An Evaluation of School Principals’ Instructional Leadership Behaviours from the Perspective of Teachers

The primary aim of this study was to evaluate school principals’ instructional leadership behaviours based onteachers’ views. The instructional leadership model developed by Hallinger and Murphy (1985) was used, andthe phenomenological design of qualitative research was employed. The participants were 16 teachers workingat public schools in Turkey. The data were analysed using content analysis technique. The results showed thatschool principals performed well in some of the areas determined by Hallinger and Murphy while performingweakly in other areas. They performed strong behaviours in conveying the objectives of the school, organisingthe curriculum, being available, preserving the time allocated to instruction, appreciating teachers’ success andmonitoring student development. However, they were reported to show a weak performance in determining theschool objectives, improving the curriculum, contributing to teachers’ professional development and followingstudent learning. Based on the results, it can be suggested that policy-makers should create favourable conditionsfor school principals to act more independently in curriculum development. Moreover, school principals shouldmake an effort to ensure teachers’ professional development and form a school culture that would strengthenprofessional cooperation among teachers. Above all, school principals’ knowledge and expertise regarding instructionalleadership can be enhanced by means of in-service training programs.

Öğretmenlerin Perspektifinden Okul Müdürlerinin Öğretim Liderliği Davranışlarının Değerlendirilmesi

Bu araştırmada, öğretmenlerin perspektifinden okul müdürlerinin öğretim liderliği davranışlarının değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Hallinger ve Murphy tarafından geliştirilen öğretim liderliği modelinin boyutlarının ölçüt alındığı bu çalışma, fenomenolojik desende kurgulanmıştır. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu kamu okullarında görev alan 15 öğretmen oluşturmaktadır. Araştırma verileri içerik analizine tabii tutulmuştur. Araştırma sonuçları okul müdürlerinin öğretim liderliği bakımından bu modelde belirtilen bazı alanlarda güçlü, bazı alanlarda ise zayıf davranışlar gösterdikleri görülmüştür. Okul müdürleri okulun amaçlarını iletme, müfredatı izleme, ulaşılabilir olma, ders zamanını etkili kullanma, öğretmen başarısını takdir etme ve öğrenciyi öğrenmeye teşvik etme konularında güçlü davranışlar sergilemişlerdir. Diğer taraftan okulun amacını belirleme, müfredatı geliştirme, öğretmenlerin mesleki gelişimine katkıda bulunma ve öğrenci öğrenmelerini izleme konularında da zayıf davranışlar sergiledikleri görülmüştür.

___

Aktepe, V., & Buluç, B. (2014). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin algılarına göre okul yöneticilerinin öğretim liderliği özelliklerinin değerlendirilmesi. [Elementary school teahcers’ perceptions of school administrators’ instructional leadership characteristics]. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 34(2), 227-247.

Al-Mahdy, Y. F. H., Emam, M. M., & Hallinger, P. (2018). Assessing the contribution of principal instructional leadership and collective teacher efficacy to teacher commitment in Oman. Teaching and Teacher Education, 69, 191-201. doi: 10.1177/1741143217700283

Alsaleh, A. (2018). Investigating instructional leadership in Kuwait’s educational reform context: school leaders’ perspectives. School Leadership & Management, 38, 1-25. doi: 10.1080/13632434.2018.1467888

Anıl, F., & Sarpkaya, R. (2014). Anadolu ve meslek lisesi okul yöneticilerinin öğretimsel liderlik rolleri. [Instructional leadership roles of Anatolian and vocational high school administrators]. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(1), 1-21.

Arslantaş, H. İ., & Özkan, M. (2012). Okul müdürlerinin çatışma çözmede yapıcı – yıkıcı olmaları ile öğretim liderliği arasındaki ilişki. [The relationship between school principals’ being constructive-destrictive in conflic resolution and instructional leadership]. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 34, 231-240.

Ayık, A., & Şayir, G. (2014). Okul müdürlerinin öğretimsel liderlik davranışları ile örgüt iklimi arasındaki ilişki. [The relationship between school principals’ instructional leadership behaviours and organisational climate]. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 13(49), 253-279. doi: 10.17755/esosder.39460.

Balcı, A. (2008). Türkiye’de eğitim yönetiminin bilimleşme düzeyi. [Evolution of educational administration as a scientific discipline in Turkey]. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi Dergisi, 14(2), 181-209.

Baş, G., & Yıldırım, A. (2010). İlköğretim okulu müdürlerinin öğretim liderliği davranışlarının farklı değişkenler açısından değerlendirmesi. [Evaluationg of primary school principals’ instructional leadership behaviours in terms of different variables]. E-Journal of New World Sciences Academy, 5(4), 1909-1931.

Bellibaş, M. S., & Gedik, Ş. (2014). Özel ve devlet okullarında çalışan müdürlerin öğretim liderliği becerileri açısından karşılaştırılması: Karma yöntem. [Comparison of private and state school principals’ instructional leadership skills]. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 20(4), 453-482. doi: 10.14527/kuey.2014.018

Bellibas, M. S., Bulut, O., Hallinger, P., & Wang, W.C. (2016). Developing a validated instructional leadership profile of Turkish primary school principals. International Journal of Educational Research 75, 115-133.doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2015.10.002

Bellibas, M. S., & Liu, Y. (2017). Multilevel analysis of the relationship between principals’ perceived practices of instructional leadership and teachers’ self-efficacy perceptions. Journal of Educational Administration, 55(1), 49-69. doi: 10.1108/JEA-12- 2015-0116

Bellibas, M. S., & Liu, Y. (2018). The effects of principals’ perceived instructional and distributed leadership practices on their perceptions of school climate. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 21(2), 226-244.

Berry, B., Johnson, D., & Montgomery, D. (2005). The power of teacher leadership. Educational Leadership, 62(5), 56-60.

Beycioğlu, K., & Dönmez, B. (2006). Eğitim yönetiminde kuramsal bilginin üretimine ve uygulanmasına ilişkin bir değerlendirme. [An evaluation on the production of theoretical knowledge and its application in educational administration]. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 47(47), 317-342.

Beycioglu, K. & Wildy, H. (2015). Principal preparation: The case of novice pridncipals in Turkey. K. Beycioğlu & P. Pashiardis (Ed.). In Multidimensional perspectives on principal leadership effectiveness (pp.1-17). USA: IGI Global.

Blase, J., & Blase, J. (2000). Effective instructional leadership: Teachers’ perspectives on how principals promote teaching and learning in schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 38(2), 130-141. doi: 10.1108/09578230010320082

Borden, A. L. (2011). Relationships between Paraguayan principals’ characteristics, teachers’ perceptions of instructional leadership and school outcomes. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 14(2), 203-227. doi: 10.1080/13603124.2010.482675

Bozkurt, S., & Arslanargun, E. (2015). Öğretim sürecinin yönetimi ve öğrenci başarısının değerlendirilmesine yönelik okul müdürlerinin öğretim liderliği davranışları. [School principals’ instructional leadership behaviours towards the management of the instructional process and the evaluation of student achievement]. Eğitim ve İnsani Bilimler Dergisi, 6(11), 151-174.

Brandon, J., Hollweck, T., Donlevy, J. K., & Whalen, C. (2018). Teacher supervision and evaluation challenges: Canadian perspectives on overall instructional leadership. Teachers and Teaching, 24(3), 263-280. doi: 10.1080/13540602.2018.1425678

Bursalıoğlu, Z. (2017). Okul yönetiminde yeni yapı ve davranış. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

Bush, T. (2015). Understanding instructional leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43(3), 487-489. doi: 10.1177/1741143215577035

Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2017). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. [Scientific research methods]. Ankara: Pegema Akademi.

Calık, T., Sezgin, F., Kavgacı, H., & Kılınç, A., Ç. (2012). Okul müdürlerinin öğretim liderliği davranışları ile öğretmen öz yeterliği ve kolektif öğretmen yeterliği arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesi. [Examining the relationships between school principals’ instructional leadership behaviours and teacher self-efficacy and collective teacher efficacy]. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 12(4), 2487-2504

Can, N., & Çelikten, M. (2000). Türkiye’de eğitim yöneticilerinin yetiştirilmesi süreci. [The process of training educational administrators in Turkey]. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 148(8), 43-50.

Cansoy, R., & Polatcan, M. (2018). Examination of instructional leadership research in Turkey. Journal of Educational Administration, 10(1), 276-291. doi: 10.15345/iojes.2018.01.020

Çelikten, M. (2005). A perspective on women principals in Turkey. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 8(3), 207-221. doi: 10.1080/13603120500041835

Christensen, L. B., Johnson, B., & Turner, L. A. (2015). Araştırma yöntemleri: Desen ve analiz [Research methods: Design and analysis]. (Translator: A. Aypay). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.

Coyle, M. (1997). Teacher leadership vs. school management: Flatten the hierarchies. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 70(5), 236-239. doi: 10.1080/00098655.1997.10543923

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods]. (Translator: L. Bütün & B. Demir). Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi.

Duyar, I., Gumus, S., & Bellibas, M. S. (2013). Multilevel analysis of teacher work attitudes: The influence of principal leadership and teacher collaboration. International Journal of Educational Management, 27(7), 700-719.

Giorgi, A. (2006). Concerning variations in the application of the phenomenological method. The Humanistic Psychologist, 34(4), 305-319.

Giorgi, A. (2008). Difficulties encountered in the application of the phenomenological method in the social sciences. Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology, 8(1), 1-9.

Giorgi, A. (2009). The descriptive phenomenological method in psychology: A modified Husserlian approach. Pittsburgh, PA, US: Duquesne University Press.

Gumus, S., & Akcaoglu, M. (2013). Instructional leadership in Turkish primary schools: An analysis of teachers’ perceptions and current policy. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 41(3), 289-302. doi: 10.1177/1741143212474801.

Gumus, E., & Bellibas, M. S. (2016). The effects of professional development activities on principals’ perceived instructional leadership practices: multi-country data analysis using TALIS 2013. Educational Studies, 42(3), 287-301. doi:10.1080/03055698.2016. 1172958

Gumus, S., Bellibas, M. S., Esen, M., & Gumus, E. (2018). A systematic review of studies on leadership models in educational research from 1980 to 2014. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(1), 25-48. doi:10.1080/13603124.2018.15087 53

Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1985). Assessing the instructional leadership behavior of principals. Elementary School Journal, 86(2), 217–248. doi: 10.1086/461445

Hallinger, P., & Heck, R.H. (1996). Reassessing the principals’ role in school effectiveness: a review of empirical research, 1980-1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 5-44. doi: 10.1177/0013161X96032001002

Hallinger, P. (2003). Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 329-352.

Hallinger, P. (2005). Instructional leadership and the school principal: A passing fancy that refuses to fade away. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 221-239. doi: 10.1080/15700760500244793

Hallinger, P. (2011). A review of three decades of doctoral studies using the principal instructional management rating scale: A lens on methodological progress in educational leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(2), 271-306. doi: 10.1177/0013161X10383412

Hallinger, P., & Lee, M. (2014). Mapping instructional leadership in Thailand: Has education reform impacted principal practice? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42(1), 6-29. doi: 10.1177/1741143213502196

Hallinger, P. & Wang, W.C. (2015). The evolution of instructional leadership. P. Hallinger, W. C. Wang, C. W. Chen, & D. Liare, (Ed.) In Assessing Instructional Leadership with the Principal Instructional Management Rating Scale (pp. 1-23). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.

Hallinger, P., Walker, A., Nguyen, D. T. H., Truong, T., & Nguyen, T. T. (2017). Perspectives on principal instructional leadership in Vietnam: a preliminary model. Journal of Educational Administration, 55(2), 222-239. doi:10.1108/JEA-11-2015-0106

Hallinger, P., Hosseingholizadeh, R., Hashemi, N., & Kouhsari, M. (2018). Do beliefs make a difference? Exploring how principal self-efficacy and instructional leadership impact teacher efficacy and commitment in Iran. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(5), 800-819. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2017.10.007

Harris, A. (2004). Distributed leadership and school improvement: leading or misleading? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 32(1), 11-24. doi: 10.1177/1741143204039297

Harris, A., & Spillane, J. (2008). Distributed leadership through the looking glass. Management in Education, 22(1), 31-34. doi: 10.1177/0892020607085623

Harris, A., Jones, M., Cheah, K. S. L., Devadason, E., & Adams, D. (2017). Exploring principals’ instructional leadership practices in Malaysia: insights and implications.Journal of Educational Administration, 55(2), 207-221. doi: 10.1108/JEA-05-2016-0051

Heck, R. H., Larsen, T. J., & Marcoulides, G. A. (1990). Instructional leadership and school achievement: Validation of a causal model. Educational Administration Quarterly, 26(2), 94-125. doi: 10.1177/0013161X90026002002

Heck, R. H. (1992). Principals’ instructional leadership and school performance: Implications for policy development. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14(1), 21-34. doi: 10.3102/01623737014001021

Heck, R. H., & Hallinger, P. (2009). Assessing the contribution of distributed leadership to school improvement and growth in math achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 46(3), 659-689. doi: 10.3102/0002831209340042

Hoadley, U., Christie, P., & Ward, C. L. (2009). Managing to learn: instructional leadership in South African secondary schools. School Leadership and Management, 29(4), 373-389. doi: 10.1080/13632430903152054.

Hopkins, D. (2013). Instructional leadership and school improvement. A. Harris, C. Day, D. Hopkins, M. Hadfield, A. Hargreaves, C. Chapman (Eds.), Effective leadership for school improvement (pp. 65-81). London: Routledge.

İnandı, Y., & Özkan, M. (2006). Resmi ilköğretim okulları ve liselerde görev yapan yönetici ve öğretmenlerin görüşlerine göre müdürler ne derece öğretim liderliği davranışları göstermektedir? [To what extent school principals perform instructional leadership behaviours based on the views of administrators and teachers working in prmary and high schools?]. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(2), 123-149.

Kalman, M., & Arslan, M. C. (2016). School principals’ evaluations of their instructional leadership behaviours: realities vs. ideals. School Leadership & Management, 36(5), 508-530. doi:10.1080/13632434.2016.1247049

Kamu Yönetimi Araştırma Projesi (KAYA) [Public Administration Research] (1991). Retrieved fromhttp://www.todaie.edu.tr//resimler/ekler/185a8f8def383a8_ek.pdf on 10/06/2018.

Kaparou, M., & Bush, T. (2015). Instructional leadership in centralised systems: evidence from Greek high-performing secondary schools. School Leadership & Management, 35(3), 321-345. doi: 10.1080/13632434.2015.1041489

Krug, S. E. (1992). Instructional leadership: A constructivist perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, 28(3), 430-443. doi:10.1177/0013161X92028003012

Kuhnert, K. W., & Lewis, P. (1987). Transactional and transformational leadership: A constructive/developmental analysis. Academy of Management Review, 12(4), 648-657. doi: 10.5465/amr.1987.4306717

Lai, E., & Cheung, D. (2013). Implementing a new senior secondary curriculum in Hong Kong: instructional leadership practices and qualities of school principals. School Leadership & Management, 33(4), 322-353. doi: 10.1080/13632434.2013.813459

Laverty, S. L. (2003). Hermeneutic phenomenology and phenomenology: A comparison of historical and methodological considerations. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2(3), 21-35.

Lambert, L. (2003). Leadership redefined: An evocative context for teacher leadership.School Leadership & Management, 23(4), 421-430. doi:10.1080/1363243032000150953

Lee, M., Hallinger, P., & Walker, A. (2012). A distributed perspective on instructional leadership in International Baccalaureate (IB) schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(4), 664-698. doi: 10.1177/0013161X11436271

Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (1990). Transformational leadership: How principals can help reform school cultures. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 1(4), 249-280. doi: 10.1080/0924345900010402

Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2000). The effects of transformational leadership on organizational conditions and student engagement with school. Journal of Educational Administration, 38(2), 112-129. doi: 10.1108/09578230010320064

Leithwood, K., & Steinbach, R. (2003). Toward a second generation of school leadership standards. P. Hallibger (Ed.), Reshaping the landscape of school leadership development: A global perspective (pp.257-272). Tokyo: Sweet & Zeitlinger.

Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2005). A review of transformational school leadership research 1996–2005. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 177-199. doi: 10.1080/15700760500244769

Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership and Management, 28(1), 27-42. doi: 10.1080/13632430701800060

Leithwood, K., Patten, S., & Jantzi, D. (2010). Testing a conception of how school leadership influences student learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(5), 671-706. doi: 10.1177/0013161X10377347

Lin, C. S. (2013). Revealing the “essence” of things: Using phenomenology in research. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries, 4, 469-478.

Marks, H. M., & Printy, S. L. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 370-397. doi: 10.1177/0013161x03253412

Merleau-Ponty, M. (2012). Algının fenomenolojisi (Translator: E. Sarıkartal & E. Hacımuratoğlu). İstanbul: İthaki Yayınları.

May, H., & Supovitz, J. A. (2011). The scope of principal efforts to improve instruction.Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(2), 332-352. doi: 10.1177/0013161X10383411

Ministry of National Education. (1949). IV. Millî Eğitim Şurası Kararları. [Decisions of the Fourth National Education Council] Retrieved fromhttps://ttkb.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_ dosyalar/2017_09/29164715_4_sura.pdf on 10/06/2018.

Ministry of National Education. (2017). Millî eğitim bakanlığı ortaöğretim kurumları yönetmeliğinde değişiklik yapılmasına dair yönetmelik. [Regulations on making changes in the regulations on high school institutions of the Ministry of National Education]. Retrieved from http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2017/09/20170916-15.htm on 15/06/2018

Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. London: Sage Publications.

Muijs, D., & Harris, A. (2006). Teacher led school improvement: Teacher leadership in the UK. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(8), 961-972. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.010 Murphy, J. (1998). What’s ahead for tomorrow’s principals? Principal, 78(1), 13-14.

Nettles, S. M. and Herrington, C. (2007). Revisiting the importance of the direct effects of school leadership on student achievement: The implications for school improvement policy. Peabody Journal of Education, 82 (4), 724-736. doi: 10.1080/01619560701603239

Örücü, D., & Şimşek, H. (2011). Akademisyenlerin gözünden Türkiye’de eğitim yönetiminin akademik durumu: Nitel bir analiz. [The academic state of educational administration in Turkey from the perspectives of academics: A qualitative analysis] Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi Dergisi, 17(2), 167-197.

Padilla-Diaz, M. (2015). Phenomenology in educational qualitative research: Philosophy as science or philosophical science. International Journal of Educational Excellence, 1(2), 101-110.

Pansiri, N. O. (2008). Instructional leadership for quality learning: An assessment of the impact of the primary school management development project in Botswana. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 36(4), 471-494. doi: 10.1177/1741143208095789

Parlar, H., & Cansoy, R. (2017). Examining the relationship between ınstructional leadership and organizational health. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(4), 18-28. doi:10.11114/jets.v5i4.2195

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3.Ed.). Londodn: Sage Publication.

Recepoğlu, E., & Kılınç, A. Ç. (2014). Türkiye’de okul yöneticilerinin seçilmesi ve yetiştirilmesi: mevcut sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri. [Selection and placement of school principals in Turkey: Current problems and suggestions] Turkish Studies, 9(2), 1817-1845. doi: 10.7827/TurkishStudies.6136

Rigby, J. G. (2014). Three logics of instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50(4), 610-644. doi: 10.1177/0013161X13509379

Robinson, V. M. (2010). From instructional leadership to leadership capabilities: Empirical findings and methodological challenges. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 9(1), 1-26. doi: 10.1080/15700760903026748

Sağır, M., & Emişoğlu, S., P. (2013). Primary school administrators’ degrees of encountering problems in instructional leadership roles and the problems they encounter. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10(2), 39-56.

Sahin, S. (2011). Öğretimsel liderlik ve okul kültürü arasındaki ilişki (İzmir İli Örneği). [The relationship between instructional leadership and school culture (Case of Izmir province)] Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 11(4), 1909-1928

Scheerens, J. (2012). Summary and conclusion: Instructional leadership in schools as loosely coupled organizations. J. Scheerens (Ed.), School leadership effects revisited (pp. 131-152). Netherlands: Springer, Dordrecht.

Sebastian, J., & Allensworth, E. (2012). The influence of principal leadership on classroom instruction and student learning: A study of mediated pathways to learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(4), 626-663. doi: 10.1177/0013161x11436273

Serin, M. K., & Buluç, B. (2012). İlköğretim okul müdürlerinin öğretim liderliği davranışları ile öğretmenlerin örgütsel bağlılıkları arasındaki ilişki. [The relationship between primary school principals’ instructional leadership behaviours and teachers’ organisational commitment] Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 3(3), 435- 459.

Silins, H. C. (1994). The relationship between transformational and transactional leadership and school improvement outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 5(3), 272-298. doi: 10.1080/0924345940050305

Simsek, H. (2002). Türkiye’de eğitim yöneticisi yetiştirilemez! [Educational administrators cannot be trained in Turkey!] C. Elma & Ş. Çınkır (Ed). Proceedings of the Symposium on Training Educational Administrators in the 21st Century. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Yayınları.

Sişman, M. (2004). Öğretim liderliği. [Instructional leadership] Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

Sheppard, B. (1996). Exploring the transformational nature of instructional leadership. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 42(4), 325-44.

Smylie, M. A., Conley, S., & Marks, H. M. (2002). Exploring new approaches to teacher leadership for school improvement. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 101(1), 162-188. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7984.2002.tb00008.x

Sofo, F., Fitzgerald, R., & Jawas, U. (2012). Instructional leadership in Indonesian school reform: overcoming the problems to move forward. School Leadership & Management, 32(5), 503-522. doi: 10.1080/13632434.2012.723616

Southworth, G. (2002). Instructional leadership in schools: Reflections and empirical evidence.School Leadership & Management,22(1), 73-91. doi: 10.1080/13632430220143042

Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2001). Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 23-28. doi: 10.3102/0013189X030003023

Tan, C. Y. (2012). Instructional leadership: toward a contextualised knowledge creation model. School Leadership & Management, 32(2), 183-194. doi: 10.1080/13632434.2011.614944

Terosky, A. L. (2016). Enacting instructional leadership: perspectives and actions of public K-12 principals. School Leadership & Management, 36(3), 311-332. doi: 10.1080/13632434.2016.1247044

Ünal, A., & Çelik, M. (2013). Okul yöneticilerinin öğretimsel liderlik davranışı ile öğretmenlerin örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışlarının analizi [The Analysis of the Instructional Leadership Behaviour of the Principals with the Organizational Citizenship Behaviours of the Teachers]. Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6(2), 239-258.

van Manen, M. (2007). Phenomenology of practice. Phenomenology & Practice, 1(1),11- 30.

Yavuz, M., & Bas, G. (2010). Perceptions of elementary teachers on the instructional leadership role of school principals. US-China Education Review, 7(4), 83-93.

Yang, Y. (2014). Principals’ transformational leadership in school improvement. International Journal of Educational Management, 28(3), 279-288. doi: 10.1108/IJEM-04- 2013-0063

Yılmaz, E., & Kurşun, A., T. (2015). Okul müdürlerinin öğretimsel liderlik davranışları ile öğretmenlerin akademik iyimserlik düzeyleri arasındaki ilişki. [The relationship between school principals’ instructional leadership behaviours and teachers’ academic optimism]. Çağdaş Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 1(1), 1-14.

Zheng, X., Yin, H., & Li, Z. (2018). Exploring the relationships among instructional leadership, professional learning communities and teacher self-efficacy in China. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(5), 1-17. doi:10.1177/1741143218764176
Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-4832
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1995
  • Yayıncı: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık Eğitim Danışmanlık Hizmetleri Tic. Ltd. Şti.