Policy Document Analysis: A Practical Educational Leadership Tool and a Qualitative Research Method

This paper presents policy document analysis as practical tool that can be put to valuable use by educationalleaders and can also be adopted as a research method. Educational leaders are at the forefront of policy interpretationand consequently need knowledge and skills that enable them to analyse policy as part of their work indeveloping, implementing and reviewing organisational policy. They need to be able to look behind the policyto know what forces brought it into being; to tap into policy history to know how it was constructed; and mostimportantly, evaluate the way it is working to achieve its stated purposes. The analysis of policy documents isalso an established and appealing qualitative research method, especially for students engaged in postgraduateresearch associated with educational leadership and policy studies because policy documents offer backgroundinsights into understanding educational problems in both research and practice. In this paper advantages anddisadvantages associated with using documentary analysis as a qualitative research method are outlined andpractical document analysis tools and approaches are presented.

___

Alexander, N. A. (2013). Policy analysis for educational leaders: A step-by-step approach. New Jersey: Pearson Education.

Atkinson, P., & Coffey, A. (2004). Analysing documentary realities. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, methods and practice (2nd ed., pp. 56-75). London. England: Sage.

Bell, L., & Stevenson, H. (2006). Education policy: Process, themes and impact. London, England: Routledge.

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40.

Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Busher, H. (2006). Understanding educational leadership: People, power and culture. New York, NY: Open University Press.

Cardno, C. (1999). Appraisal policy and implementation issues for New Zealand schools. The International Journal of Educational Management, 13(2), 87-97.

Cardno, C. (2003). Action research: A developmental approach. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. Abingdon, England: Routledge.

Dick, P. (2004). Discourse analysis. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 203-213). London, England: Sage.

Duffy, B. (2010). The analysis of documentary evidence. In J. Bell (Ed.), Doing your research project: A guide for first-time researchers in education, health and social science (5th ed., pp. 124-139). Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.

Duriau, V. J., Reger, R. K., & Pfarrer, M. D. (2007). A content analysis of the content analysis literature in organisation studies: Research themes, data sources, and methodological refinements. Organizational Research Methods, 10, 5-34.

Elo, S., & Kyngas, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107-115.

Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.

Fitzgerald, T. (2012). Documents and documentary analysis. In A. J. R. Briggs, M. Coleman & M. Morrison (Eds.), Research methods in educational leadership and management (pp. 296-308). London, England: Sage.

Forster, N. (1994). The analysis of company documentation. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 147-166). London, England: Sage.

George, A. (2009). Quantitative and qualitative approaches to content analysis. In K. Krippendorff & M. A. Bock (Eds.), The content analysis reader (pp. 144-155). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Government of New Zealand (2017). Education Act. Retrieved from the www. (10.10.2018).

Government of New Zealand. (1988). State Sector Act. Retrieved from the www. (29.09.17). http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1988/0020/102.0/DLM129110.html

Government of New Zealand. (2001). Education Standards Act. Retrieved from the www. (29.09.17). http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2001/0088/latest/DLM117863.html

Grinyer, A. (2009). The ethics of the secondary analysis and further use of qualitative data. Social Research Update, 56(summer), 1-4.

Kilmister, T. (1993). Boards at work: A new perspective on not-for profit board governance. Wellington: NFP Press.

Kohlbacher, F. (2006). The use of qualitative content analysis in case study research. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 7(1), 1-23.

Lingard, B., & Ozga, J. (2007). Introduction: Reading education policy and politics. In B. Lingard & J. Ozga (Eds.), The RoutledgeFalmer reader of educational policy and politics. London, England: RoutledgeFalmer.

Marshall, H. (1994). Discourse analysis in an occupational context. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Qualitative methods in organisational research (pp. 91-106). London, England: Sage.

Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

Ministry of Education. (2017). Performance appraisal for schools guidelines. Retrieved from the www.(25.09.17) at https://education.govt.nz/school/running-a-school/ employing-and-managing-staff/performance-management/

Ministry of Education. (2017). National administration guidelines. Retrieved from the www. (25.09.17) https://education.govt.nz/ministry-of-education/legislation/nags/

Mulderrig, J. (2003). Consuming education: A critical discourse analysis of social actors in New Labour’s education policy. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 1(1), 97-123.

Ng, D. J. (2016). Towards a framework of education policy analysis. The Head Foundation. Paltridge, B. (2006). Discourse analysis. London, England: Continuum.

Perryman, J. (2012). Discourse analysis. In A. J. R. Briggs, M. Coleman & K. Morrison (Eds.), Research methods in educational leadership and management (pp. 309-321). London, England: Sage.

Phillips, N., Sewell, G., & Jaynes, S. (2008). Applying critical discourse analysis in strategic management research. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 770-789.

Platt, J. (1981a). Evidence and proof in documentary research 2: Some shared problems of documentary research. Sociological Review, 29(1), 53-66.

Platt, J. (1981b). Evidence and proof in doumentary research 1: Some specific problems of documentary research. Sociological Review, 29(1), 31-52.

Sergiovanni. T., Burlingame, M., Coombs, F. & Thurston, P. W. (1999). Educational governance and administration. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

Scott, J. (1990). A matter of record. Cambridge, England: Polity.

Silverman, D. (2006). Interpreting qualitative data (3rd ed.). London, England: Sage.

Stone, D. (2012). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making. New York: Norton & Company.

Razik, T, A. (2001). Fundamental concepts of educational leadership and management. Upprt Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Ryan, P. (1994). Cleaning up a dirty word - policy. The Practising Administrator 2, 30-31.

Robinson, V., Hohepa, M. & Lloyd, C. (2009) School leadership and student outcomes: Identifying what works and why. Best Evidence Synthesis Iteration [BES]. Wellington: New Zealand Ministry of Education.

Taylor, S., Rizvi, F., Lingard, B., & Henry, M. (1997). Education policy and the politics of change. London, England: Routledge.

Thomas, S. & Watson, L. (2011). Quality and accountability: Policy tensions for Australian school leaders. In T. Townsend & J. MacBeath (Eds.), International handbook of leadership for learning (pp. 189-208). London: Springer.

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation. (2013). UNESCO handbook on educational policy analysis and programming: Volume 1 – education policy analysis. UNESCO Bangkok Asia and Pacific Regional Bureau for Education.

Wellington, J. (2000). Educational research: Contemporary issues and practical applications. London, England: Continuum.

Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-4832
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1995
  • Yayıncı: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık Eğitim Danışmanlık Hizmetleri Tic. Ltd. Şti.