Öğretmen adaylarının İngilizce derslerine edebiyat dahil edilmesiyle ilgili inanışları

Öğretmenlerin bilişlerinin öğretime dair kararlarını ve aktivitelerini etkilediği bir çok bilimsel çalışma tarafından gösterildiğinden, 1990’ların sonuna doğru öğretmen bilişi konusu önemli bir araştırma alanı olarak öne çıkmıştır (Borg, 2003). Söz konusu öğretmen adayları olduğunda, inanışlarının çoğunlukla kendi öğrenim deneyimlerine dayandığı, ve bu inanışların onlara öğretmen eğitimi veren programlarda sunulan yeni bilgileri işlerken ve anlamlandırırken, bir filtreleme görevi gördüğü bulunmuştur (Borg, 2009). Bu çalışma İstanbul Türkiye’de bulunan bir devlet üniversitesinde İngilizce öğretmenliği eğitimi alan 65 öğretmen adayının yabancı dil eğitiminde edebi metin kullanımı ile ilgili inanışlarındaki değişiklikleri incelemiştir. İngilizce öğretiminde edebi metinlere yer verilmesinin öğrencilerin dil gelişimlerine, farklı kültürlerin zenginliklerini fark etmelerine ve kişisel gelişimlerine yaptığı katkılara uzun zamandır dikkat çekilmektedir (Carter & Long, 1991). Bu bağlamda, Türkiye’deki İngilizce öğretmenliği programları da öğretmen adaylarının edebiyatı derslerine nasıl dahil edebilecekleri konusunda bilgi ve becerileri kazandırmak amaçlı dersler sunmaktadır. Söz konusu çalışma İngilizce öğretmen adaylarının iki sömestr süren Edebiyat Yoluyla İngilizce Öğretimi dersini almadan önce yabancı dil öğretiminde edebiyat kullanımıyla ilgili deneyimlerini ve inanışlarını irdelemiş, ve bunları ders sonrası inanışlarıyla karşılaştırmıştır. Çalışmanın verileri ders öncesi ve sonrasında uygulanan açık uçlu bir anket ile toplanmış ve toplanan verilere içerik analizi yapılmıştır (Weber, 1990). Çalışma, öğretmen adaylarının İngilizce öğretiminde edebiyat kullanılması ile ilgili olumlu inanışlara sahip olduğunu; bununla beraber, ilgili dersin öğretmen adaylarının inanışları üzerindeki etkisinin sınırlı olduğunu göstermiştir.

Pre-service teachers’ beliefs about literature integration in English language teaching classrooms

In late 1990s, teacher cognition has emerged as an important field of inquiry as more and more research studieshave demonstrated that teachers’ cognitions influence their instructional decisions and activities (Borg, 2003). Inthe case of pre-service teachers, their beliefs are mainly influenced by their prior experience as learners while thesebeliefs also act as a filtering mechanism to process new information presented in teacher education programs(Borg, 2009). This study investigated changes in the beliefs about the use of literary texts in English languageteaching (ELT) of 65 pre-service teachers enrolled at the teacher education department of a state university inIstanbul, Turkey. The inclusion of literature in ELT classrooms has been viewed as a beneficial process as itcontributes to students’ linguistic development, appreciation of different cultures, personal involvement, andindividual growth (Carter & Long, 1991). To that extent, ELT teacher education programs in Turkey have beenoffering courses to equip pre-service teachers with the knowledge and skills on how to integrate literature intolanguage teaching. The present study explored prior experiences and beliefs of pre-service English as a ForeignLanguage (EFL) teachers about literature integration and compared them with those formed after the completionof a two-semester course on teaching English through literature. Data were collected through open-endedquestionnaires administered before and after the course and subjected to content analysis as suggested by Weber(1990). Results showed that pre-service teachers had positive beliefs about literature integration while the coursehad some limited impact on their prior beliefs.

___

  • Akyel, A., & Yalcin, E. (1990). Literature in the EFL class: A study of goal-achievement incongruence. ELT Journal, 44(3), 174-180.
  • Alam, F. (2007). Imperial entanglements and literature in English: Using postcolonial literature in ELT. Dhaka: Writers.ink.
  • Alexander, O. (2012). Exploring teacher beliefs in teaching EAP at low proficiency levels. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11, 99-111.
  • Altan, M.Z. (2006). Beliefs about language learning of foreign language-major university students. The Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 31(2), 45–52.
  • Altan, M.Z. (2012). Pre-service EFL teachers’ beliefs about foreign language learning. European Journal of Teacher Education, 35(4), 481-493.
  • Arikan, A. (2005). An evaluation of literature curriculum in HU English language teaching department. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 29, 27-33.
  • Arvidson, A., & Blanco, B. (2004). Reading across Rhode Island: One book, one state, many successful readers. English Journal, 93(5), 47-52.
  • Belcher, D., & Hirvela, A. (2000). Literature and L2 composition: Revisiting the debate. Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(1), 21-39.
  • Borg, M. (2004). The apprenticeship of observation. ELT Journal, 58(3), 274-276.
  • Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of the research on what teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36, 81-109.
  • Borg, S. (2006). Teacher cognition and language education: Research and practice. London: Continuum.
  • Borg, S. (2009). Introducing language teacher cognition. Retrieved from http://www.education.leeds.ac.uk/research/files/145.pdf
  • Borg, S. (2011). The impact of in-service teacher education on language teachers’ beliefs. System, 39, 370–380.
  • Burnett, J., & Fonder-Solano, L. (2002). Crossing the boundaries between literature and pedagogy: Perspectives on a foreign language reading course. In V. M. Scott & H. Tucker (Eds.), SLA and the literature classroom: Fostering dialogues (pp.75-106). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
  • Busch, D. (2010). Pre-service teacher beliefs about language learning: The second language acquisition course as an agent for change. Language Teaching Research, 14(3), 318- 337.
  • Buyukyavuz, O., & Inal, S. (2008). A descriptive study on Turkish teachers of English regarding their professional needs, efforts for development and available resources. The Asian EFL Journal, 10, 215-234.
  • Cabaroglu, N., & Roberts, J. (2000). Development in student teachers’ pre- existing beliefs during a 1- year PGCE programme, System, 28(3), 387-402.
  • Capan, S. A. (2014). Pre-service English as a foreign language teachers' belief development about grammar instruction. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 39(12), 131.
  • Carter, R., & Long, M. (1991). Teaching Literature. Harlow: Longman.
  • Chopin, K. (2003). The kiss. In A. Mignani (Ed.), Tales to talk about (pp. 29-34). Genoa: Black Cat Publishing.
  • Cirakli, M.Z., & Kilickaya, F. (2011). Literature courses in EFL curriculum: Pre-service language teachers’ perceptions. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, 1(13), 11-15.
  • Collie, J., & S. Slater (1987). Literature in the language classroom: A resource book of ideas and activities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Cortazzi, M., & Jin, L. (1996). Cultures of learning: Language classrooms in China. In H. Coleman (Ed.), Society and the language classroom (pp. 169–203). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ellis, E. M. (2006). Language learning experience as a contributor to ESOL teacher cognition. TESLEJ, 10(1), 1-20.
  • Ganakumaran, S., Shahizah, I.H., & Koo, Y.L. (2003). Pedagogical implications of the incorporation of the literature component in the Malaysian ESL syllabus. In S. Ganakumaran (Ed.), The Malaysian ESL syllabus in teaching of literature in ESL/EFL contexts (pp.62-87). Petaling Jaya, Malaysia: Sasbadi.
  • Hall, G. (2003). Poetry, pleasure and second language classrooms. Applied Linguistics, 24(3), 295-299.
  • Hall, G. (2005). Literature in language education. New York: Palgrave.
  • Hirvela, A., & Belcher, D. (Eds.). (2001). Linking literacies: Perspectives on second language readingwriting connections. Michigan: Michigan Applied Linguistics.
  • Hismanoglu, M. (2005). Teaching English through literature. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 1(1), 53-66.
  • Isikli, C., & Tarakcioglu, A.O. (2017). Investigating problems of English literature teaching to EFL high school students in Turkey with focus on language proficiency. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 13(2), 82-95.
  • Karci, C., & Vural, R.A. (2011). Teachers’ views with regard to teaching English in multigraded classrooms. Elementary Education Online, 10(2), 593-607.
  • Katz, S. (2001). Teaching literary texts at the intermediate level: A structured input approach. In V. M. Scott & H. Tucker (Eds.), SLA and the literature classroom: Fostering dialogues (pp.169-186). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
  • Kim, M. (2004). Literature discussions in adult L2 learning. Language and Education, 18(2), 145-166.
  • Kodama, K. (2012). The role of literature in the EFL/ESL classroom revisited: Using literature in communicative language teaching. Bulletin of the Graduate School of International Cultural Studies, 13, 31-56.
  • Kramsch, C. (1993). Context and culture in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Kunt, N., & Ozdemir, C. (2010). Impact of methodology courses on pre-service EFL teachers’ beliefs. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 3938-3944.
  • Lazar, G. (1993). Literature and language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Levin, B., & He, Y. (2008). Investigating the content and sources of teacher candidates’ personal practical theories (PPTs). Journal of Teacher Education, 59 (1), 55–68.
  • Lowry, L. (1993). The giver. New York: Dell Laurel-Leaf.
  • Mattheoudakis, M. (2007). Tracking changes in pre-service EFL teacher beliefs in Greece: A longitudinal study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 1272-1288.
  • McKay, S. (1987). Literature in the ESL classroom. In C. J. Brumfit & R. A. Carter (Eds.), Literature and language teaching (pp.191-198). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Minkoff, P. (2006). Talking it over in class. In A. Paran (Ed.), Literature in language teaching and learning (pp. 45-57). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
  • Morpurgo, M. (2005). The amazing story of Adolphus Tips. London: HarperCollins.
  • Nusrat, M.A. (2015). Bridging the gap between language and literature: Teaching English in Bangladesh at tertiary level. ELT Worldwide, 2(2), 1-32.
  • Pajares, M.F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307-332.
  • Paran, A. (2008). The role of literature in instructed foreign language learning and teaching: An evidence-based survey. Language Teaching, 41(4), 465-496.
  • Parkinson, B., & Reid Thomas, H. (2000). Teaching literature in a second language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Peacock, M. (2001). Pre-service ESL teachers’ beliefs about second language learning: A longitudinal study. System, 29(2), 177-195.
  • Phipps, S., & Borg, S. (2009). Exploring tensions between teachers’ grammar teaching beliefs and practices. System, 37(3), 380-390.
  • Popko, J. (2005). How MA-TESOL students use knowledge about language in teaching ESL classes. In Bartels, N. (Ed.) Applied linguistics and language teacher education (pp.387-404). New York: Springer.
  • Richards, J. C., & Lockhart, C. (1994). Reflective teaching in second language classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In J. Sikula, T. J. Buttery, and E. Guyton (Eds.) Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 102-119). New York: Macmillan.
  • Stuart, C., & Thurlow, D. (2000). Making it their own: Preservice teachers’ experiences, beliefs, and classroom practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(2), 113–121.
  • Tang, E., Lee, J., & Chun, C. (2012). Development of teaching beliefs and the focus of change in the process of pre-service ESL teacher education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(5), 90– 107.
  • Tasneen, W. (1996). Literary texts in the language classroom: A study of teachers’ and students’ views at international schools in Bangkok. Asian EFL Journal, 12(4), 1-17.
  • Tuncer, H., & Kizildag, A. (2014). Pre-service EFL teachers’ attitude towards the use of literature in practice teaching. International Journal of Language Academy, 2/3, 170-185.
  • Ur, P. (1996). A course in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Van, T.M.T. (2009). The relevance of literary analysis to teaching literature in the EFL classroom. English Teaching Forum, 47(3), 2-9.
  • Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic Content Analysis (2nd ed.). California: Sage Publications.
  • Wright, T. (2010). Second language teacher education: Review of recent research on practice. Language Teaching, 43(3), 259-296.
  • Yeasmin, N., Azad, A.K., & Ferdoush, J. (2011). Teaching language through literature: Designing appropriate classroom activities. ASA University Review, 5(2), 283-297.
  • Yuan, R., & Lee, I. (2014). Pre-service teachers’ changing beliefs in the teaching practicum: Three cases in an EFL context. System, 44, 1-12.
  • Zheng, H. (2009). A review of research on EFL pre-service teachers’ beliefs and practices, Journal of Cambridge Studies, 4(1), 73-81.