ed.). 2000. New Forms of Consumption: Consumers, Culture, and Commodification, Lanham, MA: Rowman and Littlefield.
  • GUY, C. (2007) Planning for Retail Development: A Critical View of the British Experience, Routledge, New York.
  • HAIG, R.M. (1926) Towards an Understanding of the Metropolis, Quarterly Journal of Economics (40) 402-34.
  • HARVEY, D. (1973) Social Justice and the City, Edward Arnold, London.
  • HARVEY, D. (1985a) Urbanisation of Capital: Studies in the History and Theory of Capitalist Urbanisation, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
  • HARVEY, D. (1985b) The Geopolitics of Capitalism, Social Relations and Spatial Structures, ed. D. Gregory, J. Urry, Macmillan, London; 112- 131.
  • HOYT, H. (1933) One Hundred Years of Land Values in Chicago, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • Hürriyet Ekonomi (2009) İşte rakamlarla Ankara. [http://hurarsiv.hurriyet. com.tr/goster/ShowNew.aspx?id=7666685] Accessed on 02.06.2013.
  • JENSEN-BUTLER, C. (1972) Gravity Models as Planning Tools, Geografiska Annaler 54(b) 68-78.
  • Mc Kinsey Global Institute (2003) Turkey: Making Productivity and Growth Breakthrough [http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/mgi/research/ productivity_competitiveness_and_growth/turkey_making_the_ productivity_and_growth_breakthrough] Accessed on 02.09.2010.
  • PAMIR AND SOYUER, DTZ (2008) Turkey Retail Market Overview. Retail Market Research. [http://balkans.com/relevant/b48a9-Turkey%252 0Retail%2520Market%2520Overview%25202008.pdf] Accessed on 14.03.2009.
  • PECK, J., TICKELL A. (2008[2002]) Neoliberalising Space, Antipode, 34(3) 380-404.
  • PECK, J., THEODORE, N., BRENNER, N. (2009) Neoliberal Urbanism: Models, Moments, Mutations, SAIS Review (39/1) 49-66.
  • PECK, J., THEODORE, N. (2012) Reanimating Neoliberalism: Process Geographies of Neo-liberalisation, Social Anthropology 20(2) 117-185.
  • Price Waterhouse Coopers (2007) Transition of the Turkish Retail Sector and the impacts on the Economy, report prepared for the Turkish Council of Shopping Centres and Retailers (AMPD).
  • [http://www.pwc.fr/assets/files/pdf/2008/04/pwc_transition_turkish_ retail_sector.pdf] Accessed on 16.05.2009.
  • REISSMAN, L. (1964) The Urban Process: Cities in Industrial Societies, Free Press, London.
  • Revenue Administration (2006) Minimum Square-meter Land Unit Values for Ankara [http://www.gib.gov.tr/index.php?id=827] Accessed on 14.06.2009.
  • SALINGAROS, N.A. (1998) Theory of the Urban Web, Journal of Urban Design, 3(1) 53-71.
  • WHITE, R. (1998) Cities and Cellular Automata, Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society (2) 111-25.
  • SAUNDERS, P. (1984) Beyond Housing Classes: the Sociological Significance of Private Property Rights in Means of Consumption, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 8(2) 202-227.
  • SAUNDERS, P. (1978) Domestic Property and Social Class, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2(1-4) 233–51.
  • SUI, D., Z. (1999) Postmodern Urbanism Disrobed: or Why Postmodern Urbanism is a Dead End for Urban Geography, Urban Geography 20(5) 403-411.
  • TANNIER, C., PUMAIN, D. (2005) Fractals in Urban Geography: a Theoretical Outline and Empirical Example, Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography: Systemes, Modelisation, Geostatistiques. [http:// cybergeo.revues.org/3275 ; DOI : 10.4000/cybergeo.3275] Accessed on 23.05.2012.
  • Turkish Statistical Institute, TUİK (2008) Census of Population Social and Economic Characteristics of Population, TUİK Publications, Ankara.