GDPR, DPD sonrası beklentileri karşılar mı ?

Teknolojik gelişmeler ve küreselleşme nedeniyle kişisel verilerin korunması son yirmi yılda ciddi bir problem haline gelmiştir. İnsanın sosyal bir birey olmasından dolayı insana ait tüm bilgiler bankalar, okullar ve ulusal sağlık servisleri gibi tüm dünyaya yayılmıştır. Bu yayılmanın sonucu olarak toplum kişisel verileri hakkında koruyucu haklara ihtiyaç duymaktadır. Avrupa Birliği Veri Koruma Direktifi (DPD) veri koruma düzenlemesi için uluslararası bir standart olarak kabul edilmiştir. Dijital veriler, veri denetleyicilerinin daha iyi ürün ve hizmetler sunmalarına yardımcı olmaktadır. Ancak tüm bu gelişmeler tüketici mahremiyetini ihlal etmemelidir. 95/46 sayılı DPD’nin hızlı teknolojik gelişmelerin ve küreselleşmenin gerekliliklerini yerine getiremediği yönündeki ortak yaklaşımın sonucu olarak Mayıs 2018’de DPD’nin yerini alan Genel Veri Koruma Yönetmeliği (GDPR) adında yeni bir düzenleme Avrupa Birliği tarafından kabul edilmiştir. Veri koruma düzenlemeleri küresel bir reform geçirmektedir. Bu yeni düzenlemeye hem olumlu hem de olumsuz tepkiler oldu; Bir yandan, GDPR’ın veri koruma hakkını güçlendireceği, diğer taraftan daha güçlü ve daha kapsamlı bir düzenleme beklentisini karşılamadığı gerekçesiyle eleştirilere maruz kalmaktadır.

DOES GDPR COVER THE EXPECTATIONS AFTER DPD ?

Due to technological developments andglobalization personal data protection hasbecome a severe problem in the last two decades.Mankind is a social alien because of that people’sinformation spread whole area of the worldsuch as banks, schools and NHS. Due to thisdeployment community needs to protective rightsabout their personal data.The EC Data ProtectionDirective (DPD) has been acknowledged as aninternational standard for data protection law.Digital data help data controllers to create betterproducts and services, but all this developmentmay not be done at the expense of the consumerprivacy. The common approach that the Directive95/46 is no longer able to meet the requirementsof rapid technological developments andglobalization the European Union adopted anew regulation called General Data ProtectionRegulation(GDPR), which replaced the DPDon May 2018. Data protection regulations areundergoing a global reform. There have beenboth positive and negative reactions to that novelregulation; on the one hand, it is argued that theGDPR will reinforce the right to data protection,on the other hand, it is widely criticized on theground that it does not cater for a stronger andmore comprehensive regulation expectations.

PDF

___

Case C-131/12 Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v Agencia Española de Protección de Datos, Mario Costeja González (2014) ECLI:317.
REGULATION (EU) 2016/679 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (2016) OJ L 119/1 Article 4(1)
Murray A., Information Technology Law (3 rd edition OPU 2016)
Bernal P.A, “A Right to Delete?” (2011) European Journal of Law and Technology, Vol. 2, No. 2.
Blume P., “ Will it be a better world? The proposed EU Data Protection Regulation.”( İnternational Data Privacy Law, 2012 VOL.2 No.3)
Brennan D., ‘GDPR Series: Personal Data - An Expanding Concept?’ (2016) 17(2) P. & D.P., 12-14
Chassang G, “The impact of the EU general data protection regulation on scientific research” (2017) ecancer 2017, 11:709 DOI: 10.3332/ ecancer.2017.709.
Costa L., Poullet Y., “ Privacy and the regulation of 2012” (Universty of Namur, Belgium).
Cullen P., Gonie J., ‘Tomorrow’s Privacy, 1995–2012: from a directive to a regulation, the Microsoft perspective’ International Data Privacy Law, 2012, Vol. 2, No. 3. 117-118
Dorraji S. E., Barcys M., ‘Privacy in Digital Age: Dead or Alive?! Regarding the New EU Data Protection Regulations’ (2014) 4(2) S.T. 306–317
Francoise G., ‘Proposed EU Data Protection Regulation: The Good.The Bad. and The Unknown (2012) Vol.15, No.10.
Fulford N., Oastler K, ‘GDPR Series: The New Right to Data Portability’ (2017) 17(3), P. & D.P 3-6
Hert P.D., Papakonstantinou V., ‘The New General Data Protection Regulation: Still a Sound System for The Protection of Individuals?’ (2016) 32 C.L.S.R. 179-194
Hon W.K, Kosta E, Millard C, Stefanatou D, “Cloud Accountability: The Likely Impact of the Proposed EU Data Protection Regulation” (2014) Tilburg Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series.
Jay R, Henderson J, ‘The Right to Be Forgotten - Under Spotlight’ (2016) 16(3) P. & D.P. 6-8
McCluskey C., ‘GDPR Series: Fining Powers of The Supervisory Authority’ (2017) 17(4) P. & D.P. 14-16
Mantelero A, “The EU Proposal for a General Data Protection Regulation and the roots of the ‘right to be forgotten’” (2013) Computer law & Security review 29, 229-235.
Meriani, M. ‘A Relative Notion of Personal Data and A Flexible Balance Test on Online Platforms: Are Dynamic Ip Addresses Too New for The Old Rules? Bayer v Bundesrepublik Deutschland’ (2017) 23(3) C.T.L.R. 75-81
Mikkonen T., “ Perceptions of controllers on EU data protection reform: A Finnish perspective ( 2014);
Shoor E. A, “Narrowing The Right To Be Forgotten: Why The European Union Needs To Amend The Proposed Data Protection Regulation” (2014) Vol. 39, No.1.
Sloot Bart van der, “ Do data protection rules protect the individual and should they? An assessment of the propesed General Data Protection Regulation.” (İnternational Data Privacy Law, 2014 VOL.4 No.4)
Ustaran E., ‘EU General Data Protection Regulation: Things You Should Know’ (2016) 16(3) P. & D.P. 3-5
Varotto S., James C., ‘The European General Data Protection Regulation and Its Potential Impact on Businesses: Some Critical Notes on The Strengthened Regime of Accountability and The New Sanctions’ (2015) 20(3), Comms. L. 78-85
Victor J. M, “The EU General Data Protection Regulation: Toward a Property Regime for Protecting Data Privacy” (2013) The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 123, No. 2, 513-528.
Voss W. G., ‘Looking at European Union Data Protection Law Reform through a Different Prism: The Proposed EU General Data Protection Regulation Two Years Later’ (2014) 17/9 J.I.L. 11-24
Wuermeling Ulrich, ‘Modernization of Europen data protection law at a turning point’( Latham& Watkins LLP, Frankfurt, Germany).
Cuijpers C., Purtova N., Kosta E., ‘Data Protection Reform and the Internet: The Draft Data Protection Regulation’ (2014) Tilburg Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series No. 03/2014 http://ssrn.com/abstract=2373683 accessed 18 April 2017
Dix A., EU Data Protection Reform: Opportunities and Concerns, The Commissions’ Data Protection Reform After Snowden’s Summer’ archive. intereconomics.eu/downloads/getfile.php?id=871 accessed 23 April 2017
Kuner C., ‘The European Commission’s Proposed Data Protection Regulation: A Copernican Revolution in European Data Protection Law’ (2012) P.S.L.R. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2162781 accessed 16 April 2017
Information Commissioner’s Office, Overview of The General Data Protection Regulation, 03March2017< https://www.google.co.uk/ urlsa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd= 1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved= 0 a h U K E w i rg o e b n q 3 TA h V N Z 1 A K H X 6 C C Z s Q F g g o M A A & u r l = https%3A%2F%2Fico.org.uk%2Ffor-organisations%2Fdata-protectionreform% 2 Foverview-ofthegdpr%2F&usg=AFQjCNFZe6yYN4bEZc BOisY 62i5gLhVrYA&sig2=gpubaQ0gN6my2g2Nf-X4Qw> accessed 13 April 2017
“Overview of the General Data Protection Regulation”
https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/data-protection-reform/overview-ofthe- gdpr/introduction/ accessed 21 April 2017
‘Survey Expects Banks Will be First to be Fined 100 Million Euros Under New European Union Legislation’ (MarketWatch, May 4, 2015), available at < Accessed 11 April 2017.
Allen&Overy, ‘The EU General Data Protection Regulation’ (2016) www. allenovery.com, accessed 11 April 2017
Article 29 Data Protection Working Party Opinion (2007)