Pamuk-Buğday Sistemlerinde Buğdayın Bazı Özellikleri Üzerine Geleneksel ve Azaltılmış Toprak İşlemenin Etkileri
Buğdayda toprak işleme sistemi, özellikle bitki boyu (PH), tane verimi (GY) ve verim unsurları açısından en önemli tarımsal uygulamalardan biridir. Bu çalışma, pamuk hasadından sonra geleneksel (CT) ve azaltılmış toprak işleme (RT) sistemlerinin beş buğday çeşidinde (Adana, Ceyhan, Doğankent, Menemen ve Yüreğir) PH, metre karede fertil başak sayısı (SM), başak uzunluğu (SL), başakta fertil başakçık sayısı (SS), başakta tane sayısı (GS), 1000 tane ağırlığı (KW) ve GY unsurları üzerine etkilerini araştırmak için 2007- 08 ve 2008-09 ürün sezonlarında Kahramanmaraş'ta yürütülmüştür. Toprak, CT sisteminde 25-30 cm derinlikte sürülürken, RT’de yapılmadı. Sonuçlar, KW ve GY hariç diğer tüm özellikler 2008-09 sezonunda 2007-08 sezonundan daha yüksek değerlere sahip olmuşlardır. Toprak işleme sistemleri KW dışındaki PH, SM, SL, SS, GS ve GY özellikler üzerinde önemli derecede etkili olmuşlardır. İki yıla ait sonuçlara göre, CT'deki tüm özelliklere ait verilerin RT'ye göre daha yüksek olduğu gözlemlendi. CT ve RT sistemleri altında GY, SS, GS ve KW özellikleri açısından önemli ve pozitif korelasyonlar vardı. Çeşitler yıl ve toprak işleme sisteminden etkilenmiştir. Doğankent çeşidi her iki yılda da CT ve RT altında diğerler çeşitlere kıyasla özelliklerin çoğunda daha en iyi bir performansa ve stabiliteye sahipti.
Effects of Conventional and Reduced Tillage Methods on Some Traits of Wheat in Cotton- Wheat System
Tillage is one of the most important agronomical practices especiallyfor plant height (PH), grain yield (GY) and yield components inwheat production. This study was carried out in 2007–08 and 2008–09 growing seasons in Kahramanmaras, Turkey, to investigateresponse of five wheat cultivars (Adana, Ceyhan, Dogankent,Menemen and Yuregir) to conventional (CT) and reduced tillage(RT) systems after cotton harvest for PH, number of fertile spikesper m 2 (SM), spike length (SL), number of fertile spikelets spike –1(SS), number of grains spike –1 (GS), 1000–kernel weight (KW) andGY components. The soil was ploughed at a depth of 25–30 cm in CTsystem, while it was not used in RT. The results indicated that alltraits had greater values in 2008–09 than in 2007–08 except KWand GY. The tillage systems significantly affected PH, SM, SL, SS,GS and GY except KW. Over the two years, values of all traits in CTwere higher than those of RT. There was a significant and positivecorrelation for GY, SS, GS and KW between CT and RT. Thecultivars were affected by year and tillage system. Dogankentcultivar had better performance and stable for most of the traitscompared to others under CT and RT in both years.
___
- Akbar M, Khan NI, Chaudhry MH 1995. Variation and
interrelationship
between
some
biometric
characters in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).
Journal of Agricultural Research, 23: 247–255.
- Baresel JP, Zimmermann G, Reents HJ 2008. Effects
of genotypes and environment on N uptake and N
partition in organically grown winter wheat
( Triticum aestivum L.) in Germany. Euphytica, 163: 347–354.
- Belay G, Tesemma T, Mitiku D 1993. Variability and
correlation studies in durum wheat in Alem-Tena,
Ethiopia Rachis, 12: 38–41.
- Buttar GS, Sidhu HS, Singh V, Jat ML, Gupta R, Singh
Y, Singh B 2012. Relay planting of wheat in cotton:
an
innovative
technology
for
enhancing
productivity and profitability of wheat in cotton–
wheat production system of South Asia. Exploring
Agriculture, 49: 19–30.
- Cantrell RG, Haro-Arias ES 1986. Selection for
spikelet fertility in a semi dwarf durum wheat
population. Crop Science, 26: 691–693.
- Dexter AR 2004. Soil physical quality: Parts I, II, III.
Geoderma, 120: 201–239.
- Dexter AR, Czyz EA 2011. Soil crumbling during
tillage as a function of soil organic matter content.
International Agrophysics, 25: 215–221.
- Eunus M, Sarke DC, Khan ZA, Sarker AU 1986.
Interrelationships among some quantitative
characters of wheat. Bangladesh Journal of
Agricultural Research, 11: 91–94.
- Gangwar KS, Singh KK, Sharma SK 2004. Effect of
tillage on growth, yield and nutrient uptake in
wheat after rice in the Indo-Gangetic Plains of
India. Journal of Agricultural Science, 142: 453–
459.
- Haq W, Munir M, Akram Z 2010. Estimation of
interrelationships among yield and yield related
attributes in wheat lines. Pakistan Journal of
Botany, 42: 567–573.
- Humphreys E, Kuka SS, Christen EW, Hira GS, Singh
B, Yadav S, Sharma RK 2010. Halting the
groundwater decline in North-West India – which
crop technologies will be winners? Advanced
Agronomy, 109: 155–217.
- Iftikhar R, Khaliq I, Ijaz M, Rashid, MAR 2012.
Association analysis of grain yield and its
components in spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)
American-Eurasian Journal of Agriculture and
Environment Science, 12: 389–392.
- Ji B, Zhao Y, Mu X, Liu K, Li C 2013. Effects of tillage
on soil physical properties and root growth of maize
in loam and clay in central China. Plant Soil
Environment, 7: 295–302.
- Jia XL, Ma RK, Zhang QG, Yao, YR, Zhang LH 2009.
Trend in relationship between water supply
amount and grain yield of winter wheat from 1987
to 2007. Acta Agriculture Boreali-Sinica, 1: 214–217
(In Chinese).
- Jug I, Jug D, Sabo M, Stipesevic B, Stosic M 2011.
Winter wheat and yield components as affected by
soil tillage systems. Turkish Journal of Agriculture
and Forestry, 35: 1–7.
- Khan MB, Khaliq A 2005. Production of winter cereals
as relay crops by surface seeding in cotton based
cropping system. University of Pakistan Bahauddin
Journal of Research Science, 16: 79–86.
- Khan HA, Shaik M, Mohammad S 1999. Character
association and path coefficient analysis of grain
yield and yield components in wheat. Hisar Crop
Research, 17: 229–233.
- Lihua L, Yanrong Y, Lihua Z, Zhiqiang D, Xiuling J,
Shuangbo L, Junjie J 2013. Winter wheat grain
yield and its components in the north china lain:
irrigation management, cultivation, and climate.
Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research, 73: 233–
242.
- Logsdon SD, Reneau RBJ, Parker JC 1987. Corn
seedling root growth as influenced by soil physical
properties. Agronomy Journal, 79: 221–224.
- Malecka I, Blecharczyk A, Pudelko J 2004. Response of
spring barley and pea to reduced tillage. Fragm
Agronomy, 21: 100–114 (in Polish).
- Malecka I, Blecharczyk A, Sawinska Z, Dobrzeniecki T
2012. Th e eff ect of various long-term tillage
systems on soil properties and spring barley yield.
Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 36:
217–226.
- Maral H, Dumlupinar Z, Dokuyucu T, Akkay A 2013.
Response of six oat ( Avena sativa L.) Cultivars to
nitrogen fertilization for agronomical traits.
Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 18: 254-259.
- Micucci FG, Taboada MA 2006. Soil physical
properties and soybean ( Glycine max , Merrill) root
abundance in conventionally- and zero-tilled soils in
the humid Pampas of Argentina. Soil and Tillage
Research, 86: 152–162.
- Mohsin T, Khan N, Naqvi FN 2009. Heritability,
phenotypic correlation and path coefficient studies
for some agronomic characters in synthetic elite
lines of wheat. Journal of Food Agriculture and
Environment, 7: 278–283.
- Mosaddeghi MR, Mahboubi AA, Safadoust A 2009.
Short-term effects of tillage and manure on some
soil physical properties and maize root growth in a
sandy loam soil in western Iran. Soil and Tillage
Research, 104: 173–179.
- Narwal NK, Verma PK, Narwal M 1999. Genetic
variability, correlation and path coefficient analysis
in bread wheat in two climatic zones of Hayrana.
Agric. Sci. Digest Karnal, 19: 73–76.
- Nasrullah MH, Cheema SM, Akhtar M 2010. Efficacy
of different dry sowing methods to enhance wheat
yield under cotton-wheat cropping system. Crop
Environment, 1: 27–30.
- Ram H, Yadvinder-Singh KS, Kler DS, Timsina J,
Humphreys EJ 2012. Agronomic and economic
evaluation of permanent raised beds, no tillage and
straw mulching for an irrigated maize-wheat
system in northwest India. Experimental
Agriculture, 48: 21–38.
- Shah SA, Mohammad T, Anwar S, Hassan S, Rahman
K 1988. Induced quantitative variation and
correlation in wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.). Sarhad
Journal of Agriculture 4, 119–125.
- Sharma RC, Smith EL 1986. Selection for high and low
harvest index in three winter populations. Crop
Science, 26: 1147–1150.
- Wozniak A 2013. The effect of tillage systems on yield
and quality of durum wheat cultivars. Turkish
Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 37: 133–138.
- Varsa EC, Chong SK, Abolaji JO, Farquhar DA, Olsen
FJ 1997. Effect of deep tillage on soil physical
characteristics and corn ( Zea mays L.) root growth
and production. Soil and Tillage research, 43: 219–
228.
- Virk TS, Anand SC 1970. Studies on correlation and
their implication in wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.).
Madras Agriculturak Journal, 57: 713–717.
- Vita P, Paolo E, Fecondo G, Fonzo N, Pisante M 2007.
No-tillage and conventional tillage effects on durum
wheat yield, grain quality, and soil moisture
content in Southern Italy. Soil and Tillage
Research, 92: 69–78.
- Zadoks JC, Chang TT, Konzak CF 1974. A Decimal
Code for the Growth Stages of Cereals. Weed
Research 14, 415–421.