INVESTOR MISCONDUCT IN INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT ARBITRATION: CAN THE UNCLEAN HANDS DOCTRINE BE A CURE?

INVESTOR MISCONDUCT IN INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT ARBITRATION: CAN THE UNCLEAN HANDS DOCTRINE BE A CURE?

The vast majority of international investment treaties enable foreign investors to bring claims against their host states without having to exhaust local remedies or to seek espousal from their home states. These international agreements form the backbone of the modern investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) system, which has been subject to harsh criticism by states due to its chronic issues such as contentious legitimacy, inconsistency and unpredictability. Along with its structural deficiencies, asymmetries and proinvestor bias in the ISDS system have contributed to the proliferation of investor misconduct in international investment arbitration proceedings. These wrongful conducts involve not only abuse of process but also illegal conduct such as corruption and fraud. This article, in the first part, identifies the characteristics of the functional types of investor misconduct. Second part discusses the unclean hands doctrine in the context of public international law, in particular its applicability in cases involving investor misconduct.

___

  • Andrea K. Bjorklund & Lukas Vanhonnaeker, Yukos: The Clean Hands Doctrine Revisited (2015) vol. 9:2 Diritti umani e diritto internazionale. Aloysius Llamzon & Anthony C.Sinclair, Investor Wrongdoing in Investment Arbitration: Standards Governing Issues of Corruption, Fraud, Misrepresentation and Other Investor Misconduct, in Albert Jan van den Berg (ed), Legitimacy: Myths, Realities, Challenges, ICCA Congress Series, Volume 18 (© Kluwer Law International; Kluwer Law International 2015)
  • Aloysius Llamzon, 'Chapter 2: On Corruption’s Peremptory Treatment in International Arbitration', in Domitille Baizeau and Richard H. Kreindler (eds), Addressing Issues of Corruption in Commercial and Investment Arbitration, Dossiers of the ICC Institute of World Business Law, Volume 13 (© Kluwer Law International; International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) 2015)
  • Brooke Guven & Lisa Johnson, The Policy Implications of Third-Party Funding in Investor-State Dispute Settlement, Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment, CCSI Working Paper (2019)
  • Bruce W. Klaw, State Responsibility for Bribe Solicitation and Extortion: Obligations, Obstacles, and Opportunities, 33 Berkeley J. Int'l L. 60 (2015) CAMPBELL MCLACHLAN, LAURENCE SHORE & MATTHEW WEINIGER, INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT ARBITRATION: SUBSTANTIVE PRINCIPLES (2 ed. 2017)
  • Caroline Le Moullec, The Clean Hands Doctrine: A Tool for Accountability of Investor Conduct and Inadmissibility of Investment Claims, The International Journal of Arbitration, Mediation and Dispute Management, Volume 84, Issue 1, February 2018
  • Carolyn B. Lamm, Hansel T. Pham, et al., 'Fraud and Corruption in International Arbitration', in Miguel Angel Fernandez-Ballester and David Arias (eds), Liber Amicorum Bernardo Cremades, (© Wolters Kluwer España; La Ley 2010)
  • Carolyn B. Lamm & Andrea J. Menaker, 'Chapter 31: Consequences of Corruption in Investor State Arbitration, in Meg Kinnear, Geraldine R. Fischer, et al. (eds), Building International Investment Law: The First 50 Years of ICSID, (© Kluwer Law International, 2016)
  • Emmanuel Gaillard, Chapter 9: Concurrent Proceedings in Investment Arbitration, in Patricia Shaughnessy and Sherlin Tung (eds), The Powers and Duties of an Arbitrator: Liber Amicorum Pierre A. Karrer, (© Kluwer Law International; Kluwer Law International 2017)
  • Emmanuel Gaillard, Abuse of Process in International Arbitration, ICSID Review, (2017)
  • Florian Haugeneder, Corruption in Investor-State Arbitration, 10 J. World Investment & Trade 323 (2009)
  • George Kahale III, ‘The new Dutch sandwich: The issue of treaty abuse’, Columbia FDI Perspectives, No: 48, (10 October 2011) Herve Ascensio, Abuse of Process in International Investment Arbitration, 13 Chinese J. Int'l L. 763 (2014)
  • JORUN BAUMGARTNER, TREATY SHOPPING IN INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LAW, (2016)
  • Julia G. Brown, International Investment Agreements: Regulatory Chill in the Face of Litigious Heat, 3 W. J. Legal Stud. [i] (2013)
  • Mojtaba Dani & Afshin Akhtar-Khavari, Rethinking the Use of Deference in Investment Arbitration: New Solutions against the Perception of Bias, 22 UCLA J. Int'l L. Foreign Aff. 37 (2018)
  • M. Cherif Bassiouni, A Functional Approach to "General Principles of International Law, 11 Mich. J. Int'l L. 768 (1990)
  • NATHAN JENSEN & GLEN BIGLAISER, POLITICS AND FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT (2014).
  • Patric Dumberry, State of Confusion: The Doctrine of ‘Clean Hands’ in Investment Arbitration After the Yukos Award, 17 Journal of World Investments and Trade (2016)
  • Sergio Puig & Gregory Shaffer, Imperfect Alternatives: Institutional Choice and the Reform of Investment Law, 112 American Journal of International Law 361–409 (2018)
  • Thomas Kendra & Anna Bonini, Dealing with Corruption Allegations in International Investment Arbitration: Reaching a Procedural Consensus, Journal of International Arbitration vol. 31, no. 4 (August 2014)
  • Thomas, Obersteiner, “In Accordance with Domestic Law" Clauses: How International Investment Tribunals Deal with Allegations of Unlawful Conduct of Investors. Journal of International Arbitration 31, no.2 (2014)
  • Tsai-Fang Chen, Deterring Frivolous Challenges in Investor-State Dispute Settlement, 8 Contemp. Asia Arb. J. 61 (2015)
  • Vaughan Lowe, Overlapping Jurisdiction in International Tribunals, AYBIL, Volume 20, (1999)
  • William J. Lawrence, Application of the Clean Hands Doctrine in Damage Actions (1982) 57 Notre Dame L. Rev. 673
  • ZIMMERMANN ET AL., THE STATUTE OF THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE: A COMMENTARY (2006) CASES
  • ICJ Case Concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and Against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America), Judgment of 27 June 1986, Dissenting Opinion of Judge Schwebel.
  • Gustaf F. W. Hamester GmbH amp; Co KG v. Republic of Ghana, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/24, Award, 18 June 2010
  • Guyana v. Suriname, PCA, Award of 17 September 2007 (under UNCLOS Ch. VII)
  • Hesham Talaat M. Al-Warraq v. Indonesia, Arbitration under the Agreement on Promotion, Protection and Guarantee of Investments among Member States of the Organisation of the Islamic Conference, Final Award ,15 December 2014.
  • Inceysa Vallisoletana v. Republic of El Salvador, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/26), Award, 2 August 2006
  • Niko Resources (Bangladesh) Ltd. v. Bangladesh Petroleum Exploration & Production Company Limited ("Bapex") and Bangladesh Oil Gas and Mineral Corporation ("Petrobangla"), ICSID Case No. ARB/10/11 and ARB/10/18, Decision on Jurisdiction, 19 August 2013.
  • Plama Consortium Limited v. Bulgaria, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/24, Award, 27 August 2008
  • Yukos Universal Limited (Isle of Man) v The Russian Federation, UNCITRAL, PCA Case No AA 227, Final Award, 18 July 2014