Gemilerin Tescili: Gerçek Bağ ve Kolay Bayrak Uygulamaları Bağlamında Bir Değerlendirme

Günümüzde uluslararası ticaret için en çok tercih edilen rota denizyoludur. Bu açıdan gemilerin milliyetlerinin tanımlanması ve onların devlet nezdinde kayıtlarının yapılması uluslararası ticaret ve özellikle deniz ticareti hukuku açısından önemlidir. İşte bu makalede, bir gemi ile onu tescil eden devlet arasındaki gerçek bağın rolü tartışılarak ve elverişli bayrak uygulaması incelenerek gemilerin tescili analiz edilmektedir. Çalışmada, bayrak devletinin yargı yetkileri ele alındıktan sonra, gerçek bağ kavramının uluslararası deniz hukuku bağlamında nasıl anlaşılabileceği tartışılacaktır: Bir gemi ile devlet arasında ne zaman gerçek bir bağ oluşur? Gemilerin tescilinde, gemi ile ilgili devlet arasında gerçek bir bağın olması bir zorunluluk mudur? Eğer öyleyse, gerçek bağ ile bağlı olmadığı bir devletin bayrağını taşıyan gemi, yaptırıma tabi tutulur mu? Bunun yanı sıra, gerçek bağ sistemine aykırı olan ve nispeten yeni bir uygulama olarak karşımıza çıkan elverişli bayrak sistemi ele alınacaktır: Elverişli bayrak sisteminin uluslararası alanda gerçek bağa nazaran daha çok benimsenmesi ve uygulanmasının önüne geçilememesi sonucunda gemilerin tescilinin hukuki niteliği nasıl değişmiştir? Bu uygulamanın pozitif ve negatif yönleri nelerdir? İşte bu çalışmada, bahsi geçen sorular; yasal mercilere, içtihat hukukuna ve uluslararası düzenlemelere başvurularak cevaplanmaya çalışılacaktır

THE REGISTRATION OF SHIPS: AN EVALUATION IN THE CONTEXT OF GENUINE LINK AND FLAG OF CONVENIENCE PRACTICES

Today, the most preferred route for international trade is by seaway. In this respect, defining the nationality of ships and registering them with the state are important in terms of international trade and especially maritime law. In this article, it is analysed the registration of ships by discussing the role of the genuine link between a ship and the state that registered it, and examining the flag of convenience practice. In the study, after discussing the flag state jurisdiction, it is going to be discussed how the concept of genuine link can be understood in the context of international maritime law: When does a genuine link form between a ship and the state? Is it an obligation to have a genuine link between the ship and the state involved in the registration of ships? If so, are there any sanctions against a ship not flying a flag under a genuine link? In addition, the flag of convenience system, which is a relatively new practice, and is contrary to the genuine link system, is going to be discussed: How has the legal nature of the registration of ships changed as a result of that it could not be prevented the adoption and practising of the flag of convenience system in the international area more than the genuine link? What are the positive and negative aspects of this practice? Thus, in this study, it is going to be tried to answer the abovementioned questions by referring to legal authorities, case law and international regulations

___

  • Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Co Ltd (Belgium v Spain) [1970] ICJ Rep 1
  • Lauritzen v Larsen (1953) 345 U.S. 571 IMCO Case (Advisory Opinion) Constitution of the Maritime Safety Committee of the Inter-Governmental Maritime Consultative Organization [1960] ICJ Reports
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines v Guinea (M/V "Saiga" case No. 2) (1999) ITLOS Case No 2
  • Naim Molvan v Attorney General for Palestine (The "Asya") (1947) 81 Ll.L. Rep 277
  • Liechtenstein v Guatemala (Nottebohm Case) [1955] ICJ Rep 4 The Muscat Dhows Case (France v Great Britain) (1906) Hague Court Reports 94
  • Convention on Certain Questions Relating to Conflict of Nationality Laws (1930)
  • Geneva Conventions - Convention on the High Seas (1958)
  • The Merchant Shipping (Registration of Ships) Regulations (1993)
  • Turkish Commercial Code (2011)
  • Turkish International Ship Registry Act (1999)
  • Turkish Ship Registry Regulation (1957)
  • United Nations Convention on Conditions for Registration of Ships (1986)
  • United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (1982) Secondary Resources
  • ANDERSON III HE, 'The Nationality of Ships and Flags of Convenience: Economics, Politics, and Alternatives' (1996-1997) 21 Tulane Maritime Law Journal 139.
  • BARNES R, ‘Flag State’ (2015) The Oxford Handbook of the Law of the Sea. BALYK L, ‘Crewing of Ships in Contemporary Ship Registry Systems: Safety and Socio-economic Considerations’ (MSc Dissertation World Maritime University 2006).
  • BEMFELD JS, ‘States, Ships, and Secondary Registers: Examining Sovereignty and Standards in a Globalized World’ (Master Thesis Cardiff University 2007). BOCZED BA, Flags of Convenience – An International Legal Study (Harvard University Press 1962).
  • CHURCILL RR, ‘The Meaning of the “Genuine Link” Requirement in Relation to the Nationality of Ships’ (University of Wales 2000).
  • DUBNER BH and ARIAS MC, 'Under International Law, Must a Ship on the High Seas Fly the Flag of a State in Order to Avoid Being a Stateless Vessel? Is a Flag Painted on Either Side of the Ship Sufficient to Identify it?' (2017) 29 U.S.F. Maritime Law Journal 99.
  • GAUCI GM and AQUILINA K, ‘The Legal Fiction of a Genuine Link as a Requirement for the Grant of Nationality to Ships and Humans – the Triumph of Formality over Substance?’ (2017) 17 International Comparative Law Review 167.
  • GOLDREIN QC I (et.al), "Ship Sale and Purchase" (4th Edition 2003). GREGORY WR, ‘Flags of Convenience: The Development of Open Registries in The Global Maritime Business and Implications for Modern Seafarers’ (Master Thesis Georgetown University 2012).
  • HAMAD HB, ‘Flag of Convenience Practice: A Threat to Maritime Safety and Security’ (2016) 1 Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research 2017. HOSANEE NM, 'A Critical Analysis of Flag State Duties as Laid Down Under Article 94 of The 1982 United Nations Convention on The Law Of The Sea' (Oceans and Law of the Sea 2009).
  • KURT H, 'Türk Uluslararası Gemi Sicili Kanunu’nun Değerlendirilmesi' (2014) 2 Ankara Barosu Dergisi 269.
  • MATLIN DF, ‘Re-evaluating The Status of Flags of Convenience under International Law’ (1990) 23 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 1017.
  • MCDOUGAL MS (et. al), ‘The Maintenance of Public Order at Sea and the Nationality of Ships’ (1960) Faculty Scholarship Series 25.
  • MEYERS H, The Nationality of Ships (Martinus Nijhoff / the Hague 1967). MİSİLİ S, ‘Açık Denizlerin Serbestliği, Gemilerin Uyrukluğu ve Bayrak Devleti Münhasır Yargı Yetkisi Arasındaki İlişkinin Teamül Hukuku,
  • Konvansiyonlar ve Mahkeme Kararları Işığında İncelenmesi’ (2014) 18 Gazi Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 179.
  • MUKHERJEE PK, ‘The Changing Face of the Flag State: Experience with Alternative Registries’ (World Maritime University 1993).
  • OKUR DA, ‘Uluslararası Hukukta Gemilerin Uyrukluğu ve Gerçek Bağ Tartışması’ (2006) 5 Maltepe Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 67.
  • OSIEKE E, ‘Flag of Convenience: Recent Developments’ (1979) 73 The American Journal of International Law 604.
  • POURMOTAMED B, ‘Parallel Registration of Ships’ (Goteborg University 2008).
  • READY N, Ship Registration (Lloyd’s of London Press 1991). ROGERS R, ‘Ship Registration: a critical analysis’ (Master Thesis World Maritime University 2010).
  • ŞEKER Z, ‘Elverişli Bayrak ve İkinci Sicil’ (Master Thesis İstanbul Üniversitesi 1992).
  • SHAUGHNESSY T and TOBIN E, ‘Flags of Inconvenience: Freedom and Insecurity on the High Seas’ (2005-2006) 5 Journal of International Law & Policy.
  • TACHE SW, ‘The Nationality of Ships: The Definitional Controversy and Enforcement of Genuine Link’ (1982) 16 The International Lawyer 301.
  • UWEDE-MESHACK O, ‘Does Registration of Ships Signify Genuine-Link’ (School of Law and Security Studies, Babcock University 2013)
  • WATT EB and COLES RMF, "Ship Registration: Law and Practice" (3rd Edition 2018).