Teacher trainers as action researchers: Scrutinizing the reasons for student failure7

Eylem araştırmacısı olarak öğretmen eğitimcileri: Öğrenci başarısızlığının altındaki etmenler Bu eylem araştırması Türkiye"de büyük bir üniversitede öğrenim gören öğretmen adaylarının "Çocuklara Yabancı Dil Öğretimi" dersinde yaşadıkları yüksek oranlı başarısızlıklarını bağladıkları nedenleri, kontrol odaklarını ve başarı hedeflerini araştırmayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu nedenle, nitel ve nicel veriler başarısızlık nedenleri anketi, kontrol odağı ölçeği ve görüşmeler yoluyla toplanmıştır. Araştırmacıların geliştirdiği ve 35 maddeden oluşan ankette dört bölüm bulunmaktadır: öğrenci, öğretmen, ders ve sınav kaynaklı nedenler. Öğrenci kaynaklı nedenler aynı zamanda dört alt kategoriden oluşmaktadır. Bunlar çalışma becerileri, kritik düşünme yeteneği, sınıf içi performansı/katılımı ve grup çalışması performansı/katılımı. Anketin aynı kategorileri içeren açık uçlu bir bölümü de bulunmaktadır. Anket .80 alfa değeriyle güvenilir bulunmuştur. Anketin alt ölçeklerinin güvenirlikleri ise sırasıyla .77, .78, .70 ve .81"dir. Katılımcılara aynı zamanda bir akademik kontrol odağı ölçeği verilmiş ve 21"i başarılı, 21"i başarısız olmak üzere toplam 42 öğrenci ile de görüşme yoluyla veri toplanmıştır. Sonuçlar en yüksek ortalama ile öğrenci kaynaklı nedenlerin başarısızlığın sebebi olarak ortaya çıktığını göstermiştir. Ayrıca katılımcıların içsel kontrol odağına sahip oldukları ve performans hedefleri olduğu da bulunmuştur. Buna ek olarak katılımcıların %40"ının mezuniyet sonrası öğretmenlik yapmayı düşünmedikleri de ortaya çıkmıştır. Bulgular benzer problemleri Türkiye bağlamında yaşayan öğretmen eğitimcileri ve öğretmen kalitesi ve öğretmen seçimi açısından da hükümet kurumları için önem taşımaktadır.

Eylem araştırmacısı olarak öğretmen eğitimcileri: Öğrenci başarısızlığının altındaki etmenler Bu eylem araştırması

This action research aims to identify the teacher trainees" attributions for their failure, their locus of control and their achievement goals as a result of high failure rate in "Teaching English to Young Learners" course at a large state university in Turkey. For this purpose, qualitative and quantitative data were gathered via an attribution questionnaire, locus of control (LOC) scale, and interviews. The 35-item attribution questionnaire was developed by the researchers and consisted of four parts investigating student, instructor, course, and exam related reasons. The student related reasons had also four sub categories such as study skills, critical thinking ability, in-class performance/attendance and group work performance/attendance. The questionnaire also had an open-ended part with the same categories. The overall reliability of the questionnaire was found to be .80 and .77, .78, .70, .81 for respective sub-groups. The participants were also given a LOC scale and finally 21 successful and 21 unsuccessful students were interviewed. The results revealed that, having the highest mean score, student-related reasons were identified to be the major reason for the participants" failure from the course. Moreover, the participants" had internal locus of control and they mostly carried performance goals for achievement. In addition, it was found out that 40% of trainees did not have a desire to be a teacher after graduation. The results have implications for teacher trainers facing similar problems in Turkish context and governmental institutions in terms of teacher qualifications and teacher trainee selection in education faculties. © 2015 JLLS and the Authors - Published by JLLS

PDF

___

Akın, A. (2010). Achievement goals and academic locus of control: Structural equation modeling. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 38, 1-18.
Ames, C. (1992). Classroom goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261-171.
Chubb, N.H., Fertman, C.I. & Ross, J.L. (1997). Adolescent self-esteem and locus of control: A longitudinal study of gender and age differences. Adolescence, 32, 113-130.
Covington, M. V. (2000). Goal theory, motivation, and school achievement: An integrative review. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 171-200.
Demetriou, C. (2011). The attribution theory of learning and advising students on academic probation. NACADA Journal, 31, 16-21.
Elliot, E. S., & Dweck, C. S. (1988). Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 54, 5-12.
Hasan, S. S., Khalid, R. (2014). Academic locus of control of high and low achieving students. Journal of Research and Reflections in Education, 8, 22 -33.
Middleton, M., & Midgley, C. (1997). Avoiding the demonstration of lack ability: An under-explored aspect of goal theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 710-718.
Perry, R. P. (1991). Perceived control in college students: Implications for instruction in higher education. In J. C. Smart (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of theory and research, (vol. 7, pp. 1-56). New York, NY: Agathon Press.
Perry, R. P., Hladkyj, S., Pekrun, R., and Pelletier, S. (2001). Academic control and action control in the achievement of college students: A longitudinal field study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 776-789.
Perry, R. P., Hall, N. C., and Ruthig, J. C. (2005). Perceived (academic) control and scholastic attainment in higher education, In J.C. Smart (ed.). Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (vol. 20 pp. 363-436). The Netherlands: Springer Publishers. doi: 10.1037/0278- 6133.24.4.393sss
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 544-555.
Robbins, S.B., Lauver, K., Davis, H.L., Davis, D., Langley, R., and Carlstorm, A. (2004). Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 261-288.
Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(1), 1-28.
Rotter, J. B. (1975). Some problems and misconceptions related to the construct of internal versus external control of reinforcement. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 56-67.
Seifert, T. L. (1995). Academic goals and emotions: A test of two models. The Journal of Psychology, 129, 543-552.
Stipek, D. J. and Weisz, J. R. (1981). Perceived personal control and academic achievement. Review of Educational Research, 51, 101-137.
Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548-573.
Weiner, B. (1995). Judgements of Responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Weiner, B. (2000). Intrapersonal and interpersonal theories of motivation from an attributional perspective. Educational Psychology, 12, 1-14.
Weiner, B. (2010). The development of an attribution-based theory of motivation: A history of ideas. Educational Psychologist, 45, 28-36.
Whilhite, S. C. (1990). Self-efficacy, locus of control, self-assessment of memory ability, and study activities as predictors of college course achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 696-700