Aristoteles’in izahat yöntemi hakkındaki yorumlar

Aristoteles’in izahat yöntemiyle ispatlaması hakkında gerek Aristoteles’in metinlerinde, gerekse Aristoteles yorumcularının metinlerindeki bilgiler oldukça azdır. Günümüz yorumcuları tarafından yapılan izahat yöntemi araştırmaları genellikle izah edici terim üzerine olmuştur. Çalışmamızda Aristoteles’in izahat yöntemi yöntemiyle elde edilen ispatlar verilerek izahat yöntemi hakkında verilen yorumlar değerlendirilmiş, meydana gelen çıkmazlar tespit edilmiş, izah edici terim hakkında görüşler aktarılmıştır.

Comments on Aristotle’s ecthesis

There is very little information about the proving by Aristotle’s ecthesis method both in Aristotle’s and his commentators’ articles. Researches on ecthesis which were made by recent commentators are only on expository term. In our study, comments have been evaluated, points that are subject to contradiction have been determined, and opinions about ecthesis have been cited by giving proofs obtained by the ecthesis method.

___

Aristotle; The Complete Works of Aristotle, Ed. J. Barnes, Princeton University Press, Vol. I., 1991

Corcoran, J.; “Aristotle’s Natural Deduction System”, In Ancient Logic and Its Modern Inter- pretations, ed., J.Corcoran, D.Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 85-131, 1974.

––––; “Completeness of an Ancient Logic”. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 37, 696-702, 1972.

Falnnery, K. F.; Ways into The Logic of Alexander Aphrodisias, Brill, 1994.

Henle, P.; “On the Foruth Figure of the Syllogism”, Philosophy of Science. 16(2), 94-104, 1949.

Johnson, F.; “Modal Ecthesis”, History and Philosophy of Logic, 14(2), 171-182, 1993.

Lear, J.; Aristotle and Logical Theory, Cambridge University Press, 1980.

Lukasiewicz, J.; Aristotle’s Syllogistic from the standpoint of modern logic, Oxford Clarendon Press, London, 1957.

McCall, S.; Aristotle’s Modal Syllogisms, Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co., 1963.

Mignucci, M.; “Expository Proofs in Aristotles Syllogistic”, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philo- sophy, Oxford, 9-28, 1991.

Patterson, R.; Aristotle’s Modal Logic Essence and Entailment in the Organon, Cambridge University Press, 1995.

Patzig, G.; Aristotle’s Theory of the Syllogism: A Logico-Philogical Study of Book A of the Prior Analytics, Trans. Jonathan Barnes, Springer, 2010.

Politzer, G.; Mercier, H. “Solving Categorical Syllogisms With Singular Premises”, Thinking & Reasoning, 14(4), 434-454, 2008.

Rijen, J. V.; Aspects of Aristotle’s Modal Logic of Modalities, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1986.

Rini, A.; Aristotle’s Modal Proofs: Prior Analytics A8-22 in Predicate Logic, Springer, 2010.

Ross, W. D.; Aristoteles, İstanbul: Kabalcı, 1999.

Smiley, T. J.; “What is a Syllogism?”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2, s. 136-154, 1973.

Smith, R.; “What is Aristotelian Ecthesis?”, History and Philosophy of Logic, 3, s. 113-127, 1982.

Thom, P.; The Syllogism, München: Philosophia Verlag, 1981.

––––; “Apodeictic Ecthesis”, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 34(2), 193-208, 1993.

––––; The Logic of Essentialism an Interpretation of Aristotle’s Modal Syllogism, Kluwer Publishers, 1996.

Venn, J.; Symbolic Logic, London: Mac Millan and co., 1881.

Weidemann H.; “Aristotle on The Reducibility of All Valid Syllogistic Moods to The Two Universal Moods of The First Figure” (APr A7, 29b1-25), History and Philosophy of Logic, 25 (1), 2004, s. 73-78.

Zarnecka-Bialy, E.; “Aristotle’s Proofs by Ecthesis”, Bullein of The Section of Logic, 22 (1), 1993, s. 40-44.