Dijital öyküleme: Çok biçimli öyküsel yazma türü

Bu çalışma dijital öykülemenin İngilizceyi yabancı dil olarak öğrenen öğrencilerin (öyküsel) yazma becerilerine olan etkisini araştırmıştır. Bu çalışma Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Yabancı Diller Yüksekokulundan İngilizceyi yabancı dil olarak öğrenen 43 hazırlık öğrencisinin katılımıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Deneysel bir araştırma olduğu için, bu çalışmaya deney ve kontrol grubu adıyla iki grup araştırma için seçilmiştir. Deney grubu dijital öykülemeye dayalı bir (öyküsel) yazma dersine dahil olmuştur. Kontrol grubu ise geleneksel (öyküsel) yazma dersi almıştır. Bu araştırma 14 hafta sürmüştür. Araştırmaya başlamadan önce her iki gruba da mevcut yazma becerilerini ölçmeyi hedefleyen bir ön test uygulanmıştır. Araştırmanın sonunda, katılımcıların yazma becerilerinde herhangi bir değişiklik olup olmadığını ölçmek amacıyla aynı test her iki gruba tekrar uygulanmıştır. Araştırma bulgularına göre her iki yazma yöntemi de etkilidir. Fakat nicel veri ayrıca göstermiştir ki deney grubu kontrol grubuna göre son testte istatistiki olarak anlamlı bir üstünlük göstermiştir. Bu bulgu ile dijital öyküleme yönteminin diğer geleneksel kâğıda dayalı yazma yöntemine göre daha etkili olduğu sonucu çıkartılabilir. Tüm bu bilgiler, öğrencilerine kendilerini farklı biçimlerde ifade etme yolları açarak, 21. yüzyıl yazma dersinde bugünün öğrencilerinin ilgi ve ihtiyaçlarını karşılamak isteyen eğitimcilere faydalı olacaktır.

Digital storytelling: A multimodal narrative writing genre

This study explored the impact of a digital storytelling (DS)-integrated methodology on English as a foreignlanguage (EFL) learners’ (narrative) writing skills. This current study was conducted at School of ForeignLanguages, Cumhuriyet University with the participation of 43 EFL English-major-students. Because it was anexperimental research study, two groups (one experimental and one control) were chosen for this study randomly;the former was exposed to DS-integrated (narrative) writing instruction, the latter was taught through traditional(narrative) writing practices. The experimental phase lasted for 14 weeks. Before the experimental phase, a pretest was given to both groups in order to determine their writing proficiency levels and at the end of thisexperimental phase, the same test was re-administered to both groups in order to see if there were any changes intheir (narrative) writing proficiency. The results showed that both instruction types namely, DS-integrated writinginstruction and traditional paper-based writing practices were effective in developing learners’ (narrative) writingskills. But the quantitative data also showed that the experimental group students scored significantly higher thanthe control group students at the post test as a result of the participation into the DS-integrated instruction process,suggesting the superiority of DS over traditional writing applications. Overall, the results of this study can helpeducators who are willing to meet today’s students’ needs and expectations in the 21st century composition classesby opening up a new channel for them to express themselves in different modalities.

___

  • Abdel-hack, E. M., & Helwa, A. A. (2014). Using digital storytelling and weblogs instruction to enhance EFL narrative writing and critical thinking skills among EFL majors at faculty of education. International Research Journal, 5(1), 8–41.
  • Ballast, K. H., Stephens, L. C., & Radcliffe, R. (2008). The effects of digital storytelling on sixth grade students’ writing and their attitudes about writing. In K. McFerrin (Ed.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2008 (pp. 875–879). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  • Banaszewski, T. (2002). Digital storytelling finds its place in the classroom. Multimedia Schools, 9(1), 32–35.
  • Bandi-Rao, S., & Sepp, M. (2015). Creating an effective model for digital storytelling in the ESL writing class. NYS TESOL Journal, 2(1), 76–88.
  • Connolly, E. M. (2008). From page to screen: Multimodal learning in a high school English class (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Hofstra University, the USA.
  • Digital Storytelling Association. (2002). The center for digital storytelling. Retrieved on April 20, 2015 from: http://www.dsaweb.org
  • Elola, I., & Oskoz, A. (2010). Collaborative writing: Fostering foreign language and writing conventions development. Language Learning & Technology, 14(3), 51–71.
  • Flihan, S. (2013). Telling tales with talking texts: Developing language and literacy with digital tools. In S. Huffmann, W. Rickman, J. Whittingham, & C. Wiedmaier (Eds.), Technology Tools for the Literacy Classroom (pp. 105–118). Hershey: IGI Global.
  • Foley, L. (2013). Digital storytelling in primary-grade classrooms (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Arizona State University, the USA.
  • Harrison, J. (2011). Digital storytelling: A multimodal wonderland (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Victoria, Canada.
  • Hicks, T., Turner, K., & Stratton, J. (2013). Reimagining a writer’s process through digital storytelling. Learning Landscapes, 6(2), 167–183.
  • Jonassen, D., Peck, K., & Wilson, B. (1999). Learning with technology. A constructivist perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Kajder, S. (2004). Enter here: Personal narrative and digital storytelling. The English Journal, 93(3), 64.
  • Kern, R., & Schultz, J. M. (2005). Beyond orality: Investigating literacy and literary in second and foreign language instruction. Modern Language Journal, 89, 381–392.
  • Kulla-Abbott, T. M. (2006). Developing literacy practices through digital storytelling (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Missouri, the USA.
  • LoBello, C. (2015). The impact of digital storytelling on fourth grade students’ motivation to write (Unpublished master’s thesis). State University of New York, the USA.
  • Maina, F. (2004). Authentic learning: Perspectives from contemporary educators. Journal of Authentic Learning, 1(1).
  • Miller, E. (2009). Digital storytelling (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Northern Iowa, the USA.
  • Miller, L. (2010). Make me a story: Teaching writing through digital storytelling. Maine: Stenhouse Publishers.
  • Niemi, H., Harju, V., Vivitsou, M., Viitanen, K., & Multisilta, J. (2014). Digital storytelling for 21st century skills in virtual learning environments. Creative Education, 5, 657–671.
  • Ohler, J. (2008). Digital storytelling in the classroom: New media pathways into literacy, learning and creativity. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
  • Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants: Part 1. On the Horizon.
  • Robin, B. (2006). The educational uses of digital storytelling. Information Technology & Teacher Education, 709–716.
  • Robin, B. (2008). Digital storytelling: A powerful technology tool for the 21st century classroom. Theory into Practice, 47(3), 220–228.
  • Sadik, A. (2008). Digital storytelling: A meaningful technology-integrated approach for engaged student learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(4), 487–506.
  • Shin, D. S., & Cimasko, T. (2008). Multimodal composition in a college ESL class: New tools, traditional norms. Computers and Composition, 25(4), 376–395.
  • Simpson, T. (2011). A motivation to write: Stepping it up digital storytelling. Retrieved on October 25, 2015 from: http://tammisimpsonportfolio.weebly.com/uploads/1/0/8/2/10829844/te848_digital_story_research _paper.pdf
  • Skinner, E., & Hagood, M. C. (2008). Developing literate identities with English language learners through digital storytelling. The Reading Matrix, 8(2), 12–38. Retrieved on October 25, 2015 from: http://www.readingmatrix.com/articles/skinner_hagood/article.pdf
  • Takayoshi, P., & Selfe, C. L. (2007). Thinking about multimodality. In C. L. Selfe (Ed.), Multimodal composition. Resources for teachers (pp. 1–12). Cresskill, New Jersey: Hampton Press.
  • Thang, S. M., Lin, L. K., Mahmud, N., Ismail, K., & Zabidi, N. A. (2014). Technology integration in the form of digital storytelling: Mapping the concerns of four Malaysian ESL instructors. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(4), 311–329.
  • Timuçin, M., & Irgın, P. (2015). Digital storytelling: An outlet for expression in EFL context. International Journal of Languages’ Education and Teaching, 3(1), 288–302.
  • Xu, Y., Park, H., & Baek, Y. (2011). A new approach toward digital storytelling: An activity focused on writing self-efficacy in a virtual learning environment. Educational Technology and Society, 14(4), 181–191.
  • Vinogradova, P. (2014). Digital stories in a language classroom: Engaging students through a meaningful multimodal task. The FLTMAG., Retrieved on March 11, 2015 from: http://fltmag.com/digital-stories/
  • Yamaç, A. (2015). The effect of digital storytelling on improving the writing skills of third grade students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Yancey, K. B. (2006). Writing in the 21st century. Written Communication, 23(4), 1–9.
  • Yang, Y.-T. C., & Wu, W.-C. I. (2012). Digital storytelling for enhancing student academic achievement, critical thinking, and learning motivation: A year-long experimental study. Computers & Education, 59(2), 339–352.
  • Yoon, T. (2012). Are you digitized? Ways to provide motivation for ELLs using digital storytelling. International Journal of Research Studies in Educational Technology, 2(1), 25–34.
  • Yoon, T. (2014). Developing multimodal literacy: The application of digital storytelling as a new avenue for effective English learning with EFL elementary school students in Korea (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Massachusetts Amherst, the USA.