Kentsel mekân örgütlenmesinin yaşlıların kentsel etkinlikleri üzerindeki etkisi, İstanbul ve Viyana örneği (1)

The impact of urban space organisation on the urban activity of the elderly, Istanbul and Venna example

Improved quality in technological and medical services have resulted in an increase in the number of elderly people within the average population. Concordantly , the demands and desires of the elderly population have gained significance. Standards that consider elderly people’s needs in their living environments have become one of the primary topics of discussion. Today, behind the global-scale transformation of the concept of old age and perception towards elderly people lies modernism (including industrialization), economic growth and rapid urbanisation. Consequently, the shift in values of judgement, social norms and behavioural models are pushing the elderly to a life of solitude within urban environments. Therefore, it is very important to ensure that the urban elderly individual living alone, particularly in metropolitan cities due to the rapidly increasing global elderly population and changing lifestyles, can participate in urban life. Changing physical and social needs of elderly people in cities have forced reconsideration of urban design and organization of cities from a strategic planning approach. Consequently, to achieve sustainability of such reorganizations, issues such as accurate and effective design of public open spaces and accessibility are very important. Based on the fact that, the life-sustaining conditions permitting, everyone will eventually become elderly, this study focuses on the effect urban outdoor design standards have on urban elderly populations’ participation in urban space in two cities with different spatial standards: Istanbul and Vienna. Locations with similar features were chosen in both cities to analyse demographic variation, physical adequacy and means of transportation / accessibility. 60 elderly people living in the locality were chosen to conduct interviews aiming at comparing the physiological condition, reason and frequency for going outside, difficulties encountered outdoors and the extent of satisfaction regarding home / outdoor accessibility. Based on spatial analysis and questionnaire survey the study compares outdoor standards and user satisfaction of both cities to infer on both ageing and design. Taking a closer look at current legislation concerning accessibility of public open space in Europe and Turkey it is evident that Turkey is considerably late regarding the issue. “Baordnung”, the mandatory structural regulation in effect in Germany, Austria and Switzerland is especially effective. Whereas initiatives in Turkey have not gone much further than defining standards and making certain minor modifications. Let alone accessibility for the elderly, studies focusing on universal design standards are equally as rare. In this context this study could be considered as an investigation into raising awareness about the elderly in Turkey that provides guidance in future urban design initiatives. Considering findings from the study, Turkey has to take steps towards restructuring the social security system, taking necessary economic measures, improving level of education and undertaking work to increase the functionality of facilities like old people’s homes and nursing homes on a national level in order to prevent suffering of the elderly whose numbers will rise inevitably in the future. It is also very important to design multi-functional public spaces allowing mixed use, develop pedestrian oriented urban design projects and consider all age groups in the transportation plans on a city scale. On the other hand, taking a closer look at elderly policies and related urban design solutions in other countries will contribute to developing effective solutions to problems of the elderly in Turkey through a different perspective. There is a particular need to reconsider ways of increasing the quality of public open space, transportation planning, reviewing function and site selection to ultimately develop a form of urban design that can successfully integrate these factors.

___

  • AKIN, B., EMİROĞLU, O.N. (2003) Evde Yaşayan Yaşlılarda Mobilitede Yetiyitimi ve İlişkili Faktörlerin İncelenmesi, Turkish Journal of Geriatrics, Geriatri 6 (2): 59-67.
  • BAKAN, K., KONUK, G. (1987) Türkiye’de Kentsel Dış Mekânların Düzenlenmesi, Tübitak Yayınları No: 45, Ankara.
  • BLOOM E.D., CANNING, D., FINK, G. (2008) Population Aging and Economic Growth, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, The World Bank, On behalf of the Commission on Growth and Development, Working Paper No. 32, Washington.
  • BMVIT (2010) Radverkehr in Zahlen, Daten Fackten und Stimmungen, Bundesministerum für Verkehrinnovation und Technologgie, Wien.
  • DPT (2010) Devlet Plânlama Teşkilatı Tarihçesi, [http://www.dpt.gov.tr/DPT. portal] Erişim Tarihi (15.04.2010).
  • FINK, A., KOSECOFF, J. (1985) How to Conduct Surveys, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills.
  • KOÇOĞLU, G.O., BİLİR, N. (2002) Yaşlanma 2002-Uluslararası Eylem Plânı, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Geriatrik Bilimler Araştırma ve Uygulama Merkezi, Ankara.
  • NEUMANN, W. L. (2000) Social Research Methods, Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, Allynand Bacon, Boston.
  • OECD (2011) How’s Life? Measuring Well-being, [http://www.keepeek.com/ Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/economics/how-s-life/personal security_9789264121164-13-en#page13] Erişim Tarihi (06.09.2013).
  • ÖAW (2012) Population Projections for Forty-Four European Countries: The Ongoing Population Ageing, [http://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/download/ edrp_2_09.pdf] Erişim Tarihi (30.11.2012).
  • STATISTIK AUSTRIA (2001) Population by demographic characteristics [http:// www.statistik.at/web_en/] Erişim Tarihi (15.01.2011).
  • ŞENOL, P., YÖRÜR N., ALTINÖRS A. (2006) Kent Yaşamında Yaşlılara Sunulan Yaşlı Bakım Evleri ve Huzurevlerinin Yetersizliği ve Yeni Arayışlar, Kent ve Sağlık Sempozyumu 07/09, Haziran 2006, Bursa.
  • TUFAN, İ. (2007) I. Türkiye Yaşlılık Raporu, Geroyay, Antalya.
  • TÜİK (2009) Türkiye İstatistik Yıllığı 2008, Yayın no:3248, Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu, Ankara, [http://www.library.illinois.edu/cgs/gives/turkish/ Turkey_Statistical_Yearbook_2008.pdf] Erişim Tarihi (02.10.2010).
  • TÜİK (2010) Türkiye İstatistik Yıllığı-2009, Yayın no:3436, Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu, Ankara, [http://www.tuik.gov.tr/yillik/yillik.pdf] Erişim Tarihi (25.02.2011).
  • UN (2010) World Population Ageing-2009, Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division, New York.
  • UN (2012) Demographic and Social Statistics, [http://unstats.un.org/unsd/ demographic/products/socind/Tables_Excel/table2a_Dec%202011. xls] Erişim Tarihi (22 Kasım 2011).
  • WHO (2002) Assessinng the Nutritional Status of Older Persons Meeting the Nutritional Needs of Older Persons, World Health Organization Tufts University School of Nutrition and Policy, France.
  • WHO (2007) Ageing and Life Course, Family and Community Health, Global Age-Friendly Cities: A Guide - 2007, France, [http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2007/9789241547307_eng.pdf] Erişim Tarihi (02.05.2009).
  • WIEN.AT (2010) Monitoring Integration Wien, [http://www.wien.gv.at/ menschen/integration/pdf/monitoring-integration.pdf] Erişim Tarihi (26.08.2010).
  • YENEN, Z., CENGİZ, H., ERKAN, N.Ç., YERLİYURT, B. (2006) İstanbul’un Eylem Planlamasına Yönelik Mekânsal Gelişme Stratejileri Araştırma ve Model Geliştirme İşi, Kadıköy Merkezinin Günümüz Koşulları İçin Yeniden Düzenlenmesinde Yöntem Raporu, İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyesi, İstanbul.