Paydaşların FATİH Projesi‟ne ilişkin görüşleri: Akıllı İngilizce sınıfları
Türkiye, bilgi ve iletişim teknolojilerini eğitime entegre etmek için büyük bir ulusal girişim başlatmıştır. 8 milyar dolar değerinde olan ve 5 ila 12 yaş arası öğrenciler için her sınıfta interaktif beyaz tahtalar ve internet bağlantısı olan tablet bilgisayarlarla harmanlanan FATİH projesi, genellikle, iddialı, masif, görkemli ve ileri teknoloji olarak tanımlanmaktadır. Mevcut çalışma, dil öğretim ve öğrenim süreci ile ilgili olarak paydaşların görüşlerine dayanarak FATİH Projesinin etkinliğini ve verimliliğini araştırmayı amaçlamaktadır. Çalışma, pilot çalışma aşamasından itibaren projenin bir parçası olan Ankara'da bir lisede gerçekleştirilmiştir. Yedi İngilizce öğretmeni, 20 öğrenci ve 10 ebeveyn, iki okul yöneticisi, üç proje görevlisi ve Yenilik ve Eğitim Teknolojileri Genel Müdürü de dâhil olmak üzere 40 katılımcı ile yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler yapılmıştır. Çalışma, politika yapıcılar (Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı ve Yenilik ve Eğitim Teknolojileri Müdürlüğü yetkilileri) ve kullanıcıların (öğretmenler ve öğrenciler) görüşleri arasında bir ayrım olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Projenin etkinliğine olan bağlılığı ve inancı sağlamak için projenin hedefleri ve planlaması hakkında öğretmenleri ve öğrencileri bilgilendirmek için daha fazla eğitim verilmesi gerektiği görülmektedir. Sonuçlar aynı zamanda interaktif yazı tahtalarının hem İngilizce öğretmenlerinin İngilizce'yi etkili bir şekilde öğretmelerine, hem de öğrencilerin özellikle dinleme, okuma ve yazma konusunda dil becerilerini geliştirerek teknolojinin kullanımı yoluyla motivasyon sağlamasına yardımcı olurken, tablet PC'lerin öğretmenler, ebeveynler ve öğrenciler tarafından bazı teknik ve pratik nedenlerden dolayı uygun maliyetli olmadığı düşünülmektedir.
Stakeholders‟ views about the FATIH Project: Smart EFL classrooms
Turkey has launched a large national initiative to integrate information and communication technologies ineducation. FATIH project, valued at 8 billion$ and with tablet computers for every student from grade 5 to 12,interactive white boards and internet connection in every class, is often defined as ambitious, massive, grandioseand high-tech. The current study aims to investigate the effectiveness and efficiency of FATIH Project based onthe views of stakeholders with particular reference to language teaching and learning process. The study hasbeen carried out at a high school in Ankara, which has been a part of the project from the piloting phase. Fortythree participants including seven English teachers, 20 students and 10 parents, two school administrators, threeproject officials and the General Director of Innovation and Education Technologies have been administeredsemi structured interviews. The study has revealed a distinction between the views of policy makers (officials inMinistry of National Education and Directory of Innovation and Education Technologies) and those of users(teachers and students). It appears that more briefings are needed to inform the teachers and students about thegoals and planning of the project to ensure devotion and belief into the effectiveness of the project. The resultsalso indicate that interactive whiteboards helped both language teachers to teach English effectively and studentsto improve language skills especially in listening, reading and writing by providing motivation via use oftechnology whereas tablet PCs are not thought to be cost effective by teachers, parents and students because ofsome technical and practical reasons.
___
- Adigüzel, T., Gürbulak, N., & Sariçayir, H. (2011). Akıllı Tahtalar Ve Öğretim Uygulamaları/Smart
Boards And Their Instructional Uses. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
Dergisi, 8(15).
- Akarsu, O., & Darıyemez, T. (2014). The reading habits of university students studying English
language and literature in the digital age. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 10(2), 85-
99.
- Akıncı, A., Kurtoğlu, M., & Seferoğlu, S. S. (2012). Bir teknoloji politikası olarak Fatih Projesinin
başarılı olması için yapılması gerekenler: Bir durum analizi çalışması. Akademik Bilişim
Konferansı, 1-3.
- Ateş, M. (2010). Ortaöğretim coğrafya derslerinde akilli tahta kullanimi. Marmara coğrafya dergisi,
(22).
- Bax, S. (2000). Putting technology in its place: ICT in modern foreign language teaching. In K. Field
(Ed.), Issues in modern foreign language teaching (pp. 199-210). London, England: Routledge
Falmer.
- Beeland, W. D. (2002). Student engagement, visual learning and technology: Can interactive
whiteboards help?. Retrieved from
http://chiron.valdosta.edu/are/Artmanscrpt/vol1no1/beeland_am.pdf..
- Betcher, C., & Lee, M. (2009). The interactive whiteboard revolution: Teaching with IWBs. Victoria:
ACER Press. Retrieved from
http://schoolnet.org.za/CoL/ACE/course/classroom/documents/iwb_revolution.pdf
- Bilgen, A. (2012). Chalk vs. tablet: Can FATIH Project revolutionize the Turkish education
system. The European Strategists.
- Bonifaz, A., & Zucker, A. (2004). Lessons learned about providing laptops for all students. Boston,
MA: Development Center, Inc. & Northeast and the Islands Regional Technology in Education
Consortium.
- Coyle, Y., Yañez, L., & Verdú, M. (2010). The impact of the interactive whiteboard on the teacher and
children‟s language use in an ESL immersion classroom. System, 38(4), 614-625.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2010.10.002
- Çelik, S., Arkın, E., & Sabriler, D. (2012). EFL learners' use of ICT for self-regulated
learning. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 8(2), pp-98.
- Çiftçi, S., Taşkaya, S. M., & Alemdar, M. (2013). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin FATİH Projesine ilişkin
görüşleri The opinions of classroom teachers about Fatih Project. İlköğretim Online, 12(1).
- Daşdemir, İ., Cengiz, E., Uzoğlu, M., & Bozdoğan, A. E. (2012). Tablet Bilgisayarların Fen Ve
Teknoloji Derslerinde Kullanılmasıyla İlgili Fen Ve Teknoloji Öğretmenlerinin Görüşlerinin
İncelenmesi/Examınatıon Of Scıence Teachers' Opınıons Related To Tablet Pcs Usıng In Scıence
And Technology Courses. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(20).
- Demir, S. B., & Yorulmaz, E. (2014). Tarih derslerinde akıllı tahta kullanım durumunun incelenmesi
(Bir durum çalışması). Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (28), 15-38.
- Ekici, S., & Yılmaz, B. (2013). FATİH Projesi üzerine bir değerlendirme. Türk
Kütüphaneciliği, 27(2), 317-339.
- Ekşi, G., & Yakışık, B. Y. (2015). An Investigation of Prospective English Language Teachers‟
Multimodal Literacy. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 464-471.
- Golonka, E. M., Bowles, A. R., Frank, V. M., Richardson, D. L., & Freynik, S. (2014). Technologies
for foreign language learning: a review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer
Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), 70-105.
- Fri-tic. (2012). Projet One to One iPad: Visite de l‟Institut international de Lancy. Retrieved July 11,
2012 from http:// www.fri-tic.ch/dyn/bin/45214-46185-1-fritic_visite_ onetoone_lancy_v2.pdf.
- Gateway. (2004). One-to-One laptop initiatives: Providing tools for 21stcentury learners. Folsom, CA:
Center for Digital Education
- Gerard, F., Greene, M., & Widener, J. (1999). Using SMART Board in Foreign Language Classes.
- Gérard, F., & Widener, J. (1999). A SMARTer way to teach foreign language: The SMART board
interactive whiteboard as a language learning tool. Retrieved August, 23, 2010.
- Hsieh, H. & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative
Health Research, 15 (9), 1277-1288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
- Ingram, D., Willcutt, J., & Jordan, K. (2008). Laptop initiative evaluation report. University of
Minnesota: Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement.
- Isci, T. G., & Demir, S. B. (2015). The Use of Tablets Distributed within the Scope of FATIH Project
for Education in Turkey (Is FATIH Project a Fiasco or a Technological Revolution?). Universal
Journal of Educational Research, 3(7), 442-450.
- Johnson, E. M., Ramanair, J., & Brine, J. (2010). „It‟s not necessary to have this board to learn
English, but it‟s helpful‟: Student and teacher perceptions of interactive whiteboard use. Innovation
in Language Learning and Teaching, 4(3), 199-212. http://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2010.513444
- Jung Won Hur & Suhyun Suh (2012) Making Learning Active with Interactive Whiteboards,
Podcasts, and Digital Storytelling in ELL Classrooms, Computers in the Schools: Interdisciplinary
Journal of Practice, Theory, and Applied Research, 29:4, 320-338, DOI:
10.1080/07380569.2012.734275
- Kim, J. H-Y., & Jung, H-Y. (2010). South Korean digital textbook project. Computers in the Schools,
27(3-4), 247-265.
- Lan, Y. J., Sung, Y. T., & Chang, K. E. (2007). A mobile-device-supported peer-assisted learning
system for collaborative early EFL reading. Language Learning & Technology, Vol 11(3), 130-
151.
- Lesardoises. (2012). Les tablettes dans l‟éducation la Thaïlande. Retrieved July 12, 2012 from
http://lesardoises. com/11123/les-tablettes-dans-leducation-la-thailande-franchit-le-pas-pour-328-
millions-de-dollars.html.
- Lewin, C., & Luckin, R. (2010). Technology to support parental engagement in elementary education:
Lessons learned from the UK. Computers & Education, 54(3), 749-758.
- Liu, T.-Y. (2009). A context-aware ubiquitous learning environment for language listening and
speaking. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25, 515–527.
- Massé, O. (2012) Rapport au sujet de l‟expérimentation de l‟académie de Bordeaux sur l‟usage des
tablettes tactiles en français. Bordeaux: IA IPR.
- Millum, T., & Warren, C. (2014). Sharing not staring: 21 interactive whiteboard lessons for the
English classroom (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
- MoNE (2012a) Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı FATİH Projesi. Retrieved from: http://fatihprojesi.meb.gov.tr
- MoNE. (2017) Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı FATİH Projesi. Retrieved from:
http://fatihprojesi.meb.gov.tr/proje-hakkinda/
- MoNE. (2012b). Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı, Milli Eğitim istatistikleri. Retrieved from:
http://sgb.meb.gov.tr/istatistik/meb_istatistikleri_orgun_egitim_2011_2012.pdf
- MoNE (2010). Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı, FATİH Projesi: Fırsatları Artırma ve Teknolojiyi İyileştirme
Hareketi. Retrieved from: http://fatihprojesi.meb.gov.tr
- Moss, G., Jewitt, Carrey, L, R., Armstrong, V., Cardini, A., & Castle, F. (2007). The interactive
whiteboards pedagogy and pupil performance evaluation: An evaluation of the schools whiteboard
expansion (SWE) project: London Challenge. Institute of Education, University of London.
Research report no: 816.
- Öz, H. (2014). Teachers‟ And Students‟ Perceptions Of Interactive Whiteboards in The English as a
Foreign Language Classroom The Turkish. Online Journal of Educational Technology – July
2014, volume 13 issue 3
- Öztan, A. C. (2012). Fen ve teknoloji öğretiminde akıllı tahta kullanımının ilköğretim 7. sınıf
öğrencilerininakademik başarılarına etkisi. (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi), Necmettin
Erbakan Üniversitesi, TÜRKİYE.
- Pamuk, S., Çakır, R., Ergun, M., Yılmaz, H.B., Ayas, C. (2013). "The use of tablet PC and interactive
board from the perspectives of teachers and students: evaluation of the FATİH project"
Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13(3), 1815-1822. 2013 - See more at:
http://acikerisim.sinop.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11486/758?show=full#sthash.pJMgY2OT.dpuf
- Pennington, M. C (1996). The power of CALL. Houston, TX: Athelstan Publications.
- Peterson, M. (2011). Towards a research agenda for the use of three-dimensional virtual worlds in
language learning. Calico Journal, 29(1), 67-80.
- Potter, W. J., & Levine-Donnerstein, D. (1999). Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis.
Journal of Applied Communication Research, 27, 258-284.
- Pouezevara, S., Dinçer, A., Kipp, S., & Sarışık, Y. (2013). Turkey's FATIH project: A plan to conquer
the digital divide or a technological leap of faith. Turkey: RTI International & Education Reform
Initiative (ERI).
- Sakız, G., Özden, B., Aksu, D., & Şimşek, Ö. (2014). Fen ve Teknoloji dersinde akıllı tahta
kullanımının öğrenci başarısına ve dersin işlenişine yönelik tutuma etkisi. Atatürk Üniversitesi
Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 18(3), 257-274.
- Savas, P. (2014). Tablet PCs as instructional tools in English as a foreign language education. TOJET:
The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(1).
- Shenton, A., & Pagett, L. (2008). From „bored‟ to screen: the use of the interactive whiteboard for
literacy in six primary classrooms in England. Literacy, 41(3), 129–136.
- Tamim, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Pickup, D., & Bernard, R. M. (2015). Large-scale, governmentsupported
educational tablet initiatives.
- Thomas, M., & Schmid, E. C. (Eds.) (2010). Interactive whiteboards for education: Theory, research
and practice. New York, NY: IGI Global.
- Uluyol, Ç. (2013). ICT integration in Turkish schools: Recall where you are coming from to recognise
where you are going to. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(1).
- U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology. (2010). Transforming American
education: Learning powered by technology. Washington, D.C. Retrieved July 1, 2012 from
http://www.ed.gov/edblogs/ technology/netp-2010/.
- Van Dusen, G. (2000). Digital dilemma: Issues of access, cost, and quality in media enhanced and
distance education. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 27(5), 1–120.
- Widener, J., Greene, M. & Gérard, F. (1999). Using SMART Board in Foreign Language Classes. In J.
Price et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education
International Conference 1999 (pp. 1268-1273). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the
Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
- Windschitl, M., & Sahl, K., (2002). Tracing teachers‟ use of technology in a laptop computer school:
The interplay of teacher beliefs, social dynamics, and institutional culture. American Educational
Research Journal, 39(1), 165-205.
- Yang, J. Y., & Teng, Y.W. (2014). Perceptions of elementary school teachers and students using
interactive whiteboards in English teaching and learning. Journal of Interactive Learning
Research, 25(1), 125-154.
- Yáñez, L., & Coyle, Y. (2011). Children‟s perceptions of learning with an interactive whiteboard. ELT
Journal, 65(4), 446-457. http://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccq069
- Yorgancı, S., & Terzioğlu, Ö. (2013). Matematik öğretiminde akıllı tahta kullanımının başarıya ve
matematiğe karşı tutuma etkisi.. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 21(3), 919-930.