Back to the year when it all started: local determinants of party preferences In 2002 Turkish elections

İslami eğilimleri olan Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi’nin (AKP) 2002 seçimlerini kazanarak iktidara gelmesi ile birlikte Türkiye siyasetinde çok önemli bir değişim yaşandı. Seçimler Türkiye siyasetini derinden belirleyen “tsunami” etkisi yaratmış olsa da, Türkiye seçim coğrafyasında ortaya çıkan farklılaşmaların ne denli kalıcı olduğunu bir kez daha gözler önüne serdi. Coğrafi ağırlıklandırılmış regresyon olarak bilinen bir teknik yardımıyla bu yazıda, Türkiye’deki eşitsiz seçim coğrafyasının ardında yatan nedenler araştırılmaktadır. Elde edilen sonuçlar Türkiye siyaset sahnesinin iki temel aktörü olan AKP ve CHP’nin oy düzeyini belirleyen yerel etmenler açısından belirgin bir karşıtlık içinde olduklarını ortaya koymaktadır. AKP’nin, geleneksel sağ partilerin tersine, kent yoksulları ile Anadolu’nun hızla gelişen bölgelerinde kendine bir taban bulmuş olmasına karşın, sosyal demokrat CHP büyük ölçüde kentli seçkin kesimlerle kısıtlı kalmış görünmektedir. Bu bulgu, çoğu araştırmacı tarafından Türkiye siyasetinin en belirgin özelliklerinden biri olarak görülen “merkez-çevre” ayrımının yeni bir görüntüsü olarak ele alınmalıdır.
Anahtar Kelimeler:

Türkiye

Herşeyin değiştiği yıla geri dönüş: 2002 genel seçimlerinde parti tercihlerini yerel düzeyde belirleyen etmenler

The ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) won the 2007 general elections in Turkey by a large margin and became the first party since the 1980s to increase its votes in two consecutive elections while in power (1). Although the elections were held in a highly tense political climate arising from controversy surrounding the presidential elections (Bacik, 2008), the results came as no surprise to many and received far less attention in the media, academia and public compared to the previous elections held in 2002. The exceptionally low turnout rate of 59.3%, as opposed to 84.3% in 2002, is one of the obvious indications of low public interest in the elections.
Keywords:

Turkey,

___

  • AÇIKEL, F. (2003) Mapping the Turkish political landscape through November 2002 elections, Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans 5(2) 185-203.
  • BACIK, G. (2004) The Parliamentary Election in Turkey, November 2002, Electoral Studies 23; 821-45.
  • BACIK, G. (2008) The parliamentary elections in Turkey, July 2007, Electoral Studies 27(2): 377-81.
  • BAŞKAN, F. (2005) At the crossroads of ideological divides: Cooperation between leftists and ultranationalists in Turkey, Turkish Studies 6(1) 53-69.
  • BIVAND, R. S. and R. J. BRUNSTAD (2002) Regional growth in Western Europe: An empirical exploration of interactions with agriculture and agricultural policy, Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration, Discussion Paper.
  • BRUNSDON, C., A. S. FOTHE RINGHAM, and M. CHARLTON (1996) Geographically weighted regression: A method for exploring spatial nonstationarity, Geographical Analysis 28(4) 281-9.
  • BRUNSDON, C., A. S. FOTHE RINGHAM, and M. CHARLTON (1998) Geographically weighted regression- Modelling spatial nonstationarity, The Statistician 47(3) 431-43.
  • BRUNSDON, C., A. S. FOTHE RINGHAM, and M. CHARLTON (1999) Some notes on parametric significance tests for geographically weighted regression, Journal of Regional Science 39(3) 497-524.
  • BRUNSDON, C., A. S. FOTHE RINGHAM, and M. CHARLTON (2002) Geographically weighted summary statistics- A framework for localized exploratory data analysis, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 26; 501-24.
  • BUĞ RA, A. (2002) Labour, capital, and religion: Harmony and conflict among the constituency of political Islam in Turkey, Middle Eastern Studies 38(2) 187-204.
  • CALVO, E. and M. ESCOLAR (2003) The local voter: A geographically weighted approach to ecological inference, American Journal of Political Science 47(1): 189–204.
  • ÇAHA, Ö. (2003) Turkish Election of November 2002 and the Rise of “Moderate” Political Islam, Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations 2(1) 95-116.
  • ÇARKOĞLU , A. (2000) The Geography of the Aprill 1999 Turkish Elections, Turkish Studies 1(1) 149-71.
  • ÇARKOĞLU , A. (2005) Political Preferences of the Turkish Electorate: Reflections of an Alevi–Sunni Cleavage, Turkish Studies 6(2) 273-92.
  • ÇARKOĞLU , A. and M. J. HINICH (2006) A spatial analysis of Turkish party preferences, Electoral Studies 25(2): 369-92.
  • ÇINAR, A. and B. ARIKAN (2002) The Nationalist Action Party: Representing the State, the Nation or the Nationalists?, Turkish Studies 3(1) 25-40.
  • ÇOŞAR, S. and A. ÖZMAN Centre-right politics in Turkey after the November 2002 general election: neo-liberalism with a Muslim Face, Contemporary Politics 10(1) 57-74.
  • DAĞI, İ. D. (2005) Transformation of Islamic Political Identity in Turkey: Rethinking the West and Westernization, Turkish Studies 6(1) 21-37.
  • DOĞAN, E. (2005) The Historical and Discoursive Roots of the Justice and Development Party’s EU Stance, Turkish Studies 6(3) 421-37.
  • ERMAN, T. and E. GÖKER (2000) Alevi politics in contemporary Turkey, Middle Eastern Studies 36(4) 99-118.
  • FARROW, A., C. LARREA, G. HYMANN and G. LE MA (2005) Exploring the spatial variation of food poverty in Ecuador, Food Policy 30; 510- 31.
  • FOTHE RINGHAM, S., M. CHARLTON, and C. BRUNSDON, (2002) Geographically Weighted Regression, Chichester; John Wiley.
  • GRUEN, G. E. (2003) Turkey’s ‘Political Earthquake’: Significance for the United States and the Region, American Foregin Policy Interests 25; 87-97.
  • HALE , W. (2005) Christian Democracy and the AKP: Parallels and Contrasts, Turkish Studies 6(2) 293-310.
  • HE RMANN, R. (2003) Political Islam in Secular Turkey, Islam and Christian- Muslim Relations 14(3) 265-76.
  • İNSEL , A. (2003) The AKP and normalizing democracy in Turkey, The South Atlantic Quarterly 102(2/3) 293-308.
  • IŞIK, O. and M. M. PINARCIOĞLU (2006a) Bölgesel siyasi tercihler ve AKP, Toplum ve Bilim, 107: 66-86.
  • IŞIK, O. and M. M. PINARCIOĞLU (2006b) Geographies of a silent transition: A geographically weighted regression approach to regional fertility differences in Turkey, European Journal of Population 22(4) 399-421.
  • IŞIK, O. and M. M. PINARCIOĞLU (2006c) Ankara 2002 genel seçimleri coğrafyası, in Tansı Şenyapılı (ed.) ‘Cumhuriyet’in Ankarası’, ODTÜ Yayıncılık, Ankara.
  • KALAYCIOĞLU , E. (1994) Elections and party preferences in Turkey: Changes and continuities in the 1990s, Comparative Political Studies 27(3) 402-24.
  • KALAYCIOĞLU , E. (2002) The Motherland party: the challenge of institutionalization in a charismatic leader party, Turkish Studies 3(1) 40-61.
  • KANRA, B. (2005) Democracy, Islam and Dialogue: The Case of Turkey, Government and Opposition 40(4) 515-39.
  • MARDİN, S. (1973) Center-periphery relations: A key to Turkish politics?, Daedalus 102(1) 169-90.
  • MECHAM, Q. R. (2004) From the Ashes of Virtue, a Promise of Light: The Transformation of Political Islam in Turkey, Third World Quarterly 25(2) 339-58.
  • ÖZBUDUN, E. (1981) The Turkish party system: institutionalization, polarization, factionalization, Middle Eastern Studies 17(2) 228-40.
  • ÖZBUDUN, E. (2006) From Political Islam to Conservative Democracy: The Case of the Justice and Development Party in Turkey, South European Society & Politics 11; 543-57.
  • ÖZEL , S. (2003) Turkey at the Polls: After the Tsunami, Journal of Democracy 14(2) 80-94.
  • PINARCIOĞLU , M. M. and O. IŞIK (2008) Not only helpless but also hopeless: Changing dynamics of urban poverty in Turkey, European Planning Studies 16(10): 1353-71.
  • PLATT, R. V. (2004) Global and local analysis of fragmentation in a mountain region of Colorado, Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 101; 207-18.
  • SAYARI, S. (1978) The Turkish party system in transition, Government and Opposition, 13(1) 39-57.
  • SECOR, A. J. (2001) Ideologies in crisis: Political cleavages and electoral politics in Turkey in the 1990s, Political Geography 20; 539-60.
  • SMITH, T. W. (2005) Between Allah and Atatürk: Liberal İslam in Turkey, The International Journal of Human Rights, 9(3) 307-25.
  • TACHAU, F. (1984). Turkey: the politics of authority, democracy, and development, Praeger, New York.
  • WEST, J. W. (2005) Regional cleavages in Turkish politics: An electoral geography of the 1999 and 2002 National Elections, Political Geography 24; 499-523.
  • WORLD BANK (2006) Turkey: Labor Market Study, World Bank, Poverty Reduction and Economic Management Unit, Report no: 33254-TR.
  • YAVUZ , M. H. and ÖZCAN, N. A. (2006) The Kurdish question and Turkey’s Justice and Development Party, Middle East Policy 13(1) 102- 19.